• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.198-203
• /
• 2013

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of resin cements and primer on the retentive force of zirconia copings bonded to zirconia abutments with insufficient retention. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Zirconia blocks (Lava, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) were obtained and forty sets of zirconia abutments and copings were fabricated using CAD/CAM technology. They were grouped into 4 categories as follows, depending on the types of resin cements used, and whether the primer is applied or not:Panavia F2.0 (P), Panavia F2.0 using Primer (PRIME Plus, Bisco Inc, Schaumburg, IL, USA) (PZ), Superbond C&B (S), and Superbond C&B using Primer (SZ). For each of the groups, the cementation was conducted. The specimens were kept in sterilized water ($37^{\circ}C$) for 24 hours. Retentive forces were tested and measured, and a statistical analysis was carried out. The nature of failure was recorded. RESULTS. The means and standard deviations of retentive force in Newton for each group were $265.15{\pm}35.04$ N (P), $318.21{\pm}22.24$ N (PZ), $445.13{\pm}78.54$ N (S) and $508.21{\pm}79.48$ N (SZ). Superbond C&B groups (S & SZ) showed significantly higher retentive force than Panavia F2.0 groups (P & PZ). In Panavia F2.0 groups, the use of primer was found to contribute to the increase of retentive force. On the other hand, in Superbond C&B groups, the use of primer did not influence the retention forces. Adhesive failure was observed in all groups. CONCLUSION. This study suggests that cementation of the zirconia abutments and zirconia copings with Superbond C&B have a higher retentive force than Panavia F2.0. When using Panavia F2.0, the use of primer increases the retentive force.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제52권3호
• /
• pp.195-201
• /
• 2014

목적: 본 연구에서는 세 가지 중합 방법에 따른 이원 중합 레진 시멘트의 중합 수축률을 비교하고 광조사가 중합 정도에 미치는 영향에 관하여 알아보고자 하였다. 재료 및 방법: 네 가지 종류의 이원 중합형 레진 시멘트(Smartcem 2, Panavia F 2.0, Clearfil SA Luting, Zirconite)가 사용되었다. 각 재료 당 세가지 서로 다른 중합 방법(자가 중합, 즉시 광중합, 5분 지연 광중합)으로 중합하였으며, 각 방법 당 5개의 시편을 사용하였다. Bonded disk method를 사용하여 $37^{\circ}C$에서 30분간, 시간에 따른 중합 수축률을 측정하였다. 측정값은 일원분산분석과 다중 분석을 위한 Scheff$\acute{e}$ test를 사용하였고, 유의수준은 0.05으로 하였다. 결과: Panavia F 2.0를 제외한 나머지 세 종류의 이원 중합 레진 시멘트들은 지연 광중합 반응에서 가장 높은 중합 수축률을 보였다. Panavia F 2.0의 중합 수축률은 중합 방법간에 통계학적 유의성이 없었다. 중합이 개시된 초기 10분 내에 즉시 혹은 지연 광중합에서 모든 시멘트는 90% 이상의 중합수축을 보였다. 결론: 이원 중합 레진 시멘트의 지연 광중합이 중합 효율을 높인다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제8권6호
• /
• pp.449-456
• /
• 2016

PURPOSE. This in vitro study evaluated the effects of four different cements on the color attributes of a zirconia ceramic. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 40 zirconia ceramic disk specimens (0.5 mm thickness, 10 mm diameter, 0.1 mm cement space) were fabricated by a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing system. The specimens were divided into 4 groups of 10 specimens and cemented to composite substrates using four different cements including: Glass Ionomer, Panavia F2.0, Zinc Phosphate, and TempBond. The $L^*$, $a^*$, and $b^*$ color attributes of the specimens were measured before and after cementation by a spectrophotometer. Additionally, ${\Delta}E$ values were measured to determine color changes for the groups and then compared with the perceptional threshold of ${\Delta}E=3.3$. Repeated Measures ANOVA, Tukey Post Hoc, Bonferroni, One-way ANOVA, and One-sample t-test tests were used to analyze the data. All tests were carried out at the 0.05 level of significance. RESULTS. Statistically significant differences were detected in the ${\Delta}E$ values for Zinc Phosphate (P<.0001) and TempBond (P<.0001) groups. However, there were no statistically significant differences in this respect for Glass Ionomer (P=.99) and Panavia F2.0 (P=1) groups. The means and standard deviations of the ${\Delta}E$ values for Glass Ionomer, Panavia F2.0, Zinc Phosphate, and Tempbond groups were $2.11{\pm}0.66$, $0.94{\pm}0.39$, $5.77{\pm}0.83$, and $7.50{\pm}1.16$ Unit, respectively. CONCLUSION. Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that Zinc Phosphate and Tempbond cements affected the color attributes of the tested zirconia ceramic beyond the perceptional threshold. However, Glass Ionomer and Panavia F2.0 cements created acceptable color changes.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.85-92
• /
• 2017

