• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.74-77
• /
• 2005

A neurolytic celiac plexus block produces long-lasting pain relief in upper abdominal cancer patients. Unwanted side effects such as local pain, hypotension, and diarrhea are common but the durations of these side effects are usually transient. Chronic diarrhea induced by a neurolytic celiac plexus block is rarely reported and is considered to be an autonomic neuropathy due to sympathetic denervation. A 73-year-old Klatskin tumor patient developed chronic diarrhea after a neurolytic celiac plexus block and the diarrhea was sustained for 3 months despite the use of conventional antidiarrheal treatments. We report a case of chronic diarrhea that was induced by a neurolytic celiac plexus block.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.274-277
• /
• 2010

Abdominal pain associated with chronic pancreatitis is often difficult to control with analgesics and can be severely debilitating with significant impairment of quality of life. In these patients, neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) is an effective treatment option with a low complication rate. However, there is a risk of ejaculatory failure after NCPB, which may be a problem in patients with a long life expectancy. We report a case of ejaculatory failure after unilateral NCPB in a patient with chronic pancreatitis.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.28-33
• /
• 1988

1986년 3월 통증치료실을 개설한 이래 상복부의 불인통을 호소하는 12명의 암환자에서 복강신경총 차단을 시행하였다. 처음 5예는 fluoroscopy의 도움만으로, 나머지 7예는 CT를 이용하여 피부에 천자부위를 정하고 재차 수술실로 옮겨서 시행한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1) CT를 이용한 복강신경총 차단을 시행할 경우, 평균 시술시간을 훨씬 단축시킬 뿐 아니라(약 1시간) 초보자에게는 시술이 훨씬 용이하다. 2) Fluoroscopy만 이용한 5예 중 3예에서, CT 및 fluoroscopy틀 동시에 이용한 경우는 7예중 5예에서 양호한 결과를 얻었다. 3) 정확한 위치에서 천자하면 신경파괴제의 양을 줄 일 수 있다. 4) 거대 간장, 심한 복수 등에서는 그 효과가 의문시 된다.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제34권4호
• /
• pp.479-486
• /
• 2021

Background: Prior studies have reported that 40%-90% of the patients with celiac plexus-mediated visceral pain benefit from the neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB), but the predictive factors of response to NCPB have not been evaluated extensively. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with the immediate analgesic effectiveness of NCPB in patients with intractable upper abdominal cancer-related pain. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 513 patients who underwent NCPB for upper abdominal cancer-related pain. Response to the procedure was defined as (1) a decrease of ≥ 50% or ≥ 4 points on the numerical rating scale (NRS) in pain intensity from the baseline without an increase in opioid requirement, or (2) a decrease of ≥ 30% or ≥ 2 points on the NRS from the baseline with simultaneously reduced opioid consumption after NCPB. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with successful responses to NCPB. Results: Among the 513 patients included in the analysis, 255 (49.8%) and 258 (50.2%) patients were in the non-responder and responder group after NCPB, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 0.644, P = 0.035), history of upper abdominal surgery (OR = 0.691, P = 0.040), and celiac metastasis (OR = 1.496, P = 0.039) were the independent factors associated with response to NCPB. Conclusions: Celiac plexus metastases, absence of diabetes, and absence of prior upper abdominal surgery may be independently associated with better response to NCPB for upper abdominal cancer-related pain.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.22-31
• /
• 2015

Background: The celiac plexus and splanchnic nerves are targets for neurolytic blocks for pain relief from pain caused by upper gastrointestinal tumors. Therefore, we investigated the analgesic effect of a celiac plexus block versus a splanchnic nerve block and the effects of these blocks on the quality of life six months post-intervention for patients with upper GIT tumors. Methods: Seventy-nine patients with inoperable upper GIT tumors and with severe uncontrolled visceral pain were randomized into two groups. These were Group I, for whom a celiac plexus block was used with a bilateral needle retrocrural technique, and Group II, for whom a splanchnic nerve block with a bilateral needle technique was used. The visual analogue scale for pain (0 to 100), the quality of life via the QLQ-C30 questionnaire, and survival rates were assessed. Results: Pain scores were comparable in both groups in the first week after the block. Significantly more patients retained good analgesia with tramadol in the splanchnic group from 16 weeks onwards (P = 0.005, 0.001, 0.005, 0.001, 0.01). Social and cognitive scales improved significantly from the second week onwards in the splanchnic group. Survival of both groups was comparable. Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that the efficacy of the splanchnic nerve block technique appears to be clinically comparable to a celiac block. All statistically significant differences are of little clinical value.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.211-216
• /
• 1994

