• 제목/요약/키워드: Korea-Japan joint development

검색결과 74건 처리시간 0.02초

Maritime Delimitation and Joint Resource Development in the East China Sea (동중국해 해양경계획정과 자원공동개발)

  • LEE, Seok-woo;PARK, Young-kil
    • Strategy21
    • /
    • 통권30호
    • /
    • pp.177-199
    • /
    • 2012
  • As is generally known, the sovereignty dispute over the Senkaku Islands between China/Taiwan and Japan was triggered by a report commissioned by the UN in 1968, which reported the possibility of a substantial amount of petroleum and natural gas buried in the South China Sea. When the administrative authority over the Ryukyu Islands was transferred from the US to Japan in 1972, jurisdiction over the Senkaku Islands was also transferred. A dispute ensued between China (Taiwan) and Japan over the Senkaku Islands except during the period in which formal relations were established between the two states. This paper will take a look particularly at the events that occurred in the 2000's and discuss their recent trends and aspects of the dispute. Though China and Japan agreed to joint resource development in 2008, the agreed zone was a very small area adjacent to the Korea-Japan Joint Continental Shelf Development Zone, and the points of agreement have not been implemented. China has been developing four oil fields including Chunxiao in its waters adjacent to the median line asserted by Japan. However, China also has been excluding the participation of Japan, while Japan has been strongly objecting to the unilateral development of oil fields by China. If indeed the oil fields on China's side are connected past the median line asserted by Japan, then China's unilateral development will infringe upon the potential sovereign rights of Japan, thereby violating international law.

  • PDF

A Comparative Analysis of Energy Policies and Joint R&D Programs in Advanced Nations

  • Kim, Eun-Sun;Koo, Young-Duk;Park, Young-Seo
    • Journal of information and communication convergence engineering
    • /
    • 제2권4호
    • /
    • pp.247-250
    • /
    • 2004
  • Currently, advanced countries such as European countries and Japan invest lots of efforts to develop improvement of electric power production and supply, environmental countermeasure, and renewable energy development. Accordingly, Korea has been putting efforts to all kinds of electric related technical development based on the mid-long term plan. Further, it is necessary to increase effectiveness of R&D investment by propelling joint research activities with advanced countries for development of important technologies. Based on this background, this study tries to find thought-provoking suggestions of energy projects, programs and policies. For a comparative analysis, Japan which is similar to Korea in terms of market size and policies, and EU where joint research has been actively carried out among nations are analyzed and compared to policies and joint R&D activities of Korea.

A Study on the Strategy of Korea-Japan Space Cooperation for Development of Geostationary Satellite (정지위성의 한ㆍ일 공동개발 추진전략)

  • 김두환;길상철
    • Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
    • /
    • 제6권4호
    • /
    • pp.480-491
    • /
    • 2003
  • When Korea develop a geostationary satellite (Communication. Broadcasting. Meteorology Satellite), it is more economical and effective to make as an international cooperation program from the first phase, because Korea doesn't have any experience of manufacturing a geostationary satellite. This paper discusses why Japan is appropriate for cooperating country, and suggests cooperation of space technology between Korea and Japan and setting up of the organization for Korea and Japan joint geostationary satellite development.

  • PDF

Perspective on Maritime Boundary Delimitation through Oil and Gas Development Dispute between China and Japan in the East China Sea (동중국해 중.일 유전 개발 분쟁을 통해 본 양국의 해양경계획정에 대한 입장 연구)

  • Yang, Hee-Cheol;Park, Seong-Wook;Park, Se-Hun
    • Ocean and Polar Research
    • /
    • 제28권2호
    • /
    • pp.175-186
    • /
    • 2006
  • There are disputes for oil and gas development between China and Japan in the East China Sea. These involve the area where China is already carrying out activities of oil and gas development and where Japan is proclaiming its EEZ. China insists that the Chinese activities on oil and gas development area are being carried out within the Chinese jurisdictional waters even if the median line principle of Japanese proclamation is applied in delimitation. Indeed, the permit for Japanese development is causing disputes between China and Japan because its permit allows development in the waters adjacent to Chinese development area. h the event, the core of this dispute around the oil and gas field in the East China Sea relates to issues of maritime boundary delimitation and issues of resources acquisition with both states. Chinese policy on oil and gas development is to first consider development issues in accordance with a median line principle where waters toward to China from the median line should be developed by China and the area toward Japan from the median line within the Chinese continental shelf should be jointly developed. However, the Japanese position is that the East China Sea should be jointly developed, and Japan hopes to eventually convince China to accept its median line delimitation. With on-going development of such issues, Korea should establish a strategy of negotiation based on analyses of resource distributional conditions and other strategic factors in the Korean delimitation area. In particular, Korea should prepare and make the best use of joint development zone established in an agreement between the ROK and Japan concerning the development of the southern part of continental shelf adjacent to both states.

