• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.357-366
• /
• 2005

이 연구는 교육과정에 명시적으로 표기하지 않은 개념형성과정을 밝혀 구조망으로 나타내고, 여기에서 교사가 지도할 내용의 개열을 구성하는데 그 목적을 둔다. 이를 위해 연구진은 사인함수의 그래프에 대한 개념형성과정을 수업모델로 만들어 교실에서 수업을 실시하고 수업 중학생들의 모둠활동을 관찰했다. 또, 수업 후에는 인터뷰를 통해 개념형성과정에서 보인 상황 찾기(인식), 사용된 사고전략, 효과적인 자료 및 학습도구 등 학생들의 반응을 면밀히 기록했다. 이들 결과는 5인의 전문 집단에 의하여 분석되어 내용구조망(network)과 그 지도계열을 구성할 수 있었다. 이 연구는 학교현장에서 소홀이 되고 있는 개념교육에 구체적인 방법을 제시하고 있다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.253-266
• /
• 2009

This study was focused on analyzing students' informal reasoning patterns and their considerations in decision-making on socioscientific issues. This study involved 20 undergraduate students (10 biology majors and 10 non-biology majors) and showed how the two groups responded on socioscientific issues. Semi-structured interviews were conducted twice respectively based on six scenarios of gene therapy and human cloning. The result showed 93% of the total number of participants' decisions were made by rationalistic reasoning, whereas emotional reasoning was 49%, and intuitive reasoning was 27%. Students usually used two or three informal reasoning patterns together. Most of the students took more consideration on social factors. Some perceived ethical and moral implications of the issues, but they did not consider them seriously. They made their decisions depending on their own values, etc. 65% of the participants got their information on socioscientific issues from the mass media. Biology majors hardly used intuitive reasoning compared to non-biology majors. The Biology major group took into deep considerations on socioscientific issues while the non-biology major group seemed to interpret the given scenarios simply. This implied that the content knowledge was a significant factor of their decision-making. Therefore, it is necessary to develop proper science courses for non-major students to improve their decision-making on socioscientific issues. So, when we develop educational materials or programs, we should consider students' reasoning patterns, their considerations in decision-making, and their content knowledge. And because the mass media has the potential to play a key role for an effective education, we need to make a plan to make a practical application.

• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제42권3호
• /
• pp.293-307
• /
• 2018

이 연구에서는 앞으로 비형식 과학 학습 연구가 추구해야 할 방향을 모색하기 위하여, 기존의 비형식 과학 학습 관련 연구들이 다루어온 교육적 관점을 각 분야별로 분석하였다. 이를 위하여 최근 6년간 발행한 비형식 과학 학습 관련 학술지 144편을 대상으로 하여 각 연구에서의 교육적 관점을 분석하였다. 그 결과, 과학적 실천 참여나 정서 고양, 지식의 이해에 관한 연구가 다수 이루어졌지만, 과학의 본성에 대한 이해에 대한 연구는 드물게 이뤄지는 등 몇 가지 교육적 관점에 치우쳐서 연구가 이뤄진 경향이 있었다. 또한 이러한 경향은 각 분야 세부 매체별에서도 나타났는데, 치우친 양상은 매체별로 다양하게 나타났다. 따라서 형식 교육의 보조가 아닌 비형식 과학 학습 그 자체로서의 다양한 측면을 살펴보고, 추구하고자 하는 바를 깊게 이해하기 위해서는 각 매체별 연구에 있어서 다양한 교육적 관점을 검토해야 할 것이다.

• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.139-154
• /
• 2001

Recently, more firms have shown an interest in implementing knowledge management methods. However, few companies are capable of adopting knowledge management methods effectively to improve organizational performance because it is still unclear how these methods improve corporate performance. To find this relationship between knowledge management methods and organizational performance, this paper analyses effects of knowledge management methods on corporate performance empirically. 51 Korean firms are selected as a sample base for empirical tests. Knowledge management methods can be categorized into four styles; harmony, codification, personalization, and ignorance. For example, the emphasis of harmony style is on both knowledge reusability using information technologies and knowledge sharing through informal intimacy among employees. Corporate performance varies depending on styles. Harmony style is founded to be most effective for corporate performance. Personalization and codification styles don't show any difference. This outcome is in line with the general observation that both tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge are important for effective knowledge management.

• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.57-75
• /
• 2004

The knowledge management is increasingly an important strategic weapon for sustaining competitive advantage of firms. Firms are undertaking knowledge management initiatives and making significant investments. However, there is relatively little empirical support for the impact of knowledge management on performance of firms. Understanding of the impact of knowledge management, this paper explores how knowledge management strategy influences firms' market value. We examine this issue using event study methodology and evaluate the cumulative abnormal returns for knowledge management strategy announced by firms from 1998 to 2002. The results show that firms' announcements of knowledge management strategy are positively related with firms' market value. Specially, dynamic style-which emphasizes both (i) knowledge reusability through information technologies and (ii) knowledge sharing through informal discussions among employees-has higher performance. This outcome presents empirical support to argument that the emphasis on both tacit and explicit knowledge results in better market value.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.65-85
• /
• 2010

The importance of communities of practice(CoP) as an organizational informal unit for fostering knowledge transfer and sharing gains a lot of attention from KM researchers and practitioners. Since most of CoPs are formulated online these days, the credibility or trustworthiness of knowledge contents circulated within a certain CoP should be considered thoroughly for them to be fully utilized safely. Here comes the need for an appropriate trust measuring methodology to determine the true value of knowledge given by unknown people through an online channel. In this paper, an improved trust measuring method is proposed using new trust variables such as level of degrees derived from the relationships among community users. In addition, activeness, relevance, and usefulness of the knowledge contents themselves, which are calculated automatically using a text categorization technique, are also used for trust measurement. The proposed framework incorporates fuzzy set and calculation concepts to help build trust matrices and models, which are used to measure the level of trust involved in specific knowledge artifacts concerned.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.17-33
• /
• 2008

This study proposes University 2.0 as a model case of open, flexible, and distributed learning environment for higher education based on theoretical foundations and perspectives. As web 2.0 technologies emerge into the field of education, ways of generating and disseminating information and knowledge have been drastically changed. Professors are no longer the only source of knowledge. Students using internet often become prosumers of knowledge who search and access information through the web as well as publish their own knowledge using the web. A concept and framework of University 2.0 is introduced for implementing the new interactive learning paradigm with an open, flexible and distributed learning environment for higher education. University 2.0 incorporates online and offline learning environments with various educational media. Furthermore, it employs various learning strategies and integrates formal and informal learning through learning communities. Both instructors and students in University 2.0 environment are expected to be active knowledge generators as well as creative designers of their own learning and teaching.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.75-97
• /
• 2019

In the rapidly changing business environment, knowledge has been recognized as a core asset for sustaining an organization's competitive advantage. In addition, knowledge sharing is one of the key elements of knowledge management, emphasizing external knowledge sharing beyond initial internal knowledge sharing. However, while knowledge management research emphasizes knowledge sharing, which is a positive aspect, research on preventing knowledge leakage that can have negative consequences is relatively lacking. Companies have tried to minimize the negative effects of knowledge management but many knowledge leakage accidents are still occurring. Therefore, this study aims to examine the effects of external factors based on deterrence theory and internal factors based on self-determination theory on knowledge leakage intention focusing on tacit knowledge. The results of the empirical analysis of 100 data sets collected through a scenario-based survey show that certainty of sanctions, social disapproval, and competence are found to have a significant effect on reducing tacit knowledge leakage intention. Furthermore, informal sanctions have a greater impact on tacit knowledge leakage intention than formal sanctions and external factors have a greater effect on tacit knowledge leakage intention than internal factors.

• 한국경영정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영정보학회 2008년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.270-275
• /
• 2008

The various research on Communities of practices (CoP) for propagation of softer type knowledge in new Knowledge Management (KM) strategy having been performed for past couple of years. CoP is one of effective process innovation tool for diffusion of knowledge. Based on CoP's voluntary and spontaneous characteristic, it performs a function of delivering softer type knowledge of workers to the other colleagues of organization. But one step further to CoP's function of propagation of internal knowledge, research on function of CoP's contribution in enterprise strategy are insufficient yet. This paper presents enterprise CoP should be managed and aligned to strategic objectives of enterprise, and also, suggests the methodology for CoPs to maintain a lifecycle as a tool to contribute in strategic goal attainment. Although CoPs are voluntary and spontaneous informal organization, it can display a contribution as tool for KM strategy when it is aligned to strategy properly and form efficient lifecycle.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.75-91
• /
• 2002

This research is interested in organization members' knowledge contribution, along with the requirement for the effective knowledge management as a critical corporate asset. We consider the performance appraisal and reward system on knowledge sharing as a key issue for the successful knowledge management. Analyzed will be the interactive relationship among the performance appraisal and reward system, individual knowledge contribution, and organizational knowledge contribution effectiveness. This case study is based on in-depth interviews in the consulting industry recognized as a knowledge-integrated industry. The purpose of this research is to examine how firms evaluate and reward organization members' knowledge contribution, to define how fim1s utilize IT for the knowledge management, and to show how the performance appraisal and reward system influence organizational knowledge contribution effectiveness. Besides, other determinants for knowledge contribution effectiveness are defined. It is recognized that knowledge contribution effectiveness is positively related to non-monetary rewards and informal appraisals. As for the future study, we recommend the empirical research based on several propositions developed in this study.