• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.123-138
• /
• 2016

본 연구의 목적은 자기질문전략 중 QAR(Question-Answer-Relationship) 전략을 적용한 과학수업이 학습유형에 따라 초등학교 5학년 학생들의 과학적 태도에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지를 알아보는 것이다. 따라서 연구대상은 초등학교 5학년 4개 학급 97명을 대상으로 실험집단 49명과 비교집단 48명을 선정하였다. 수업실시 전과 후, 각 집단을 대상으로 검사를 실시하여 자기질문전략이 과학적 태도에 미치는 영향을 알아보았다. 또한 실험집단 학생을 대상으로 Kolb의 자기보고식 학습유형 검사를 실시하여 학습유형에 따른 과학적 태도의 변화를 비교 분석 하였다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 이 연구에서 밝혀진 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 과학적 태도에 있어 수업 실시 후 실험집단과 비교집단 사이에 유의미한 차이가 있었다. 둘째, 실험집단의 학습유형을 분류한 결과 적응자(46.9%), 수렴자(24.5%), 분산자(20.4%), 융합자(8.2%) 순이었다. 자기질문전략을 적용한 수업 후 과학적 태도에 있어 학습유형 집단 간에는 통계적인 유의미한 차이를 보이지 않았으나 학습유형 중 융합자 보다는 적응자, 수렴자, 분산자의 과학적 태도에 더 긍정적인 영향을 끼쳤다.

• 기본간호학회지
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.200-206
• /
• 2009

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze nursing students' learning styles and relationship of learning style to participation and academic achievement. Method: The study participants were nursing students in C college learning through problem based learning (PBL). Data were collected using a questionnaire which included Kolb's learning styles. Performance evaluation and paper examination were used to evaluate academic achievement. Results: Most of the students had converger type learning style. Student with a tendency to abstract conceptualization, such as converger type and assimilator type, preferred discussion and presentation. The students with converger type learning style participated and achieved better than students with diverger style. Conclusion: The results indicate that learning style was related to participation and academic achievement. Therefore in order to use PBL effectively, facilitators should consider students' learning styles.

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.343-350
• /
• 2013

Objectives : The objective of this study is to analyze about learning styles and self-regulated learning strategies of dental hygiene students and to find methods that may increase learning outcomes by selecting effective learning methods. Methods : The subjects of this study are 524 dental hygiene students in region of chonbuk from May, 2012 to June, 2012. collected informations are analyzed with SPSS. Results : 1. 38.1%, assimilator is most of learning styles of dental hygiene students, followed by 29.7%, converger, 16.2%, diverger, 15.8%, accommodator. 2. 28.0%, converger and diverger are most of subjects whose grade score is between 2.0-2.9, 41.50%, accommodator is most of 3.0-3.4, and 41.61% accommodator is most of 3.5-3.9, and 28.0%, converger is most of subjects whose grade score is more than 4.0. this results has statistically signification(p<0.01). 3. $8.71{\pm}1.78$, assimilation strategy is most self-regulated learning strategies of dental hygiene students, followed by $8.26{\pm}1.94$, control strategy, $7.52{\pm}2.00$, memorization strategy. accommodator is most showed $7.82{\pm}2.24$, $9.13{\pm}1.74$, $8.71{\pm}2.20$ in memorization strategy, assimilation strategy, control strategy. 4. It is showed that assimilator is significantly related with satisfaction for major(p<0.01), accommodator is significantly related with academic records(p<0.05), and diverger is significantly negative related with academic records, through the results of the analysis of factors that affects learning styles. Conclusions : Organizing above results, It is considered that instructor needs to acknowledge learning styles of students through understanding about various learning styles of students, and may has to develop suitable teaching method for students based on that.

