Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Development of Performance Indicators for the National Library of Korea using Balanced Scorecard(BSC)

균형성과표(BSC)를 활용한 국립중앙도서관 성과지표 개발에 관한 연구

  • 김수정 (이화여자대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 차미경 (이화여자대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2021.01.19
  • Accepted : 2021.02.08
  • Published : 2021.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As a national library, the National Library of Korea is responsible for collection, provision, and preservation of national knowledge, information, and cultural heritage. This study aims to develop performance indicators as a rational tool to improve management of the National Library of Korea for its continuous growth and development. The performance indicators are based on the BSC(Balanced Scorecard), which is useful for linking the organization's strategies in response to changes in the library environment with performance measurement. As a result, 4 BSC-based perspectives (① Resources, Access, Infrastructure Perspective, ② Usage Perspective, ③ Efficiency Perspective, ④ Potential and Growth Perspective), 19 key success factors, and 71 performance indicators were developed for the National Library of Korea. Also, differences in perception of performance indicators by ranks and job duties at the National Library of Korea were analyzed.

국립중앙도서관은 국가대표도서관으로 국가지식문화유산의 수집·제공·보존관리 등의 국가도서관 임무를 수행하고 있다. 본 연구는 국가도서관인 국립중앙도서관의 지속적 성장과 발전을 위한 합리적 경영개선 도구로서 성과지표 개발을 목표로 하였다. 성과지표는 도서관 환경변화에 대응한 조직의 전략과 성과측정 연계에 유용한 균형성과표(Balanced Scorecard, BSC)를 기반으로 하였다. ① 자원, 접근, 인프라 관점, ② 이용 관점, ③ 효율성 관점, ④ 잠재력과 성장 관점, 19개 핵심성공요인, 71개 지표로 국립중앙도서관 성과지표를 개발하였다. 또한 국립중앙도서관 직급과 직무에 따른 성과지표 인식의 차이를 분석하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kwack, Dong-Chul, Shim, Kyung and Yoon, Cheong-Ok. 2009. "A Research on the Mediumand Long-Term Plan for the Development of the Branches of the National Library of Korea." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 20(1): 119-135.
  2. Kwack, Dong-Chul. 2004. "A Study on the Formulation of Missions and Visions in the National Library of Korea." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 35(3): 205-227.
  3. National Library of Korea. 2019. National Library of Korea 2019-2023. 17-20. Seoul: Korea.
  4. Kim, Gyuhwan and Nam, Young Joon. 2008. "A Study on Development of Performance Indicators for Korean Public Libraries." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(4): 113-139. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2008.42.4.113
  5. Kim, Jeong-Taek. 2009. "A Study on Developing BSC-based Public Library Performance Indicator Model." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(1): 47-71. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.40.1.200903.47
  6. Nam, Young-Joon, Chang, Bo-Sung and Lee, Soo-Young. 2008. "The Study of BSC Balanced Scorecard of School Library." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(2): 277-294. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2008.42.2.277
  7. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. 2019. 2019 Performance Management Implementation Plan, 32-39. [cited 2019. 11. 5.]
  8. Park, In-Ung. 1984. "A Study on the Functions of the National Library of Korea." Functions and Responsibility of the National Library of Korea in the Changing Era: Essays in celebration of the 60th Anniversary of the National Library of Korea, 37-55.
  9. Oh, Dong-Geun. 1997. "A Study on the Theories of National Library Functions." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 26, 57-92.
  10. Yoon, Hee-Yoon. 2008. A Study on Strategic Establishment of Systematization of National Library. [Link to the National Library of Korea] the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism Publishing, 11-18.
  11. Yoon, Hee-Yoon. 2011. "A Study on Ensuring the Professionalism of the National Library Director." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 45(3): 87-106. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.3.087
  12. Cho, Wonho. 1987. "The Concept of the National Representative Library and the Development of the National Representative Library in Korea." Educational Development, 9(2): 18-25.
  13. Cho, Yoon-Hee. 2006. "A Study on Applying the BSC for University Libraries." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 40(1): 241-262. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.1.241
  14. Cho, Hyun-Yun and Kang, Guhyo. 2005. "Development of indicators for the application of BSC in Libraries-Focusing on the Customer's Perspective." Proceedings of the Academic Research Presentation of Korean Accounting Association, 991-1009.
