• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제12권6호
• /
• pp.15-20
• /
• 2014

Purpose - In general, researchers try to abide by the code of research ethics, but many of them are not fully aware of plagiarism, unintentionally committing the research misconduct when they write a research paper. This research aims to introduce researchers a clear and easy guideline at a conference, which helps researchers avoid accidental plagiarism by addressing the issue. This research is expected to contribute building a climate and encouraging creative research among scholars. Research design, data, methodology & Results - Plagiarism is considered a sort of research misconduct along with fabrication and falsification. It is defined as an improper usage of another author's ideas, language, process, or results without giving appropriate credit. Plagiarism has nothing to do with examining the truth or accessing value of research data, process, or results. Plagiarism is determined based on whether a research corresponds to widely-used research ethics, containing proper citations. Within academia, plagiarism goes beyond the legal boundary, encompassing any kind of intentional wrongful appropriation of a research, which was created by another researchers. In summary, the definition of plagiarism is to steal other people's creative idea, research model, hypotheses, methods, definition, variables, images, tables and graphs, and use them without reasonable attribution to their true sources. There are various types of plagiarism. Some people assort plagiarism into idea plagiarism, text plagiarism, mosaic plagiarism, and idea distortion. Others view that plagiarism includes uncredited usage of another person's work without appropriate citations, self-plagiarism (using a part of a researcher's own previous research without proper citations), duplicate publication (publishing a researcher's own previous work with a different title), unethical citation (using quoted parts of another person's research without proper citations as if the parts are being cited by the current author). When an author wants to cite a part that was previously drawn from another source the author is supposed to reveal that the part is re-cited. If it is hard to state all the sources the author is allowed to mention the original source only. Today, various disciplines are developing their own measures to address these plagiarism issues, especially duplicate publications, by requiring researchers to clearly reveal true sources when they refer to any other research. Conclusions - Research misconducts including plagiarism have broad and unclear boundaries which allow ambiguous definitions and diverse interpretations. It seems difficult for researchers to have clear understandings of ways to avoid plagiarism and how to cite other's works properly. However, if guidelines are developed to detect and avoid plagiarism considering characteristics of each discipline (For example, social science and natural sciences might be able to have different standards on plagiarism.) and shared among researchers they will likely have a consensus and understanding regarding the issue. Particularly, since duplicate publications has frequently appeared more than plagiarism, academic institutions will need to provide pre-warning and screening in evaluation processes in order to reduce mistakes of researchers and to prevent duplicate publications. What is critical for researchers is to clearly reveal the true sources based on the common citation rules and to only borrow necessary amounts of others' research.

• 한국재난정보학회 논문집
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.280-289
• /
• 2022

연구목적: 본 연구에서는 발화열원을 작동기기, 담뱃불·라이터불, 불꽃·불티 등 발화열원에 따른 화재 발생의 특징을 알아보고자 하였다. 연구방법: 일원배치 분산분석과 교차분석을 이용하여 발화열원에 따른 발화환경, 화재피해 현황 및 규모, 발화원인과의 차이 검증을 통해 화재발생 특성을 분석하였다. 연구결과: 작동기기에 의해 발생한 화재는 다른 발화열원에 비해 평일에 발생 빈도가 높고, 이재세대수와 이재민 발생이 가장 많아 소방력 동원과 재산피해가 가장 큰 것으로 나타났다. 최초착화물은 전기·전자기기에 의해 발생되었으며, 합성수지에 의해 연소가 확대되는 특징을 보였다. 담뱃불·라이터불에 의해 발생하는 화재는 토·일요일에 화재가 가장 많이 발생되었으며, 소방력 동원보다는 경찰력 동원이 많은 특징을 보였다. 특히, 최초착화물과 연소확대물은 종이·목재·건초에 의해 발생하는 것으로 나타났다. 불꽃·불티에 의해 발생하는 화재는 토·일요일에 화재가 가장 많이 발생되었으며, 최초착화물과 연소확대물은 종이·목재·건초에 의해 발생하는 것으로 나타났다. 특히, 소방서와의 거리가 가장 먼 곳에서 발생하고 있는 특징을 보였다. 모든 발화열원에서의 공통적인 특징은 오후시간대에 화재가 가장 많았으며, 화재유형은 건축구조물화재가 지배적이었고 발화지점만 연소되는 경우가 가장 많은 것으로 나타났다. 결론: 대형 화재가 발생하게 될 확률은 높아지고 있기 때문에 화재 예방 및 피해를 최소화 하기 위해서는 화재 발생 경향을 분석하고 화재발생 요인에 따른 적절한 대비를 해야 한다. 향후 공공데이터를 이용한 화재발생 특성 분석을 위해서는 재난 데이터의 표준화와, 데이터 개방 및 활성화가 필요하다.