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of tooth surface pre-treatment steps on shear bond strength, which is essential for understanding the adhesive cementation process. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Shear bond strengths of different cements with various tooth surface treatments (none, etching, priming, or etching and priming) on enamel and dentin of human teeth were measured using the Swiss shear test design. Three adhesives (Permaflo DC, Panavia F 2.0, and Panavia V5) and one self-adhesive cement (Panavia SA plus) were included in this study. The interface of the cement and the tooth surface with the different pre-treatments was analyzed using SEM. pH values of the cements and primers were measured. RESULTS. The highest bond strength values for all cements were achieved with etching and primer on enamel ($25.6{\pm}5.3-32.3{\pm}10.4MPa$). On dentin, etching and priming produced the highest bond strength values for all cements ($8.6{\pm}2.9-11.7{\pm}3.5MPa$) except for Panavia V5, which achieved significantly higher bond strengths when pre-treated with primer only ($15.3{\pm}4.1MPa$). Shear bond strength values were correlated with the micro-retentive surface topography of enamel and the tag length on dentin except for Panavia V5, which revealed the highest bond strength with primer application only without etching, resulting in short but sturdy tags. CONCLUSION. The highest bond strength can be achieved for Panavia F 2.0, Permaflo DC, and Panavia SA plus when the tooth substrate is previously etched and the respective primer is applied. The new cement Panavia V5 displayed low technique-sensitivity and attained significantly higher adhesion of all tested cements to dentin when only primer was applied.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제45권6호
• /
• pp.743-752
• /
• 2007

Statement of problem. The aims of the study were to evaluate the effect of current surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of a resin composite luting cement bonded to ceramic surfaces and to identify the optimum cement type. Material and methods. The sixty zirconia ceramic specimens(10 per group) with EVEREST milling machine and 60 tooth block were made. The zirconia ceramic surface was divided into two groups according to surface treatment: (1) airborne abrasion with $110{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide particles; (2) Rocatec system, tribochemical silica coating. The zirconia ceramic specimens were cemented to tooth block using resin cements. The tested resin cements were Rely X ARC, Panavia F and Superbond C&B. Each specimen was mount in a jig of the universal testing machine for shear strength. The results were subjected to 2-way ANOVA and Post hoc tests was performed using Tukey, Scheffe, and Bonferroni test. Results. The mean value of shear bond strength(MPa) were as follows: $$RelyXARC(+Al_2O_3),5.35{\pm}1.69$$; $$RelyXARC(+Rocatec),8.50{\pm}2.13$$; $$PanaviaF(+Al_2O_3),9.58{\pm}1.13$$; $$PanaviaF(+Rocatec),12.98{\pm}1.71$$; $$SuperbondC&B(+Al_2O_3)8.27{\pm}2.04$$; $$SuperbondC&B(+Rocatec),14.46{\pm}2.39$$. There was a significant increase in the shear bond strength when the ceramic surface was subjected to the tribochemical treatment(Rocatec 3M) in all cement groups(P<0.05). Bonding strengths of cements applied to samples treated with $Al_2O_3$ were compared; Rely X ARC showed the lowest values, whereas Panavia F cement showed higher value than that of Superbond C&B group with no statistical significance. When the bond strength of cements with of Rocatec treatment was compared, Rely X ARC showed lowest values. Overall, it was apparent that tribochemical treated Super-Bond possessed higher mean bond strength (14.46MPa; P<0.05) than that of Panavia F cement group with no significance. Conclusions. Silica coating followed silanization(Rocatec treatment) increase the bond strength between resin cement and zirconia ceramic. Panavia F containing phosphate monomer and Superbond C&B comprised of 4-META tend to bond chemically with zirconia ceramic, thus demonstrating higher bond strength compared to BisGMA resin cement. Superbond C&B has shown to have highest value of bonding strength to zirconia ceramic after Rocatec treatment compared to other cement.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.119-126
• /
• 2012

