• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.1087-1116
• /
• 2005

This research examines performance evaluatees' opinions regarding the institutional performance evaluation systems of Government S&T Research Institutes (GRI). Research methodology is as follows: first, four perspectives of Kaplan & Norton (1992) Balanced Scorecard Model are revised into six perspectives suitable to GRI's characteristics. Second, experts classify current performance evaluation measures into the six perspectives. This enables different evaluation systems of three GRI evaluation groups to be compared under the same evaluation measures. Third, GRI's evaluatees are asked to allocate ideal weights on the performance measures. The evaluatees' weights are compared with the weights of current performance measures, and the characteristics of evaluatees' opinions about current performance evaluation systems are analyzed. Results are as follows; first, six perspectives for Korean GRIs are financial, long-term outcome, short-term outcome, strategic direction, project management, human resources perspectives. second, GRI evaluation systems put the most weights on the long- and short-term outcome perspectives and the least weights on the financial perspective. This result complies with theoretical model: in performance evaluation of GRIs, the customer perspective is the most important one while the financial perspective is the least important one. Third, evaluatees think that the long-term outcome perspective of the Basic-technology GRI group and the short-term outcome perspective of the Applied-technology GRI Group needs more weight. Fourth, it is found that the current systems have more weights on the project management and strategic direction perspectives than evaluatees think. The possible explanation of this result would be that since the measures of these perspectives are relatively easier to set up than those of other perspectives, the current systems contains larger number of measures and, accordingly more weights.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.94-116
• /
• 2014

The technological innovation is considered as an important factor and there is a positive externality in developing technology in the form of technology spillover. In this context, it is argued that government should play an active role in advancing technology development and several means have been introduced. This study attempts to analyze manufacturing firms' evaluation for the performance of government assistance programs to their R&D activities. Considering that the performance evaluation takes the form of a count outcome, we apply several kinds of count data models. Some interesting findings emerge from the analysis. For example, we found that a firm's sales amount, dummy for the firm's having an R&D department, dummy for the firm's being a venture one, and the number of the firm's innovative activities have positive relationships with the degree that the firm evaluates government assistance as being useful.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제43권1호
• /
• pp.19-29
• /
• 2017

Nowadays, the policy of open data disclosure has become one of the globally used tools for public innovation. For this reason, this study investigates whether the policy has eventually created the achievement of public innovation in Korea. To this end, this study evaluates qualities of the fourteen thousand open data in Korea that is disclosed to the public and compares it with indexes such as the usage of data, transparency index, and Government 3.0 Excellency Index, which are regarded as the outcome of the disclosure. Based on the result, this study aims to suggest future orientation for the policy.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.41-59
• /
• 2003

Daedeok Valley, located in the Daejon Metropolitan City, Korea, has around 1,000 start-ups. There is no comprehensive study for the valley except Seol et al.(2002), because the valley is a new one. There was no such valley four years ago, in 1998. This paper defines the spatial boundary, origins and characteristics of the valley. The core area of the valley is Daedeok Science Town. This valley is an outcome of so called the Venture Policy of DJ government and business restructuring after foreign exchange crisis of November, 1997.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.754-783
• /
• 2013

본 연구는 최근의 대학기술이전 사례들을 활용하여 대학에서 개발된 기술에 대한 기술가치평가의 신뢰성을 향상시키기 위한 실증적인 접근방안을 제안하고자 하는 목적으로 수행되었다. 연구를 위해 대학의 내부역량관련 요인들과 기술분야별 특성에 관한 요인들이 대학기술이전 성과에 미치는 영향에 관해 조사하였다. 분석결과 최근 대학별 기술이전 성과의 기술분야별 분포는 크게 IT 및 NT 분야의 기술이전이 우세한 유형과 BT 및 기타분야의 기술이전이 우세한 유형으로 나눌 수 있었다. 또한 특허출원건수와 기술사업화 인력수가 기술이전 성과에 정의 영향을 미치는 가운데 기술이전 성과의 기술분야별 분포유형이 조절작용을 하는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 분석결과는 대학의 기술개발역량 및 기술확산역량이 기술가치평가 전 영역에 직간접적으로 연관되어 있다는 점을 감안하면 이들과 관련된 요인들과 기술분야별 특성에 관련된 요인들을 활용하여 대학기술의 기술가치평가에 관한 신뢰성을 보다 향상시킬 수 있을 가능성을 시사한다.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.111-134
• /
• 2004