• 대순사상논총
• /
• 제25_1집
• /
• pp.121-155
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this article is to study on the comparative relationship between mutual cooperation of the Dae-soon thought of Dae-soon jinrihoe and Shinnyo thought of Shinjo Ito. Dae-soon thought focuses on outspreading virtues and enlightenment teaching based on the saying of Jeong-san Sang Jae's Mutual cooperation without any grudge. According to the Buddha's nature thought of Shinjo Ito, 'Dharma kāya resident' is the source of touching upon buddhahood. The Shinyo-en is an outward manifestation of their deep resolve to help others by cultivating spiritual faculty and mind session. First, we can find the virtue action theory in the mutual cooperation of Dae-soon thought and the virtue nature theory in the Shinnyo thought of Shinjo Ito. From the perspective of comparative relationship, it was Jeong-san Sang Jae who laid foundation for the Posterior Grand Renewal. His idea is that the universe should be completed through the mutual communication between the earth and men following the Posterior Grand Renewal. It was Kyodoin-sama who laid the foundation for identifying the place Shinchoji was established. It was at the time that the power we call bakku-daiju as transversality and Shinnyo spiritual faculty were perfected through Shindoin-sama's passing. Second, based on Jeon-kyungn or Dae-soon Ji Chim, outspreading virtue is to awaken mutual cooperation without any grudge and the enlightenment teaching to practice according to mutual cooperation principle without any deceit toward one's own self. No deceit toward one's own self is to be sincere, to be respectful and to be faithful in Jeong-san Sang Jae. In the different context of Mahayana Buddhism, we can be aware that the immortal resident immortal of Dharma kāya is the source of permanent bliss in the Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra' From the perspective of comparative relationship to pray toward Jeong-san Sang Jae and to participate in the Posterior Grand Renewal is to take part in Cheonji-Gongsa. It is a similar phenomena to be reflected suchness reality before the three personifications of buddhahood and the Shinnyo Stupa is the same meaning as meeting the ever present Buddha. Both of them, they focus to find religious altruism from real possibilities of mutual support. They argue that to dispense with altruism is to dispense with Sang Jae or Dharma for the divine transformation of human possibilities Third, Everybody possesses unique and wonderful abilities to be unified with Jeong-san Sang Jae. If we seek happiness by trying to get by without making much of an effort to take part in CheonjiGongsa, it will be difficult to attain the harmony and peace of mankind with outspreading virtues and enlightenment teaching. In the 'Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra' tells us 'all sentient beings have Buddha nature' that could be the possibility to the fulfillment of buddhahood in the spiritual practice. From the comparative relationship, we can strive with open hearts and minds, in efforts that benefit others, and in ways we can work together to build a word of joy in which everyone can have an opportunity to cultivate spiritual faculty. This is based on mutually beneficial voluntary focused our principles into practice the spirit to build a mind session of Shinnyo as the civic clean precepts of 'Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra'. Fourth, the disciples of Jeong-san Sang Jae are encouraged to acquire the Mutual cooperation manner of being considerate. It is important to accumulate virtue action by daily effort. It is the contrast to awaken virtue nature by daily practice. The Buddha's nature thought of Shinjo Ito is based on the thought of Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra. It can be supported by the Shinnyo parents and the two Dojis to build a world of joy as the light dharma descending and the emphasis of Tathatā spiritual faculty. It's not that we can't do something we haven't attained a higher spiritual level. What counts is our continuos effort, act so we can cultivate our spiritual faculty through the way of mind session.

