• 한국전문물리치료학회지
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.24-30
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) in assessing Korean patients with low back pain. We performed translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaire and enrolled 52 patients (18 males and 34 females) with low back pain. The subjects completed a standardized self-administered questionnaire that included the FABQ assessment along with evaluations for the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and Beck depression inventory-Korean version (K-BDI). The reliability of the obtained data was determined by evaluating the internal consistency on the basis of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Cronbach's alpha values, while the validity of the data was examined by correlating the FABQ scores to the VAS, ODI, SAS, and K-BDI scores. The translated versions of the FABQ showed good test-retest reliability: ICC (3, 1)=.90 (FABQ for physical activity) and .97 (FABQ for work) these values were statistically significant (p<.01). The Cronbach's alpha value for FABQ was .90 (p<.01). FABQ moderately correlated with pain, disability, anxiety, and depression (p<.01). The results of this study indicate that the Korean version of the FABQ is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring fear-avoidance beliefs in Korean patients with low back pain.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.277-279
• /
• 2016

• 한방재활의학과학회지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.203-212
• /
• 2013

Objectives This study was to investigate the correlation of low back pain, stress by event, and fear-avoidance beliefs caused by traffic accident. Methods We investigated 103 cases of out-patient with traffic accident. The patients answered that Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Impact of Event Scale Revised Korean Version (IES-R-K), and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) on the first medical examination. We calculated statistical significance with this data. Results VAS, IES-R-K, and FABQ scores of the female patients with the traffic accident were higher than the male patients. VAS, IES-R-K, and FABQ scores showed low significant positive correlation and showed partial correlation between IES-R-K and FABQ, controlled by VAS, had no statistical significance in this research. Conclusions More considerations on pain, stress by event, and fear avoidance belief should be needed in treatment of the traffic accident patients.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제18권6호
• /
• pp.538-546
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 앞십자인대 재건술 환자에게 신경근전기자극 및 경피신경전기자극을 적용하여 근력과 통증, 관절가동범위 및 공포-회피반응에 미치는 효과를 알아보고자 한 연구이다. 앞십자인대 완전파열로 인해 관절경재건술을 받은자를 대상으로 신경근전기자극군(n=14), 경피신경전기자극군(n=14)으로 나누었고 각 군은 일반적인 물리치료를 받은 후 각 중재를 적용받았다. 각 전기치료 중재는 1일 1회 30분, 주 3회씩 4주간, 총 12회 규칙적으로 적용하였다. 중재방법에 따른 평가에는 무릎관절의 굽힘과 폄시 등속성 근력, 통증, 무릎관절 가동범위, 공포-회피반응이 포함되었다. 연구결과 신경근전기자극군과 경피신경전기자극군 모두에서 통증, 관절가동범위, 공포-회피반응에서 유의한 개선이 있었다. 하지만 등속성 무릎 굽힘 및 폄근력의 경우 신경근전기자극군에서만 유의한 개선이 있었다. 또한, 신경근전기자극과 경피신경전기자극 두 전기치료 방법간, 근력, 통증, 관절가동범위, 공포-회피반응에선 유의한 차이가 없었다. 본 연구를 통해 신경근전기자극과 경피신경전기자극은 앞십자인대 재건술 환자의 통증, 관절가동범위, 공포-회피반응에 효과적인 중재방법이 될 수 있다는 것을 알 수 있었지만 넙다리네갈래근 근력을 개선시키기 위해서는 신경근전기자극이 더욱 효과적일 수 있다는 것을 알 수 있었다.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.169-182
• /
• 2010

This study sought to compare beliefs regarding injury, accidents, and prevention behaviors between mothers and teachers in childcare centers. The subjects were 252 mothers whose children were aged between 1 and 4 years old and 264 teachers in childcare centers. The data were analyzed using t-tests, ANOVA, and partial correlation. Our results were as follows; 1) Mothers believed that by experiencing minor injuries young children would learn to recognize risk and develop their abilities to endure pain. Mothers engaged in prevention behaviors in accidents less when compared to teachers in childcare centers. 2) Mothers and teachers in childcare centers whose ages were below 30-years-old and whose education levels were below high school tended to believe young children would learn to recognize risk through accidents, and they engaged in prevention behaviors in accidents less. 3) There was a negative correlation between injury beliefs and prevention behaviors in accidents.

• 대한지역사회영양학회지
• /
• 제3권3호
• /
• pp.358-367
• /
• 1998

The study purpose was to investigate psychosocial factors related to smoking among adolescent boys. The Theory of Planned Behavior provide the basis for the study. Twenty-five attitudinal beliefs, 9 normative beliefs and 20control beliefs were identified through questionnaire development. The data were analyzed using t-test and χ2-test. Thirty-three percent of 300 students were smokers. Most of the beliefs examined were significantly different between smokers(n=92) and nonsmokers(n=92). With respect to attitudinal beliefs, smokers responded less negatively on the items of bad health effects of smoking such as sore throat, headache, chest pain, risk of cancer and bad blood circulation(p<0.001), and decreased physical strength(p<0.05). Smokers believed less negatively on the items that smoking leads to bothering others, bad breath, yellow teeth and making them spend money(p<0.001). In contrast, smokers felt more positively on smoking as a means of stress management, relaxing, helping digestion(P<0.001). Smokers felt less pressure for not smoking from significant others. Especially mother, siblings, friends, girl friends, seniors of school were important sources of influence regarding subject's smoking. Smokers felt less confident in controlling the urge to smoke in several situations including; when they were with friends or asked to smoke by friends; after the meal, or drinking; when they were bored or stressed, upset, and when they felt unstable(p<0.001). Smokers also scored lower on specific skills to quit or control the urge to smoke as well as overall perceived control, compared to nonsmokers(p<0.001). These results suggest that interventions for adolescents incorporate diverse strategies to increase the perceived control over smoking in specific situations as well as overall perceived control, to help them realize and modify attitudinal beliefs, and to elicit support from significant others for not smoking. (Korean J Community Nutrition 3(3) : 358∼367,1998)