A Study on Developing Bussn Port into A Northeast Asian Hub-Port & "the Korea-Japan Strait Economic Zone" (부산항의 Hub-Port화와 "한.일해협 경제권")

  • Park, Chang-Sik;Kim, Cheong-Yeoul
    • Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
    • /
    • 제25권1호
    • /
    • pp.271-292
    • /
    • 2009
  • Opening and regional economic integration are characteristic of global economic trends that have been made since the 1990s. Accordingly, all economic blocs of the world are largely reorganized into three poles, European Economic Bloc, American Economic Bloc and Northeast Asian Economic Block which are respectively led by EU, the United States and the rapidly emerging economic power, China. Considering this direction of global economy, the current status of Northeast Asia, China's unprecedentedly enormous port development project and Japan's introduction of an epoch-making port policy towards the restoration of its port competitiveness, Korea is urgently need to take its own initiatives and positive actions that can cope with the above situations. The purpose of this study is to propose ways of strategic cooperation for Korea-Japan joint development. For the purpose, this researcher provides the concept and preconditions of hub-port, investigates hub-port development strategies of rival companies in Northeast Asia and discusses the potential of the development of the Korea-Japan Strait Economic Zone which is located between Busan port and Japan's Honshu(Simonoseki port) and Kyushu(Kitakyushu port).

  • PDF

A Study on the Development of Joint Logistics System for Small and Medium Sized Companies (중소기업 공동물류 시스템 구축에 관한 연구)

  • 김성태
    • Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering
    • /
    • 제20권44호
    • /
    • pp.311-321
    • /
    • 1997
  • The development of Joint-Logistics System(JTS) for small/medium sized companies has been proposed for, particularity, Namdong Indusrial Complex located in Incheon. In this paper, JTS methodology is introduced and characterized in terms joint-control transportation, material handling and storage and order receipt. This methodology, which is unprecedented in Korea, has been considerably investigated and developed to implement a feasible model in Japan. A number of successful cases in Japanese companies are also presented to show how it works.

  • PDF

A Study on the Ways to Joint Marine Development and Joint Marine Environmental Protection in Northeast Asia (동북아 해역 권원중첩수역 공동개발합의와 공동환경보호합의 도출 방안)

  • Kim, Ki-Sun
    • Strategy21
    • /
    • 통권37호
    • /
    • pp.193-241
    • /
    • 2015
  • China, Japan and Korea are the world's top 10 energy consumers, and so very interested in the development of seabed hydrocarbon resources in order to meet their energy demands. The East China Sea is the tri-junction area where three countries' entitlements on the maritime boundaries are overlapped. There are abundant oil reserves in the East China Sea, and therefore competitions among countries are growing to get control of them. Although these countries have concluded the bilateral agreements to jointly develop resources in the East China Sea, they do not function as well. Because joint development and management of seabed petroleum resources can lead to stable development system, and to lower possibility of legal and political disputes, the needs for joint development agreement among three countries are urgent. Meanwhile, Northeast Asian seas are semi-closed seas, which are geographically closed and vulnerable to marine pollution. Moreover there are a lot of nuclear power plants in coastal area, and seabed petroleum resources are being developed. So it is likely to occur nuclear and oil spill accidents. Fukushima nuclear disaster and Bohai Bay oil spill accident in 2011 are the cases to exhibit the potential of major marine pollution accidents in this area. It is anticipated that the risks become higher because power plants and offshore oil platforms are extending gradually. Therefore, the ways to seek the joint marine environmental protection agreement focused on regulation of nuclear power plant and offshore oil platform have to be considered. In this paper, we try to find the way to make joint development and joint environmental protection agreement in Northeast Asian seas. We concentrate on the measure to drive joint development of seabed petroleum deposits in East China Sea's overlap area, despite of maritime delimitation and territorial disputes, and we try to drive joint marine environmental protection system to respond to marine pollution and accidents due to offshore oil platform and nuclear power plants. Through these consideration, we seek solutions to deal with lack of energy, disputes of maritime territorial and boundary delimitation, and marine pollution in Northeast Asia.