• 지능정보연구
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.89-105
• /
• 2014

Web2.0의 등장과 함께 급속히 발전해온 온라인 포럼, 블로그, 트위터, 페이스북과 같은 소셜 미디어 서비스는 소비자와 소비자간의 의사소통을 넘어 이제 기업과 소비자 사이의 새로운 커뮤니케이션 매체로도 인식되고 있다. 때문에 기업뿐만 아니라 수많은 기관, 조직 등에서도 소셜미디어를 활용하여 소비자와 적극적인 의사소통을 전개하고 있으며, 나아가 소셜 미디어 콘텐츠에 담겨있는 소비자 고객들의 의견, 관심, 불만, 평판 등을 분석하고 이해하며 비즈니스에 적용하기 위해 이를 적극 분석하는 단계로 진화하고 있다. 이러한 연구의 한 분야로서 비정형 텍스트 콘텐츠와 같은 빅 데이터에서 저자의 감성이나 의견 등을 추출하는 오피니언 마이닝과 감성분석 기법이 소셜미디어 콘텐츠 분석에도 활발히 이용되고 있으며, 이미 여러 연구에서 이를 위한 방법론, 테크닉, 툴 등을 제시하고 있다. 그러나 아직 대량의 소셜미디어 데이터를 수집하여 언어처리를 거치고 의미를 해석하여 비즈니스 인사이트를 도출하는 전반의 과정을 제시한 연구가 많지 않으며, 그 결과를 의사결정자들이 쉽게 이해할 수 있는 시각화 기법으로 풀어내는 것 또한 드문 실정이다. 그러므로 본 연구에서는 소셜미디어 콘텐츠의 오피니언 마이닝을 위한 실무적인 분석방법을 제시하고 이를 통해 기업의사결정을 지원할 수 있는 시각화된 결과물을 제시하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 한국 인스턴트 식품 1위 기업의 대표 상품인 N-라면을 사례 연구의 대상으로 실제 블로그 데이터와 뉴스를 수집/분석하고 결과를 도출하였다. 또한 이런 과정에서 프리웨어 오픈 소스 R을 이용함으로써 비용부담 없이 어떤 조직에서도 적용할 수 있는 레퍼런스를 구현하였다. 그러므로 저자들은 본 연구의 분석방법과 결과물들이 식품산업뿐만 아니라 타 산업에서도 바로 적용 가능한 실용적 가이드와 참조자료가 될 것으로 기대한다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.376-388
• /
• 1996

