The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies (한국전자거래학회지)

Society for e-Business Studies (한국전자거래학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Evaluation Model of IT PMO Performance Using Pentagon Model

Pentagon Model을 활용한 정보화 프로젝트 PMO의 성과평가 모형 제시

  • Kim, Ki-Hyun (Department of Management Consulting, Hanyang University) ;
  • Park, Geun-Wan (Department of Business Administration, Hanyang University) ;
  • Hwang, Seung-June (Department of Business Administration, Hanyang University)
  • Received : 2016.11.04
  • Accepted : 2016.11.23
  • Published : 2016.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Precedent studies revealed that success of IT project strongly depends on the competency of PMO(project management offices), however, there are only few studies which show the importance of PMO competency. In this study, we will suggest an evaluation model of IT PMO competency using the Pentagon Model which is a tool to assess the performance of project organization, and the Analytic Hierarchy Process. We classified effect factor of PMO competency into 25 items in 5 fields such as Structure, Technology, Culture, Interaction, Social Relations and Networks based on pentagon model, also analysis of criticality between the effect factors was conducted by AHP. The study result shows 3 factors of Structure were included in the top 10, while 2 factors of Technology, Culture, Interaction were included separately. In terms of Social Relations and Networks, only 1 factor was included in the top 10. Therefore Structure of PMO should be aggressively considered for the successful IT project.

