• International Journal of Human Ecology
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.23-33
• /
• 2009

This study identified the appropriateness of acceptance models of smart clothing and differences in the hypothesis of the path to clothing acceptance by classifying consumers depending on the level of technology innovation and fashion innovation through the extended TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) presented by Chae (2009). 815 copies of data were collected from adults over twenty living in major South Korean cities and analyzed them using a SPSS 15.0 and AMOS 5.0 package. Based on the average value of technology innovation and fashion innovation, the respondents were classified into: Group 1 with high technology innovation and fashion innovation, Group 2 with high technology innovation but low fashion innovation, Group 3 with low technology innovation but high fashion innovation, and Group 4 with low technology innovation and fashion innovation. The appropriateness of models for the four classified groups was verified. The analysis proved that an extended TAM for each classified group explains the acceptance process of smart clothing; especially the appropriateness of model of Group 1 and Group 4 was comparatively higher than other groups. Perceived usefulness was revealed as the key variable that affects consumer attitudes to accept smart clothing. Perceived ease of use has indirect positive effects on consumer attitudes passing through perceived usefulness and clothing involvement partly exerted impacts on consumer attitudes and the intention of acceptance. The mediating role of attitudes to explain the intention of the acceptance of smart clothing is high and suggests that it is necessary to take a positive role to help the consumer perceive the functional and useful aspects of the clothing.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.38-64
• /
• 2002

This paper presents research linking national culture and innovation. The research identifies how key features of Korean culture, collectivism and hierarchical authoritarianism, affect technological innovation. This perspective casts new light on cultural research that, while generally confirming national culture-innovation ties at the organization level, has had less success accounting for culture barriers to innovation in collectivist nations, especially at the interorganizational level. The data for this study was obtained from interviews and written sources. The paper introduces the concept of the social shaping of technology, with which the influence of culture on technological innovation is analyzed, and highlights the development of EDI systems in the collectivist Korean society. It draws attention to the interorganizational basis of collectivism and authoritarianism in the technology innovation process. Finally, Korean innovation systems are questioned, and some negative effects of the collectivist Korean culture at the interorganizational level are discussed.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.1-16
• /
• 2016

Technology supply has been the main thrust of the Korean government's science & technology policy, focusing on the development and acquisition of new technology in line with the catching-up strategy of economic growth and industrial development. However, new social or societal problems have become major government policy issues, heralding new innovation policy aimed to address them. Such new policy initiatives for social problem-solving present a niche where the existing system of government innovation policy process is challenged, including such processes as goal-setting, planning, implementation, project management, and evaluation. The rigidity of the existing institution of government innovation policy, however, still shapes the content and progression of innovation policy for social problem-solving. This study reviews Korean innovation policy for social problem-solving as a policy niche, and aims to clarify its challenges and opportunities. It uses a system transition framework to explain the emergence and evolution of the innovation policy niche in Korea. The main research question is to what extent and in what aspect the existing innovation policy regime shaped innovation policy for social problem-solving. The study examines the inertia of the current paradigm of innovation policies and R&D programs, and sheds light on the search for a distinctive identity for innovation policies that tackles social problems.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.711-735
• /
• 2011

본 연구는 기업이 외부 기관들을 통해 혁신에 필요한 지식을 습득하는 전략이 혁신 성과에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지를 실증적으로 분석한다. 구체적으로 2008년도 한국 제조업 분야 혁신 활동 조사 자료를 사용하여, 외부 지식 원천들을 적극적으로 활용하는 것이 혁신 성과에 어떤 영향을 미치는지를 분석한다. 또한, 흡수능력이 강할 경우, 소기업일 경우, 혁신 보호 방법을 적극적으로 사용할 경우 외부 지식을 활용하는 전략이 혁신 창출에 보다 효과적이 되는지 여부도 분석한다. 본 연구를 통해 발견한 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 외부 지식 활용의 효과는 혁신 유형에 따라 다르다. 즉, 외부 지식 활용은 점진적 혁신에 효과적이나 급진적 혁신에는 효과적이지 않다. 둘째, 연구 개발에 많은 투자를 하는 기업의 경우 외부 지식 활용이 증가하면 점진적 혁신 성과도 증가한다. 셋째, 소기업이 급진적 혁신을 추진하는 경우 외부 지식을 활용하는 전략의 효과는 더욱 크다. 넷째, 혁신 보호 방법을 적극적으로 사용하는 기업들의 경우 외부 지식을 활용하는 방식은 점진적 혁신을 추진하는데 효과적이지 못하다.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.331-353
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 2008년과 2010년 한국 제조업 부문 기술혁신조사 자료를 이용하여 비기술적 혁신 활동이 기업의 기술적 혁신 성과에 어떤 영향을 미치는지를 실증 분석하였다. 비기술적 혁신 활동을 조직혁신과 마케팅혁신으로 구분하고 각 혁신 활동이 혁신제품의 매출에 미치는 영향을 추정하였다. Tobit모형의 추정결과에 따르면 조직혁신과 마케팅혁신 모두 혁신제품의 매출 비중을 증가시키는 것으로 나타났다. 특히, 비기술적 혁신 활동은 급진적 혁신제품인 시장 최초의 혁신제품에 더 큰 영향을 미치는 것으로 추정되었다. 비기술적 혁신의 세부 유형별로 효과를 추정한 결과에 따르면 조직혁신 중에서는 업무수행방식의 변화만 유의한 효과를 보였으며 마케팅혁신은 제품디자인, 제품홍보, 가격전략 등이 혁신제품의 매출 비중을 높이는 것으로 나타났다.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.49-72
• /
• 2016

