• Title/Summary/Keyword: Piping and Instrumentation Diagram

Search Result 4, Processing Time 0.022 seconds

Automatic Recognition of Symbol Objects in P&IDs using Artificial Intelligence (인공지능 기반 플랜트 도면 내 심볼 객체 자동화 검출)

  • Shin, Ho-Jin;Jeon, Eun-Mi;Kwon, Do-kyung;Kwon, Jun-Seok;Lee, Chul-Jin
    • Plant Journal
    • /
    • v.17 no.3
    • /
    • pp.37-41
    • /
    • 2021
  • P&ID((Piping and Instrument Diagram) is a key drawing in the engineering industry because it contains information about the units and instrumentation of the plant. Until now, simple repetitive tasks like listing symbols in P&ID drawings have been done manually, consuming lots of time and manpower. Currently, a deep learning model based on CNN(Convolutional Neural Network) is studied for drawing object detection, but the detection time is about 30 minutes and the accuracy is about 90%, indicating performance that is not sufficient to be implemented in the real word. In this study, the detection of symbols in a drawing is performed using 1-stage object detection algorithms that process both region proposal and detection. Specifically, build the training data using the image labeling tool, and show the results of recognizing the symbol in the drawing which are trained in the deep learning model.

Large Steel Tank Fails and Rockets to Height of 30 meters - Rupture Disc Installed Incorrectly

  • Hedlund, Frank H.;Selig, Robert S.;Kragh, Eva K.
    • Safety and Health at Work
    • /
    • v.7 no.2
    • /
    • pp.130-137
    • /
    • 2016
  • At a brewery, the base plate-to-shell weld seam of a $90-m^3$ vertical cylindrical steel tank failed catastrophically. The 4 ton tank "took off" like a rocket leaving its contents behind, and landed on a van, crushing it. The top of the tank reached a height of 30 m. The internal overpressure responsible for the failure was an estimated 60 kPa. A rupture disc rated at < 50 kPa provided overpressure protection and thus prevented the tank from being covered by the European Pressure Equipment Directive. This safeguard failed and it was later discovered that the rupture disc had been installed upside down. The organizational root cause of this incident may be a fundamental lack of appreciation of the hazards of large volumes of low-pressure compressed air or gas. A contributing factor may be that the standard piping and instrumentation diagram (P&ID) symbol for a rupture disc may confuse and lead to incorrect installation. Compressed air systems are ubiquitous. The medium is not toxic or flammable. Such systems however, when operated at "slight overpressure" can store a great deal of energy and thus constitute a hazard that ought to be addressed by safety managers.

A Case Study on the Risk Assessment for Offshore Plant Solid Desiccant Dehydration Package by using HAZOP (HAZOP을 통한 해양플랜트 흡착식 탈수공정 패키지의 위험성평가 및 안전도 향상 방안)

  • Noh, Hyonjeong;Park, SangHyun;Cho, Su-gil;Kang, Kwangu;Kim, Hyungwoo
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Industry Convergence
    • /
    • v.23 no.4_2
    • /
    • pp.569-581
    • /
    • 2020
  • Since the dehydration packages of offshore plant deal directly with oil & gas, there is a great risk of fire and explosion during operation. Therefore, this study performed risk assessment through HAZard & OPerability (HAZOP) for solid desiccant dehydration package that can remove water component of natural gas in offshore floating liquefied natural gas (LNG) production facilities below 0.1 ppmv. The risk matrix was determined by dividing the likelihood and the severity into five levels separately by asset, life, environment and reputation. The piping & instrumentation diagram (P&ID) of the dehydration package was divided into 9 nodes. Total 22 deviations were assessed in consideration of the adsorption and desorption conversion cycle. A risk assessment based on deviations revealed 14 major hazards. Three representative types of hazards were open/close failure of the control valve, control failure of the heater, and abnormal operation of the regeneration gas cooler. Finally, we proposed the installation of additional safety devices to improve safety against these major hazards, such as safety instrumented functions, alarms, etc.

A Plant Modeling Case Based on SysML Domain Specific Language (SysML DSL 기반 플랜트 모델링 케이스)

  • Lee, Taekyong;Cha, Jae-Min;Kim, Jun-Young;Shin, Junguk;Kim, Jinil;Yeom, Choongsub
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Systems Engineering
    • /
    • v.13 no.2
    • /
    • pp.49-56
    • /
    • 2017
  • Implementation of Model-based Systems Engineering(MBSE) depends on a model supporting efficient communication among engineers from various domains. And SysML is designed to create models supporting MBSE but unfortunately, SysML itself is not practical enough to be used in real-world engineering projects. SysML is designed to express generic systems and requires specialized knowledge, so a model written in SysML is less capable of supporting communication between a systems engineer and a sub-system engineer. Domain Specific Languages(DSL) can be a great solution to overcome the weakness of the standard SysML. A SysML based DSL means a customized SysML for a specific engineering domain. Unfortunately, current researches on SysML Domain Specific Language(DSL) for the plant engineering industry are still on the early stage. So as the first step, we have developed our own SysML based Piping & Instrumentation Diagram (P&ID) creation environment and P&ID itself of a specific plant system, using a widely used SysML authoring tool called MagicDraw. P&ID is one of the most critical output during the plant design phase, which contains all information required for the plant construction phase. So a SysML based P&ID has a great potential to enhance the communication among plant engineers of various disciplines.