• 한국의사학회지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.75-83
• /
• 2014

This study investigated the various editions of Huangjenaegyeongsomun (黃帝內經素問) published in the Joseon Dynasty. Only study for on Eulhae metal type (乙亥字) Huangjenaegyeongsomun and bibliography research of some holding institutions are the existing research on this topic. The conclusion of this paper is as follows. 1. The 14 and 15-volume book are existing most common versions of Huangjenaegyeongsomun (黃帝內經素問) published in Joseon Dynasty. The two books were corrected by Naeuiwon (內醫院). According to this study, the latter is more early than the former. But in the study of the past were not made clear distinction between the two books. 2. The 15-volume book of Huangjenaegyeongsomun (黃帝內經素問) was published in the mid-18th century between the first half of the 19th century. 3. A Wooden print editions Huangjenaegyeongsomun (黃帝內經素問) about Japanese invasion of Korea in 1592 ago have been investigated holding institution. 4. The Gyeongju-published Huangjenaegyeongsomun (黃帝內經素問) is estimated that in the mid Joseon Dynasty, This edition has been estimated that the late Joseon Dynasty far.

• 대한한의학원전학회지
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.33-49
• /
• 2020

Objectives : While the original version of 『Eoyakwonbang』 does not exist, its contents have been introduced in several studies. The existing editions are the Joseon versions 『SinganHyeminEoyakwonbang』(Eulhaeja edition) and 『GyesaSinganHyeminEoyakwonbang』(Gapjinja edition), and a Japanese version, 『GyesaSinganHyeminEoyakwonbang』(Gwanjeong edition). In a recent research, it has been discovered that there is a fourth edition of the book, 『SinganHyeminEoyakwonbang』(Jeonggadang edition), in the Japanese Parliament Library collection. Methods : Contents of the chapter on pediatric diseases were compared among the four editions to clarify their relation with each other. Results : Based on the organization of the chapter, formula names in the list and body, explanatory methods of the formulas, application, formula construction and methods of application, we found that there were great similarities between Eulhaeja edition and Jeonggadang edition, and between Gapjinja edition and Gwanjeong edition. Conclusions : 1. Jeonggadang edition is similar to Eulhaeja edition in contents and form. 2. Although the exact publication date of Jeonggadang edition is unknown, based on the fact that it was mostly circulated in the Qing period, it can be assumed to have been published after the Eulhaeja edition which was published in the 15th century. 3. Gapjinja edition was published in the 16th century and shares little similarity in form, organization and contents with Eulhaeja edition, indicating that a different version was used as the original script. 4. Gwanjeong edition was published in the 18th century, and is very similar in form, organization and contents with Gapjinja edition, repeating the same errors made in the Gapjinja edition. This indicate that Gapjinja edition was the mother script of Gwanjeong edition.

• 한국의사학회지
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.33-44
• /
• 2017

Introduction to Medicine (Euihak-Ipmun), written by Lee Chun of the Ming Dynasty, is a comprehensive medical book brought to Joseon in the 1600s. It directly influenced many medical books written in the Joseon Dynasty of the same period, and became a major citation document of Dongui-Bogam. Introduction to Medicine became a major text for medical education in 1834 and has since been used as a clinical primer of Korean medicine. This article first examines the Joseon's era published version of Introduction to Medicine using documentation of the Diary of the Royal Secretariat (Seungjeongwon Ilgi), and a woodblock list. Based on these investigations, the reviewer examined the existing versions of the book, and focused on various characteristics for comparison. This article reveals facts which include : 1) All editions of Introduction to Medicine published at the present office are published by Jeolla-do provincial office (Jeolla-Gamyeong). 2) The first edition was published before 1636. 3) A finely produced version (Jeongganbon) was published around 1760. 4) The Jeongrijache-iron type publication was published around 1801.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제49권4호
• /
• pp.405-427
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 해방기에 출간되었던 <아협 그림얘기책>시리즈를 대상으로 당시 출판 현전본의, 현황, 체제 및 발행 분석, 삽도화가 분석을 통해 <아협 그림얘기책>의 발행을 비롯하여 체제, 형태, 내용에 대해 심도 있게 살펴보았다. 을유문화사와 조선아동문화협회 (아협)에서 어린이의 생활 해방과 아동문화 건설을 위해 출간한 <아협 그림얘기책> 시리즈는 현재 5책이 남아 있다. 미전본은 당시 발행되었던 신문에 실린 광고 기사를 토대로 책들의 출판 이력을 확인하였다. 현전본을 대상으로 분석한 결과, 표지 권수(卷首) 본문 권말(卷末)의 체제로 동일하게 구성되었으며, 본문에는 그림이야기 형식의 3컷 만화와 이야기로 이루어진 특징을 보였다. 책의 크기는 A5 판형, 분량은 대체로 32면이며 반양장의 장정 형태로 발행되었다. 삽화가로는 당대에 미술 분야에서 활약을 했던 김용환, 김의환 형제가 참여했다.

