• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제35권4호
• /
• pp.619-628
• /
• 2015

이 연구의 목적은 동형검사를 활용한 진단 및 형성평가가 초등과학 수업에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 진단 및 형성평가의 문항 및 학업성취도 문항을 개발하여 수업에 적용 및 투입하였는데 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 진단평가를 실시한 과학수업은 학생들의 과학 학업성취도를 향상시켰다. 둘째, 형성평가를 실시한 과학 수업에서는 학생들의 과학 학업성취도 향상에 도움을 주지못하였으며, 자기주도적 학습 태도의 영역 중에서는 학습기회의 개방성 영역만 향상시켰다. 셋째, 진단 및 형성평가 실시한 과학 수업에서는 학생들의 과학 학업성취도를 향상시켰으며, 자기주도적 학습 태도의 영역 중에서 문제 해결 기술을 제외한 학습기회의 개방성, 학습에 대한 주도성, 학습에 대한 애착 영역을 향상시켰다. 따라서 이 연구에서는 학생들의 학업성취도와 자기주도적 학습 태도를 향상시키기 위해서는 형성평가를 진단평가와 함께 실시해야 함을 강조하였다.

• 대한예방한의학회지
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.13-31
• /
• 2021

Objectives : The objectives of this study are to provide the education of communication skills in the class of theories of Korean medical famous physicians and to survey students' perception of the effect. Methods : The class of theories of Korean medical famous physicians was newly designed and was given to students. The results from the questionnaire survey with second year students at department of Korean medicine were applied to the evaluation of study issues. The scale used for this study was the modified version of 'Beyer-Fetzer's Essential Elements of Communication Skills Assessment Sheet', which was developed by researchers in line with the education of Korean medicine. Results : In six (except for 'opening a conversation') out of seven categories, post-test results were more improved than pretest results. In the category of communication skills (a total of 25 questions), post-test results were higher than pretest results in all items. Among them, 13 items were statistically significant. With regard to the question as to how important the class of communication skills is to raise their professionalism as Korean medicine doctor, post-test result was higher than pretest result. Regarding an appropriate education point of time, there were various points in the entire period of curriculum. The appropriateness of teaching-learning method was positively evaluated. In terms of the content helpful for learning, learner-oriented activities was preferred over teacher-oriented lecturing. Conclusions : The communication skills learned in the class of theories of Korean medical famous physicians were effective. Communications skills should be taught constantly in the entire curriculum in order to raise students' professionalism as Korean medicine doctor. In terms of education method, it is desirable to design a class based on students' various activities, rather than lecturing.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.506-515
• /
• 2001

중학교 3학년 학생들이 과학적 탐구과정기능에 대한 자기평가를 신뢰롭게 할 수 있는지 알아보기 위해 학생의 평가가 교사의 평가와 얼마나 일치하는지, 교사에 비해 자신을 얼마나 높게 혹은 낮게 평가하는지 알아보았다. 학생들은 탐구과정 기능에 초점이 맞추어진 점검표를 이용하여 개방적 탐구 후에 작성한 보고서를 자기평가 하였다. 학생의 자기평가와 교사의 평가가 일치하는 정도는 평균 73% 이었다. '자기평가능력'의 남녀간 차이는 없었으나, '성취도'를 기준으로 한 상 중 하 집단의 차이가 있었다. '자기평가능력'은 '성취도와 상관이 있는 것으로 나타났고, 여학생의 경우 상관 관계가 더 높았다. 탐구과정기능의 영역 중에서 '자기평가능력'이 높은 영역은 결과정리 및 해석 영역이었고, 가장 낮은 영역은 결론도출영역이었다. '자기평가경향'을 분석한 결과 전체 학생들은 평균적으로 교사보다 자신의 능력을 조금 높게 평가하였다. 탐구계획 영역의 항목들과 변인통제 항목은 교사에 비해 자신을 낮게 평가하였고, 결론도출 영역의 항목들은 교사보다 자신을 높게 평가하였다. 상위권 학생들은 교사보다 평가항목에 대한 기대 수준이 높아 자신을 낮게 평가하였고, 특히 하위권 학생들은 평가항목에 대한 기대수준이 교사보다 낮아 자신을 교사보다 높게 평가하는 경향이 두드러졌다.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.937-957
• /
• 2013

This study was conducted for the purpose of developing the UCC project teaching and learning model based on the rationale which are applicable effectively in the field of university education. Firstly, we have designed the rationale based on the research of documents and preceding researches about teaching method models. Secondly, we have developed the UCC project teaching and learning model. the UCC project teaching and learning model based on the rationale was assessed by the professional formative evaluation group and tested in the field of university education in advance and thereafter. It was finally rectified and supplemented. Particularly, any corrections were to be made repeatedly in the stage of developing of the UCC project. And also, during the assessment and arrangement process, it was designed for the study participants to feel a sense of achievement as learners who combine knowledge and attitudes toward participants'subjects of the curriculum and professional vocational skills by performing the nursing science training scene which could happen in the field. Thirdly, the final version of the UCC project teaching and learning model was verified in its effectiveness by being applied in the field of the nursing science education in the $2^{nd}$ step. As a result, we noticed that learners diverse abilities were improved through systemic process and performing elements such as teaching plan which was needed for designing the UCC project in the field, making storyboard and skills for making video contents. We hope that the UCC project teaching and learning model in this study will be used by the students for designing, developing and utilizing educational UCCs which are necessary in industrial fields and it will contribute for training university students as professionals having the practical skills in the field.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.241-263
• /
• 2011

