• Transactions of the Korean Society of Pressure Vessels and Piping
• /
• v.9 no.1
• /
• pp.20-24
• /
• 2013

Reactor Vessel Internals(RVIs), which are installed within the reactor pressure vessel and support the fuel assembly, take responsibility for safety of reactor core. In operating Nuclear Power Plants(NPPs), the RVIs have been exposed to severe conditions such as neutron irradiation, high temperature, high pressure, and high velocity of coolant flow and have degraded by materials aging with long-term operation. Therefore, the effective aging management plan and the appropriate regulatory requirements are necessary to maintain the integrity of RVIs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a review guide for Periodic Safety Review(PSR) of RVIs in presurized water reactor. The review guide is developed based on the revised review guides and reports established from IAEA and USNRC, and the analysis results of design characteristics, aging mechanisms, and operating experiences of RVIs in domestic and international NPPs. Consequently, the developed review guide for PSR of RVIs is expected to contribute an overall strategy and standard for the PSR of RVIs.

• The Journal of Korean Medicine Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology and Dermatology
• /
• v.22 no.2
• /
• pp.186-191
• /
• 2009

목적 : 체계적 문헌고찰(Systematic Review)은 Protocol 개발과 Review로 구분되며, 본 연구는 국내외 의학논문 검색엔진에 등재된 이명증의 RCT 문헌들을 대상으로 평가지표를 추출하는 Systematic Review를 진행하기 위한 Protocol의 개발을 목적으로 함. 방법 : 문헌고찰을 위한 각 과정들 및 연구에 필요한 사전 결정 인자 들을 연구자 회의와 체계적 문헌고찰 protocol 개발 방식에 근거하여 개발함. 결과 : Outcome measurement의 추출을 위한 Systermatic Review의 진행에 적합한 database의 선정, 각 database에 적합한 검색식, 검색기간, 논문의 선정 및 제외기준, PICO(patient, intervention, comparator, outcome) form의 개발, 질 평가의 근거기준, 각 연구자의 역할, data의 취합 및 분석 방법 등의 결과를 개발하고 결정하였음. 결론 : 이상에서 과정에서 도출된 결과에 근거하여, 향후 Outcome measurement 추출을 위한 Review를 진행하고 차후 Review논문으로 발표할 예정임.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.99-105
• /
• 2015

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the differenceof GMFM evaluationcapacity according to the preparation and review times on the college students. METHODS: 58 subjects among physical therapymajor studentswere recruited. The group was constructed the fourgroupsbypreparation and review times. The firstgroup was less than 1hour, the second group wasmore than 1 hour ~ less than 2 hours, the third group was more than 2 hours ~ less than 3 hours, the fourth group was more than 3 hours that was preparation and reviewtimes. The students were performed GMFM evaluation capacity after they learned the normal motor development for 5 weeks and evaluation method. They continued the preparation and review learning about the lesson during 5 weeks. RESULTS: The group of more than 3 hours was the highest and next order was the group of more than 1 hour ~ less than 2 hours, group of less than 1hour on GMFM evaluation capacity. CONCLUSION: Preparation and review times improved the GMFM evaluation capacity of students. Therefore, Emphasizing the preparation and review of learning is proper way to increase the evaluation capacity. In addition, the professor should create the appropriate teaching strategies using preparation and review times to upgrade a learner's ability.

• Journal of Korean Medical Science
• /
• v.33 no.46
• /
• pp.287.1-287.14
• /
• 2018

Integrity of authorship and peer review practices are important considerations for ethical publishing. Criteria for authorship, as delineated in the guidelines by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), have undergone evolution over the decades, and now require fulfillment of four criteria, including the need to be able to take responsibility for all aspects of the manuscript in question. Although such updated authorship criteria were published nearly five years ago, still, many major medical and specialist journals have yet to revise their author instructions to conform to this. Inappropriate authorship practices may include gift, guest or ghost authorship. Existing literature suggests that such practices are still widely prevalent, especially in non-English speaking countries. Another emerging problem is that of peer review fraud, mostly by authors, but also rarely by handling editors. There is literature to suggest that a proportion of such fake peer review may be driven by the support of some unscrupulous external editing agencies. Such inappropriate practices with authorship malpractices or disagreement, or peer review fraud, have resulted in more than 600 retractions each, as identified on the retractions database of Retractionwatch.com. There is a need to generate greater awareness, especially in authors from non-English speaking regions of the world, about inappropriate authorship and unethical practices in peer review. Also, support of any external editing agency should be clearly disclosed by authors at the time of submission of a manuscript.

