• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제14권9호
• /
• pp.85-92
• /
• 2014

본 논문은 <도가니>가 어떠한 재현전략으로 대중성을 확보하는지에 관하여 짚어낸다. <도가니>의 '집단적 기억의 환기', '고전적인 내러티브', '영화의 자기반영성'은 관객을 분노하게 하여 사이버 공론장으로 모이게 했으며, 더 나아가 '참여적인 관객성'을 가능하게 했던 중요한 요인들이다. 그런데 관객의 분노를 극대화시킬 수 있었던 이 영화의 장치들은 윤리적 논란을 불러일으킨다. 본 논문은 <도가니>가 다양한 재현전략을 통해 '참여적인 관객성'을 이끌어 낼 수 있었던 원인분석을 목표로 한다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.241-249
• /
• 2016

본 논문은 우리사회의 성매매문제를 다루고 있는 한국 독립다큐멘터리 <언니>에 초점을 맞추고 있다. <언니>를 둘러싸고 이루어질 수 있는 다양한 담론 중 '영화의 정치성', '투쟁의 도구로서 한국 독립다큐멘터리', '영화의 사회적 영향력', '성매매문제와 성매매여성인권', '반성매매와 성노동 진영의 논쟁', '<언니>의 반성매매를 위한 내러티브 구성' 등을 중심으로 살펴본다. 그리고 마지막으로 대학생 202명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여 <언니>를 통한 '관객의 인식변화'와 '참여적인 관객성'의 가능성에 관해 진단한다.

• 한국연극학
• /
• 제49호
• /
• pp.75-100
• /
• 2013

An on-going creative process was the major principle of Kantor's artistic endeavors. Kantor's emphasis on process grew out of his frustration with the experience of creation being isolated from the audience in the present time, during the moments of encounter. At the same time, however, Kantor was always aware of the fact that the first night of each and every performance that he made was the last point of his creative intervention. Despite being performed live in the present time, Kantor saw theatre essentially as an end product. This does not mean that Kantor abandoned the concept of on-going process, for process was for the artist a means to reject the idea of a finished work of art and to denounce the feeling of satisfaction derived from the traditional denouement in representational theatre. For him, theatre that dominated his time isolated the audience from the art work and the artist, and from this perspective his continual emphasis on process should be understood as an aesthetic principle in order to open up and expand the dimension of art into the realm of the spectator so that the experiences of both the artist and spectator may coexist. The heaviest barrier that separated the artist and his work from its audience was the creative structure that governed Western art. In theatre it was the dramatic structure that was the main object of his series of severe challenges. Not only did it fail to represent reality but it distorted reality, creating nothing but artificial illusion. Under this condition, all that was permitted to the audience was mirages. However, Kantor never completely discarded illusion from his theatre. The point for him was always to created a circumstance where the illusory reality of drama comes to exist within the dimensions of our reality. It was Kantor's belief that instead of a total denial of illusion, his theatre should strategically accommodate illusion which comes from reality. And, the aim of Kantor's theatrical experiments was to invite the audience into this ambience and transform the experience of his audience into a much more participatory one. This paper traces the ways in which Kantor transgressed the dominating conventions of representational, literary theatre, and how such attempts induced an alternative mode of spectatorship. The study will begin from an investigation into Kantor's attitude towards illusion and reality, and then move onto a closer inspection of how he spatially and dramaturgically materialized his concepts on stage, giving special focus on Wielopole, Wielopole.