• Title/Summary/Keyword: Key performance indicators

Search Result 233, Processing Time 0.025 seconds

Development of Organizational Performance Evaluation Indicators of A Public Health Center Using Balanced Scorecard Approach - Health Promotion Team of K City Public Health Center - (BSC기법을 이용한 보건소 성과평가지표 - K시보건소 건강증진팀을 대상으로 -)

  • Shin, Eui-Chul;Sohn, Hae-Sook;Koh, Kwang-Wook;Shin, Jun-Ho;Lee, Mu-Sik;Na, Baeg-Ju;Choi, Soo-Mi;Kim, Ye-Soon;Jeong, Jong-Sup;Lee, Key-Hyo
    • Health Policy and Management
    • /
    • v.16 no.3
    • /
    • pp.52-69
    • /
    • 2006
  • Researchers indicates several issues as to performance evaluation methods for public health centers. Firstly, health centers are passively involved in the evaluation process, the performance indicators are activity-oriented, and mostly unrealistic. Balanced Scorecard is one of the methods for evaluating organizational performance, which is utilized at current in many industries including public sector. The purposes of this study is to apply balanced scorecard approach to a public health center and to develop performance indicators as well as their vision and strategies. For developing performance indicators, researchers selected K City Public Health Center and implemented brainstorming with members of health promotion team. Through team process they suggested goals, strategies and several indicators they considered proper to accomplish their shared vision. And then appropriateness of the indicators were evaluated by professional researchers in health promotion field for consensus building by email questionnaire. Based on survey and professional consensus meeting, 11 performance indicators were tailored in four perspectives as well as 6 strategies and 10 strategic goals, which are steps for accomplishing shared vision of health promotion team. For details, refer to the paper. Most members of health promotion team were satisfied with the indicators. However issues such as low level of recognition and familiarity with a new concept of BSC, and cultural resistance to strategic approach in public organizations should be addressed for future application and dissemination of BSC technique to public health organizations.

BSC 방법론을 이용한 광가입자망사업 성과분석 연구

  • Kim, Jae-Jeon;No, Hui-Ok;Park, Jae-Seong;Kim, Sang-Min;Yu, Il
    • Proceedings of the Korea Society for Industrial Systems Conference
    • /
    • 2008.10b
    • /
    • pp.684-690
    • /
    • 2008
  • FTTH(Fiber to The Home), a next generation communication service, is expected to boost up the growth of the whole IT industry and to creating new businesses by enabling the convergence of the broadcasting and communication technologies. It will consequently contribute to improve the quality of our life. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of EPFSD using the Balanced Scorecard(BSC) model with five perspectives which are known to have inherent relationship: regional economy, regional customer, regional process, innovation and growth in the region, and regional infrastructure. 16 critical success factors(CSFs) and 37 key performance indicators(KPIs) are developed based on the BSC model to measure the performance indicators of the EPFSD.

  • PDF

A Comprehensive Performance Indicators by SIPOC Model (SIPOC 개념을 활용한 성과지표 개발 모델)

  • Chung, Kyu-Suk;Yun, Sang-Un
    • Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management
    • /
    • v.40 no.3
    • /
    • pp.394-405
    • /
    • 2012
  • Purpose: In this study, we suggest the systematic and comprehensive model to develop PI(Performance Indicators) of the organization or the process. Methods: The model is developed theoretically by using SIPOC(Supplier, Input, Process, Output, Customer) approach which is a tool to analyze the process and is compared with existing models to develop PI or KPI(key performance indicators); financial indicators, BSC, IPOO(input, process, output, outcome), traditional QCD (quality, cost, delivery), and IOS(input, output system). Results: The model provides more systematic method to develop PI and more comprehensive set of PI pools for all kinds of hierarchical levels of process than any other models to develop PI or KPI. Conclusion: This model will provide useful tools for the managers and the organizations who wish to develop PI.