본 연구는 프로젝트 조직(Project Management Office: PMO)의 성과 평가 모델인 펜타곤 모델을 활용하여 IT 분야의 PMO 역량과 성과를 평가할 수 있는 모델 및 세부지표를 제시하는 연구이다. 펜타곤 모델은 정보화 프로젝트 성과에 영향을 미치는 PMO 역량요인을 다섯 가지로 구분, 즉 구조(Structure), 기술(Technology), 조직문화(Culture), 상호작용(Interaction), 사회적 관계와 네트워크(Social Relations and Networks)로 분류하여 접근한다. 이에 본 연구에서는 다섯 가지 상위 요인에 대한 세부요인을 설계하여, AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) 분석을 활용하여 역량 요인(5개의 상위요인과 25개의 세부요인) 간의 중요도를 분석을 하였다. 연구결과 Structure 부문에서는 3개의 세부요인이 상위 10위 안에 포함되었으며, Technology, Culture, Interaction 부문에서는 각각 2개 세부요인이, Social Relations and Networks 부문에서는 1개의 세부요인이 10위 안에 포함되어 있음을 알 수 있었다. 본 연구는 정보화 프로젝트 성과를 관리할 수 있는 틀(framework)을 제시한다는 점, 그리고 틀을 구성하는 상위요인에 속한 하위 세부요인의 우선순위를 도출하였다는 시사점을 제시한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aladwani, A. M., "An Integrated Performance Model of Information Systems Projects," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 185-210, 2002.
  2. Aubry, M. and Hobbs, B., "A Multi-phase Research Program Investigating Project Management Offices (PMOS): The results of phase 1," Project Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 74-86, 2007.
  3. Aubry, M., Hobbs, B., Muller, R., and Blomquist, T., "Identifying Forces Driving PMO Changes," Project Management Journal, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 30-45, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20191
  4. Beulen, E., Tiwari, V., and Heck, E., "Understanding Transition Performance during Offshore IT Outsourcing," Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 204-227, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538291111185449
  5. Chalvin, S., "There is No IT Outsourcing without a Transition: An Introduction to ITO Transitions," PMI Virtual Library, pp. 1-9, 2014.
  6. Cho, S. H., Koo, B. J., and Lee, S. J., "A Study on the Effects of Organizational Equity Factors on the Performance and trust of IT PMO Organization," Journal of Information Technology and Architecture, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 525-534, 2015.
  7. Choi, K. D., "An Empirical Study on Critical Success Factors in Implementing ERP System: A System Development Life Cycle Perspective," The Graduate School, Kwangwoon University, Ph. D. Dissertation, 2000.
  8. Dobbins, J. H. and Donnelly R. G., "Summary Research Report on Critical Success Factor s in Federal Government Program Management," Acquisition Review Quarterly, pp. 61-82, 1998.
  9. Han, S. C. and Lee, G. H., "An Exploratory Study on the Relative Importances of the Critical Success Factors in an ERP Project," Korea Society of IT Services, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 57-69, 2005.
  10. Hill, G. M., "Evolving the Project Management Office: A Competency Continuum," Information Systems Management, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 45-51, 2004.
  11. Jang, K. S., Seo, K. S., and Lee, M. B., "An Exploratory Study on the Core Requisites for Success of Realization of ERP System," The Korea Society of Management Information Systems, Information Systems Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 255-281, 2000.
  12. Jurison, J., "Software Project Management," The Manager's View, Communications of AIS, Vol. 2, No. 17, pp. 3-12, 1999.
  13. Kim, K. M., Park, Y. J., and Kim, K. J., "Investigating the Factors Influencing Project Satisfaction and Performance in Pre-Project Phase," Journal of information technology applications & m, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 293-313, 2013.
  14. Kim, K. H., Park, G. W., and Hwang, S. J., "A Study on the Effect of PMO Capability and Organization Justice on IT Project Performance," Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 129-151, 2016. https://doi.org/10.7838/jsebs.2016.21.3.129
  15. Kim, S. B., Kim, J. T., and Chang, B. M., "A Comparative Study on Critical Competence Importance of PMO Professional: Using the Fuzzy AHP," Journal of KIIT, Vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 179-198, 2014.
  16. Kim, S. B., Nam, Y. S., and Chang, B. M., "Study on Factors Related to Core Competencies According to PMO Workers," Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 147-161, 2016.
  17. Lee, B. Y. and Yi, S. G., "A Study on the Importance of the Impact Factors on the Performance of IT Project," Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, Korea, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 127-138, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14801/jkiit.2015.13.1.127
  18. Lee, J. S. and Kim, S. K., "An Empirical Study on Effects of PMO Governance and Its Influencing Factors," Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management, Korea, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 61-83, 2012.
  19. Lee, K. H. and Lim, C. Z., "A Study on the Extraction Structures of Gallery Environment Affecting Viewing Behavior in Art Museums-Focusing on Psychological Experiments Applied to the Repertory Grid Development Method," Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (Planning and Design), Vol. 24, No. 9, pp. 113-121, 2008.
  20. Lee, S. M., Kim, E. H., and Moon, S. C., "The Effect of PMO Service and Capability on Project Performance," Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 107-132, 2013.
  21. Moon, D. W., "An Exploratory Study to Deduct Requisites for Success of Public Information System Development Project," Ph. D. Dissertation, Graduate School of Kuk-Min University, 2001.
  22. Peter, W. G. Morris, "Research and the Future of Project Management," International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 139-146, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371011014080
  23. PMI, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 3rd Edition, 2004.
  24. PMI, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 5th Edition, 2013.
  25. PMS, The State of the Project Management office, A PM Soutions Research Report Inc., 2014.
  26. Rolstadas, A., Tommelein, I., Schiefloe, P. M., and Ballard, G., "Understanding Project Success through Analysis of Project Management Approach," International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 638-660, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-09-2013-0048
  27. Saaty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
  28. Schiefloe, P. M. and Vikland, K. M., "Formal and Informal Safety Barriers: the Snorre A Incident," in Soares, C. G. and Zio, E. (Eds), Safety and Reliability for Managing Risk, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 419-426, 2006.
  29. Schiefloe, P. M., Mennesker og Samfunn, Fagbokforlaget, Bergen, 2011.
  30. Sumner, M., "There is No IT Outsourcing without a Transition: An Introduction to ITO Transitions," Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 317-327, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1080/02683960010009079
  31. The Standish Group, The Standish Group Report: Chaos. USA, 2015.
  32. Ward, J., "The Role of Project Management Offices (PMOs) in IS Project Success and Management Satisfaction," Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 316-336, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410391311325252