• 제목/요약/키워드: Probabilistic ecological risk assessment

검색결과 6건 처리시간 0.03초

확률생태위해성평가(PERA) 선진국 사례분석 및 국내수계에 적합한 PERA 기법 제안 (Comparative Study of Probabilistic Ecological Risk Assessment (PERA) used in Developed Countries and Proposed PERA approach for Korean Water Environment)

  • 안윤주;남선화;이우미
    • 한국물환경학회지
    • /
    • 제25권4호
    • /
    • pp.494-501
    • /
    • 2009
  • Probabilistic Ecological risk assessment (PERA) is extensive approach to qualify and quantify risk on the multi species based on species sensitivity distribution (SSD). As a while, deterministic ecological risk assessment (DERA) considers the comparison of predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) and predicted exposure concentration (PEC). DERA is used to determine if there is potential risk or no risk, and it doesn't consider the nature variability and the species sensitivity. But PERA can be more realistic and reasonable approach to estimate likelihood or risk. In this study, we compared PERA used in developed countries, and proposed PERA applicable for the Korean water environment. Taxonomic groups were classified as "class" level including Actinopterygill, Branchiopoda, Chlorophyceae, Maxillapoda, Insects, Bivalvia, Gastropoda, Secernentea, Polychaeta, Monocotyldoneae, and Chanophyceae in this study. Statistical extrapolation method (SEM), statistical extrapolation method $_{acutechronicratio}$ ($SEM_{ACR}$) and assessment factor method (AFM) were used to calculate the ecological protective concentration based on qualitative and quantitative levels of taxonomic toxicity data. This study would be useful to establish the PERA for the protection of aquatic ecosystem in Korea.

Deriving Ecological Protective Concentration of Cadmium for Korean Soil Environment

  • Lee, Woo-Mi;Nam, Sun-Hwa;An, Youn-Joo
    • Environmental Engineering Research
    • /
    • 제18권4호
    • /
    • pp.241-246
    • /
    • 2013
  • For effective and efficient environmental management, developed countries, such as the Netherlands, UK, Australia, Canada, and United States apply ecological risk assessment, and they have an autonomous risk assessment methodology to protect native receptors. In this study, soil ecological protective concentration (EPC) of cadmium in Korea was derived using Korean ecological risk assessment methodology. The soil EPC of cadmium was calculated using probabilistic ecological risk assessment based on species sensitivity distribution. The soil EPC was calculated according to land use for residential/agricultural and industrial/commercial purposes. The chronic soil EPCs for residential/agricultural and industrial/commercial lands were derived to be 1.58 and 9.60 mg/kg, respectively. These values were similar to soil EPC of European Commission, the Netherlands, UK, and Canada. However, these values were lower than the established Korean soil standard, because the current soil standard was based on human risk. Therefore, the impact on an ecosystem when establishing environmental standard should be considered.

토양준거치 도출을 위한 국내형 생태위해성평가기법 제안 (Proposed Approach of Korean Ecological Risk Assessment for the Derivation of Soil Quality Criteria)

  • 안윤주;이우미;남선화;정승우
    • 한국지하수토양환경학회지:지하수토양환경
    • /
    • 제15권3호
    • /
    • pp.7-14
    • /
    • 2010
  • Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) supports a decision-making process such as establishment of environmental quality criteria. Soil quality criteria (SQC) are essential to protect soil organisms from the exposure to various soil contaminants. In this study, ERA methodologies of advanced countries for soil pollution were extensively compared to propose the ERA approach suitable for soil ecosystem in Korea. The soil ERAs in European Chemical Bureau(ECB), The Netherlands, and Canada can be classified as deterministic ecological risk assessment (DERA), and probabilistic ecological risk assessment (PERA) based on species sensitivity distribution (SSD). We propose three ERA methods according to abundance and reliability of soil ecotoxicity data. The method considered land use such as residential/agricultural, and industrial/commercial uses. The taxonomic groups of soil organism were classified as 'Class' level including different trophic levels (Magnoliopsida or Liliopsida, Clitellata, and Insecta or Secernentea). This study can be used to estimate the soil quality criteria to protect soil biota.