시멘트 유지 임플란트 지지 수복물은 치과 치료에 일상적으로 사용된다. 임플란트와 지대주 나사연결의 안정적인 견고함과 골유합 임플란트의 높은 생존율로 인해 높은 강도를 가진 시멘트의 사용이 점차 늘어나고 있다. 그러나 CAD/CAM을 이용하여 제작한 금속 코핑의 유지력에 대해 이용할 수 있는 임상 자료가 없다. 네 종류의 시멘트를 이용하여 티타늄 지대주와 CAD/CAM을 이용하여 제작한 금속 코핑의 유지력을 평가하는 것과 시멘트 유지력에 대한 sandblasting의 효과를 알아보고자 함이다. 40개의 티타늄 지대주 블록(Innovium, 세라젬바이오시스, 대한민국)을 제작하여 네 그룹으로 나누었다. 40개의 금속 코핑을 CAD/CAM을 이용하여 제작하고 금속 코핑의 교합면 상방부에 유지력 테스트를 위해 구멍을 형성하였다. 네 종류의 시멘트는 Fujicem(Fuji, Japan), Maxcem Elite(Kerr, USA), Panavia F2.0(Kurarary, Japan), Superbond C&B(Sunmedical, Japan)이다. 금속 코핑과 티타늄 지대주를 제조사의 지시대로 시멘트 혼합하여 합착하고 100% 습도 하에 37도에서 24시간 동안 보관 후 유지력 테스트하였다. 유지 실패가 발생하는 힘을 newton으로 기록하고 실패의 양상 또한 기록하였다. 유지력의 평균과 표준 편차를 ANOVA와 Paired t-test 로 통계분석하였다. Panavia F2.0이 Fujicem과 Maxcem Elite보다 통계적으로 유의하게 높은 유지력을 보였다(p<0.05). Sandblasting이 모든 시멘트에서 유의하게 유지력을 증가시켰다(p<0.05). 유지력 실패의 양상은 대부분의 시멘트가 금속 코핑 내부에 남아있는 접착성 실패였다. 본 연구의 한계 내에서 Panavia F2.0이 Fujicem이나 Maxcem Elite보다 통계적으로 유의하게 큰 유지력을 보였고(p<0.05), Fujicem과 Maxcem Elite는 유지력의 차이를 보이지 않았다. Sandblasting처리는 모든 실험군에서 유지력의 향상을 보였다. 따라서 임플란트 지대주에 합착된 금속 코핑의 유지력은 표면 거칠기와 시멘트의 종류에 영향을 받는다.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제52권4호
• /
• pp.312-316
• /
• 2014

목적: 본 연구에서는 지르코니아 수복물의 접착에 사용되는 레진 시멘트의 파괴인성을 측정하고 각 레진 시멘트의 다양한 수중 보관 기간이 파괴 인성에 미치는 영향에 관하여 알아보고자 하였다. 재료 및 방법: 세가지 종류의 레진 시멘트(Panavia F2.0, Clearfil SA luting, Zirconite)를 사용하여 single edge notched 형태의 시편($3mm{\times}6mm{\times}25mm$)을 제작하였다. 각 시편은 $37^{\circ}C$ 증류수에서 1일 (대조군), 30일, 90일, 180일 동안 보관하였다 (n=5). 만능시험기를 이용하여 0.1 mm/s 속도로 삼점굽힘 시험을 시행하고, 파절 시의 최대하중으로 파괴인성($K_{IC}$)을 계산하였다. 측정값은 일원분산분석과 다중분석을 위한 $Scheff{\acute{e}}$ test를 사용하였고, 유의수준은 0.05로 하였다. 결과: 대조군에서 Panavia F2.0가 $3.41{\pm}0.64MN{\cdot}m^{-1.5}$로 가장 높은 $K_{IC}$를 보였으며 Zirconite가 $3.07{\pm}0.41MN{\cdot}m^{-1.5}$, Clearfil SA luting이 $2.58{\pm}0.30MN{\cdot}m^{-1.5}$으로 가장 낮은 $K_{IC}$를 보였으나, 재료간에 유의성 있는 차이는 없었다. 수중보관 기간이 증가함에 따라 Panavia F2.0의 값은 감소였고, Clearfil SA luting과 Zirconite는 증가하였으나, 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 결론: 지르코니아 수복물 전용 레진 시멘트의 파괴인성은 다른 일반 시멘트에 비해 대체로 높으며, 이러한 파괴인성은 수중 보관에 영향을 받지 않는다.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제37권4호
• /
• pp.465-473
• /
• 1999