• Journal of Applied Reliability
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.137-146
• /
• 2014

This paper is to develop Energy-FMEA for Energy Review of ISO 50001 Energy Management System. Energy Review is the core requirement of ISO 50001. This study develop Energy-FMEA and suggest Energy Review Inventory and Assessment Criteria for performing Energy-FMEA. Also, it shows case study to verify whether to proper.

• The Journal of KAIRB
• /
• v.5 no.2
• /
• pp.59-59
• /
• 2023

• The Journal of the Korean life insurance medical association
• /
• v.28 no.1_2
• /
• pp.31-35
• /
• 2009

Background : Many of internists have been working for insurance industry. Insurance medicine is use of medical knowledge for insurance industry. There is social role of insurance medicine in terms of soundness of insurance administration. Recently social role of internists also have been being watched. Although theme of insurance medicine is medical risk selection, insurance claims administration also needs medical experts'opinion. There are not any corroborative study of medical consulting for insurance claims. Among insurance industry, someone called this medical review of insurance claims as 'medical claims review'. Aim : To investigate usefulness of medical review of insurance claims. Design : Questionnaire survey with claim staffs in one of insurance claim adjustment company in Korea. Methods : 265 claim staffs were divided into 4 groups and conducted survey using a questionnaire of 20 questions. Utility score, job satisfaction score, and difficult factors of claims administration were measured. Results : Utility score and job satisfaction score are highest in medical claims review group. The most difficult in claim administration to claim staffs was demonstrated to medical knowledge. Conclusion : Medical review of insurance claims is proved to be worthy. Document-based consulting method, namely medical claims review, is more useful than telephone-based simple query among claim staffs...Subjects of the medical claims review are medical record and it's principle is independent medical examination with evidence-based approach, it also has role of protecting fraud of insurance claims. Two main question types of medical claims review are verification and advice.

• The Journal of KAIRB
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2023

In the United States (US), due to the Common Rule, completely revised in 2017, single Institutional Review Board (IRB) review has become mandatory for government-sponsored multi-institutional research since 2020 regardless of the number of participating institutions. The goal of these changes is to reduce redundant reviews by the IRB at each institution and better protect research participants. In this paper, single IRB and Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) in the US and Korea were compared and considered, and their implications were discussed. A comparison of the HRPP evaluation and certification systems of the US and Korea includes that of SMART IRB in the US and Korea Central IRB, aiming at single IRB review for efficient review with support from the country and building a more efficient national human subject research network in the future. Its comparison and analysis will be helpful in deriving future tasks and development directions of single IRB and HRPP in Korea.

• Toxicological Research
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2004

Evaluation of toxicological pathology is to some extend subjective judgments by pathologist and the accuracy of pathologist's works is based on the individual training and experiences. It has been required to establish a peer review system for toxicologic pathology and these review system has been employed by various practice of toxicological pathology. It would be pointed out that the possible causes of drifts in pathology are due to 1) lack of knowledge or experience of individual pathologists, 2) poorly maintained consistence of grading among animals in study, 3) different interpretation of findings between pathologists, or 4) pathology data processing. Example cases of diagnostic errors and current practice of peer review including tissue selection criteria, documentation and problem resolution for short-term and carcinogenicity studies were introduced. For sound regulatory system and high integrity of practice in toxicological pathology, current approaches of peer review system were reviewed.

• Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management
• /
• v.35 no.1
• /
• pp.97-112
• /
• 2007

Six Sigma methodology has been evolved since it was first introduced in late 1980's and the number of company which adopts Six Sigma is getting increased. Therefore, it is timely that ire review research papers on Six Sigma extensively. We review 85 papers published in Korea by April 2006 and classify them based on research contents and methodology. We suggest future research issues and fields which can adopt Six Sigma methodology.