Return on Leadership

  • Martensen, Anne;Gronholdt, Lars
    • International Journal of Quality Innovation
    • /
    • v.6 no.3
    • /
    • pp.19-37
    • /
    • 2005
  • It is generally accepted that leadership is the foundation for creation of a company's business results. However, empirical evidence is lacking. This paper examines the relationship between leadership and key performance results based on a Return on Leadership Model. The model links Denison's four leadership traits to people results, customer results, and ultimately key performance results. Further specified, the model is a structural equation model with nine latent variables, each measured by a set of indicators, observed by survey questions. To validate the model, an empirical study was conducted, and 379 managers from medium-sized and large companies in Denmark participated. The estimation of the model shows that the model structure explains return on leadership very well, and the findings support the developed model. We are able to quantify the relationships from leadership to people results, customer results and key performance results and, in this way, the data presented here provide evidence that leadership is linked to key performance results. Several results and applications of the model are shown. The findings provide new knowledge about how leadership can be linked to performance, and how excellent leadership creates key performance results.

The Development of Performance Indicators for the Institution of Information Transfer Based on BSC and the Analysis of Their Importance (BSC를 이용한 학술정보 유통기관의 성과지표 개발 및 중요도 분석)

  • Kwak, Seung-Jin;Choi, Jae-Hwang;Kim, Hwan-Min
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
    • /
    • v.41 no.4
    • /
    • pp.273-294
    • /
    • 2007
  • The purpose of this study is to focus on developing the performance indicators for the distribution of scholarly information based on BSC and to analyze the importance of the performance indicators against the specialists. From the case studies on performance indicators both at home and abroad four viewpoints(information resource, information service, user, and economy) were derived. In addition. the core success factors(CSF) and key performance indicators(KPI) were extracted from the viewpoints. Four viewpoints are composed of 12 CSF items and 31 KPI items. In order to analyze the weight of the performance indicators. questions were thrown to the specialists in universities and research institutes. For the method of analysis, analytic hierarchy process(AHP) was adopted. As a result, the analysis showed that the user viewpoint, information service viewpoint, information resource viewpoint and economic viewpoint are in the order of their importance.

Comparison of Smart City Efficiency Using DEA and KPI

  • Sang-Ho Lee;Hee-Yeon Jo;Yun-Hong Min
    • Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
    • /
    • v.29 no.1
    • /
    • pp.97-109
    • /
    • 2024
  • This research aims to investigate how major cities in Korea utilize smart city-related technologies, develop key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the smartness and efficiency of cities, and propose a methodology for assessing and suggesting smart city policy directions based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Referring to the CITYkeys Smart City Performance Measurement Framework, 10 key performance indicators (KPIs) were derived. For each KPI, city statistical data were allocated to input and output variables, and 15 cities were assigned as Decision Making Units (DMUs). The DEA methodology was employed to evaluate the operational efficiency and scale profitability of cities, providing insights into the operational efficiency of each city. Finally, the operational efficiency among DMUs was ranked to propose smart city policy directions for each city.

Key Performance Indicators for Project Management Performance of Large Contractors in Developing Countries: A Case Study in Vietnam

  • Soo-Yong Kim;Troung-Van Luu
    • International conference on construction engineering and project management
    • /
    • 2009.05a
    • /
    • pp.1599-1607
    • /
    • 2009
  • In order to deal with severe competition in the construction market of developing countries, large contractors must continually improve their own performance and operation. Performance measurement is the heart of ceaseless improvement in organizations. Key performance indicators (KPIs) play a key role in measuring project management performance (PMP) of large contractors in developing countries. The main objective of this paper is to identify KPIs, which can be used to measure PMP of contractors, and then analyze the underlying relationships of these KPIs in order to gain insight into PMP of large construction firms in Vietnam construction industry (VCI). Literature reviews and the pilot survey provided 30 KPIs. Fourteen KPIs, which have the mean values higher than 3.0, were considered as important KPIs through a questionnaire survey of 32 professionals. Factor analysis of these KPIs was employed to categorize them. The results of the survey revealed that top six KPIs are construction time and cost, owner satisfaction on services and products, and quality management and project team performance. Factor analysis uncovered that 14 top-ranked KPIs can be grouped under six categories, namely: (1) construction input management, (2) owner satisfaction, (3) cost and quality, (4) manpower management, (5) subcontractor performance and (6) equipment management. The findings of this research can be used as a guideline to measure PMP of contractors in Vietnam as well as in other developing countries. Since contractors from a country to the other country may have the same manner to manage construction projects, the results of this study may be useful not only to practitioners and researchers in Vietnam but also to participants in other developing countries.

