• 제목/요약/키워드: Open Access Maturity Model

검색결과 2건 처리시간 0.015초

AHP를 활용한 국내 학술단체 오픈액세스 성숙단계 가중치 부여 연구 - 한국과학기술정보연구원을 중심으로 - (A Study on the Weighting of Open Access Maturity Stages of Domestic Academic Organizations Using AHP: Focusing on Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information)

  • 박진호
    • 한국비블리아학회지
    • /
    • 제34권2호
    • /
    • pp.115-136
    • /
    • 2023
  • 본 연구 목적은 KISTI 오픈액세스 성숙도 모델 진단기준에 대한 가중치 부여이다. 해당 성숙도 모델은 3개 차원, 12개 세부항목, 28개 측정질문으로 구성되어 있다. 가중치 부여는 상대적 중요도를 알아보기 위한것으로 3개 차원, 차원에 속하는 12개 세부항목에 대해 수행하였다. 그 결과 3개 차원에서는 'OA 제도화'(49%)가 가장 중요한 요소로 도출되었다. 'OA 제도화'의 하위 요소 중 관련 규정 제·개정(65%)이 중요하였고, 'OA 지속가능성'에서는 재정(40%)이 중요한 요소로 도출되었다. '학술지 개방성'의 중요한 요소로는 투고와 심사(26%), 저자 권리(22%)가 확인되었다.

오픈 소스 개발자들의 참여 의도 강화 기제 및 참여 지속 의도에 관한 연구: 사회 정체성 이론과 조직시민행동 이론에 기반하여 (The Reinforcing Mechanism of Sustaining Participations in Open Source Software Developers: Based on Social Identity Theory and Organizational Citizenship Behavior Theory)

  • 최정홍;최주희;이혜선;황보환;이인성;김진우
    • Asia pacific journal of information systems
    • /
    • 제23권3호
    • /
    • pp.1-23
    • /
    • 2013
  • Open Source Software Development (OSSD) differentiates itself from traditional closed software development in that it reveals its source codes online and allows anyone to participate in projects. Even though its success was in doubt, many of the open collaborative working models produced successful results. Academia started to get interested in how developers are willing to participate even when there are no extrinsic rewards for their efforts. Many studies tried to explain developers' motivations, and the pursuit of ideology, reputation, and altruism are found to be the answers. Those studies, however, focused mostly on how the first contribution is made out of a certain motivation. Nowadays, OSSD reaches at its maturity and 70% of professional developers have used or utilized open source software or code in their works. As the proportion of people experiencing OSS, the accounts from previous studies are expected to be weakened. Also, extant literature fails to explain how the motivation of participating in OSS evolves over time and experiences. Given that changing over time or over experiences is the natural in the perception of motivation, studies in an attempt to understand how the motivation changes or evolves are in need. In this study, we aimed to explain how the perception about OSS from past usage or related experiences leads to the intention to sustain OSS participations. By doing so, we try to bridge the gap between previous studies and the actual phenomenon. We argued that perceived instrumentality about OSS learned from past experiences will first affect the formation of organizational identity towards general OSS community. And once the organizational identity is formed, it will affect the one's following behaviors related to OSS development, most likely to sustain the favoring stance toward OSS community. Our research distinguishes itself from previous one in that it divides the paths from organizational identity formed to the intention to sustain the voluntary helping behaviors, by altruistic and conforming intentions. Drawing on this structural model, we could explain how organizational identity engages in forming the sustaining intention from past experiences, and that the intention to help at individual level and organizational level works at different level in OSS community. We grounded our arguments on Social identity theory and Organizational Citizenship theory. We examined our assumption by constructing a structural equation model (SEM) and had 88 developers to answer our online surveys. The result is analyzed by PLS (partial least square) method. Consequently, all paths but one in our model are supported, the one which assumed the association between perceived instrumentality and altruistic intention. Our results provide directions in designing online collaborative platforms where open access collaboration is meant to occur. Theoretically, our study suggests that organizational citizenship behavior can occur from organizational identity, even in bottom-up organizational settings. More specifically, we also argue to consider both organizational level and individual level of motivation in inducing sustained participations within the platforms. Our result can be interpreted to indicate the importance of forming organizational identity in sustaining the participatory behaviors. It is because there was no direct association between perceived instrumentality from past experiences and altruistic behavior, but the perception of organizational identity bridges the two constructs. This means that people with no organizational identity can sustain their participations through conforming intention from only the perception of instrumentality, but it needs little more than that for the people to feel the intention to directly help someone in the community-first to form the self-identity as a member of the given community.