Extant research on firm innovation productivity is limited in measuring the innovation productivity, in which they measured firm innovation productivity by using either inputs or outputs of innovation. The present study complemented the extant research by employing Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach to measure firm innovation productivity. Furthermore, this paper examined the effects of firms' external knowledge search, as one of open innovation practices, on firm innovation productivity, for open innovation activities are regarded as an influencing factor on firm innovation productivity in the previous literatures. Using the data of the Korean Innovation Survey (KIS) of manufacturing industries conducted in 2008, this study developed hypotheses in which we considered not only two dimensions of external knowledge search (breadth and depth) but also two subtypes of external knowledge search (market-driven and science-driven). The results found that searching deeply and market-driven search are positively related to firm innovation productivity, but science-driven search is somewhat negatively related to firm innovation productivity. Furthermore, market-driven search can mitigate the negative effect of science-driven search on innovation productivity.

• 과학기술학연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.135-162
• /
• 2015

이 글은 사회문제 해결형 혁신정책의 관점에서 기존 혁신정책을 재해석하고 발전방향을 제시한다. 기존 산업혁신정책의 프레임과 다른 틀로 혁신활동과 정책을 살펴보는 것이다. 이를 위해 먼저 사회문제 해결형 혁신정책이 갖는 정의와 특성을 살펴본다. 여기서는 사회 기술시스템의 전환에 대한 전망과 시민사회의 참여에 대한 강조가 기존 관점과 차별화되는 점이라는 것을 논의한다. 다음에는 사회문제 해결형 혁신정책의 렌즈로 혁신정책의 요소들을 새롭게 해석한다. 혁신 거버넌스, 산업혁신정책, 지역혁신정책, 인프라 구축 정책과 같이 혁신정책의 핵심적 수단을 사회문제 해결형 혁신정책의 관점에서 새롭게 조명하고 발전방향을 제시한다. 이는 과학기술혁신정책을 지속가능한 시스템으로의 전환과 참여의 관점에서 접근하면서 기존 혁신정책 수단을 재해석하고 성찰하는 계기가 될 것이다.

• 벤처창업연구
• /
• 제3권3호
• /
• pp.67-88
• /
• 2008

Innovation has become a key distinct feature of modern industrial society. It is generally recognized that new knowledge and technology are one of the most important sources of innovation. However, because of their limited resources, firms can not pursue all the promising new knowledge and technology that have possibilities to be developed into critical innovation. In this article, using the stakeholder theory, we try to establish a new conceptual model that can be used for understanding knowledge creation and innovation in society. In a society, there exist diverse socio-economic groups that have conflicting values and interests. Our stakeholder theory perspective on innovation claims that innovation can occur only when new solutions can satisfy their idiosyncratic stakeholder' values and interests better than current existing solutions. From the viewpoint of stakeholder innovation theory, there could be three different types of innovation: value improvement innovation, non-traditional value Innovation, and innovation for non-traditional stakeholder.

• 기술경영경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 기술경영경제학회 2005년도 통합학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.5-28
• /
• 2005

This paper estimates the effect of networks on innovative performance at the firm level , using Korean Innovation Survey (KIS) dataset Product innovation, product improvement , and process innovation are used as proxies for innovative activity. The explanatory variables such as firm size, market concentration ratio, lagged profitability, foreign ownership, export ratio, firm's age, formal R&D activity, and industrial R&D intensity are yet other considerations. With two year-long (2000 and 2001) data from 1,124 Korean manufacturing firms, we estimated the logistic regression model. The research finding indicates that the external networks have a strong positive effect on innovative output regardless of type of innovation. However, the network effects by partner (other firms or research institutions) vary across the type of innovation. Especially, we found that the user-supplier linkage plays an important role in product ion innovation, product improvement, and process innovation.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.861-882
• /
• 2013

본 연구는 혁신체제론에 입각해서 국내 생명공학산업의 조직간 혁신네트워크 현황 및 활성화방안을 실증적으로 분석했다. 본 연구의 결과를 요약하면, 다음과 같다. 아직 국내 생명공학산업의 혁신네트워크는 활성화되지 못했지만 혁신네트워크에 참여하고 있는 벤처기업 근무자, 대학교수, 공공연구기관 연구원들은 혁신네트워크 및 혁신네트워크의 성과에 대하여 긍정적으로 평가하고 있다. 이는 국내 생명공학산업의 혁신네트워크가 활성화될 필요성이 있음을 의미한다. 실증분석 결과 혁신네트워크에 참여하는 주체들의 의지와 능력이 제고되고, 혁신네트워크 내 참여주체간 신뢰와 통제가 강화되고, 혁신네트워크내 참여주체들의 기술접근과 자원확보가 잘 이루어진다면, 혁신네트워크는 더욱 활성화될 수 있을 것이다.