• 대한한의학원전학회지
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2014

Objectives : This paper analyze several version of Danbangshinpyon(單方新編), a simple medical book that was widely used in the private sector from late Joseon dynasty to Japanese colonial period in Korea. Since it had not only collected the treatments easy to get around but also translated the classical Chinese into Korean, Danbangshinpyon(單方新編) was popular in the environment of poor medical service for the people. Methods : We compared several types of issue having heen popular either in the form of plate printing or as manuscripts until recently. Enlarged edition of Danbangshinpyon(增補單方新編) was edited in 1913, and it had been published a total of 13 times until 1922 with 8th edition. On the other hand, it is regarded that the contents of which are again included into Shinpyonmyobang(新篇妙方) published in 1938. Results : Danbangshinpyon was edited to match the demand for medical care at the time in 1909 on the basis of previously existing Gyungheombang(經驗方) of that time. Taking advantage of the public popularity of Danbangshinpyon, Enlarged edition of Danbangshinpyon was hurriedly constructed with weak consideration of upgrading the content. Shinpyonmyobang(新篇妙方) contains the whole content of Danbangshinpyon(單方新編) in the second half of it. Surveying details in the Shinpyonmyobang, one can find that it had been edited to copytext Enlarged edition of Danbang-shinpyon rather than Danbangshinpyon(單方新編). In other words, it is presumed to have been re-edited after the publication of Enlarged edition of Danbangshinpyon.

• 비교문화연구
• /
• 제51권
• /
• pp.257-257
• /
• 2018

조선간본(朝鮮刊本) "유향신서(劉向新序)"는 이극돈(李克墩)이 1492년경 출간하도록 한 판본이다. 현존하는 조선간본(朝鮮刊本) "유향신서(劉向新序)"는 민관동에 의해 계명대학교 소장본 2종(上冊)과 김준식(金俊植) 집안(이하에서는 '후조당(後彫堂)'으로 약칭)의 소장본(下冊) 그리고 분실된 최재석(崔在石) 소장본과 김용기(金用基) 소장본이 발굴되었다. 필자는 이외에 한국학중앙연구원(하책(下冊)) 경기대학교(하책(下冊)) 일본국회도서관(완질) 아단문고(상책(上冊)) 성암고서박물관(하책(下冊)) 소장본의 존재를 확인하였다. 본 논문은 위의 판본들 중 원문을 확인할 수 있는 판본인 계명대 한국학중앙연구원 경기대 후조당(後彫堂) 일본국회도서관 소장본을 대상으로 조선간본(朝鮮刊本)의 특징들을 연구하였다. 상책(上冊)의 경우, 계명대 귀중본은 '초각본(初刻本)'이고 고본은 '초각본(初刻本)'의 제69~70면과 제71~72면을 보각(補刻)한 '보각본(補刻本)'이다, 또한 일본국회도서관 소장본도 고본과 동일한 면이 보각(補刻)된 '보각본(補刻本)'이다. 하책(下冊)의 경우, 한국학중앙연구원과 경기대 소장본은 '초각본(初刻本)'이고, 후조당(後彫堂)과 일본국회도서관 소장본은 제9~10면 제63~64면 제87~88 제107~108면을 상책(上冊)과 마찬가지로 해당 면을 보각(補刻)한 '보각본(補刻本)'이다. 현존 판본들을 비교해보면, 상책(上冊)의 경우 현존하는 판본으로는 2회에 걸쳐 인출되었음만 단정할 수 있고, 하책(下冊)의 경우에는 현존하는 4종의 판본들은 3회에 걸쳐 인쇄가 이루어졌음을 확정할 수 있다. 필자는 이어서 현존 판본들을 바탕으로 실제 문헌에 대한 연구를 진행하여 조선간본(朝鮮刊本)의 특징을 도출하였다. 먼저 권수제(卷首題) 권미제(卷尾題)와 문단의 형식을 논술하였고, 그리고 본문은 원칙적으로 자수(字數)가 '11행(行)18자(字)'로 되어있으나, 실제 판본 상에는 '18자(字)'가 아닌 경우들을 찾아내 해당 면(面)과 행(行)의 자수(字數)를 표로 제시하였으며, 또한 소자주(小字註)가 쌍행(雙行)으로 된 경우를 고찰하였다. 그 다음으로는 조선간본(朝鮮刊本)에는 원문에 빈칸이 나타나는데 해당부분과 해당 글자를 모두 밝혔으며, 마지막으로 조선간본(朝鮮刊本)의 '오탈자(誤脫字)'를 찾아내어 해당부분을 명기하고 오류의 이유를 구체적으로 분석하였다.