  15. Choi, Jae-Hwang, Kwak, Seung-Jin and Kim, Jeong-Taek. 2007. "Application of Performance Indicators for Digital Library Services Focusing on the Analysis of ISO/DIS 11620: 2007." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 41(3): 81-102. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2007.41.3.081
  16. Hyun, KyuSub. 1977. "Functions and Automation direction of the National Library of Korea." Doseogwan, 221, 7-15.
  17. 国立国会図書館. 2016. 国立国会図書館中期ビジョン ユニバーサル․アクセス2020 及び 国立国会図書館 活動目標 2017-2020. [2019. 2. 2. 검색]
  18. 国立国会図書館. n.d.. 平成30年度 国立国会図書館 活動実績評価. pp. 3-19. . [2020. 9. 1. 검색].
  19. Al-Nahari, A. M. 1984. The role of national libraries in developing countries: with special reference to Saudi Arabia. Mansell Publishing.
  20. Ambrozic, M., Jakac-Bizjak, V. and Mlekus, H. P. 2003. "Performance evaluation in European national libraries: state-of-the-art." In World Library and Information Congress: 69th IFLA General Conference and Council 1-9 August 2003, Berlin, 1-23.
  21. Andersen, H. V., Lawrie, G. and Shulver, M. 2000. The Balanced Scorecard vs. the EFQM Business Excellence Model-which is the better strategic management tool. 2GC Active management, 1-15.
  22. Bibliotek, D. K. 2017b. 2018-2019 Rammeaftale. Retrieved from
  23. Bibliotek, D. K. 2017a. Omverdensanalyse. Retrieved from
  24. Bibliotheque nationale de France. 2014. Contrat de performance 2014-2016. Accessed October 4. 2017.
  25. Bibliotheque nationale de France. 2017. "Contrat de performance 2017-2021." Accessed October 5. 2017.
  26. Brindley, L. 2002. "The role of national libraries in the twenty-first century." Bodleian Library Record, 17(6): 464-481.
  27. British Library. 2010. 2020 Vision.
  28. British Library. 2015. Living Knowledge: The British Library 2015-2023. British Library, 9-33.
  29. British Library. 2019. British Library Annual Report and Accounts 2018/19 / UK Parliament British Library, 38-39.
  30. Cameron, J. 2008. Measuring performance through financial information: A case study. In World Library and Information Congress.
  31. Cornish, G. P. 1991. The Role of National Libraries in the New Information Environment.
  32. Cribb, G. and Hogan, C. 2003. Balanced Scorecard: linking strategic planning to measurement and communication. Information Services Papers, 8.
  33. Da Costa, N. 2010. "Un contrat de performance à la Bibliothèque nationale de France." [Article]. Bulletindes Bibliotheques de France, 55(4): 26-29.
  34. de la Mano, M. and Creaser, C. 2016. "The impact of the Balanced Scorecard in libraries: From performance measurement to strategic management." Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 48(2): 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000614558078
  35. De-la-Mano-Gonzalez, M. and Albelda-Esteban, B. 2009. "Evaluacion de bibliotecas nacionales: elaboracion de una normativa internacional y su aplicacion en la Biblioteca Nacional de Espaoa." (Spanish). El Profesional de La Informacion, 18(6): 660-668. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2009.nov.10
  36. Gururaja, A. 2016. "Measuring Library Performance of RYM Engineering College, Bellary in Karnataka Using Balanced Score Card: A Case Study." International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 3(3), 198-201.
  37. Finnish National Library. 2005. The Finnish National Library Strategy 2006-2015. Quoted in De la Mano, M. and Creaser, C. 2016. "The impact of the Balanced Scorecard in libraries: From performance measurement to strategic management." Journal of librarianship and information science, 48(2): 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000614558078
  38. Harbour, J. L. 1997. The Basics of Performance Measurement, New York. NY: Quality Resources.
  39. Huang, R. and Song, L. 2010. "Application of balanced scorecard in library management and evaluation." In 2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science, 1-4. IEEE.
  40. Humphreys, K. W. 1966. "National library functions." UNESCO bulletin for libraries, 20(4): 158-169.
  41. Hunter, D. 2009. "Development of strategic performance information at the National Library of Scotland." Performance Measurement and Metrics, 10(2): 142-150. https://doi.org/10.1108/14678040911005446
  42. ISO. 2009. ISO/TR 28118:2009(E), Information and documentation - Performance indicators for national libraries. 2009.