Derivation of Ecological Protective Concentration using the Probabilistic Ecological Risk Assessment applicable for Korean Water Environment: (I) Cadmium

  • Nam, Sun-Hwa;Lee, Woo-Mi;An, Youn-Joo
    • Toxicological Research
    • /
    • 제28권2호
    • /
    • pp.129-137
    • /
    • 2012
  • Probabilistic ecological risk assessment (PERA) for deriving ecological protective concentration (EPC) was previously suggested in USA, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and Netherland. This study suggested the EPC of cadmium (Cd) based on the PERA to be suitable to Korean aquatic ecosystem. First, we collected reliable ecotoxicity data from reliable data without restriction and reliable data with restrictions. Next, we sorted the ecotoxicity data based on the site-specific locations, exposure duration, and water hardness. To correct toxicity by the water hardness, EU's hardness corrected algorithm was used with slope factor 0.89 and a benchmark of water hardness 100. EPC was calculated according to statistical extrapolation method (SEM), statistical extrapolation $method_{Acute\;to\;chronic\;ratio}$ ($SEM_{ACR}$), and assessment factor method (AFM). As a result, aquatic toxicity data of Cd were collected from 43 acute toxicity data (4 Actinopterygill, 29 Branchiopoda, 1 Polychaeta, 2 Bryozoa, 6 Chlorophyceae, 1 Chanophyceae) and 40 chronic toxicity data (2 Actinopterygill, 23 Branchiopoda, 9 Chlorophyceae, 6 Macrophytes). Because toxicity data of Cd belongs to 4 classes in taxonomical classification, acute and chronic EPC (11.07 ${\mu}g/l$ and 0.034 ${\mu}g/l$, respectively) was calculated according to SEM technique. These values were included in the range of international EPCs. This study would be useful to establish the ecological standard for the protection of aquatic ecosystem in Korea.

농업용수를 공급하는 호소 수역 내 잔류 농약의 생태위해성평가 : 위해지수방법과 확률론적 방법 (Ecological Risk Assessment of Pesticide Residues in Agricultural Lake : Risk Quotients and Probabilistic Approach)

  • 이지호;박병준;박상원;김원일;홍수명;임건재;홍무기
    • 한국환경농학회지
    • /
    • 제30권3호
    • /
    • pp.316-322
    • /
    • 2011
  • 국내 호소 수역 50지점에서 검출빈도가 비교적 높은 4종의 농약성분에 대해 성수기와 비성수기를 구분하여 오염도를 조사하였고, 위해지수방법과 확률론적인 방법을 적용하여 조류, 물벼룩, 어류, 양서류 등의 수생 종들에 대한 생태위해성 평가를 수행하였다. 조류 종에 대해서는 중간 위해성 수준으로, 그 외 다른 수생 종들의 위해성은 낮은 위해성 기준에 비해 훨씬 낮게 산정되어 위해성이 없는 것으로 평가되었다. 조류 종에 대한 위해성은 주로 제초제인 oxadiazon 성분에 기인하였고, 어류 및 양서류에서도 높은 위해 기여도를 보여주었다. $HC_5$값을 적용한 생태위해지수 또한 oxadiazon 성분에서만 중간 위해성 수준이었고, 이 성분이 수생 종에 위해 영향을 주는 주 기여요인으로 조사되었다. 각 농약성분의 농도가 $HC_5$값에 비해 낮은 수준으로 검출되었고, 혼합된 형태의 농약성분에 대한 결합된 생태위해확률 또한 허용기준인 5% 이하로서 생태위해성이 없는 것으로 평가되었다. 결론적으로, 농업용수를 공급하는 전국 호소 수역의 관리를 위해서는 주기적인 생태위해성평가가 필요하며, 급성독성과 노출량을 비교하는 위해지수와 확률론적 기법은 기초 위해성평가이며, 우리나라 고유 생물 종을 이용한 위해성평가, 만성독성, 환경 중 거동, 환경 요인 등을 모두 고려한 보다 높은 단계의 위해성평가 기법 연구가 반드시 필요할 것으로 사료된다.