• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.89-106
• /
• 1998

This essay addresses the role of environmental aesthetics in landscape architecture : how can environmental aesthetics enrich landscape architectural theory and practice\ulcorner It begins by criticizing the predominant notions toward theory : theory as an instrumental design method, theoretical vacuum in modernism of landscape architecture, and the intimate relation of theory and practice in 18th-century England. It suggests that the expulsion of theory in landscape architectural academics and profession is nothing but an inappropriate bias. In the second place, the essay explores a remaining question : why environmental aesthetics is a part of landscape architectural theory\ulcorner I would argue that environmental aesthetics can transcend the man-nature(subject-object) dichotomy, one of heritages of Western modernity project. Here, landscape architecture meets environmental aesthetics, and both can intermediate between theory and practice. For landscape architecture is (and ought to be) a device of embodied communication, creating symbolic settings wherein an interconnection of man and nature can occur. Finally, this essay examines the aesthetics of engagement that Arnold Berleant claimed recently. This theory of aesthetic experience has a possibility of making corrections some improper conventions in landscape architectural creation and appreciation : disinterested contemplation, visual-orientedness, decoration-denteredness, and so forth. I would conclude that environmental aesthetics can be a significant theory which can correct misconceptions in landscape design and appreciation and, further, can lead contemporary practice. As the great mediator between man and nature, between theory and practice, environmental aesthetics has a profound role to play in the realm of landscape architecture, and vice versa.

• 한국조경학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국조경학회 2023년도 춘계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.27-28
• /
• 2023

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제31권6호
• /
• pp.107-119
• /
• 2004

special subjects, from basic data-building to applied design itself, and from how-why studies to theory building research. It seems that the research concerns are mainly the explanation of the processes of design projects rather than the application and expression of design theory and conceptual work itself. The articles do not show a clear trend or design concerns that would lead landscape architecture firms or its market. A few articles deal with aesthetical theory and with design criticism that could be one of landscape design's fundamental theories. It is not enough to regard the Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture as the main stream of contemporary Korean landscape design trends. More research in the field of landscape design need to focus on pre-research work rather than on post-work reports. More research work in the field of landscape aesthetics is also required. The format of the journal needs to be reformed to include more design research papers that are of a free-presentation style in nature.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제31권5호
• /
• pp.73-85
• /
• 2003

With more and more people paying attention to substantial democracy, participatory democracy is presented as a practical strategy and an index of Korean democracy. In this social and political atmosphere, participation in environmental planning and design is essential. Nonetheless, the true meaning of “participation” is not used properly because many people do not understand it correctly, The concept of social and political participation is “the action or attempt of ordinary members of society for affecting on the result of decision making.” Based on this concept, participation is accomplished through conventional means and as a form of mobilization in environmental planning and desist Most of the theories on public participation in landscape architecture are technical theories. Therefore, this paper proposes that planning and design of landscape architecture be understood as a communicative action that aims to enable stakeholders to reach a consensus through communication. This study offers the framework of theory to understand and practice planning and design of landscape architecture as a communicative action, after reviewing communicative action theory and communicative planning theory. Results suggest that communicative action theory should be accepted in landscape architecture to overcome the shortcomings of instrumental rationality -- the same way planning theory accepted this theory --and to join the culture of experts focusing on the artistic truth and the culture of life of the world. In addition, accepting communicative action theory enables the acquisition of the instrumental effect and social learning effect and the making of social capital. This study also suggested prerequisite for using the method. There should be change in the social institution and in individual action. In addition the method is composed of three steps: creating the atmosphere for communication; communicating, and; reaching a consensus among stakeholders. Finally, raising the possibility of applying the theory presented in this study requires the accumulation of know-how through trial and error.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.33-45
• /
• 1999

The essence of Chinese landscape architecture is realization of a space that embraces nature and human integrating the openness and encloseness. The concept of landscape architecture that artificially furnishes natural elegance into urban areas coincides with the spiritual basis of Chinese literati-painting which subjectifies the scenery of objective world and entrusts personal feelings on that. In other words, the ultimate ideal of Chinese landscape architecture is embodying the Utopia of confucian intellectual in a city. This paper has tried to shed a light on inter-relationship of literati-painting theory and Chinese landscape architecture theory through comparing them. It is the identical spiritual basis they shared harmoniously that made landscape architecture, poetry and painting possible to meet.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제52권3호
• /
• pp.1-17
• /
• 2024

