• 대한환경공학회지
• /
• 제29권6호
• /
• pp.722-727
• /
• 2007

전과정평가(Life Cycle Assessment; LCA)는 전과정에 걸친 투입과 산출을 정량화하고, 잠재적인 환경 영향을 평가하는 도구이다. 기존 LCA 방법은 시간을 명확하게 고려하지 않는다는 결함이 있다. 또한 정규화(normalization)단계에서도 시간 경계에 관한 문제가 존재한다. 본 연구의 목적은 시간이 고려된 새로운 LCA 방법을 제안하는 것이다. 본 연구에서 제안하는 새로운 LCA 방법론인 '시간-부하 LCA'는 각각의 전과정단계에서 발생하는 환경 부하를 해당 전과정단계에서 소요되는 시간으로 나누는 것이다. 전과정평가에서 시간 고려를 명확히 함으로써 제품 시스템의 환경 영향에 대한 새로운 관점을 제공할 수 있을 뿐만 아니라 정규화 단계의 시간 단위 불일치를 보완할 수 있다. 시간-부하 LCA의 기본 전제는 같은 양의 환경 부하라 하더라도 짧은 시간 동안 발생하는 환경부하가 긴 시간 동안 발생하는 환경 영향보다 더 튼 환경 영향을 미칠 수 있다는 것이다. 그러므로 목록 파라미터가 환경에 미치는 영향을 평가할 때 시간 당 부하를 고려할 필요가 있다.

• 한국철도학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국철도학회 2004년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.533-538
• /
• 2004

Rolling Stock life cycle can not provide weakness of environment due to the absence DB on about environment information for contaminant, expense analysis on each step which consists of raw material-design-manufacture-running-waste step. In order to estimate environmental impacts on LCA for rolling stock system, scientifically and internationally fair standards of assessment method for pursuing environmental friendly in environment regulation policy, application of LCA system is proposed and introduced in the present paper.

• 대한안전경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한안전경영과학회 2005년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.276-280
• /
• 2005

Industrial processes and operations can not be accomplished independently but are connected with each others through suppliers and customer, and these ideas are fundamental notions of Life Cycle Assessment(LCA). This paper will introduce Life Cycle Assessment(LCA) in environment which is rising, and would like to build environmental management system using approach of Quality Function Deployment(QFD) and Safety Function Deployment(SFD) belonging to the assessment method.

• 한국태양에너지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국태양에너지학회 2009년도 추계학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.394-399
• /
• 2009

Since some decades ago, there has been a concern for resource depletion and environmental pollution associated with building properties. In addressing such impact of the built environment, there is a recognition of the existence of alternative building materials, fuels for energy supply as well as technologies for waste handling and disposal. Nevertheless, for long time, the choice between such alternatives was dictated by factors such as differences in prices and aesthetic values. A new important dimension in discriminating between different options is the environmental dimension. This aspect is important since buildings are one of the spatially big new additions to the natural environment that consume a lot of materials and energy during their long lifetime. Thus, with the environmental dimension kept in mind, a existing cost estimation needs to be changed. A new cost assessment method, Life Cycle Cost, should calculate overall costs with dimensional factors: investment and utility costs as well as maintenance costs over the lifetime of the building. Aiming to give an overview of the present status of Building Life Cycle Assessment(LCA) tools as a basis for further research and development including economic performance, this paper describes and compares 3 different tools for Life Cycle Assessment(LCA) and economic analysis of the green buildings. This paper compared these approaches based on various aspects. These include economic analysis method, evaluation duration, data of results(index). Use of the comparison analysis is to produce a better picture and indicate profits and shortcomings for the tools as a group; thus providing important direction improvement of LCA tool as well as further research and development of this group of tools.

• 한국철도학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국철도학회 2007년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.6-14
• /
• 2007

The objective of this research is to comparative LCA(life cycle assessment) between two different model of Electric Motor Unit(EMU).the environmental impact of Aluminum body Electric Motor Unit(EMU) and Stainless Steel(STS) body Electric Motor Unit(EMU). LCA process consists of four steps which are goal, scope definition, life cycle impact analysis(LCIA) and life cycle interpretation. ISO 14044 provides the LCA standard method which can be conducted by using comparative LCA. From the research it is foung that the Aluminium Body Electric Motor Unit (EMU) is 3.6ton heaver than Stainless Steel(STS) body Electric Motor Unit(EMU). The system boundary of both Electric Motor Unit (EMU) are same life span and travel same distance. These both Electric Motor Unit (EMU) has same kind of environmental impact which is maximum Ozone Depletion(OD). During using period of these two models, the Aluminium Body Electric Motor Unit(EMU) has more global warming(GW) effect but Stainless Steel(STS) body Electric Motor Unit(EMU) has more Ozone Depletion(OD) effect. The above result is obtained by using LCA software PASS verson 3.1.3.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.113-130
• /
• 2006

As environmental damage increase by a highly developed material civilization of today, many companies take a growing immensely interest in the influence of environment for beginning a new paradigm year by year. The previous assessments dose not run the gamut of industry but is confined within a certain facility or an area. Industrial processes and operations can not be accomplished independently but are connected with each others through suppliers and customer, and these ideas are fundamental notions of Life Cycle Assessment(LCA). This paper will introduce Life Cycle Assessment(LCA) in environment which is rising, and would like to build environmental management system using approach of Quality Function Deployment(QFD) and Safety Function Deployment(SFD) belonging to the assessment method.