Celiac plexus block is performed to relieve intractable upper abdominal cancer pain. Generally, celiac plexus blocks have been performed under control of X-ray fluoroscopy to determine the position of the needle tip and the spread of contrast media. During the period from March 1992 to February 1994, we have performed 21 cases of neurolytic celiac plexus block to alleviate pain of intra-abdominal malignancy. We retrospectively evaluated the location of the needle tip and the spread of contrast media. P-A views of simple abdomen demonstrated the locations of the needle tip: 66.7% of the left needle tips were in upper 3/1 of L1 (6 cases) and $T_{12}-L_1$ interspace (8 cases), 50% of the right needle tips were in upper 1/3 of $L_1$, (6 cases) and $T_{12}-L_1$ interspace (4 cases). Contrast media from the right needle spread upward to middle 1/3 of $T_{10}$ (5 cases) and middle 1/3 of $T_{11}$ (5 cases), downward to middle 1/3 of $L_1$ (6 cases) and lower 1/3 of $L_1$ (3 cases). Contrast media from the left needle were spread upward to middle 1/3 of $T_{10}$ (5 cases) and evenly to other spaces, downward to middle 1/3 of $L_1$, (4 cases) and $L_1-L_2$ interspace (6 cases). We analyze the spread of contrast media according to distance from needle tip by authors score system. Contrast media of right needle spread upward 6.1 and downward 3.4, that of left needle spread upward 6.5 and downward 3.7.

• Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.51-54
• /
• 2008

말기암 환자에서 암성통증 완화와 삶의 질 유지는 여전히 도전과제로 남아있다. 암성 통증 환자에게서 약물치료는 여전히 치료의 중심이 되고 있으나, 약물적 중재도 불구하고 많은 환자에서 적절한 통증 조절 효과를 얻지 못하거나 진통제와 관련된 부작용을 경험하고 있다. 이에 저자들은 복강신경총차단과 하장간막신경총차단 그리고 상하복신경 총차단의 다양한 교감신경차단을 시행하여 통증조절에 성공한 증례를 보고한다.

• Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.56-60
• /
• 2009

암성 통증의 80%는 진통제를 투여하는 약물치료로서 조절될수 있지만 $10{\sim}20%$는 다른 대책이 필요하다. 신경파괴제를 사용하는 블록은 이런 경우 중요한 역할을 한다. 신경블록은 암환자의 통증을 예방하고 삶의 질을 증가시킬수 있다. 특히 암성 통증이 신체 말단부위나 어떤 한 부위에 국한되 있는 경우 말초신경블록이나 교감신경블록은 좋은 효과를 나타낸다. 신경파괴제를 사용하는 교감신경블록 특히 복강신경총블록은 조기에 시행하면 훨씬 효과적이며 장기간 효과를 나타낸다. 환자 선택이 성공적인 결과를 얻는데 중요하다. 신경파괴제를 사용하는 신경블록은 복부 및 골반강내 암성통증을 감소시키고 진통제의 사용량을 감소시킬뿐 아니라 진통제에 관련된 부작용을 감소시키므로서 삶의 질을 향상시킨다. 따라서 조기단계에서 보다 적극적인 신경블록요법이 권고된다.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.111-114
• /
• 2006

Pancreatic cancer often elicits intractable abdominal pain which has significant negative impact on the quality of life in patients. Various therapeutic modalities including celiac plexus block are being used to alleviate the pain. The anatomic location of the pancreas often hinders the spread of anesthetic or neurolytic solutions by obliterating the retrocrural space, thus making the classic retrocrural approach unsuccessful. The following case describes a patient with intractable abdominal pain originating from advanced pancreatic cancer, which could be managed successfully with thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy after retrocrural celiac plexus block had failed.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제35권2호
• /
• pp.202-208
• /
• 2022

Background: Neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) is a typical treatment for severe epigastric cancer pain, but the therapeutic effect is often affected by the variation of local anatomical structures induced by the tumor. Greater and lesser splanchnic nerve neurolysis (SNN) had similar effects to the NCPB, and was recently performed with a paravertebral approach under the image guidance, or with the transdiscal approach under the guidance of computed tomography. This study observed the feasibility and safety of SNN via a transdiscal approach under fluoroscopic guidance. Methods: The follow-up records of 34 patients with epigastric cancer pain who underwent the splanchnic nerve block via the T11-12 transdiscal approach under fluoroscopic guidance were investigated retrospectively. The numerical rating scale (NRS), the patient satisfaction scale (PSS) and quality of life (QOL) of the patient, the dose of morphine consumed, and the occurrence and severity of adverse events were recorded preoperatively and 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 2 months after surgery. Results: Compared with the preoperative scores, the NRS scores and daily morphine consumption decreased and the QOL and PSS scores increased at each postoperative time point (P < 0.001). No patients experienced serious complications. Conclusions: SNN via the transdiscal approach under flouroscopic guidance was an effective, safe, and easy operation for epigastric cancer pain, with fewer complications.