• Korean Journal of Acupuncture
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.77-97
• /
• 2007

Objectives : The aim of this study is to introduce pain measurement tools that are considered suitable for clinical practice and research for Korean Medicine Doctors. Methods : We analysed some widely used and also useful pain measurement tools in terms of their methods and dimensions. Results : Diagrams, scales and questions are usually used to measure pain intensity, temporal pattern, treatment including exacerbating and/or relieving factors, pain location, pain interference, pain quality, pain affect, pain duration, pain beliefs and pain history. Specific pain measurements are also available for specific conditions such as Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Oswestry Disability Index and Neck Disability Index. Conclusions : Faces Pain Rating Scale, numeric rating scale, visual analogue scale, McGill Pain Questionnaire and Brief Pain Inventory and commonly used pain measurements. Specific measurements should be considered depending on research topics.

• 한국전문물리치료학회지
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.76-84
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlations between pain intensity, physical impairments, disability, and psychological factors according to the difference in duration of low back pain. This study was a cross-sectional survey of 102 participants with low back pain, divided into two groups equal in number: The first group consisted of patients with acute and subacute low back pain, while the second group consisted of patients suffering from chronic low back pain. The results showed that gender, age, pain intensity, physical impairment, disability and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs (FABs) for work activities were not significantly different between two groups. FABs for physical activities of the first group were significantly more prevalent than in the second group. More than moderate correlations were found between pain intensity, physical impairment, and disability in the first group. Less than moderate correlations were found between pain intensity, physical impairment, disability, FABs, and depression in the second group. These findings suggest that we must consider psychological factors in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain. Regression analyses revealed that pain intensity and FABs for work activities significantly contributed to the prediction of disability in the first group. Also, pain intensity and FABs for physical activities significantly contributed to the prediction of disability in the second group. Pain intensity was most important predictor of disability in two groups.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제14권6호
• /
• pp.2862-2868
• /
• 2013

본 연구는 비특이성 경부통 환자의 경부통증수준과 상지 기능장애간에 상관성을 알아보고자 실시하였다. 경부통증과 경부기능장애는 Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire(NPQ)로 상지 기능장애는 상지기능장애 설문지(disabilities of arm, shoulder, hand questionnaire; DASH)를 이용하여 평가하였다. 잠재적인 교란변수로 작용할 수 있는 심리학적 변수는 통증 자아효능감(Pain Self Efficacy; PES)과 공포회피반응 설문지(fear-avoidence beliefs questionnaire; FABQ)를 이용하여 측정하였다. 분석 결과, NPQ 점수와 DASH 점수는 피어슨 상관 계수가 0.628점의 양의 상관관계가 있었으며, PES과 FABQ 점수와도 유의한 상관성을 나타내었다. 이 결과를 통해 경부통 환자의 경부통 및 경부기능장애 수준과 상지 기능장애 수준 간에 상관성이 나타날 수 있음을 알 수 있었다. 또한 통증에 대한 부정적인 인식과 공포회피반응이 심한 환자의 경우 상지 기능평가에 직접적인 영향을 줄 수 있는 것으로 확인되었다. 이에 경부통 환자의 관리 시 상지 기능장애와 심리학적 요인을 평가하여야만 할 것이다.

• Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.184-189
• /
• 2007

목적: 효과적인 통증관리의 장애요인은 크게 제도적 측면, 의료진 측면, 그리고 환자 측면으로 구분되며, 이는 모두 사회적 통념에 영향을 받는다. 따라서 본 연구는 일반인의 통증관리 장애요인을 규명하여 궁극적으로 우리 사회의 통증관리에 대한 이해를 향상시키기 위한 기초 자료를 마련하고자 시도되었다. 방법: 2007년 5월 15일부터 6월 15일까지 자원봉사자, 교사 및 지역사회 주민 163명을 대상으로 Gunnarsdottir, Donovan, Serlin, Voge와 Ward (2002)가 개발한 Barriers Questionnaire II (BQ-II)를 유양숙, 이원희, 조옥희와 이소우(2005)가 번한 보완한 통증관리 장애척도를 사용하여 자료를 수집하였다. 통증관리 장애척도의 Cronbach's $\alpha$는 .88이었다. 결과: 대상자의 평균연령은 53.36세이며, 92.6%가 통증교육을 받은 경험이 없었다. 대상자의 통증장애 정도는 평균 2.51점이었으며, 중독을 포함하는 해로운 영향 영역이 3.03점, 부작용을 포함하는 신체적 효과 영역 2.73점, 숙명론적 태도 영역 2.15점, 그리고 의사소통 영역 1.71점 순이었다. 문항별로는 '진통제를 사용하면 중독의 위험이 있다'의 장애정도가 가장 높았고, 다음은 '진통제를 사용하면 새로운 통증이 생겼을 때 알기가 어렵다', '진통제를 사용하면 몸이 익숙해져 곧 진통효과가 없을 것이다', '진통제로 인한 졸림은 조절하기 어렵다', '진통제는 면역력을 떨어뜨린다' 순이었다. 통증교육을 받은 경우의 통증관리 장애정도는 교육을 받지 않은 경우보다 유의하게 낮았다. 결론: 일반인들의 통증관리 장애요인은 환자나 가족과 유사하게 진통제 중독 및 내성에 대한 염려가 가장 높았으므로 사회적으로 확산되어 있는 통증관리 및 진통제 사용에 대한 올바른 이해를 높이기 위한 교육 및 홍보가 필요하다.