• 대한지역사회작업치료학회지
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.65-73
• /
• 2012

목적 : 본 논문은 물리치료사와 작업치료사의 전문적 교육을 위한 기초자료를 제공하기 위해 작업치료학과 물리치료학과 신입생들의 성취목표 지향성과 학습유형의 특성을 알아보고자 하였다. 연구방법 : 경북에 소재하고 있는 3년제 대학과 강원도에 소재하고 있는 4년제 대학교의 작업치료학과와 물리치료학과 일학년 학생 123명을 대상으로 하였다. 측정도구는 Kolb의 학습양식검사와 Elliot와 Church의 성취목표척도를 이용하여 학습양식과 성취목표에 대한 설문지 조사를 실시하였다. 수집된 자료는 교차분석과 상관관계분석을 실시하여 분석하였다. 결과 : 학습양식에서는 융통자가 가장 많았고 확산자가 가장 적게 나타났으며, 3년제와 4년제에서 학습양식의 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 성취목표 지향성에서는 숙달목표가 가장 높게 나타났다. 수행접근 목표는 남학생이 여학생보다 높게 나타났고 수행회피 목표에서는 물리치료학과에서 높게 나타났다. 학습양식과 성취목표 지향성의 상호관련성에서는 수행회피 목표가 높을수록 집중자의 특성이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 작업치료학과와 물리치료학과의 신입생들의 성취목표는 큰 차이가 없는 것으로 보이며 학습양식은 학제에 따라 차이가 있는 것으로 보인다. 결론 : 가장 많은 학습양식인 숙달목표의 특성에 맞는 교수법을 개발하고 각 학생들의 학습양식과 성취목표 지향성에 대한 정보를 제공하여 학생 개개인이 자신의 학습의 장단점을 파악할 수 있도록 하여야 할 것이다.

• 한국간호교육학회지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.13-22
• /
• 2007

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine learning styles and preferred learning methods of undergraduate nursing students in Korea. Method: Data was collected from 724 nursing students at five universities in Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Daejeon, and Gwangju. Kolb's Learning Style Inventory, a self-report questionnaire was completed. Result: Learning styles of nursing students were diverger 43.5%, accommodator 36.7%, assimilator 10.8%, or converger 9.0% Learning styles were significantly different related to preferred future clinical practice area and grade. Furthermore, active experimentation(AE) learning mode was significantly different by grade. Concrete experience(CE), conceptualization(AC), and active experimentation(AE) learning modes were significantly different preferred future clinical practice area. preferred learning methods were lecture 40.7%, clinical practice 37.2%, self-directed learning 8.7%, laboratory practice 8.0%, and group discussion 5.4%. Preferred learning methods were significantly different by learning styles and grade. Lecture was preferred in diverger and assimilator. Clinical practice was preferred in accommodator and converger. Styles Conclusion: This study suggested that nursing education should be applied to nursing students after examining learning styles and preferred learning methods. In conclusion, nursing educators should help to develop various learning modes for student's balanced learning capabilities.

• 한국간호교육학회지
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.355-364
• /
• 2011

Purpose: This study was designed to explore the influencing factors on self-directed learning ability of nursing students and to investigate the relationship between learning style, learning attitude, and self-directed learning ability. Methods: The study sample was composed of 263 nursing students. Data were collected from March 8th to April 7th, 2011 using a questionnaire which included Kolb's learning style inventory, learning attitude inventory, and self-directed learning ability inventory. Results: Learning styles of the subjects were assimilator 33.8%, converger 31.9%, accommodator 24.7%, and diverger 9.5%. There was no significant difference in learning styles among grades. However, the total mean score of learning attitude (F=8.30, p<.001) and self-directed learning ability (F=2.85, p=.038) significantly differed among grades. Learning attitude positively correlated to self-directed learning ability (r=.62, p<.001). Learning attitude was the most significant predictor and accounted for 36.5% of the variance in self-directed leaning ability in nursing students. Conclusion: It is important for students to use all four learning styles rather than to rely solely on one style. There should be more emphasis placed on the development of positive learning attitude and self-directed learning ability of nursing students.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제30권6호
• /
• pp.1521-1530
• /
• 2000

This descriptive study identifies nursing students' methods of studying related to the learning stages, based on a sample of 251 nursing students in a Korean university. The main findings of the study are as follows. The major learning styles of nursing students were accomodation (68.6%), divergen (53.6%), and convergence (38.8%) for the first, second, third, and fourth year group. For all students, the majority (71.3%) showed accomodation or the divergence. The learning styles for grade level were significantly different, (x2=110.021, df=9, p=0.001). The stage of concrete experience was the majority for all of the first year group (51.8%), the second year group (57.1%), and the third year group (61.3%). But, active experimentation (41.9%) was the majority for the fourth year group. Also there were significant differences between the stages of learning by age (x22= 64.391, df=9, p=0.001). The most significant result of the study was the establishment of different modes of learning stages by year, thus supporting the experiential learning theory. The greatest change of style from the first year group to the second year group was reflective observation (7.3%longrightarrow12.9%). That from the second year group to the third year group was the abstractive conceptualization (14.3%longrightarrow21.3%); and that from the third year group to the fourth year group was active experimentation (12.0%longrightarrow41.9%). This reflects the same cycle as indicated by the experimental learning theory of Kolb. According to the study, nursing students' learning stages tended to be more unbalanced as year increases. Therefore this calls for a careful review of the current nursing curriculum.