본 연구는 한국 조경을 살펴보기 위해 조경가 정영선에 집중하였다. 이를 위해 2014년까지의 작가의 사고, 정영선과 서안 작품, 관련 담론(조경가, 조경작품, 조경담론) 등을 대상으로, 조경설계안, 조경작품, 조경가의 사고 및 그것의 조경이론화 과정, 조경작품과 조경가의 설계사고 사이의 관계 등을 살펴보고 인터뷰(정영선 및 관련 인사), 문헌조사, 설계작품 분석 등의 방법으로 접근하였다. 자료를 종합한 결과 정영선 조경을 구분하여 볼 때, 조경을 처음 접하고 이를 수련하며 실무에 뛰어든 시기부터 독립 사무실을 운영하며 설계의 경향과 설계사고의 깊이를 달리하며 보이는 네 가지의 변곡 지점이 나타난다. 이 과정에서 초기 조경에 대한 학습기를 제외하면 정영선 조경의 범주는 현대 조경, 정원, 전통 조경의 세 가지로 나타났다. 이 세 가지 범주의 조경 활동을 통해 현대 조경의 수입과 내재화(현대조경론), 독자적 정원론의 성립과 그 실천(정원론), 전통 컴플렉스의 극복과 창의적 계승(전통조경론) 등의 세 가지 성취를 보여준다. 종합적으로 볼 때 정영선 조경은 지역주의적 사고와 작가주의적 사고의 실천이라 요약할 수 있다.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.3-12
• /
• 2007

This study examines the nature-introducing methods between Korea Traditional Architecture and Landscape Architecture dividing them into three; semantic methods, constructive methods and visual methods on the basis of architectural features deduced from Borrowed Landscape theory which is a typical nature-introducing theory in the orient. Through the findings of this study, we can explain the nature-introducing methods of Landscape Architecture by way of the method of the Borrowed Landscape which was frequently used by our ancestors for a long time to Introduce nature in the course of building structures, and we can find several similarities between the Architecture of two fields of both different times and areas. It can be said to be meaningful for us to be able to confirm the contemporary value of Traditional nature-introducing method through the Borrowed Landscape theory. However, we can find that there is a difference between Traditional Architecture and Landscape Architecture in looking at nature. If the Landscape Architecture which emerged recently as a result of recognizing the importance of nature, maintains the nature view of regarding nature and architecture as equal, the nature view of Traditional Architecture is essentially different in that it is humble and aims to return to nature. The most outstanding feature of nature-introducing way in Traditional Architecture obviously implies something different from the various architectural trends of 'nature-human', or 'nature-architecture' which appeared breaking the relation of dichotomy. It is the thinking that 'nature and human are continual', and 'human is part of nature'; that is, 'the humbleness to nature'.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.49-60
• /
• 2000

The purpose of this study is to overview domestic and foreign trends in the study of the landscape evaluation through new framework of landscape evaluation studies. 108 studies on the landscape evaluation are summarized and categorized into theoretical studies, verification of theories, development of evaluation methods and applications in physical planning. Major theories in the landscape evaluation came from the psycho-physics, the evolutionary theory ann the cultural-learning theory, and were verified and applied into physical planning. Early experimental researches on landscape evaluation, based on psycho-physics, were focused on relatively simple responses to landscapes. But many studies have been gradually related to the evolutionary theory and the cultural learning theory, emphasizing biological and cultural effects on landscape evaluation. Especially, Appleton's Prospect-Refuge theory' and Kaplans' 'Information Processing model' have very strong influence in landscape evaluation. Relatively there have been many application researches in Korea, which tells there have been strong needs to solve pending practical problems caused by the rapid economic and social growth for several decades. Almost of applications in physical planning are focused on physical features of landscapes, but for more comprehensive landscape evaluation, many other factors such as cognitive and sociocultural variables should be integrated into the whole evaluation system. As a result of reviewing of landscape evaluation studies, I found the overall domestic and foreign trends and the necessity of more research on the applications in physical planning. Because this study mainly focused on academic researches, for more appropriate landscape evaluation and management there should be more practical researches including various approaches.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제37권6호
• /
• pp.85-95
• /
• 2010