The first and the second "Discussion Contest of Scientific Investigation" was evaluated in this study. This contest was a part of 'Korean Youth Science Festival' held in 1993 and 1994. The evaluation was based on the data collected from the middle school students of final teams, their teachers, a large number of middle school students and college students who were audience of the final competition. Questionnaires, interviews, reports of final teams, and video tape of final competition were used to collect data. The study focussed on three research questions. The first was about the preparation and the research process of students of final teams. The second was about the format and the proceeding of the Contest. The third was whether participating the Contest was useful experience for the students and the teachers of the final teams. The first area, the preparation and the research process of students, were investigated in three aspects. One was the level of cooperation, participation, support and the role of teachers. The second was the information search and experiment, and the third was the report writing. The students of the final teams from both years, had positive opinion about the cooperation, students' active involvement, and support from family and school. Students considered their teachers to be a guide or a counsellor, showing their level of active participation. On the other hand, the interview of 1993 participants showed that there were times that teachers took strong leading role. Therefore one can conclude that students took active roles most of the time while the room for improvement still exists. To search the information they need during the period of the preparation, student visited various places such as libraries, bookstores, universities, and research institutes. Their search was not limited to reading the books, although the books were primary source of information. Students also learned how to organize the information they found and considered leaning of organizing skill useful and fun. Variety of experiments was an important part of preparation and students had positive opinion about it. Understanding related theory was considered most difficult and important, while designing and building proper equipments was considered difficult but not important. This reflects the students' school experience where the equipments were all set in advance and students were asked to confirm the theories presented in the previous class hours. About the reports recording the research process, students recognize the importance and the necessity of the report but had difficulty in writing it. Their reports showed tendency to list everything they did without clear connection to the problem to be solved. Most of the reports did not record the references and some of them confused report writing with story telling. Therefore most of them need training in writing the reports. It is also desirable to describe the process of student learning when theory or mathematics that are beyond the level of middle school curriculum were used because it is part of their investigation. The second area of evaluation was about the format and the proceeding of the Contest, the problems given to students, and the process of student discussion. The format of the Contests, which consisted of four parts, presentation, refutation, debate and review, received good evaluation from students because it made students think more and gave more difficult time but was meaningful and helped to remember longer time according to students. On the other hand, students said the time given to each part of the contest was too short. The problems given to students were short and open ended to stimulate students' imagination and to offer various possible routes to the solution. This type of problem was very unfamiliar and gave a lot of difficulty to students. Student had positive opinion about the research process they experienced but did not recognize the fact that such a process was possible because of the oneness of the task. The level of the problems was rated as too difficult by teachers and college students but as appropriate by the middle school students in audience and participating students. This suggests that it is possible for student to convert the problems to be challengeable and intellectually satisfactory appropriate for their level of understanding even when the problems were difficult for middle school students. During the process of student discussion, a few problems were observed. Some problems were related to the technics of the discussion, such as inappropriate behavior for the role he/she was taking, mismatching answers to the questions. Some problems were related to thinking. For example, students thinking was off balanced toward deductive reasoning, and reasoning based on experimental data was weak. The last area of evaluation was the effect of the Contest. It was measured through the change of the attitude toward science and science classes, and willingness to attend the next Contest. According to the result of the questionnaire, no meaningful change in attitude was observed. However, through the interview several students were observed to have significant positive change in attitude while no student with negative change was observed. Most of the students participated in Contest said they would participate again or recommend their friend to participate. Most of the teachers agreed that the Contest should continue and they would recommend their colleagues or students to participate. As described above, the "Discussion Contest of Scientific Investigation", which was developed and tried as a new science contest, had positive response from participating students and teachers, and the audience. Two among the list of results especially demonstrated that the goal of the Contest, "active and cooperative science learning experience", was reached. One is the fact that students recognized the experience of cooperation, discussion, information search, variety of experiments to be fun and valuable. The other is the fact that the students recognized the format of the contest consisting of presentation, refutation, discussion and review, required more thinking and was challenging, but was more meaningful. Despite a few problems such as, unfamiliarity with the technics of discussion, weakness in inductive and/or experiment based reasoning, and difficulty in report writing, The Contest demonstrated the possibility of new science learning environment and science contest by offering the chance to challenge open tasks by utilizing student science knowledge and ability to inquire and to discuss rationally and critically with other students.

• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.125-148
• /
• 2009

UGC(User Generated Contents) is emerging as the center of e-business in the web 2.0 era. The trend reflects changing roles of users in production and consumption of contents on websites and helps us to understand new strategies of websites such as web portals and social network websites. Nowadays, we consume contents created by other non-professional users for both utilitarian (e.g., knowledge) and hedonic values (e.g., fun). Also, contents produced by ourselves (e.g., photo, video) are posted on websites so that our friends, family, and even the public can consume those contents. This means that non-professionals, who used to be passive audience in the past, are now creating contents and share their UGCs with others in the Web. Accessible media, tools, and applications have also reduced difficulty and complexity in the process of creating contents. Realizing that users create plenty of materials which are very interesting to other people, media companies (i.e., web portals and social networking websites) are adjusting their strategies and business models accordingly. Increased demand of UGC may lead to website visits which are the source of benefits from advertising. Therefore, they put more efforts into making their websites open platforms where UGCs can be created and shared among users without technical and methodological difficulties. Many websites have increasingly adopted new technologies such as RSS and openAPI. Some have even changed the structure of web pages so that UGC can be seen several times to more visitors. This mainstream of UGCs on websites indicates that acquiring more UGCs and supporting participating users have become important things to media companies. Although those companies need to understand why general users have shown increasing interest in creating and posting contents and what is important to them in the process of productions, few research results exist in this area to address these issues. Also, behavioral process in creating video UGCs has not been explored enough for the public to fully understand it. With a solid theoretical background (i.e., theory of implementation intentions), parts of our proposed research model mirror the process of user behaviors in creating video contents, which consist of intention to upload, intention to edit, edit, and upload. In addition, in order to explain how those behavioral intentions are developed, we investigated influences of antecedents from three motivational perspectives (i.e., intrinsic, editing software-oriented, and website's network effect-oriented). First, from the intrinsic motivation perspective, we studied the roles of self-expression, enjoyment, and social attention in forming intention to edit with preferred editing software or in forming intention to upload video contents to preferred websites. Second, we explored the roles of editing software for non-professionals to edit video contents, in terms of how it makes production process easier and how it is useful in the process. Finally, from the website characteristic-oriented perspective, we investigated the role of a website's network externality as an antecedent of users' intention to upload to preferred websites. The rationale is that posting UGCs on websites are basically social-oriented behaviors; thus, users prefer a website with the high level of network externality for contents uploading. This study adopted a longitudinal research design; we emailed recipients twice with different questionnaires. Guided by invitation email including a link to web survey page, respondents answered most of questions except edit and upload at the first survey. They were asked to provide information about UGC editing software they mainly used and preferred website to upload edited contents, and then asked to answer related questions. For example, before answering questions regarding network externality, they individually had to declare the name of the website to which they would be willing to upload. At the end of the first survey, we asked if they agreed to participate in the corresponding survey in a month. During twenty days, 333 complete responses were gathered in the first survey. One month later, we emailed those recipients to ask for participation in the second survey. 185 of the 333 recipients (about 56 percentages) answered in the second survey. Personalized questionnaires were provided for them to remind the names of editing software and website that they reported in the first survey. They answered the degree of editing with the software and the degree of uploading video contents to the website for the past one month. To all recipients of the two surveys, exchange tickets for books (about 5,000~10,000 Korean Won) were provided according to the frequency of participations. PLS analysis shows that user behaviors in creating video contents are well explained by the theory of implementation intentions. In fact, intention to upload significantly influences intention to edit in the process of accomplishing the goal behavior, upload. These relationships show the behavioral process that has been unclear in users' creating video contents for uploading and also highlight important roles of editing in the process. Regarding the intrinsic motivations, the results illustrated that users are likely to edit their own video contents in order to express their own intrinsic traits such as thoughts and feelings. Also, their intention to upload contents in preferred website is formed because they want to attract much attention from others through contents reflecting themselves. This result well corresponds to the roles of the website characteristic, namely, network externality. Based on the PLS results, the network effect of a website has significant influence on users' intention to upload to the preferred website. This indicates that users with social attention motivations are likely to upload their video UGCs to a website whose network size is big enough to realize their motivations easily. Finally, regarding editing software characteristic-oriented motivations, making exclusively-provided editing software more user-friendly (i.e., easy of use, usefulness) plays an important role in leading to users' intention to edit. Our research contributes to both academic scholars and professionals. For researchers, our results show that the theory of implementation intentions is well applied to the video UGC context and very useful to explain the relationship between implementation intentions and goal behaviors. With the theory, this study theoretically and empirically confirmed that editing is a different and important behavior from uploading behavior, and we tested the behavioral process of ordinary users in creating video UGCs, focusing on significant motivational factors in each step. In addition, parts of our research model are also rooted in the solid theoretical background such as the technology acceptance model and the theory of network externality to explain the effects of UGC-related motivations. For practitioners, our results suggest that media companies need to restructure their websites so that users' needs for social interaction through UGC (e.g., self-expression, social attention) are well met. Also, we emphasize strategic importance of the network size of websites in leading non-professionals to upload video contents to the websites. Those websites need to find a way to utilize the network effects for acquiring more UGCs. Finally, we suggest that some ways to improve editing software be considered as a way to increase edit behavior which is a very important process leading to UGC uploading.