• 한국간호교육학회지
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.64-76
• /
• 2000

The purpose of this study is to identify the difference in learning styles, learning stages, and preferred nursing specialties between two groups of nursing programs, regular BSN and RN-BSN. The survey instrument was a simplified version of the Kolb's Learning-Style Instrument which was developed by the researcher, a self- reported learning style questionnaire with twelve questions related to the four learning stages. The sample of the study was the 218 nursing students in a university in Korea which consisted of 58 junior and 67 senior students in the regular BSN program, and 58 junior and 35 senior students in the RN-BSN program. Main findings of the study were as the following. 1) Over all, the major learning style was either the diverger or the accomodator; the most preferred learning stage was the concrete experience and the leastly preferred learning stage was the abstractive conceptualization learning stage; and the most preferred nursing specialty in the future was the clinical nursing. 2) Students in the BSN program preferred four learning stages with rather equal proportion, whereas the students in the RN-BSN program preferred the concrete experience learning stage as high as 60.3% and the abstractive conceptualization learning stage as low as 9.5%. 3)For the future career, the junior students of both programs preferred clinical and educational nursing areas, and the senior students of both programs preferred clinical and research areas. The main reason of the difference seemed to result from the different courses such as Health Education or Teaching Method for the juniors and the Nursing Research for the seniors of both groups. Because the sample of the study was limited to a university, it is difficult to generalize the study results for the entire nursing students in Korea. Continuous studies with larger numbers of nursing students and nurse educators, and experimental studies measuring the effects of new curricula are needed for the future.

• 기본간호학회지
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.334-342
• /
• 2012

Purpose: This descriptive study was done to identify the academic achievement, self-directed learning (SDL), and critical thinking disposition (CTD) of nursing students according to their learning styles. Method: The participants were 240 nursing students. Data were collected using structured questionnaires which included Kolb's Learning Style Inventory, Academic Achievement in Fundamental Nursing and Health Assessment, Self Directed Learning Readiness Scale, and California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Data were analyzed using ${\chi}^2$ test, ANOVA, Pearson' correlation coefficients, and Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Results: One third of respondents were shown to be Convergers in their learning style (33.3%). The Academic Achievement of students who were Convergers was significantly higher than those who were Divergers or Accommodators (F=5.95, p=.001). The SDL and CTD of students who were Convergers were significantly higher than Divergers and Assimilators (F=9.67, p<.001 and F=8.42, p<.001). No significant correlations were found between Academic Achievement and SDL or CTD, but a statistically significant positive correlation was found between SDL and CTD (r=.68, p<.001). Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that learning style influences academic achievement, SDL and CTD.

• 한국간호교육학회지
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.413-422
• /
• 2013

Purpose: This study was designed to explore the influencing factors on communication skill of nursing students and to investigate the relationship between learning style, critical thinking disposition and communication skill, Methods: The study sample was composed of 559 nursing students. Data was collected from 1st to 30th, May 2012 used a questionnaire which included Kolb's learning style inventory, critical thinking disposition inventory, communication skill inventory. The SPSS 18.0 Window program was used for descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and stepwise multiple regression. Results: Learning styles of subjects were diverging 39.5%, accommodating 32.6%, assimilating 22.7%, and converging 5.2%. The total mean score of critical thinking disposition and communication skill was 3.58 and 3.39 respectively. The score of Critical thinking disposition(t=3.06, p=.002) and Communication skill(t=3.25, p=.002) significantly differed between clinical practice satisfaction. Communication skill was the most significant predictor and accounted for 41.3% of the variance in critical thinking disposition in nursing students. Conclusion: It is important for students to use all four learning styles rather than to rely on one style. There should be more emphasis placed on the development of positive critical thinking disposition and communication skill of nursing students.