Current technology innovation or new product development project is composed of various process elements that conduct researches on fundamental technologies. However, with the effects of PERT and CPM, the greater part of the existing project management researches have only focused on the resource allocation and scheduling. But in the multi-project environment, priorities between technology elements need to be considered. Furthermore, a disagreement of opinion between project managers and researchers should be considered. In this study, technology element priority was determined using modified QFD and Taguchi method. Outcome of each method was compared to analyze the difference between project managers and researchers. As a result, QFD method showed relatively high level of consistency between project managers and researchers.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제20권5호
• /
• pp.34-42
• /
• 2017

This study aimed to identify the causal relationships among self-regulated learning strategy, problem solving efficacy, task value and learning outcome, and mediation effect of self-regulated learning strategy in engineering capstone design course. The data were collected from 363 university students who enrolled in capstone design courses and analyzed using structural equation modeling method. The results were: first, problem-solving efficacy and task value exerted significant effects on self-regulated learning strategy. Second, self-regulated learning strategy exerted significant effects on learning outcome, but problem-solving efficacy and task value did not. Third, problem-solving efficacy and task value showed significant indirect effects on learning outcome, which confirmed that self-regulated learning strategy fully mediated between two exogenous variables and learning outcome.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제10권6호
• /
• pp.17-22
• /
• 2012

IT산업 기업 간의 치열한 경쟁 환경에서 기업 생존을 위한 기술혁신은 경쟁력 확보를 위한 필수요소가 되고 있다. 이러한 기술혁신은 기업의 생존을 위해 반드시 필요하며 다양한 요인들이 기술혁신의 성공을 거두기 위해 필수적으로 고려되어야 한다. 본 논문에서는 정부의 지원 수준이 기술혁신의 성패에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지를 로지스틱 회귀분석을 통해 살펴보았다. 결론적으로 정부지원 측면에서 IT제조업의 제품혁신 성공을 위해서는 직접적인 기술개발 및 사업화 지원을 위한 자금 지원이 필요하며, 공정혁신을 위해서는 기술인력 지원이나 교육연구 지원 등이 성공여부에 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다.

• 기술경영경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 기술경영경제학회 2005년도 27회 하계학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.95-115
• /
• 2005

Government-sponsored Research Institutes(GRIs) have played a great role to the development of Korea Science and Technology(S&T) However, GRIs are facing with challenges of change for their role and function, appearing emerging technology, accelerating technological innovation and increasing research capabilities of other organizations(i.g., universities and firms). We will argue that GRIs should increase competitiveness of their focused research discipline in order to produce a superior outcome and in charge of distinguished role compared with other organizations. This paper aims to suggest a alternative which could increase competitiveness of GRIs's focused research discipline. As a case, in this paper, we analyzed Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology(KRIBB) which is a part of GRIs in Korea.

• 기술경영경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 기술경영경제학회 2003년도 제22회 동계학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.101-119
• /
• 2003

Assessing the effectiveness of R&D organization is hampered by the lack of measurable goals and identifiable outcome criteria. In this review, key issues In evaluating effectiveness are identified and Insights on the application of major assessment approaches are provided. This paper presents System-Process Model on assessing the effectiveness of R&D organization(Korean Government-supported Research Institutes). System-Process Model has attempted to integrate different approaches. It is useful In sensitizing evaluators to the importance of goal, internal process, system resource and feedback in improving organizational effectiveness.