• 대한공업교육학회지
• /
• v.44 no.1
• /
• pp.141-161
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the necessity of opening a lecture on intellectual property education by confirming the effect of the lecture on intellectual property education in the college students. For the study, IP program was developed for the course through literature review, and supplemented it with expert review. The developed course program was applied to 39 students for 15 weeks. In order to verify the effectiveness of the lecture, the survey was performed. And analysis method for the concept change analysis and the keyword formation analysis were performed. For the analysis, SPSS 24, UCINET and Netdraw were used. The results were as follows. First, the lecture on intellectual property education positively changed the value, necessity, and perception of intellectual property to the students. Second, the students of the lecture on intellectual property education responded that the lecture on the intellectual property should be increased. Third, through the lecture on intellectual property education, students formed basic concept about intellectual property centered on key word. The intellectual property lecture program developed and applied in this study is difficult to apply to all university situations, but it is expected to be referenced in the establishment and operation of related lectures and to be derived in various forms.

• 대한공업교육학회지
• /
• v.39 no.2
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2014

This study took existing invention intellectual property related textbooks being utilized in secondary vocational education, analyzed the formation status of 'key learning elements' reflection ratio and drew optimum key learning elements formation ratio by invention intellectual property education content required in secondary vocational education in the future. For this, the study task was set up as 'what kind and how much of invention intellectual property key learning elements are in the invention intellectual property textbook education content now and what is the desirable ratio of each key learning elements in the future'. To resolve this task, 3 specialists analyzed the invention intellectual property education content reflection status and optimum reflection ratio by invention intellectual property education content required in the future is suggested by Delphi survey. The results of this study are as following. First, the result of analysis on invention intellectual property key learning elements included in the invention patent recognition books being utilized in secondary vocational education was that the books included all key learning elements; however, some textbooks have the trend of concentrating in D area (problem-solving activities). Second, the result of analysis on the reflection ratio by invention intellectual property education content area in the invention patent recognition books being utilized in secondary vocational education was that there was the trend in most textbooks that they concentrate in intellectual property creation area; while some textbooks deal with intellectual property protection area and intellectual property utilization area. Regarding by achievement type, knowledge area was main in all textbooks. Meanwhile, function area is dealt in invention patent basic, invention and problem-solving and design textbooks. Attitude area is not dealt or is dealt insufficiently in most textbooks. Third, the optimum reflection ratio of invention intellectual property education key learning elements required in secondary vocational education in the future as obtained by specialists' delphi survey was that it is necessary to decrease D (problem-solving activities) 17.7% area, E(invention fusion knowledge) 2.9% area, K(patent application) 6.9% and L(patent information investigation) area 9.6%. Regarding the optimum reflection ratio of invention intellectual property education content, it is suggested that the invention literacy area 3.1%, intellectual property creation area 4.5% and intellectual property protection area 10.6% would be decreased; while intellectual property utilization area 17.7% would be increased. Regarding optimum reflection ratio of achievement type, it is suggested that knowledge area 52% would be decreased; while function area 32.3% and attitude area 19.6% would be increased.