  • PDF

A Comparative Study among KPI Developing Methods (핵심성과지표 개발 방법 비교연구)

  • Chung, Kyu Suk
    • Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management
    • /
    • v.46 no.4
    • /
    • pp.863-876
    • /
    • 2018
  • Purpose: There are several KPI(key performance indicators) models: BSC(balanced scorecard), IPOO(Input-process-output-outcomes) indicators, QCDP(quality-cost-delivery-productivity) indicators. This paper analyze these models and gives some suggestions to help the effective usage of KPI. Methods: This paper reviews and summarize the criteria to evaluate the PI(performance indicators) through literature review. Evaluation and analysis on the PI factors of the KPI developing models is performed by the criteria. Results: Criteria to evaluate the PI, which can be used to evaluate the goodness of PI is suggested. This paper also proposes some suggestions for the KPI models and their factors for the effective development of PI in the organization. Conclusion: This research will help the managers to develop and select useful PI and KPI for their business and processes.

Using Analytic Network Process to Establish Performance Evaluation Indicators for the R&D Management Department in Taiwan's High-tech Industry

  • Liu, Pang-Lo;Tsai, Chih-Hung
    • International Journal of Quality Innovation
    • /
    • v.8 no.3
    • /
    • pp.156-172
    • /
    • 2007
  • The high-tech industry is the economic lifeline for Taiwan. Its characteristics are short product life cycle, rapid changes in the market, and a high obsolescence rate for new products. Under globalization, the high-tech industry has adopted Information Technology (IT) to shorten the manufacturing process, reduce costs and conduct product research and development (R&D) to increase the core competence of enterprises and achieve the goal of sustainable operations. Enterprises should actively strengthen their integration with internal and external resources and lead in R&D management to increase industrial operating performance. Effectively managing operations and R&D management evaluation in Taiwan's High-tech Industry has become a critical subject. This study adopted 4 major Balanced Scorecard (BSC) perspectives to establish the Total Performance Evaluation Indicators for the R&D management department in Taiwan's High-tech Industry. The Analytic Network Process (ANP) was applied to evaluate the overall performance of the R&D management department. The research framework is divided into 2 phases. The first phase is combined with the 4 major perspectives, Financial, Customer, Internal Business Process and Learning and Growth, as the related indicators for each measurement perspective. The Key Performance Indicators (KPI) were selected using Factor Analysis to identify the key factor from the complicated indicators. The relationship between the characteristics of each BSC's evaluation perspective is dependence and feedback. This study applied ANP to conduct the calculation and adjustment of correlation between each KPI, and determine on their relative weights for the objective KPI. The "Financial Perspective" for R&D management department in Taiwan's High-tech Industry focused on the budget achievement rate of R&D management. The weight indicator value is (0.05863). The "Customer Perspective" focused on problem-solving satisfaction. The weight value of this indicator is (0.17549). The "Internal Business Process Perspective" focused on the quantity and quality of R&D. The weight value of this indicator is (0.13506). The "Learning and Growth Perspective" focused on improving competence in the research personnel's professional techniques. The weight value of this indicator is (0.02789). From the total weighting indicators, the order of the Performance Indicators for the R&D management department in Taiwan's High-tech Industry is: (1) Customer Perspective; (2) Internal Business Process Perspective; (3) Financial Perspective; and (4) Learning and Growth Perspective.

A Study on the Development of Performance Indicators for the National Library of Korea using Balanced Scorecard(BSC) (균형성과표(BSC)를 활용한 국립중앙도서관 성과지표 개발에 관한 연구)

  • Kim, Suejeong;Cha, Mikyeong
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
    • /
    • v.55 no.1
    • /
    • pp.251-283
    • /
    • 2021
  • As a national library, the National Library of Korea is responsible for collection, provision, and preservation of national knowledge, information, and cultural heritage. This study aims to develop performance indicators as a rational tool to improve management of the National Library of Korea for its continuous growth and development. The performance indicators are based on the BSC(Balanced Scorecard), which is useful for linking the organization's strategies in response to changes in the library environment with performance measurement. As a result, 4 BSC-based perspectives (① Resources, Access, Infrastructure Perspective, ② Usage Perspective, ③ Efficiency Perspective, ④ Potential and Growth Perspective), 19 key success factors, and 71 performance indicators were developed for the National Library of Korea. Also, differences in perception of performance indicators by ranks and job duties at the National Library of Korea were analyzed.