• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회/대한산업공학회 1999년도 춘계공동학술대회:정보화시대의 지식경영
• /
• pp.414-414
• /
• 1999

• 산업공학
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.314-322
• /
• 2011

This study analyzes a relationship between Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA) efficiency scores and a normalization index in order to examine the validity of DEA models. A normalization index concerned in this study is 'sales per R&D project fund' which is regarded as a crucial R&D project performance evaluation index in practice. For this correlation analysis, three distinct DEA models are selected such as DEA basic model, DEA/AR-I revised model(i.e. DEA basic model with Acceptance Region Type I constraints) and Super-Efficiency(SE) model. Especially, SE model is adopted where efficient R&D projects(i.e. Decision Making Units, DMU's) with DEA efficiency score of unity from DEA basic model can be further differentiated in ranks. Considering the non-normality and outliers, two rank correlation coefficients such as Spearman's ${\rho}_s$ and Kendall's ${\tau}_B$ are investigated in addition to Pearson's ${\gamma}$. With an up-to-date empirical massive dataset of n = 482 R&D projects associated with R&D Loan Program of Korea Information Communication Promotion Fund in the year of 2011, statistically significant (+) correlations are verified between the normalization index and every model's DEA efficiency scores with all three correlation coefficients. Especially, the congruence verified in this empirical analysis can be a useful reference for enhancing the practitioner's acceptability onto DEA efficiency scores as a real-world R&D project performance evaluation index.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 2th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.563-572
• /
• 2007

Transportation infrastructure is critical to economic growth of a country such as China. Careful evaluation of investments in traffic infrastructure projects is therefore pertinent. As traditional evaluation methods do not consider the uncertainty of future cash flows and mobility during project execution, the real option approach is gradually gaining recognition in the context of valuing construction and infrastructure projects. However, many of the cases only evaluate individual options separately although multiple options often exist in a typical large infrastructure project. Using a highway project in China as a case study, this paper first evaluates a deferment option and a growth option embedded in the project. Subsequently, the values are combined using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. It is found that the combined value is less than the sum of the two option values. This finding is consistent with the theoretical observations given in past real option literature despite the use of a different approach.

• 한국인터넷방송통신학회논문지
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.157-169
• /
• 2021

공공 정보통신기술(ICT)사업의 투자 평가 체계를 세우는 것은 궁극적으로 정부 재정이 투자되는 공공 ICT사업의 성공률을 높이고 사업의 활성화를 꾀함으로써 국가 경제 성장 기반 구축 및 글로벌 ICT산업 경쟁력을 제고 하는 것이다. 본 연구에서는 기존 평가 체계에 따라 수립된 공공 ICT사업 투자 평가 요인이 실제 사업 성공에 미치는 영향을 실증적으로 검증하고, 향후 투자 평가 요인에 대한 방향을 제시하고자 하였다. 선행 연구를 통해 공익성, 경제성, 기술성, 정책성 및 예산효율성 등 다섯 개의 평가 요인을 도출하였고, 이를 실제 사업에 직접 참여했던 전문가들의 설문을 통해 이러한 평가 기준이 실제 사업 성공에 미치는 영향을 검증하였다. 또한 ICT사업의 투자 평가 요인과 사업성공 사이에서 정부의 지원제도에 대한 조절 작용 여부도 확인하였다. 측정 도구의 신뢰도 및 타당도, 구조 모형 분석, 경로 분석 등을 실증분석하고, 기존 ICT 투자 평가 요인의 유의성을 검증하였다.

• 한국지능정보시스템학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지능정보시스템학회 2005년도 공동추계학술대회
• /
• pp.241-250
• /
• 2005

New product development (NPD) is defined as the transformation of a market opportunity and a set of assumptions about product technology into a product available for sale. Managers charged with project selection decisions in the NPD process, such as go/no-go choices and specific resource allocation decisions, are faced with a complicated problem. Therefore, the ability to develop new successful products has identifies as a major determinant in sustaining a firm's competitive advantage. The purpose of this study is to develop a new evaluation model for NPD project selection in the high -tech industry using support vector machines (SYM). The evaluation model is developed through two phases. In the first phase, binary (go/no-go) classification prediction model, i.e. SVM for high-tech NPD project selection is developed. In the second phase. using the predicted output value of SVM, feasibility grade is calculated for the final NPD project decision making. In this study, the feasibility grades are also divided as three level grades. We assume that the frequency of NPD project cases is symmetrically determined according to the feasibility grades and misclassification errors are partially minimized by the multiple grades. However, the horizon of grade level can be changed by firms' NPD strategy. Our proposed feasibility grade method is more reasonable in NPD decision problems by considering particularly risk factor of NPD in viewpoints of future NPD success probability. In our empirical study using Korean NPD cases, the SVM significantly outperformed ANN and logistic regression as benchmark models in hit ratio. And the feasibility grades generated from the predicted output value of SVM showed that they can offer a useful guideline for NPD project selection.

• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제60권3호
• /
• pp.83-94
• /
• 2018

This study aims to apply the logic model in order to evaluate outcomes of revitalization projects of rural centers as a part of the regional capacity strengthening in Yeongwol-gun. According to the study results, first of all, it was unclear to answer for questions what, how and why to lead the project, when examining logical associations among program inputs, activities, outputs and outcomes. As an alternative method, the logic model has been applied, and this in turn led to clarify the goals, inputs, contents, outputs, outcomes as well as overall outcome goals and purpose of the current projects. Second of all, the initial, intermediate and long term outcome goals of the current project were indistinctly specified, and moreover, their evaluation methods were also unclear. By applying the logic model to the current regional capacity strengthening project, it was able to figure the distinction between program outputs and outcomes, and specify initial, intermediate and long term target goals as well as their evaluation tools. It is therefore to conclude that the logic model has a possibility to apply to a project evaluation, especially in the sense that this method considers efficiency, effectiveness and accountability of each project.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2002년도 학술대회지
• /
• pp.327-330
• /
• 2002

최근 공통주택 재건축과 리모델링 사업은 경제성만을 고려하여 사업이 추진되고 있다. 그러나 경제성 이외에도 환경성은 사업계획 및 수행에 있어서 중요한 고려요소이다. 따라서 재건축과 리모델링 사업의 환경성과 경제성을 함께 평가되어야 하며, 정량적인 평가방법에 의해 의사결정의 도구로써 활용할 수 있는 방법이 필요하다. 이에 본 연구는 공동주택 재건축과 리모델링 사업의 환경성 및 경제성을 통합 및 평가할 수 있는 모델을 제시하고자 한다.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 3th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.1453-1462
• /
• 2009

It is very important for performance of information system that we make an effort to raise user's satisfaction by continuously grasping user's requirement by evaluation of PMIS based on ASP service quality and reflecting this to information system. However, It is lack that developments of suitable evaluation index of PMIS based on ASP service quality. Hereupon, In this study, we propose the evaluation indicators. First, The evaluation area is classified by form the foundation of D & M IS Success Model (2003); system quality, information quality, service quality. Second, The detail evaluation item which include considerations which are gotten through investigation of the construction industry and PMIS based on ASP is grouping by form the foundation SERVQUAL which is a service quality evaluation tool proposed PZB(1988). It is suitable to evaluate PMIS based on ASP service quality in construction industry and able to evaluate various aspects.

• 정보처리학회논문지D
• /
• 제15D권3호
• /
• pp.387-398
• /
• 2008

최근 정보화에 대한 성과평가는 투자성과에 미치는 효과를 정량적, 정성적으로 분석하여, 전통적인 투자 수익률에 근거한 가치평가방법의 한계를 극복하기 위한 다양한 성과평가방법이 응용되고 있다. 하지만 공공분야의 성과평가는 평가영역에 대한 정성적 평가 중심의 성과여부를 도출하는데 머무를 뿐, 정보화 품질을 향상시키는 데까지는 이르지 못하는 단점이 있다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 기존 공공분야 성과평가의 한계점을 개선하고 품질평가와 정량적 평가를 반영함으로써, 정보화 품질 향상과 평가결과의 객관성 및 신뢰성을 보장하는 통합성과평가모델을 제안한다. 그리고 정보화사업으로 추진된 행정정보DB구축사업을 대상으로 사업목적을 고려한 평가영역별 반영비율 및 가중치를 적용한 평가결과를 도출하였다.

• 한국전자거래학회지
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.119-136
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 프로젝트 조직(Project Management Office: PMO)의 성과 평가 모델인 펜타곤 모델을 활용하여 IT 분야의 PMO 역량과 성과를 평가할 수 있는 모델 및 세부지표를 제시하는 연구이다. 펜타곤 모델은 정보화 프로젝트 성과에 영향을 미치는 PMO 역량요인을 다섯 가지로 구분, 즉 구조(Structure), 기술(Technology), 조직문화(Culture), 상호작용(Interaction), 사회적 관계와 네트워크(Social Relations and Networks)로 분류하여 접근한다. 이에 본 연구에서는 다섯 가지 상위 요인에 대한 세부요인을 설계하여, AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) 분석을 활용하여 역량 요인(5개의 상위요인과 25개의 세부요인) 간의 중요도를 분석을 하였다. 연구결과 Structure 부문에서는 3개의 세부요인이 상위 10위 안에 포함되었으며, Technology, Culture, Interaction 부문에서는 각각 2개 세부요인이, Social Relations and Networks 부문에서는 1개의 세부요인이 10위 안에 포함되어 있음을 알 수 있었다. 본 연구는 정보화 프로젝트 성과를 관리할 수 있는 틀(framework)을 제시한다는 점, 그리고 틀을 구성하는 상위요인에 속한 하위 세부요인의 우선순위를 도출하였다는 시사점을 제시한다.