학교 교육의 내실화 및 교사의 수업 전문성을 높이기 위한 노력의 일환으로 최근에 이르기까지 국가 수준의 차원에서 좋은 수업 선정 및 사례에 관한 연구, 수업평가 시행을 위한 기준 개발에 관한 연구, 그리고 교사 지식에 관한 특징 규명 및 이를 통한 수업 컨설팅에 관한 연구 등이 교과별로 꾸준히 시행되어 왔다. 이의 궁극적 목적은 교사 지식의 중요성을 인식하여 이 부문의 계발을 통해 교사의 전문성을 신장시키고 자 함이다. 이의 실천적 방안의 하나로, 교사 자신 및 동료 교사의 수업평가는 매우 중요한 역할을 할 것이며, 이에 관한 평가기준 개발 및 관련 연구는 의미 있는 일이라 하겠다. 이에 따라, 본 연구에서는 수학 수업 및 평가에서의 교사 지식에 관한 여러 선행 연구를 바탕으로, 교사의 교수 학습 방법 및 평가에 관한 지식에 초점을 두어 이 에 적합한 수업평가의 요소를 탐색하고자 하였다.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.125-131
• /
• 2016

Recent changes in educational paradigms that emphasize the performance or outcomes of education are redefining how learning objectives are being described as 'learning outcomes' in various academic disciplines. Medical education is not an exception to this trend. However, it has come to our attention that the key concepts and appropriate descriptions of learning outcomes have not been well understood among educators and that this lack of understanding has hindered our efforts to implement the practice in the field. This study aims to provide a direction to establish and describe learning outcomes by examining previous studies that have focused on setting learning objectives as well as learning outcomes. Setting and describing learning outcomes starts from reflection on the approach of behavioral learning objectives, which overemphasizes learner's acquired knowledge, skills, and attitude in each classroom rather than actual performance. On the other hand, the learning outcome approach focuses on what the learner is able to do as a result of a learning experience. This approach is more learner-friendly and encourages students to lead and be responsible for their learning process. Learning outcomes can best be described when the relevance of actual contexts and the hierarchy of learning objectives are considered. In addition, they should be in the form of context, task, performance, and level, as well as be planned with proper assessment and feedback procedures. When these conditions are met, the learning outcome approach is beneficial to students as it presents a curriculum that is more open to learners. Despite these advantages of the learning outcome approach, there is a possible concern that setting the learning outcomes and describing them can restrict evaluation to lower cognitive skills if the concept of learning outcome is narrowly interpreted or is set too low. To avoid such narrow applications, it is important for educators to understand the comprehensiveness of the learning outcome setting and to consider long-term outcomes embedded in an organizational vision rather than only short-term behavioral outcomes.

• 한국임상약학회지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.291-299
• /
• 2013

Purpose: Problem-based learning (PBL) has been adopted to foster active and self-directed learning and enhance critical thinking and problem-solving skills in many health-care academic disciplines in Korea. Interest in PBL has rapidly grown with a 6 year pharmacy degree program in Korea. The objective of this study was to evaluate feasibility of PBL, student satisfaction and academic performance with a self-assessment survey questionnaire. Method: Sixty students participated in the PBL for pharmacotherapy course. Average scores from student self-assessment on participation, satisfaction, and academic performance were $3.85{\pm}0.55$, $2.94{\pm}1.04$, $3.09{\pm}0.91$ out of 5 point lickert scale (1-do not agree at all, 5-agree completely), respectively. Results & Conclusion: The level of participation was positively correlated with improvement of communication skill in academic performance (correlation coefficient 0.27, p=0.037). In the quality analysis of the cases provided for PBL, students who participated more in the PBL greatly agreed the cases given were appropriate to learn fundamental knowledge for each disease state. The students disagreed that PBL was fun. The students stated that PBL was good to experience self-directed learning and clinical context beforehand but too time-consuming to devote and too demanding to commit. Lack of facilitator and insight on active learning should be rectified for successful launch of PBL in Korean pharmacy education.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.177-196
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study is to help teachers and program developers develop comprehensive and authentic assessment models with appropriate ways of using various kinds of assessment tools in college English instruction and assessment. Assessing by traditional discrete tests based on grammar and vocabulary cannot measure the authentic ability for language use in meaningful context in the real world. Currently, the trend in language assessment is changing to performance assessment. Increased use of performance assessments that involve language students in selecting and reflecting on their learning means that language teachers will have a wider range of evidence on which to judge whether students are becoming purposeful and are able to communicate as English users. Also, language programs focused on performance assessment are likely to instil in students authentic skills related to communication in the global world and enable them to evaluate what they learn from their English classes. In this study, the author investigated the theoretical background, the need of change, and several types of performance assessment.