Bond strength of luting cements to dentin is a critical consideration for success of complete cast crowns. This study was performed to evaluate the relationship between surface characteristics of teeth prepared for complete cast crowns and retention of cemented restorations. Eighty artificial crowns were cast for standardized complete crown tooth preparations accomplished with the use of a special device on recently extracted human teeth. Coarse diamond(#102R, Shofu) and superfine finishing diamond(#SF102R, Shofu) burs of similar shape were used. Crowns in each group were randomly subdivided into few subgroups of 10 for luting cements selected for this study: zinc phosphate cement (FLECK' S), polycarboxylate cement (Poly-F), rein-forced glass ionomer cement (Fuji PLUS). and adhesive resin cement (Panavia 21). Retention was evaluated by measuring the tensile load required to dislodge the artificial crown from tooth preparations with an Instron testing machine, and analysed by one-way ANOVA and Student's t-test. The obtained results were as follows ; 1. When tooth preparation was done with coarse diamond bur, retentive force was diminished in order of Panavia 21 Fuji PLUS, FLECK'S, and Poly-F. Retentive forces showed the significant difference between Fuji PLUS group and FLECK'S group(p<0.001). 2. When tooth preparation was done with superfine diamond bur, retentive force was diminished in order of Fuji PLUS, Panavia 21, FLECK'S, and Poly-F. Retentive forces showed the significant difference between Panavia 21 group and FLECK'S group(p<0.001). 3. Retentive force in coarse tooth surfaces was significantly higher than that in superfine tooth surface with all luting cements(p<0.001), and cement residues were almost retained with-in the cast crown in all groups.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.110-117
• /
• 2017

PURPOSE. This laboratory study assessed the effect of different dentin cleaning procedures on shear bond strength of resin cements for recementing prosthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A $4{\times}4$ flat surface was prepared on the labial surface of 52 maxillary central incisors. Metal frames ($4{\times}4{\times}1.5mm$) were cast with nickel-chromium alloy. All specimens were randomly divided into 2 groups to be cemented with either Panavia F2.0 (P) or RelyX Ultimate (U) cement. The initial shear bond strength was recorded by Universal Testing Machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Debonded specimens were randomly allocated into 2 subgroups (n = 13) according to the dentin cleaning procedures for recementation. The residual cement on bonded dentin surfaces was eliminated with either pumice slurry (p) or tungsten carbide bur (c). The restorations were rebonded with the same cement and were subjected to shear test. Data failed the normality test (P < .05), thus were analyzed with Mann Whitney U-test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and two-way ANOVA after logarithmic transformation (${\alpha}=.05$). RESULTS. The initial shear bond strength of group P was significantly higher than group U (P = .001). Pc and Uc groups presented higher bond strength after recementation compared to the initial bond strength. However, it was significant only in Pc group (P = .034). CONCLUSION. The specimens recemented with Panavia F2.0 provided higher bond strength than RelyX Ultimate cement. Moreover, a tungsten carbide bur was a more efficient method in removing the residual resin cement and increased the bond strength of Panavia F2.0 cement after recementation.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제59권2호
• /
• pp.153-163
• /
• 2021

목적: 본 연구는 지르코니아의 거칠기 증가를 위한 4가지 표면처리 방법과 3종의 레진시멘트가 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 재료 및 방법: 총 120개의 지르코니아 시편을 표면처리 방법에 따라 4개의 군으로 나누었다: 대조군, 아무 처리를 하지 않은 군; APA50군, 50 ㎛ 크기의 Al2O3로 Airborne-particle abrasion (APA) 처리를 시행한 군; APA125군, 125 ㎛ 크기의 Al2O3로 APA 처리를 시행한 군; ZA군, ZrO2 slurry를 적용한 군. 각 군에 3종의 레진시멘트(Panavia F 2.0, Superbond C&B, Variolink N)를 접착하고, 만능시험기를 이용하여 전단결합강도를 측정하였다. 주사전자현미경을 이용해 각 군의 대표 표본의 표면을 관찰하였다. 표면처리 방법과 레진시멘트 종류에 따른 상호작용이 존재하는지 알아보기 위하여 Two-way ANOVA를 실시하였고, 각 군 간의 통계적 차이를 알아보기 위해 One-way ANOVA를 시행하였다. 사후검정으로 Tukey HSD test를 실시하였다(α = .05). 결과: 표면처리에 따른 전단결합강도 비교에서, APA125군, APA50군, ZA군, 대조군 순으로 높은 값을 보였고, APA처리를 시행한 군(APA50군, APA125군) 간에는 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었다(P > .05). 또한, ZA군은 대조군보다 유의성 있게 높은 값을 보였다(P < .05). 레진시멘트 종류에 따라서는 Panavia F 2.0, Superbond C&B, Variolink N 순으로 높은 전단결합강도를 보였다(P < .05). APA50군과 APA125군에서는 거칠고 불규칙한 표면이 관찰되었고, ZA군에서는 작고 불규칙한 다공성과 거친 표면이 관찰되었다. 결론: 본 연구의 한계내에서, APA 처리와 ZrO2 slurry를 적용했을 때 지르코니아의 표면 거칠기가 증가됨을 확인할 수 있었고, MDP를 함유한 Panavia F 2.0가 지르코니아와의 가장 높은 전단결합강도를 보였다.