• Title/Summary/Keyword: Multiobjective optimization

Search Result 122, Processing Time 0.029 seconds

A Study on Multiobjective Genetic Optimization Using Co-Evolutionary Strategy (공진화전략에 의한 다중목적 유전알고리즘 최적화기법에 관한 연구)

  • Kim, Do-Young;Lee, Jong-Soo
    • Proceedings of the KSME Conference
    • /
    • 2000.11a
    • /
    • pp.699-704
    • /
    • 2000
  • The present paper deals with a multiobjective optimization method based on the co-evolutionary genetic strategy. The co-evolutionary strategy carries out the multiobjective optimization in such way that it optimizes individual objective function as compared with each generation's value while there are more than two genetic evolutions at the same time. In this study, the designs that are out of the given constraint map compared with other objective function value are excepted by the penalty. The proposed multiobjective genetic algorithms are distinguished from other optimization methods because it seeks for the optimized value through the simultaneous search without the help of the single-objective values which have to be obtained in advance of the multiobjective designs. The proposed strategy easily applied to well-developed genetic algorithms since it doesn't need any further formulation for the multiobjective optimization. The paper describes the co-evolutionary strategy and compares design results on the simple structural optimization problem.

  • PDF

A Study of New Evolutionary Approach for Multiobjective Optimization (다목적함수 최적화를 위한 새로운 진화적 방법 연구)

  • Shim, Mun-Bo;Suh, Myung-Won
    • Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers A
    • /
    • v.26 no.6
    • /
    • pp.987-992
    • /
    • 2002
  • In an attempt to solve multiobjective optimization problems, many traditional methods scalarize the objective vector into a single objective. In those cases, the obtained solution is highly sensitive to the weight vector used in the scalarization process and demands the user to have knowledge about the underlying problem. Moreover, in solving multiobjective problems, designers may be interested in a set of Pareto-optimal points, instead of a single point. In this paper, pareto-based Continuous Evolutionary Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization problems having continuous search space are introduced. This algorithm is based on Continuous Evolutionary Algorithms to solve single objective optimization problems with a continuous function and continuous search space efficiently. For multiobjective optimization, a progressive reproduction operator and a niche-formation method fur fitness sharing and a storing process for elitism are implemented in the algorithm. The operator and the niche formulation allow the solution set to be distributed widely over the Pareto-optimal tradeoff surface. Finally, the validity of this method has been demonstrated through a numerical example.

Methods of pairwise comparisons and fuzzy global criterion for multiobjective optimization in structural engineering

  • Shih, C.J.;Yu, K.C.
    • Structural Engineering and Mechanics
    • /
    • v.6 no.1
    • /
    • pp.17-30
    • /
    • 1998
  • The method of pairwise comparison inherently contains information of ambiguity, fuzziness and conflict in design goals for a multiobjective structural design. This paper applies the principle of paired comparison so that the vaguely formulated problem can be modified and a set of numerically acceptable weight would reflect the relatively important degree of multiple objectives. This paper also presents a fuzzy global criterion method ($FGCM_{\lambda}$) included fuzzy constraints that coupled with the objective weighting rank obtained from the modified pairwise comparisons for fuzzy multiobjective optimization problems. Descriptions in sequence of this combined method and problem solving experiences are given in the current article. Multiobjective design examples of truss and mechanical spring structures illustrate this optimization process containing the revising judgement techniques.

A Study on Strengthened Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Modal and Multiobjective Optimization (강화된 유전 알고리듬을 이용한 다극 및 다목적 최적화에 관한 연구)

  • Lee Won-Bo;Park Seong-Jun;Yoon En-Sup
    • Journal of the Korean Institute of Gas
    • /
    • v.1 no.1
    • /
    • pp.33-40
    • /
    • 1997
  • An optimization system, APROGA II using genetic algorithm, was developed to solve multi-modal and multiobjective problems. To begin with, Multi-Niche Crowding(MNC) algorithm was used for multi-modal optimization problem. Secondly, a new algorithm was suggested for multiobjective optimization problem. Pareto dominance tournaments and Sharing on the non-dominated frontier was applied to it to obtain multiple objectives. APROGA II uses these two algorithms and the system has three search engines(previous APROGA search engine, multi-modal search engine and multiobjective search engine). Besides, this system can handle binary and discrete variables. And the validity of APROGA II was proved by solving several test functions and case study problems successfully.