• 상하수도학회지
• /
• 제25권6호
• /
• pp.885-892
• /
• 2011

In this study, LCA(Life Cycle Assessment) on 'Saemangum CSO Project' was carried out to evaluate environmental impact which occurred during the construction and operation periods and the potential environmental impact reduction was analyzed by comparing production and reduction level of pollution loads. LCA was conducted out according to the procedure of ISO14040 which suggested Goal and Scope Definition, Life Cycle Inventory Analysis, Life Cycle Impact Assessment and Interpretation. In the Goal and Scope Definition, the functional unit was 1 m3 of CSO, the system boundary was construction and operation phases, and the operation period was 20 years. For the data collection and inventory analysis, input energies and materials from civil, architecture, mechanical and electric fields are collected from design sheet but the landscape architecture field is excepted. LCIA(Life Cycle Impact Assessment) was performed following the procedure of Eco-Labelling Type III under 6 categories which were resource depletion, eutrophication, global warming, ozone-layer destruction, and photochemical oxide formation. In the result of LCA, 83.4% of environmental impact occurred in the construction phase and 16.6% in the operation phase. Especially 78% of environmental impact occurred in civil works. The Global warming category showed the highest contribution level in the environmental impact categories. For the analysis on potential environmental impact reduction, the reduction and increased of environmental impact which occurred on construction and operation phases were compared. In the case of considering only the operation phase, the result of the comparison showed that 78% of environmental impact is reduced. On the other hand, when considering both the construction and operation phases, 50% of environmental impact is increase. Therefore, this study showed that eco-friendly material and construction method should be used for reduction of environmental impact during life cycle, and it is strongly necessary to develop technology and skills to reduce environmental impact such as renewable energies.

• 대한안전경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한안전경영과학회 2004년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.39-46
• /
• 2004

As environmental damage increase by a highly developed material civilization of today, many companies take a growing immensely interest in the influence of environment for beginning a new paradigm year by year. The previous assessments dose not run the gamut of industry but is confined within a certain facility or an area. Industrial processes and operations can not be accomplished independently but are connected with each others through suppliers and customer, and these ideas are fundamental notions of Life Cycle Assessment(LCA). This paper will introduce Life Cycle Assessment(LCA) n environment which is rising, and would like to build environmental management system using approach of Quality Function Development(QFD) and Safety Function Development(SFD) belonging to the assessment method.

• 자원리싸이클링
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.17-26
• /
• 2002

폐기물 관리법에 의하면 2001년부터 슬러지의 매립이 금지됨에 따라, 매립이외의 다른 처리방식을 도입해야 할 상황이다. 전과 정평가는 제품 및 서비스의 전과정을 통해서 발생하는 환경부하를 정량화 하는 방법으로 대두되고 있으며 환경성에 대한 정책의 입안 및 제품의 비교평가 등 그 활용분야가 다양하다. 본 논문에서는 전과정평가(Life Cycle Assessment, LCA)를 이용하여 슬러지의 처리방법 중 소각, 퇴비화, 고형화에 대한 환경성을 비교 평가하여 적절한 처리방식을 선정하는데 도움이 되고자 하였다. 각각 처리시설의 Data는 구리시 하수처리장의 소각시설, 난지도 하수처리장의 퇴비화 시설, 수도권매립지의 고형화 처리시설을 방문하여 운영자료를 사용하였으며, 국내 D/B로 구축된 전력 및 수송자료도 이용하였다. 전과정 평가를 수행한 결과 퇴비화가 가장 낮은 환경 부하를 나타냈고. 고형화 처리방식이 가장 큰 환경부하를 나타냈다.

• 상하수도학회지
• /
• 제19권6호
• /
• pp.809-818
• /
• 2005

Comprehensive environmental impact of wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) was evaluated with life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology based on ISO 14040. As environmental impact assessment method, Eco-indicator 95 and Eco-indicator 99 were used. The studied WWTP had a capacity of $100,000m^3/d$, and its life span of civil structure and main machinery was designed to 40 years and 20 years, respectively. As the results, more than 95% of environmental impact was produced by using electricity and chemical use in operation stage. In construction stage, temporary shoring facility was the major reason of environmental load, however, its impact was much less than those by operation utilities.