Study on the Structure of the Korea-Japan Joint Development Zone by Means of Geophysical Data (지구물리 자료를 이용한 한일공동개발구역 일원의 구조 해석)

  • Jeongwon Ha;Sik Huh;Hyoungrea Rim
    • Geophysics and Geophysical Exploration
    • /
    • 제27권1호
    • /
    • pp.23-36
    • /
    • 2024
  • In this study, we analyze the structure of the Korea-Japan Joint Development Zone (JDZ) using gravity, magnetic, and seismic data. Gravity and magnetic data analysis confirmed that the Jeju Basin exhibits low anomalies compared to adjacent areas. We applied the total gradient to the Bouguer anomaly to identify basin boundaries, and computed the analytic signal from the total magnetic anomaly data to enhance the edges of the magnetic anomalies. The Taiwan-Sinzi Belt, exhibits high magnetic anomalies and crosses the center of the JDZ in the northeast-southwest direction; we presume that intrusive rocks are sporadic in the JDZ. The 3D inversion results of the gravity and magnetic data show a strong correlation between magnetic susceptibility and density (i.e. a low-density zone in the Jeju Basin and the Ho Basin, and a high magnetic susceptibility distribution in the Taiwan-Sinzi Belt). Comparison of the density and seismic profiles of the Jeju Basin shows that high densities are associated with sill, horst, and basement highs, whereas low densities are associated with basement low and grabens. These results suggest that interpretations based on seismic, gravity and magnetic data can effectively reveal the subsurface structure of the JDZ.

Legal and Historical Evaluation on the Korea-Japan Fisheries Agreement of 1965 (1965년 한(韓)-일(日)어업협정(漁業協定)의 법적(法的)·역사적(歷史的) 검토(評價))

  • Choi, Jong-Hwa
    • Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education
    • /
    • 제11권2호
    • /
    • pp.150-183
    • /
    • 1999
  • Korea-Japan Fisheries Agreement concluded in 1965 made a contribution to the stable development of fisheries relationship for both countries until the year of 1980. From the time on thereafter a series of respectable fishery disputes occurred throughout the period of fisheries self-regulation in accordance with alteration of home and abroad conditions. And both countries marched into a cooperation era by enforcement of the new fisheries agreement from the 23 January 1999, because the Fisheries Agreement system of 1965 had many limitations to settle the fundamental fisheries problems. In this paper, the author carried out the legal interpretation, arrangement of historical facts and evaluation of actual results of the Korea-Japan Fisheries Agreement of 1965. The key contents of the Fisheries Agreement were the establishment of 12-nautical mile exclusive fishery zone and the joint-control fishery zone under the principles of maintenance of MSY for fishery resources, freedom of high seas and mutual cooperation. The legal foundation of the conclusion of the Fisheries Agreement were the San Francisco Peace Treaty of 1952 and the four International Conventions on the Law of the Sea of 1958. During the 33 years, the fisheries power of Korea made a rapid stride, on the other hand that of Japan was almost stagnated. And in the meantime, there were very important development on the international law of the sea, for instant, the settlement of 12-nautical mile territorial sea regime and the establishment of 200-nautical mile exclusive economic zone regime. Annual meetings of the Joint Fisheries Committee were not successful to fill the role for conservation of fishery resources. The Fisheries Self-Regulation Agreement concluded in 1980 was also insufficient to accept the new international regime on the law of the sea, for that reason it was terminated on 23 January 1999. But it is true that the Fisheries Agreement of 1965 made a contribution to normalization of fisheries relationship between both countries and fisheries development of Korea.

  • PDF