  43. ISO. 2014. ISO 11620:2014, Information and documentation - Library performance indicators
  44. ISO. 2019. "ISO 21248:2019, Information and documentation - Performance indicators for national libraries. 2019.
  45. Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard Harvard Business School Press. Boston, MA.
  46. Kon, D. 2005. Performance measurement and management: a Singapore perspective. Measuring Business Excellence.
  47. Krarup, K. 2003. "Balanced scorecard at the Royal Library, Copenhagen." Liber Quarterly, 14(1): 37-57. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.7756
  48. Library of Congress. 2018. Enriching the Library, The FY2019-2023 Strategic Plan of the Library of Congress. Accessed October 4. 2020.
  49. Library of Congress. 2015. The FY2016-2020 Strategic Plan of the Library of Congress. Accessed October 4. 2020.
  50. Library of Congress. 2019. Financial statements fiscal year 2018. Accessed April 2. 2020.
  51. Line, M. B. 1983. "Performance assessment at national library level." Do we really need libraries, 25-42.
  52. Line, M. B. 1989. National library and information needs: alternative means of fulfilment, with special reference to the role of national libraries (No. PGI-89-WS-9). Unesco.
  53. Line, M. B. 2001. "How well are national libraries doing?" [Article]. Alexandria, 13(2): 67-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/095574900101300201
  54. Lor, P. J. and Sonnekus, E. A. S. 1997. Guidelines for legislation for national library services: Unesco Paris.
  55. MacDougall, A. 1991. "Performance Assessment: Today's Confusion, Tomorrow's Solution?" IFLA Journal, 17(4): 371-378. https://doi.org/10.1177/034003529101700409
  56. Magnussen, I. 1963. The functions and planning of a national library. National Libraries. Texts of University and Research Section.
  57. Matthews, J. 2006. "The Library Balanced Scorecard: Is It in Your Future?." Public Libraries Chicago-Public Library Association, 45(6): 64.
  58. Matthews, J. R. 2010. "Assessing organizational effectiveness: The role of frameworks." In 2010 Library assessment conference, 277.
  59. Mearns, D. C. 1955. "Current trends in national libraries." Library/Trends, 4(1).
  60. National Library of Australia. n. d. corporate_plan_2020-21. Accessed October 2. 2020.
  61. National Library of Australia. 2020. Annual Report 2019-20. Accessed October 2. 2020.
  62. Pienaar, H. and Penzhorn, C. 2000. "Using the balanced scorecard to facilitate strategic management at an academic information service." Libri, 50(3): 202-209.
  63. Poll, R. 2001. "Performance, Processes and Costs: Managing Service Quality with the Balanced Scorecard." Library Trends, 49(4): 709.
  64. Poll, R. 2008a. "Comparing the Incomparable? Performance Measures for National Libraries." [Article]. Alexandria, 20(3): 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/095574900802000305
  65. Poll, R. 2008b. "The cat's pyjamas? Performance indicators for national libraries." Performance Measurement and Metrics, 9(2): 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/14678040810906817
  66. Poll, R. and te Boekhorst, P. 2007. Measuring Quality, Performance Measurement in Libraries. 2nd revised edition.
  67. Self, J. 2003. "From values to metrics: implementation of the balanced scorecard at a university library." Performance measurement and metrics, 4(2): 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1108/14678040310486891
  68. Self, J. 2004. "Metrics and management: applying the results of the balanced scorecard." Performance measurement and metrics, 5(3): 101-105. https://doi.org/10.1108/14678040410570111
  69. Schick, F. L. 1971. "The International Standardization of Library Statistics." UNESCO bulletin for libraries, 25(1): 2-11.
  70. Sylvestre, G. 1987. Guidelines for National Libraries.
  71. Vitiello, G. 2001. "National libraries: the concept and the practice, 1700-2000." Alexandria, 13(3): 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/095574900101300302
  72. 국립중앙도서관 홈페이지 - 한국서지 표준. [cited 2020. 12. 5.] .
  73. Business & IP Centre. [cited 2020. 12. 5.]
  74. IFLA. 2020. National Libraries Section. [cited 2020. 5. 1.]
  75. Knowledge Quarter [cited 2020. 12. 5.]
  76. Library of Congress Launches Three New Educational Apps [cited 2020. 12. 5.]
  77. 도서관법 제18조, 제19조
  78. 공무원인재개발법 제4조