• 생명과학회지
• /
• 제22권7호
• /
• pp.871-879
• /
• 2012

배수체는 무핵 감귤 육종 프로그램 있어서 잠재적으로 매우 중요한 유전자원이다. 무핵성은 만다린 품종이 갖추어야 할 가장 유망한 형질 중 하나이고 3배체는 영구적으로 무핵이다. 새로운 3배체 잡종은 이종속간 배수체의 교배 또는 저빈도의 2배성 배우체 형성과 합성 같은 행동에 기인된 2배체 이종간 교배로도 이룰 수 있다. 그러나 소립의 $F_1$ 합성 종자로 발달된 이 같은 형태에 기초한 육종은 효과적인 무균적 배 적출 및 배양법 없이는 불가능하다. 본 연구에서, 무균의 배배양을 이용하여 단배의 2배체 제주 재래귤과 만다린잡종에서 방임 수분되어 자연적으로 발생한 소립종자로부터 유묘를 얻었고 배수 검정기를 이용하여 배수 정도를 검정하여 다양한 수준의 배수체를 획득하였다. 총 792 과실을 이용하여 10,289 개의 획득된 종자를 분석하여 과실당 평균 13개의 종자가 함유됨을 알 수 있었다. 정상종자와 유사한 형태로 발달된 소립종자의 과실 내 평균 함유율은 7.1%였다. 과실당 소립종자의 평균 출현 빈도는 '클레멘타인', '하레히메', '감자', '편귤', '사두감' 그리고 '윌킹' 순으로 각각 8.9, 10.2, 2.6, 3.1, 2.8, 그리고 7.0%였다. 종자 크기가 조사된 '클레멘타인' 품종 내 정상 종자의 평균 크기는 $49.52{\pm}0.07mm^2$ 였고 반면에 소립종자는 $7.95{\pm}0.04mm^2$로 전자보다 1/6배 더 작았다. 이러한 분류 기준으로 총 731개의 소립종자를 획득하였다. 이들 소립종자 중 일부는 무균의 배 배양이 수행되었고 기내 발아되어 회복된 모든 개체들은 단 하나의 배가 확인되었고 건전하게 발육하였다. 3배체 발생 빈도 비교에 있어서, '클레멘타인'은 '윌킹'과 제주 재래귤인 '편귤' 품종에 비해 각각 14배와 109배 높게 나타난 바 전자는 3배체 발생이 높음을 알 수 있었다. 자연 발생적인 배수체에 관한 기초 정보는 무핵 감귤 개발을 위해 3배체 고정종 합성에 활용될 수 있으며 그 효율 증진에도 기여할 것이라 여겨진다.

• 지능정보연구
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.1-17
• /
• 2017

딥러닝 프레임워크의 대표적인 기능으로는 '자동미분'과 'GPU의 활용' 등을 들 수 있다. 본 논문은 파이썬의 라이브러리 형태로 사용 가능한 프레임워크 중에서 구글의 텐서플로와 마이크로소프트의 CNTK, 그리고 텐서플로의 원조라고 할 수 있는 티아노를 비교하였다. 본문에서는 자동미분의 개념과 GPU의 활용형태를 간단히 설명하고, 그 다음에 logistic regression을 실행하는 예를 통하여 각 프레임워크의 문법을 알아본 뒤에, 마지막으로 대표적인 딥러닝 응용인 CNN의 예제를 실행시켜보고 코딩의 편의성과 실행속도 등을 확인해 보았다. 그 결과, 편의성의 관점에서 보면 티아노가 가장 코딩 하기가 어렵고, CNTK와 텐서플로는 많은 부분이 비슷하게 추상화 되어 있어서 코딩이 비슷하지만 가중치와 편향을 직접 정의하느냐의 여부에서 차이를 보였다. 그리고 각 프레임워크의 실행속도에 대한 평가는 '큰 차이는 없다'는 것이다. 텐서플로는 티아노에 비하여 속도가 느리다는 평가가 있어왔는데, 본 연구의 실험에 의하면, 비록 CNN 모형에 국한되었지만, 텐서플로가 아주 조금이지만 빠른 것으로 나타났다. CNTK의 경우에도, 비록 실험환경이 달랐지만, 실험환경의 차이에 의한 속도의 차이의 편차범위 이내에 있는 것으로 판단이 되었다. 본 연구에서는 세 종류의 딥러닝 프레임워크만을 살펴보았는데, 위키피디아에 따르면 딥러닝 프레임워크의 종류는 12가지가 있으며, 각 프레임워크의 특징을 15가지 속성으로 구분하여 차이를 특정하고 있다. 그 많은 속성 중에서 사용자의 입장에서 볼 때 중요한 속성은 어떤 언어(파이썬, C++, Java, 등)로 사용가능한지, 어떤 딥러닝 모형에 대한 라이브러리가 잘 구현되어 있는지 등일 것이다. 그리고 사용자가 대규모의 딥러닝 모형을 구축한다면, 다중 GPU 혹은 다중 서버를 지원하는지의 여부도 중요할 것이다. 또한 딥러닝 모형을 처음 학습하는 경우에는 사용설명서가 많은지 예제 프로그램이 많은지 여부도 중요한 기준이 될 것이다.

