• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.57-72
• /
• 2009

본 논문에서는 국내 13개 항만을 대상으로, 정상DEA 제1모형에서는 2개의 산출물(수출입 물량, 선박입출항척수)과 2개의 투입물(접안능력, 하역능력), 제2모형에서는 4개의 투입물(접안능력, 하역능력, 경비함정수, 특수함정수)과 2개의 산출물(수출입물량, 선박입출항척수)을 이용하여 전통적인 투입지향, 가변규모수확조건하에서 분석을 통해 상대적인 효율성을 측정하였으며, 기존연구의 한계를 확장시키기 위해서 국내 항만분야에서는 처음으로 Negative DEA분석(산출지향, 가변규모수확조건, 투입요소: 수출입물량, 선박입출항척수, 산출요소: 해양사고, 해상범죄, 해양오염사고)을 통해서 항만운영에 위험이 되는 산출요소를 반영하여 가장 효율적인 항만들이 가장 운영위험이 큰 항만들임을 실증분석을 통해서 보여 주었다. 주요한 실증분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 정상 DEA모형에서 운영효율성이 가장 낮은 동해항은 여수항, 부산항, 울산항들의 운영방법을 중-장기적인 측면에서 벤치마킹해야만 한다. 둘째, Negative DEA모형에서 가장 운영위험이 높은 항만들은 태안, 여수, 통영, 부산, 속초항으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 정책적인 함의는 다음과 같다. 즉, 첫째, 항만운영에 관여하는 정책입안가들은 본 연구에서 사용한 정상DEA모형에 의해서 비효율적인 항만들은 단기 중기 장기적으로 벤치마킹항만들의 운영방법을 추구해야만 한다. 둘째, Negative DEA분석을 통해서 가장 운영위험이 높은 항만은 5개 항만인 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 태안, 여수, 통영, 부산, 속초항들이다. 따라서 이러한 항만들은 중-장기적으로는 2층 효율성 분석에서 효율적이지 않은 것으로 나타난 인천, 울산, 포항, 동해항을 벤치마킹해야만 한다. 본 논문의 한계점은 Simak(2000)이 제시한 것과 같은 다양한 방법과 다년도분석법을 사용하여 항만들의 운영위험을 예측하는 측정을 했어야만 했지만 자료수집의 문제점 때문에 그렇게 하지 못하였다. 차후연구에서는 그러한 방법을 다루고자 한다.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회 2005년도 추계학술대회 및 정기총회
• /
• pp.405-408
• /
• 2005

현대 기업 환경에서 리스크 관리의 중요성이 증가함에 따라 기업도산예측을 위한 다양한 통계모형들이 개발되었다. 그러나 이러한 모형들은 기업도산에 영향을 미치는 변수들에 대한 사후적 정보와 함께 도산여부에 대한 사전적 정보를 반드시 필요로 하는 한계가 있다. 이에 따라 DEA가 기업도산예측을 위한 대안으로 연구되고 있다. DEA는 도산여부에 대한 사전적 정보 없이 사후적인 정보만을 가지고 의사결정단위(DMU)의 효율성(재무신뢰도)을 측정할 수 있는 장점이 있다. 그러나 지금까지 기업도산예측에 활용된 DEA 모형은 바람직하지 않은 산출물(negative outputs)은 다루지 못하는 한계가 있었다. 이에 본 논문에서는 Negative DEA 방법을 소개하고, 이를 기존의 DEA 방법과 병행하여 기업도산예측에 적용함으로써 기업도산예측을 위한 대안적 방법을 제시하고자 한다.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회 2005년도 추계학술대회 및 정기총회
• /
• pp.441-456
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this paper is to introduce the concept of negative DEA, which aims at identifying worst performers by placing them on the efficient frontier, This paper also proposes to use a layering technique instead of the traditional cut-off point approach, since this enables incorporation of risk attitudes and risk-based pricing. The results of the empirical application on credit risk evaluation validate the method which is proposed in this paper.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.255-265
• /
• 2013

This paper proposes a DEA-AR model for the efficiency evaluation of the iron ore brands in an integrated steel mill. The input factor is defined as unit cost of each brand based on CIF and two output factors are chosen as Fe and Al which are the important ingredients of iron ore. The relative importance between two output factors is determined by several experts using AHP model. The efficiency of each brand is determined using DEA and DEA-AR models. The negative correlation between the DEA-AR efficiency and the unit cost (CIF) is shown as significant whereas no significant correlation exist between the efficiency and the output factors. Also, the Kruskal Wallis rank sum test shows that there exist efficiency differences among the iron ore types whereas no difference is shown among the countries. The result could be utilized in selecting good brands of iron ores based on the DEA-AR efficiency in an integrated steel mill.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2014

This study suggests the two types DEA models such as DEA CCR model and Super Efficiency model to evaluate the value of a company and to apply them for the investments. 14 kinds of real data of companies such as EV/EBITDA, EPS growth rate, PCR, PER, dividend yield, PBR, stock price/net current asset, debt ratio, current ratio, ROE, operating margin, inventory turnover, accounts receivable turnover, and sales growth ratio were used as input variables of DEA models. 12 year data from December 30, 2000 up to December 30, 2012 were collected, and the data with negative, missing and 0 values were removed reflecting the characteristics of the DEA. In order to verify the effectiveness of the models, we compared the historical variability and rate of return of both models those of the market. Study results are as follows. First, two DEA models are more stable than market in terms of rate of return because the historical variability of both models are less than that of market. Second, Super Efficiency model is more stable than CCR model. Lastly, the cumulative rate of return of Super Efficiency model (434%) is greater than that of the CCR model (420%) and that of the market (269%).