• 한국의사학회지
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.57-70
• /
• 2018

Much research has already been done on Donguibogam. However, comparison of specific characters was not done because researchers found it difficult to compare different editions of the text in one place. Recently, important editions have been published on the Internet, making comparison possible. In this paper, researchers compare eight editions Donguibogam, including the original edition published in 1613 and seven other editions corrected by the Naeuiwon (Joseon Dynasty National Medical Center). The comparison results were summarized and tabulated. The results of the comparison are analyzed and presented in this article as a chart. The result of comparing the characters and the analyzed graph were in agreement. The authors propose that all written and electronic publications of Donguibogam should refer to other editions implied, quoted or referenced within the text and including with proper citations, and reference the original and first edition. Inadequate referencing will pollute future knowledge of this foundational text of Traditional Korean Medicine and may result in perpetration of mis-information. Based on accumulated knowledge and study of historical Korean Medicine texts, the Namsan edition made a mistake in the editing process. The year of publication of Gabsul-yoengyoeng-gegan Edition needs to be studied again and corrections made where appropriate.

• 한국의사학회지
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.119-143
• /
• 2006

Man-Byeong-Hoi-Chun(萬病回春) is a representative writing of Gong Zhongxian. It was generally used by Koreans in Joseon(朝鮮) era and issued many times in the latter period of Joseon dynasty. We investigated the Jeung-Bo-Man-Byeong-Hoi-Chun (增補萬病回春, An enlarged edition of the Man-Byeong-Hoi-Chun), which is published in the 17th century, coming to a conclusion like the followings. 1. In Joseon(朝鮮), there was the J eung-Bo-Man-Byeong-Hoi-Chun which was made through revision and enlargement of the Man-Byeong-Hoi-Chun written by Gong Zhongxian of China. 2. There are two versions of the Jeung-Bo-Man-Byeong-Hoi-Chun pressed in Joseon, which are written by Kim Yuk(金堉) in 1656 and by Kim Seok-ju(金錫胄) in 1679. 3. The representative medical books of Joseon such as Eui-Rim-Chual-Yo-Sok-J ip (醫林撮要續集), Dong-Eui-Bo-Gam (東醫寶鑑), J e-Jung-Sin-Pyeon(濟衆新編) contained quotations from the J eung-Bo-Man-Byeong-Hoi-Chun(增補萬病回春), not from the Man-Byeong-Hoi-Chun (萬病回春). 4. The Jeung-Bo-Man-Byeong-Hoi-Chun(增補萬病回春) contained not only the essence of the Chinese medicine but also new medical systems reflecting actual circumstances of Joseon at that time. So, it can be recognized as the foundation of the Joseon medicine in the latter period of the dynasty.

• 대한한의학원전학회지
• /
• 제24권5호
• /
• pp.107-118
• /
• 2011

Classified Emergency Materia Medica is a pharmacopoeia published by the government of the Song(宋) dynasty. After publishment, it had a decisive effect on East-Asian herbology of China, Korean & Japan. Sakae Miki(三木榮), Tameto Okanisi(岡西爲人) wrote papers on the subjects of type, publishing process, bibliographic terms of Classified Emergency Materia Medica published in the early and middle years of Joseon Dynasty. Moreover, Sakae Miki claimed that Classified Emergency Materia Medica from China had been a standard of herbology of Joseon Dynasty since its publishment, and herbology based on materia medica from countryside(鄕藥) also had occupied a part of herbology in Joseon Dynasty. Nevertheless the specific influences, from Classified Emergency Materia Medica to the medical books of Joseon Dynasty which established the herbology based on materia medica from countryside has never been handled so far. So I would like to investigate the influence of Classified Emergency Materia Medica to Joseon Dynasty, through a comparison with literature review. The main literatures for comparison are two representative medical books of Joseon Dynasty, Compendium of Prescriptions from the Countryside(1433) & Treasured Mirror of Eastern Medicine(1613), especially focusing on the pharmacognostic parts. The main comparing points on researching literatures will be the following: publication year of books; order of herbs; and quotations. This paper will show which edition of Classified Emergency Materia Medica was utilized to publish two medical books of Joseon Dynasty, and the process how Korean herbology based on materia medica from countryside was transformed after accepting Chinese herbology.

• 한국의사학회지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.55-69
• /
• 2016

This study examined the bibliographical characteristics of Hyangyak Jipseongbang that was compiled in the $15^{th}$ century (1433) and continued to publish throughout the early period of Joseon Dynasty. Various existing records and the early Joseon printed edition of Hyangyak Jipseongbang stored in a domestic Sancheong Korean Medicine Museum were reviewed from 3 perspectives as follows. First, it is the bibliographical system approach to Hyangyak Jipseongbang for some circumstances related to its compilation and publication. Second, it is the significance in terms of printing history through the analysis of bibliographical characteristics and the status of the remaining Hyangyak Jipseongbang. Particularly, the period of publication is an important factor to determine the value of a book. In this respect, most of the extant early-Joseon editions of Hyangyak Jipseongbang seem to have been published during the ruling years of King Sung Jong. Those editions are expected to have distinctive meaning from other copied editions of the $17^{th}$ century. Last, it is bibliographical orignal analysis of Hyangyak Jipseongbang. This study reviewed the contents and composition of Vol. 49 through 51 of Hyangyak Jipseongbang stored in Sancheong Korean Medicine Museum in an attempt to help understand the textual bibliography and composition system of exhibiting editions.