Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회지)

Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Weighting of Open Access Maturity Stages of Domestic Academic Organizations Using AHP: Focusing on Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information

AHP를 활용한 국내 학술단체 오픈액세스 성숙단계 가중치 부여 연구 - 한국과학기술정보연구원을 중심으로 -

  • 박진호 (한성대학교 도서관정보문화트랙)
  • Received : 2023.05.15
  • Accepted : 2023.06.13
  • Published : 2023.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to establish a weighting system for the diagnostic criteria of the KISTI Open Access Maturity Model. The maturity model consists of three dimensions, 12 sub-dimensions, and 28 measurement questions. Weighting was performed for the three dimensions and 12 sub-dimensions to determine their relative importance. The results showed that 'Institutionalization of OA' (48%) was the most important factor in the three dimensions. Among the sub-factors of "institutionalizing OA," "enacting and revising relevant regulations" (64%) was important, and "financing" (39%) was important for "OA sustainability. Submission and review (23%) and author rights (22%) were identified as important elements of "journal openness".

본 연구 목적은 KISTI 오픈액세스 성숙도 모델 진단기준에 대한 가중치 부여이다. 해당 성숙도 모델은 3개 차원, 12개 세부항목, 28개 측정질문으로 구성되어 있다. 가중치 부여는 상대적 중요도를 알아보기 위한것으로 3개 차원, 차원에 속하는 12개 세부항목에 대해 수행하였다. 그 결과 3개 차원에서는 'OA 제도화'(49%)가 가장 중요한 요소로 도출되었다. 'OA 제도화'의 하위 요소 중 관련 규정 제·개정(65%)이 중요하였고, 'OA 지속가능성'에서는 재정(40%)이 중요한 요소로 도출되었다. '학술지 개방성'의 중요한 요소로는 투고와 심사(26%), 저자 권리(22%)가 확인되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. AccessOn [n.d.]. AccessOn Overview and Services. Available: https://accesson.kisti.re.kr/guide/accesson/intro.do
  2. Choi, HeeYoon, Hwang, Hyekyong, & Baek, Jong-Myung (2012). An study on the user satisfaction of open access activities in korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(1), 279-302. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.1.279
  3. Choi, Jae-Hwang & Cho, Hyun Yang (2005). The recent trends of open access movements and the ways to help the cause by academic stakeholders. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(3), 307-326. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2005.22.3.307
  4. Jeong, Kyoung Hee (2006). Analysis on the open access policies, publishing, and archiving in the field of medicine. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 40(2), 389-414. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.2.389
  5. Kim, Gyuhwan (2014). A proposal for the acceptance and processes of open access in korean societies. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(3), 111-131. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.111
  6. Kim, Sunmi & Lee, Nani (2005). A study on building an open access based institutional repository in the university for scholarly communication. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 36(2), 45-71.
  7. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (2022). Digital Open Access Maturity Model Study (Year 2) (K-22-ID-12-02R-1)
  8. Kwak, Seung-Jin & Shin, Jae-Min (2008). A study on the usability evaluation of open access repository. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 39(4), 67-96.
  9. Lee, Jeong-Mee & Hwang, HyeKyong (2021). Case study of usability evaluation and improvement plan for open access academic publishing support interface. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 32(4), 47-66. http://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2021.32.4.047
  10. Pyo, Soon-Hee, Kwon, Nahyun, Lee, Jung Yeoun, & Moon, Sunung (2022). Measuring the economic use value of the national open access platform for accessing research papers. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 56(3), 313-334. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2022.56.3.313
  11. Shim, Wonsik (2021). A study on the awareness and experience of open access publishing among Korean authors of an open access mega journal. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 55(4), 45-65. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2021.55.4.045
  12. Jacobs, N. (Ed.). (2006). Open Access: Key strategic, technical and economic aspects. Oxford: Chandos Publishing Limited.
  13. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. Virginia: McGraw-Hill International Book Company.
  14. Saaty, T. L. (1990). Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World, rev. ed., Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
  15. Smee, E. (2022. April, 13). Moving towards an Open Access future. Dimension. Available: https://www.dimensions.ai/blog/moving-towards-an-open-access-future/