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.75-90
• /
• 1998

The improper use of input and output factors in DEA has a critical and negative impact on the efficiency measurement and the discernment of decision making units(DMUs) : hence the proper selection Process of the factors should precede the actual applications of DEA. In this paper, we propose a new approach to selecting proper factors based on Tofallis' partial efficiency evaluation method(1996). With the approach, the factors aye clustered by measuring their respective partial efficiencies and analyzing the rank correlations of them. The method and procedure we propose in this paper are then applied to measure the efficiencies of the public libraries in Seoul District area, and the results show that the proposed approach can provide meaningful information to improve discernment of the DMUs while using less number of input factors (and less information). The proposed method can be effectively used in the situation where the number of the DMUs to be considered is relatively small compared to the number of available input and output factors, which usually lessens the power to identify the inefficient units in DEA.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.109-120
• /
• 2007

본 논문에서는 항만효율성 측정 시 문제가 되었던 두 가지 문제점(첫째, 각기 상이한 기본단위를 갖는 투입변수와 산출변수의 정규화문제, 둘째, DEA분석의 기본가정인 비음수조건에 벗어난 자료, 즉, 음수를 갖는 투입-산출자료의 변환불변성)를 해결하기 위해서 국내 26개항만의 자료를 이용하여 실증분석을 한 후에 검증을 함으로써 항만효율성 측정방법을 부분적으로 확장시켰다. 본 논문의 실증분석의 핵심적인 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 항만효율성 측정 시 사용되는 자료의 정규성과 변환불변성은 실증분석 결과 분명하게 있는 것으로 검증되었다. 둘째, 항만효율성 측정 시 사용되는 자료가 마이너스(-)인 경우에 가장 큰 음수보다 더 큰 양수를 더해 주는 이른바 자료의 변환을 검증하는 변환불변성은 투입지향-산출지향 BCC 모형에서 확인되었다. 위와 같은 실증분석 결과는 다음과 같은 정책적인 함의를 갖고 있다. 즉, 효율성 측정시 사용되는 자료의 정규성과 변환불변성이 실증적으로 검증되었으므로, 국내 항만의 정책입안가들은 항만효율성 측정 시 이용되는 자료의 정규성과 변환불변성과 같은 사항을 고려하여 보다 세부적인 항만통계자료를 수집 정리 공표하는 것이 매우 필요하다. 예를 들면 항만사고와 같은 통계도 해역별이 아닌 항만별로 세부적으로 통계를 발행하도록 관련된 정책적인 지원이 필요하다.

• 아태비즈니스연구
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.1-17
• /
• 2015

This study compares the most widely used parametric and non-parametric techniques to measure cost and profit efficiency of banks, namely the Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). We formulate the specification form of both stochastic cost and profit frontier models and constant return to scale Cost DEA and Profit DEA models and provide an empirical assessment of the cost and profit frontiers based on a panel dataset of National Commercial Banks (NCBs) and Private Banks (PBs) in Bangladesh over the 2001-2010 period. The cost inefficiency and profit efficiency are slightly higher for PBs than NCBs in case of both SFA and DEA. The coefficients of advance and off-balance sheet items are significant that positively influence the banks in stochastic cost frontier model while the advance, other earning assets, price of borrowed fund are significant and negative effects on the banks in stochastic profit frontier model. The average cost inefficiency and average profit efficiency are recorded with 16.3% and 91% respectively. The highest and lowest cost inefficiency are observed for Janata Bank and United Commercial Bank Limited whilst the highest and lowest profit efficiency are recorded for Eastern Bank Limited and Janata Bank respectively. The average technical and allocative efficiency are 68.8% and 35.9%, respectively in case of CRS cost-DEA model whereas they are 70.3% and 31.8% in case of CRS profit-DEA model. The average cost inefficiency is recorded 6.3% by SFA whereas it is 24.5% by DEA. The average profit efficiency is found 91% by SFA while it is 22.1% by DEA, and SFA method shows better bank efficiency than DEA.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.527-538
• /
• 2021

The purpose of the study is to determine the efficiency, position, and partner selection of securities companies via the negative super-SBM model used in data envelopment analysis (DEA). This model utilizes a variety of inputs, including current assets, non-current assets, fixed assets, liabilities, owner's equity and charter capital, and outputs including net revenue, gross profit, operating profit, and net profit after tax collected from the financial reports (Vietstock, 2020) of 32 securities companies, operating during the period from 2016 to 2019, negative data are collected as well. Empirical results determined both efficient and inefficient terms, and then further determined the position of each securities firm under consideration of every term. The overall score arrived at discovered a large performance change realizing a maximum score able to reach 20.791. In the next stage, alliancing inefficient companies was carried out based on the 2019 scores to seek out optimal partners for the inefficient companies. The tested result indicated that AAS was the best partner selection when its partners received a good result after alliancing, as with FTS (11.04469). The partner selection is deemed as a solution helpful to inefficient securities companies in order to improve their future efficiency scores.

• 동아시아식생활학회지
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.242-252
• /
• 2008

The objective of this study was to suggest a new efficiency measurement indicator for evaluating the menu management efficiency of decision making units(DMUs) in contract-foodservice operations and to determine the relationship between the DEA(data envelopment analysis) menu efficiency score and menu factors. The results of applying DEA revealed relatively efficient types of service and frequency of meals. The efficient service was shown as a self-service type that operates Monday to Saturday. The considered menu factors included meal price, food cost per meal, meal counts, number of menu items, use of favorite menu use, forecasting error, accuracy of ordering, ratio of inventory, ratio of food loss, use of processed foods and use of prepared vegetables are considered. There were significant correlations between the DEA score and meal price, meal counts, number of menu items, ratio of food loss, accuracy of ordering and use of processed foods respectively. According to the regression results, menu price had a positive influence on the DEA menu efficiency score, and food cost per meal and the use of prepared foods had negative influences respectively.