Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지

A Study on Landscape Architecture Planning and Design as Communicative Action

의사소통 행위로서의 조경계획 및 설계에 대한 연구

  • 김연금 (서울시립대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 이규목 (서울시립대학교 도시과학대 건축도시조경학부)
  • Published : 2003.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

With more and more people paying attention to substantial democracy, participatory democracy is presented as a practical strategy and an index of Korean democracy. In this social and political atmosphere, participation in environmental planning and design is essential. Nonetheless, the true meaning of “participation” is not used properly because many people do not understand it correctly, The concept of social and political participation is “the action or attempt of ordinary members of society for affecting on the result of decision making.” Based on this concept, participation is accomplished through conventional means and as a form of mobilization in environmental planning and desist Most of the theories on public participation in landscape architecture are technical theories. Therefore, this paper proposes that planning and design of landscape architecture be understood as a communicative action that aims to enable stakeholders to reach a consensus through communication. This study offers the framework of theory to understand and practice planning and design of landscape architecture as a communicative action, after reviewing communicative action theory and communicative planning theory. Results suggest that communicative action theory should be accepted in landscape architecture to overcome the shortcomings of instrumental rationality -- the same way planning theory accepted this theory --and to join the culture of experts focusing on the artistic truth and the culture of life of the world. In addition, accepting communicative action theory enables the acquisition of the instrumental effect and social learning effect and the making of social capital. This study also suggested prerequisite for using the method. There should be change in the social institution and in individual action. In addition the method is composed of three steps: creating the atmosphere for communication; communicating, and; reaching a consensus among stakeholders. Finally, raising the possibility of applying the theory presented in this study requires the accumulation of know-how through trial and error.

Keywords

References

  1. 서울대학교 철학과 석사학위 논문 하버마스의 토의적 민주주의 이론 연구: 민주주의에 대한 규범적이고 사회학적인 연구 강병호
  2. 참여의 철학과 참여민주주의 (참여사회연구소편 "참여와 한국 사회") 김대환
  3. 지방자치와 참여민주주의 (참여사회연구소 편, "참여와 한국 사회") 김만흠
  4. 한국조경학회지 v.31 no.1 주민 참여를 통한 도시 소공원 설계 및 조성 김영모
  5. 대한부동산학회 v.6 no.0 점증적 계획이론의 과제 김영모
  6. 하버마스 사상의 형성과 발전 (김재현 등, "하버마스의 사상") 김재현
  7. 도시는 미디어 김찬호
  8. 문화도시 서울 어떻게 만들 것인가 문화연대
  9. 커뮤니티를 위한 도시계획 및 설계 미후네야스미치;도시및마을만들기연구체
  10. 환경과 조경 v.151 우리시대의 설계언어: 프랑스(15) - 피에르 도나디유. 경관의 창조적인 보전을 위하여 박정욱
  11. 서울대학교 환경대학원 2002년 21세기 국가발전과 국토 환경에 대한 세미나 자료집 지방자치와 지역발전의 연계 소지광
  12. 한국의 도시 경관 이규목
  13. 지방행정연구 v.4 no.4 계획이론에 있어 새로운 패러다임의 모색 이수장
  14. 한국조경학회지 v.30 no.6 프레데릭 로 옴스테드의 도시공원관에 대한 재해석 조경진
  15. 시민교통 창간 준비 no.4 일본의 주민참가와 마치즈쿠리 최선주
  16. 한국일보
  17. Theory in Practice Agris,C.;D.Schon
  18. Landscape & Planning v.45 Using visualization techniques for enhancing public participation in planning and design: process, implementation, and evaluation Al-Kodmany https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00024-9
  19. Landscape Desing v.306 Groundwork at 21 Duxbury
  20. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment Fischer
  21. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space v.1 The geography of planning practice Forester;John https://doi.org/10.1068/d010163
  22. The Deliberative Practitioner Forester;John
  23. In the svddeutdche Seitung of 5-6 December Modern and Postmodern Architecture Harbermas.J.
  24. Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns;소통행위 이론 Harbermas,J.;서규환 (외 역)
  25. Die Neue Unvbersichtlichkeit Harbermas,J.
  26. Juror Comment: What Makes Participation Exemplary?, in places v.14 no.1 Hester,R.T
  27. journal of the American Planning Association v.64 no.1 Knowledge and Public Policy Innes;Judith https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369808975956
  28. Journal of American Planning Association v.65 no.4 Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systmes Innes;Judith;David E.Booher https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369908976071
  29. Landscape Journal v.18 no.1 Participation and community at the landscape scale Jones,Stanton https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.18.1.65
  30. Modern Landscape Architecture: Redefining the Garden Jory,J.
  31. Landscape journal v.19 no.1 Architecture and Societal Values: Evidence from the Literature Kapper;Chenoweth https://doi.org/10.1080/01426399408706445
  32. in Naturschutz und landschaftsplanung v.33 no.2/3 Wessen Landscahft planen wir? Luz,F.;U.Weiland
  33. The American Prospect v.13 no.spring The Prosperous Community Putnam;Robert
  34. Brook-field USA:Avebury Communicative Planning theory Sager;Tore
  35. Community participation methods in design and planning Sanoff;Henry
  36. The Reflective Practitioner Schon,D.
  37. 인간의 도시 The Humane City Short;JohnR.
  38. A thesis presented to the faculty of Graduate studies of The University of Guelph Communicating Landscape Architecture Sommerville;Shiona,L.
  39. London: E & FN Spon Ecology, community and delight sources of values in landscape architecture Thompson;Ian,H.
  40. The Structure of Sociological Theory;현대 사회학 이론 Tumer;Jonathan,H.;정태환 (외 역)
  41. The Architectural Review v.177 no.1058 Co-op Consolidation Wates,N.
  42. Reconstructing the Environment Reconnecting People, Rebuilding Families