• 대한안전경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한안전경영과학회 2007년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.311-317
• /
• 2007

This study introduces 2007 criteria of Malcom Baldridge National Quality Award (MBNQA) for performance excellence. Baldridge criteria is composed of the seven categories such as leadership, strategic planning, customer and market focus, measurement, analysis, and knowledge management, workforce focus, process management, and results. Moreover this paper proposes various integrated systems with MBNQA.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제37권1호
• /
• pp.10-19
• /
• 2009

The objective of this study is to analyze the causal relationship among Non-profit Criteria of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award(MBNQA) and to compare the casuality among company, hospital and non-profit organization field. The survey instrument consists of 94 questions from the seven categories of the MBNQA. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is used to analyze the empirical data and estimates the path coefficients among the MBNQA categories. The result of our research is as follows, First, the Leadership effects on as a driver of all factors. Secondly, the positive effect of the Foundation on the Direction and the System categories, Finally, the positive influence of the Direction on the System categories of the MBNQA model. In this study, most hypothesis are statistically significant.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.82-90
• /
• 2000

MBNQA(Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award) was established in 1987 in order to promote the spread of TQM in U.S. Likewise, JQA(Japanese Quality Award) was set up in 1995 in order to upgrade the level of TQM activities in Japan. MBNQA and JQA are quite the same in their basic concepts, values, and the process of the examination, but they differ in the contents of the criteria. The objective of this study is to Identify the differences between MBNQA and JQA in terms of strategy planning category, Therefore, in this paper, strategy planning category is analyzed, especially its theoretical validity is examined by literature review. The major differences are as follows: JQA emphasizes strongly the evaluation process than MBNQA by requiring the measuring of the level of strategic achievement. On the other hand, in MBNQA, strategic objectives must be estimated by decision analysts techniques, scenario tools, and other statistical methodologies.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.140-150
• /
• 2000

MBNQA(Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award) was established in 1987 in order to promote the spread of TQM in U.S. Likewise, JQA(Japanese Quality Award) was set up in 1995 in order to upgrade the level of TQM activities in Japan. MBNQA and JQA are quite the same in their basic concept, values, and the process of the examination, but they differ in the contents of the criteria. The objective of this study is to identify the differences between MBNQA and JQA in terms of strategy planning category. Therefore, in this paper, strategy planning category is analyzed, especially its theoretical validity is examined by literature review. The major differences are as follows: JQA emphasizes strongly the evaluation process than MBNQA by requiring the measuring of the level of strategic achievement. On the other hand, in MBNQA, strategic objectives must be estimated by decision analysis techniques, scenario tools, and other statistical methodologies.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한산업공학회/한국경영과학회 1995년도 춘계공동학술대회논문집; 전남대학교; 28-29 Apr. 1995
• /
• pp.827-844
• /
• 1995

Total Quality Management (TQM) is the aggregated management philosophy for quality including production, operation, human resource, leadership, marketing, and etc. TQM is the advanced concept and philosophy rather than traditional "Quality Control" or "Quality Assurance". Nowadays, downstream costs has been increased, that made cost accountants' attention to costs of quality. Many countries have developed their own quality awards system in order to improve overall national quality level. The Deming Prize of Japan and Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) of United States are two representatives of quality prizes. We compared the two awards by means of their history, objective, coverage, and judging criteria. Deming Prize has a longer history than MBNQA. Deming Prize selects five winners a year, while MBNQA has two or three areas. The biggest difference is judgement criteria. The Deming Prizes focuses on statistical control which is a traditional quality control method, while MBNQA concentrates on modem business concept such as customer satisfaction. The suggestions to these awards are: evaluate more on information of quality; evaluate more on inter-functional relationship between quality control function and other link more financial success.e financial success.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2005

This paper investigates the effect of introducing MBNQA Model, a representative execution system of TQM with strong management innovation capability, and its Korean version, Korean Quality Award Model, to the Korean companies and analyzes the effect to find out whether the application has improved companies' management quality. The empirical result of this study not only provides the company planning to adopt those management innovation models to enhance their management quality with practical guidelines but also suggest a direction to the first class company.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제35권1호
• /
• pp.73-80
• /
• 2007

The learning, which is a view extended from and replaces the concept of continuous improvement, has become the very core concept in Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. The most potent one among 11 core values in MBNQA Model is 'organizational and personal learning'. Learning also plays a critical role to get the good scores for 6 categories except results category among 7 categories of MBNQA Model. But the concept of learning often has been overlooked by the people who are interested in the MB award or TQM. This paper reviews and analyzes the concept of learning in the MB criteria since it first appears in 1993 to enlighten the importance of learning.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제35권4호
• /
• pp.1-15
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the causal relationship among the MBNQA health care criteria in Korean University Hospitals. The survey instrument consists of 109 questions based on the seven MBNQA health care criteria: '1.Leadership', '2.Strategic Planning', '3.Focus on Patients Other Customers. Markets', '4.Measurement Analysis Knowledge Management', '5.Human Resource Focus', '6.Process Management', and '7.Results'. Structural Equation Modeling(SEM) is used to analyze the path coefficients among the seven categories. The results indicate that fourteen hypotheses are statistically significant, among eighteen hypotheses. Conclusively, this study found that Leadership drives systems that create Results through Foundation and Direction.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.43-62
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the causal relationship among health care criteria in Korean National Mental Hospitals, using Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award(MBNQA). The survey instrument consists of 92 Questions from the seven the MBNQA health care criteria. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is used to analyze the empirical data and estimates the path coefficients among the seven categories. The result of this study indicates that Leadership drives Foundation and Direction, which influence on Systems that creates Results. Conclusively, among 18 hypotheses, 15 are statistically significant.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.84-92
• /
• 2000

1987년 미국 기업의 종합적 품질 경영을 촉진하기 위한 목적으로 제정된 Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award(MBNQA)는 이제 경영 품질의 세계 기준으로 제시되고 있다. 제정 이래 기업 경영 분야에 국한하여 평가되었던 MB상은 1999년도부터 교육 부문과 의료부문까지 확대 시행되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 MB상의 평가 프로세스 및 2000년도 교육 부문 평가 기준의 변화에 대하여 소개하고, 이 평가 기준을 우리나라 대학교육기관에 적용 가능성을 확인하기 위해 연세대학교 공과대학 기전공학부 정보산업 전공과 전기공학 전공에 대하여 적용하여 보았다. 평가 결과 정보산업 전공과 전기공학 전공의 종합점수는 각각 522.5와 548.5이었으며, MB상 평가 기준에서 분류한 기준에 의하면 이 점수대는 많은 세부 영역들에 대해 효과적인 접근 방법이 사용되고 있으나, 일부 세부 영역에 대한 전개는 아직 초기 단계에 머무르고 있다고 기술되어 있다.