• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.1 no.2
• /
• pp.236-241
• /
• 1998

Recurrent dislocation of elbow joint occurs relatively rarely by the injury of the collateral ligament which contributes elbow joint stability. Among them, posterolateral rotatory instability occurs by the injury to the lateral ulnar collateral ligament. We experienced a case of recurrent dislocation of elbow joint due to posterolateral rotatory instability. We treated operatively with lateral ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using the palmaris longus tendon by technique of Nestor et al. We report it with literature analysis.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.4 no.2
• /
• pp.191-195
• /
• 2001

Posterolateral rotatory instability is the most common pattern of elbow instability especially which is recurrent, and is usually post-traumatic because of inadequate soft tissue healing. The lateral ulnar collateral ligament was reconstructed by using ipsilateral palmaris longus tendon. Functionally good result was obtained. This is a case report illustrating the posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow and its reconstruction with palmaris longus.

• 대한정형외과스포츠의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2003.11a
• /
• pp.85-94
• /
• 2003

• 대한정형외과스포츠의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2004.09a
• /
• pp.27-27
• /
• 2004

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.26 no.3
• /
• pp.287-295
• /
• 2023

Background: Posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) is a common mechanism of recurrent elbow instability. While the essential lesion is a deficiency in the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL), there are often associated concomitant bony lesions, such as an Osborne-Cotterill lesions (posterior capitellar fractures) and marginal radial head fractures, that compromise stability. Currently, there is no standard treatment for posterior capitellar deficiency associated with recurrent PLRI. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of five patients with recurrent PLRI of the elbow associated with a posterior capitellar impaction fracture engaging with the radial head during normal range of motion. The patients were treated surgically with LUCL reconstruction or repair and off-label reconstruction of the capitellar joint surface using a small metal prosthesis designed for metatarsal head resurfacing (HemiCAP toe classic). Results: Five patients (three adolescent males, two adult females) were treated between 2007 and 2018. At a median follow-up of 5 years, all patients had complete relief of their symptomatic instability. No patients had pain at rest, but two patients had mild pain (visual analog scale 1-3) during physical activity. Three patients rated their elbow as normal, one as almost normal, and one as greatly improved. On short-term radiographic follow-up there were no signs of implant loosening. None of the patients needed reoperation. Conclusions: Recurrent PLRI of the elbow associated with an engaging posterior capitellar lesion can be treated successfully by LUCL reconstruction and repair and filling of the capitellar defect with a metal prosthesis. This treatment option has excellent clinical results in the short-medium term. Level of evidence: IV.

• 대한정형외과스포츠의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2004.09a
• /
• pp.37-37
• /
• 2004

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.146-154
• /
• 2011

Injury of posterolateral corner is unusual, but it can cause disability due to severe instability and cartilage damage. However, the anatomical structures, diagnosis and treatment have not defined clearly yet. Posterolateral corner injury is regarded as the one of main factor to the results of failure in cruciate ligament reconstcution if it was undiagnosed and untreated. Diagnosis of postetolateral corner injury is consists of physical exam, radiographic finding, MRI, and arthroscopic findings. The treatment method of of postetolateral corner injury depends on the time and severity of injury. Anatomical reconstruction of posterolateral corner shows the better clinical outcome than non anatomical reconstructions, but the clinical results of long term follow up is still needed. Therefore, the aim of this article is to review the recent literatures and to organize diagnosis and treatment of posterolateral corner injury.

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.49-55
• /
• 2004

Purpose: we would like to suggest the proper surgical methods according to the severity of instability by analyzing the results. Materials and Methods: Between January 1998 and August 2002, eighty five patients have been operated on because of posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI). The materials were included the patients who had followed-ups for over 2 years in sixty one patients and the patient's assessments were done by clinical score (OAK, IKDC) and posterolateral drawer and dial test. Results: Through our results, the fibular tunnel turned out to be superior compared to the tibia tunnel method in rotational stability. Hughston-Jacobson methods and biceps tenodesis showed poor results. Fibula head tunnel was superior to tibia tunnel in rotational stabiliaty Conclusion: The surgical technique that passes the modified posterolateral corner sling through the fibula head tunnel may provide good clinical results in grade II PLRI. It is necessary to reconstruct both tibia and fibula tunnel in grade III PLRI. When there is combined varus instability, a positive result may be obtained if an additional LCL reconstruction is performed.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.91-92
• /
• 2008

후방십자인대 및 후외측인대 재건술 후 결과는 많은 발전이 있었지만, evidence medicine의 측면에서 재활 방법에 관한 전향적 연구는 없다. 현재까지의 재활 방법은 다양하게 소개되었지만 전방십자인대 재건술처럼 가속 재활을 하는 것은 바람직스럽지 않다. 후방십자인대, 후외측인대 그리고 다발성 인대 재건술 후 재활은 수술 방법과 환자의 재건된 인대의 상태, 하지 정렬 등에 따라서 개별화하여 점진적으로 진행하여야 할 것이고, 재활기간 동안 의사의 세심한 관찰이 필요하다.

• 대한관절경학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2008.04a
• /
• pp.84-85
• /
• 2008

후방십자인대 및 후외측인대 재건술 후 결과는 많은 발전이 있었지만, evidence medicine의 측면에서 재활 방법에 관한 전향적 연구는 없다. 현재까지의 재활 방법은 다양하게 소개되었지만 전방십자인대 재건술처럼 가속 재활을 하는 것은 바람직스럽지 않다. 후방십자인대, 후외측인대 그리고 다발성 인대 재건술 후 재활은 수술 방법과 환자의 재건된 인대의 상태, 하지 정렬 등에 따라서 개별화하여 점진적으로 진행하여야 할 것이고, 재활기간 동안 의사의 세심한 관찰이 필요하다.