• 한국토양비료학회지
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.162-169
• /
• 1998

젖소 90 마리, 사슴 35 마리를 노천에서 사육하는 유역면적 약 4ha의 농촌에서 빗물 유거수에 의한 축산분뇨 유출수가 하류에 있는 휴경답과 벼재배지에 유입될 때 빗물에 함유된 영양물질의 행방을 조사하여 논 생태계의 물질순환계에서 식생과 토양의 생태학적 기능을 평가하였다. 하루 56.4 mm의 비가 오는 날의 빗물 유거수중 $NH_4-N$ 함량은 $8.3mg\;{\ell}^{-1}$ 이었고, $P_2O_5$ 함량은 $1.8mg\;{\ell}^{-1}$ 이었다. 약 4 ha의 소수계에서 벼 재배 기간중 최상 위치의 휴경답으로 유입되는 빗물의 양은 20.900 Mg 였으며, 이 빗물 유거수에 함유되어 유입되는 질소의 양은 173 kg, 인산은 38 kg이었다. 축산분뇨 유출수가 휴경답과 벼 재배 포장을 통과한 후의 영양성분 감소율은 질소는 휴경답 50%, 1번답 84%, 2번답/3번답 90%, 4번답을 거친 논물은 92%가 감소하였고, 인산은 휴경답 50%, 1번답 91%, 2번답/3번답/4번답을 통과 후에는 95%가 감소하였다. 빗물 유거수에 의한 축산분뇨 유출수의 영양성분중에서 휴경답의 잡초에 의한 흡수와 토양내에 무기태 및 토양 유기물의 형태로 잔존하는 질소량은 29%이었고, 인산은 30%로서 논의 생태학적 순기능이 인정되었다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.131-141
• /
• 1991

국내에서 처음으로 사용되는 CLINAC 1800에서 발생된 15MV X-선의 특성을 구하기 위하여 3 Dimensional water Phantom Dosimetry system)를 이용하여 방사선 치료에 근간이 되는 심부선량 백분율(POD), 최대 조직 비율(TMR), 편평도(beam profile), 대칭도, Wedge인자 등을 측정하였고 선량계산을 위하여 출력 인자들을 구하였다. 1. 선축상 최대치 지점(Dmax)은 SSD 100cm일때 조사면이 $10\times10cm^2$에서 $3.0\pm0.1$ cm이였고 $4\times4cm^2,\;35\times35cm^2$에서 각각 $3.1\pm0.1\;cm,2.2\pm0.1$ cm으로 조사면이 넓어지면서 측정치가 표면에 가까워지는 결과를 보였다. 2. 조직표면 선량(Surface Dose)는 SSD 100cm일때 조사면이 $10\times10cm^2$에서 $15.5\%$이였고 $4\times4cm^2,\;35\times35cm^2$에서 각각 $9.8\%\;,51.2\%$로 조사면이 넓어지면서 표면 선량은 증가하는 결과를 보였다. 3. 심부선량 백분율(PDO)은 SSD 100cm에서 측정하였고 조사면이 $10\times10cm^2$이고 10cm depth에서 $76.8\%$이였고 $80\%,\;50\%$ 선량의 깊이는 각각 $9.1\pm0.1\;cm,19.9\pm0.2\;cm$으로 측정되었다. 4. 최대조직비율(TMR)은 심부선량 백분율(PDD)로부터 계산하였고 측정값과의 차이는 $10\times10cm^2$ 조사면에서 평균 $1\;%$ 이내의 오차를 보였다. 5. 대칭도(symmetry)와 편평도(flatness)는 조사면 $10\times10cm^2$일때 각각 $0.73\%,\;2.72\%$이였다. 6. 출력인자(output factor)는 $10\times10cm^2$ 기준 조사면에서 흡수선량을 1로 하였을때 $4\times4cm^2,\;35\times35cm^2$ 조사면에서는 각각 0.927, 1.087로 측정되었는데 조사면이 증가할수록 흡수량이 증가하는 결과를 보였다. 7. Wedge factor는 $15^{\circ}\;30^{\circ}\;45^{\circ}\;60^{\circ}$를 10cm깊이에서 측정하였는데 0.825, 0.099, 0.560, 0.457로 각각 측정되었고 아크릴 0.4 mm Tray의 투과율은 0.976이였다. 8. 15 MV X-선에 의한 납벽층의 반가층 두께는 13 mm였고 Cerrobend의 반가층은 15.5 mm으로 측정되었다.