  • PDF

ROBUST DUALITY FOR NONSMOOTH MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS

  • Lee, Gue Myung;Kim, Moon Hee
    • Journal of the Chungcheong Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.30 no.1
    • /
    • pp.31-40
    • /
    • 2017
  • In this paper, we consider a nonsmooth multiobjective robust optimization problem with more than two locally Lipschitz objective functions and locally Lipschitz constraint functions in the face of data uncertainty. We prove a nonsmooth sufficient optimality theorem for a weakly robust efficient solution of the problem. We formulate a Wolfe type dual problem for the problem, and establish duality theorems which hold between the problem and its Wolfe type dual problem.

Optimization Design of Log-periodic Dipole Antenna Arrays Via Multiobjective Genetic Algorithms

  • Wang, H.J.
    • Proceedings of the KSRS Conference
    • /
    • 2003.11a
    • /
    • pp.1353-1355
    • /
    • 2003
  • Genetic algorithms (GA) is a well known technique that is capable of handling multiobjective functions and discrete constraints in the process of numerical optimization. Together with the Pareto ranking scheme, more than one possible solution can be obtained despite the imposed constraints and multi-criteria design functions. In view of this unique capability, the design of the log-periodic dipole antenna array (LPDA) using this special feature is proposed in this paper. This method also provides gain, front-back level and S parameter design tradeoff for the LPDA design in broadband application at no extra computational cost.

  • PDF

Study on Diversity of Population in Game model based Co-evolutionary Algorithm for Multiobjective optimization (다목적 함수 최적화를 위한 게임 모델에 기반한 공진화 알고리즘에서의 해집단의 다양성에 관한 연구)

  • Lee, Hea-Jae;Sim, Kwee-Bo
    • Journal of the Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems
    • /
    • v.17 no.7
    • /
    • pp.869-874
    • /
    • 2007
  • In searching for solutions to multiobjective optimization problem, we find that there is no single optimal solution but rather a set of solutions known as 'Pareto optimal set'. To find approximation of ideal pareto optimal set, search capability of diverse individuals at population space can determine the performance of evolutionary algorithms. This paper propose the method to maintain population diversify and to find non-dominated alternatives in Game model based Co-Evolutionary Algorithm.

Design Optimization of Axial Flow Fan Using Genetic Algorithm (유전자 알고리즘을 이용한 축류 송풍기 설계최적화)

  • Lee, Sang-Hwan;Ahn, Cheol-O
    • The KSFM Journal of Fluid Machinery
    • /
    • v.7 no.2 s.23
    • /
    • pp.7-13
    • /
    • 2004
  • In an attempt to solve multiobjective optimization problems, weighted sum method is most widely used for the advantage that a designer can consider the relative significance of each object functions by weight values but it can be highly sensitive to weight vector and occasionally yield a deviated optimum from the relative weighting values designer designated because the multiobjective function has the form of simple sum of the product of the weighting values and the object functions in traditional approach. To search the design solution agree well to the designer's weighting values, we proposed new multiobjective function which was the functional of each normalized objective functions and considered to find the design solution comparing the distance between the characteristic line and the ideal optimum. In this study, proposed multiobjective function was applied to design high efficiency and low noise axial flow fan and the result shows this approach is effective for the case that the quality of the design can be highly affected by the designer's subjectiveness represented as weighting values in multiobjective design optimization process.

Design Optimization of Axial Flow Fan Using Genetic Algorithm (유전자 알고리즘을 이용한 축류 송풍기 설계최적화)

  • Yoo, In-Tae;Ahn, Cheol-O;Lee, Sang-Hwan
    • 유체기계공업학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 2003.12a
    • /
    • pp.397-403
    • /
    • 2003
  • In an attempt to solve multiobjective optimization problems, weighted sum method is most widely used for the advantage that a designer can consider the relative significance of each object functions by weight values but it can be highly sensitive to weight vector and occasionally yield a deviated optimum from the relative weighting values designer designated because the multiobjective function has the form of simple sum of the product of the weighting values and the object functions in traditional approach. To search the design solution well agree to the designer's weighting values, we proposed new multiobjective function which is the functional of each normalized objective functions and considered to find the design solution comparing the distance between the characteristic line and the ideal optimum. In this study, proposed multiobjective function was applied to design high efficiency and low noise axial flow fan and the result shows this approach will be effective for the case that the qualify of the design can be highly affected by the designer's subjectiveness represented as weighting values in multiobjective design optimization process.

  • PDF