• Educational Technology International
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.183-205
• /
• 2022

Mental status examination is an important stage in the assessment process because it serves as the foundation for establishing nursing diagnosis and intervention. Until now many students still feel difficult to understand the terms in the assessment of mental status. Interactive Mobile Learning in one of the media that is currently being developed. The use of this media will provide more in-depth learning opportunities, and students can practice their skills in carrying out practicals because of the mobility principle possessed by smartphones. The purpose of this study was to develop a smartphone-based app and evaluate the app's effectiveness by measuring nursing students' knowledge of mental status examination. Design: A randomized trial with a pre-and post-test design was conducted at a university in Indonesia. A total of seventy junior nursing students participated in this study. The intervention group received a smartphone-based app, and the control group received one-time lecture-based learning. We offered the experimental group the app and information about how to use it, and we encouraged them to use it. The control group received classroom instruction. Results: The intervention group scored significantly higher than the control group on knowledge score (t = 19.40, p = 0.000) and satisfaction with the learning method (t = 0.640, p = 0.021) Conclusion: These findings suggest that smartphonebased education could be an effective method in nursing education for teaching mental status examinations.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.173-184
• /
• 1995

The purpose of this study was to analyse the problems of 'Science Inquiry Experiment Contest(SIEC)' which was one of 8 programs of 'The 2nd Student Science Inquiry Olympic Meet(SSIOM)'. The results and conclusions of this study were as follows: 1. It needs to reconsider the role of practical work within science experiment because practical work skills form one of the mainstays in current science. But the assessment of students' laboratory skills in the contest was made little account of. It is necessary to remind of what it means to be 'good at science'. There are two aspects: knowing and doing. Both are important and, in certain respects, quite distinct. Doing science is more of a craft activity, relying more on craft skill and tacit knowledge than on the conscious application of explicit knowledge. Doing science is also divided into two aspects, 'process' and 'skill' by many science educators. 2. The report's and checklist's assessment items were overlapped. Therefore it was suggested that the checklist assessment items were set limit to the students' acts which can't be found in reports. It is important to identify those activities which produce a permanent assessable product, and those which do not. Skills connected with recording and reporting are likely to produce permanent evidence which can be evaluated after the experiment. Those connected with manipulative skills involving processes are more ephemeral and need to be assessed as they occur. The division of student's experimental skills will contribute to the accurate assess of student's scientific inquiry experimental ability. 3. There was a wide difference among the scores of one participant recorded by three evaluators. This means that there was no concrete discussion among the evaluators before the contest. Despite the items of the checklists were set by preparers of the contest experiments, the concrete discussions before the contest were necessary because students' experimental acts were very diverse. There is a variety of scientific skills. So it is necessary to assess the performance of individual students in a range of skills. But the most of the difficulties in the assessment of skills arise from the interaction between measurement and the use. To overcome the difficulties, not only must the mark needed for each skill be recorded, something which all examination groups obviously need, but also a description of the work that the student did when the skill was assessed must also be given, and not all groups need this. Fuller details must also be available for the purposes of moderation. This is a requirement for all students that there must be provision for samples of any end-product or other tangible form of evidence of candidates' work to be submitted for inspection. This is rather important if one is to be as fair as possible to students because, not only can this work be made available to moderators if necessary, but also it can be used to help in arriving at common standards among several evaluators, and in ensuring consistent standards from one evaluator over the assessment period. This need arises because there are problems associated with assessing different students on the same skill in different activities. 4. Most of the students' reports were assessed intuitively by the evaluators despite the assessment items were established concretely by preparers of the experiment. This result means that the evaluators were new to grasp the essence of the established assessment items of the experiment report and that the students' assessment scores were short of objectivity. Lastly, there are suggestions from the results and the conclusions. The students' experimental acts which were difficult to observe because they occur in a flash and which can be easily imitated should be excluded from the assessment items. Evaluators are likely to miss the time to observe the acts, and the students who are assessed later have more opportunity to practise the skill which is being assessed. It is necessary to be aware of these problems and try to reduce their influence or remove them. The skills and processes analysis has made a very useful checklist for scientific inquiry experiment assessment. But in itself it is of little value. It must be seen alongside the other vital attributes needed in the making of a good scientist, the affective aspects of commitment and confidence, the personal insights which come both through formal and informal learning, and the tacit knowledge that comes through experience, both structured and acquired in play. These four aspects must be continually interacting, in a flexible and individualistic way, throughout the scientific education of students. An increasing ability to be good at science, to be good at doing investigational practical work, will be gained through continually, successively, but often unpredictably, developing more experience, developing more insights, developing more skills, and producing more confidence and commitment.