근대이전 동아시아의 상류사회는 시서화 삼위일체의 통합체제를 유지해왔고 이에 따라 정원조성의 원리 또한 산수화의 작화원리를 참조하며 발전해 왔다. 본 연구는 중국의 산수화론과 원림론을 비교, 양자 간의 상호관계를 검토함으로써 동양그림의 경관관이 원림의 작정원리에 미친 영향을 고찰하고자 하였다. 양자 간의 비교는 내용과 형식의 양 측면에서 이루어졌다. 여기서 내용은 주로 가치와 의미 등 비가시적 측면을 말하고, 형식은 주로 시각과 공간 등 가시적 측면을 말한다. 먼저 산수화론에 있어 내용면의 주요 주제는 무엇보다도 '기운생동(氣韻生動)'이었다. 이는 음양사상을 기반으로한 동양문화 고유의 가치인데, 남조의 사혁이 이론화한 것이다. 이에 대응하는 원림론의 주요 주제는 '풍수(風水)'와 '의경(意境)'이었다. 풍수 역시 음양사상을 기반으로 한 지기(地氣)의 원리이고, '의경'이란 시서화 공동의 가치로서 마음의 경지를 의미하는데, 특히 원림론에서는 가시적 경관 이면의 상징적 의미를 말하고 있다. 형식면에서 산수화론의 두드러진 주제는 북송조 곽희에 의해 정립된 '삼원법(三遠法)'이라는 일종의 동양화의 투시도법으로 다원적 조망을 특징으로 한다. 이에 대응하는 원림론의 주제는 '인지(因地)'와 '차경(借景)'으로 명조의 계성이 이론화하였으며, 각각 대상지 내외부 경관자원의 조성과 차용을 의미한다. 특히 차경의 세목들은 삼원법의 각 관점에 대응하고 있다. 결론적으로 동아시아 원림론에 등장하는 주요 개념들은 화론과 매우 긴밀하게 연관되어 있었으며 이로서 원림술은 예술의 한 분야로 인정받아 왔다.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제49권5호
• /
• pp.12-26
• /
• 2021

본 연구의 목적은 조경의 측면에서는 크게 주목받지 못했던 르 르코뷔지에의 건축과 조경이 모더니즘 조경에 미친 영향과 유산을 객관적인 관점에서 분석하는 데 있다. 본 연구는 세 부분으로 나누어 르 코르뷔지에와 모더니즘 조경의 관계를 고찰하였다. 첫 번째 부분에서는 시기별로 르 코르뷔지에의 이론과 실천에서 나타나는 건축과 조경의 관계를 살펴보고, 르 코르뷔지에의 조경에 대한 당시의 평가를 분석하였다. 두 번째 부분에서는 르 코르뷔지에가 동 시대에 활동했던 주요한 유럽의 조경가에게 미쳤던 영향력을 베라, 뤼르사, 칸네일 클라에스를 중심으로 살펴보고, 유럽의 모더니즘 조경과 르 코르뷔지에의 관계를 분석하였다. 세 번째 부분에서는 르 코르뷔지에가 주요한 영미권의 모더니즘 조경가에게 미쳤던 영향력을 살펴보았다. 본 연구는 르 코르뷔지에가 당시 유럽과 미국의 모더니즘 조경가들에게 큰 영향을 미침으로써 모더니즘 조경의 형성 과정에 영향을 주었다는 사실을 밝혀내었다. 르 코르뷔지에의 이론과 실천은 일방적으로 현대 조경의 담론 내로 받아들여졌기보다는 부정적인 평가와 긍정적인 평가가 공존한 상태에서 선택적으로 수용되었다. 칸레일 클라에스, 터너드, 에크보와 같은 조경가들은 자신의 이론과 실천을 확립하면서 르 르코뷔지에를 적극적으로 수용하였지만, 스틸과 로즈의 경우 르 코르뷔지에의 조경에 대한 비판적인 입장에 있었다. 또한, 처치, 카일리와 같이 르 코르뷔지에에게 간접적으로 영향을 받아 모더니즘 조경의 양식을 구축한 조경가들도 있었다.