• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.59-67
• /
• 2006

발치 등 치과치료 후에 발생한 하악신경의 감각이상(이감각증)으로 인해 발음문제를 호소하는 환자들이 있지만, 감각신경의 이상과 운동구어능력 사이의 직접적인 관련성에 대해서는 논란이 존재한다. 본 연구의 목적은 편측 하악 신경의 마취로 인한 일시적인 감각손상이 운동구어능력에 미치는 영향을 평가하여 감각이상과 운동구어능력과의 관련성을 밝히고자 하였다. 본 연구는 단국대학교 치과대학에 재학중인 학생들 중 표준어를 구사하는 건강한 지원자 10명 (남:녀=7:3)을 대상으로 통법에 따라 우측 하치조신경, 설신경, 장협신경의 마취를 시행하였다. 주관적인 평가를 위해 대상자들은 마취전, 마취 후 30초, 30분, 60분, 90분, 120분, 150분, 180분에 마취 심도와 주관적으로 느끼는 발음불편감의 정도를 VAS로 기록하게 하였고, 운동 구어능력을 객관적으로 평가하기 위해 선택된 문장과 단어를 각각의 경과시간 마다 피검자에게 읽도록 하여 녹음하고 채취된 녹음샘플을 Computerized Speech $Lab^{(R)}$, Model 4500을 사용하여 발화속도, 교호운동력, 억양, 음성진전, 발음을 평가하였다. 실험 결과, 마취에 의한 주관적인 발음불편감 정도는 마취 후 60분에서 최고조에 이르고 이후 점점 감소하는데, 이는 주관적 마취 심도의 증감과 상당한 상관관계가 있었다. 주관적 마취 심도와 마취에 대한 발음불편감 정도에 따르는 다중선형회귀 분석결과, 연속발화기본 주파수에서만 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 보였고 발화속도, 교호운동력, 음성진전 등 나머지 항목에서는 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 또한, 마취 전후 발음상의 변화도 관찰되지 않았다. 즉, 편측 하악 전달마취는 마취의 증감에 따라 주관적인 발음불편은 변화하지만, 객관적 항목에서 운동구어능력에는 뚜렷한 영향을 미친다고 볼 수는 없었다. 그러므로 편측 하악의 감각손상이 운동구어능력에 뚜렷한 영향을 미친다고 볼 수는 없는 것으로 사료된다.

• Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
• /
• 제20권6호
• /
• pp.367-375
• /
• 2020

Background: Intraosseous anesthesia (IO) allows the anesthetic solution to be injected directly into the cancellous bone. The anesthetic solution immediately reaches the periapical region, and thus the axonal area of the nerve, where it can temporarily disable the sodium pump. The effect is felt almost without any time delay, and only a small amount of anesthetic solution is required. Methods: This study aims to investigate the efficacy of IO using the AnestoⓇ device after infiltration anesthesia (IA) and/or inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia (IANB) failed to work in symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (hot tooth). The 33 patients included in the study were treated additionally with 1.7 ml articaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine hydrochloride (UltracainⓇ D-S, Sanofi-Aventis, Frankfurt, Germany) IO. Results: The electrical pulp test showed that 95.76% of the volunteers reacted positively to the combination of IANB or IA with the IO. In women, the additive IO was effective at 97.22%. In men, the IO led to pain elimination in 94.00% of cases. The duration of the IO was less than a quarter of an hour (13.03 min). The IO worked longer in women than in men (13.61 min vs. 12.33 min). Overall, more than every third tooth that needed trepanation was located in the posterior area of the mandible (36.4%). Treatment of hot teeth in this area was associated with an increased pulse rate and increased residual pain. There was a moderate correlation (Spearman-Rho [IRI] = 0.280) between the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and bone density, and a significant correlation (IRI = 0.612) between subjective residual pain and bone width. The IO resulted in a moderate, transient increase in the pulse rate by approximately 20 bpm. This is similar to the temporary increase in heart rate after conventional anesthesia techniques in non-preloaded patients and can be considered clinically irrelevant. Conclusion: IO with the AnestoⓇ device as an extension and deepening of local pain elimination is recommended for the treatment of hot teeth.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.297-308
• /
• 1989

저자동은 약 1년전 모 병원에서 하악과 상악에 각기 안모변형과 골팽창을 동반한 병소에 대해 수술을 재발한 치주인대에서 기인한 양성 섬유골성 병소를 치험하였으며 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 본증례 1은 32세 남자의 우측 하악 골체부에서 술후 약 1년만에 재발된 백악질골섬유종이었고 증례 2는 72세 여자의 상악 전치부에서 술후 약 5개월만에 재발소견을 보인 골섬유종이었다. 2. 방사선학적 소견에서 증례 1은 방사선 투과상의 병소내에 방사선불투과상의 석회화 물질이 함유된 혼합기의 상태였고 증례 2는 비교적 불명확한 경계를 가졌으나 방사선 투명대에 의해 치밀한 방사선 불투과상의 병소가 둘러싸여 있는 성숙기의 상태였다. 3. 조직병리학적 소견으로 두 증례 모두 조골세포의 부연이나 규칙적인 골소주 구조 및 기절내 세포성분의 증가를 관찰할 수 있었으나 증례 1에서는 골성분외에 백악질소적과 같은 석회화물질이 관찰되었고 증례 2에서는 층판골만이 관찰되어 증례 1은 백악질골섬유종, 증례 2는 골섬유종의 특징을 지닌 양성 섬유 골성 병소였다. 4. 재발된 병소이므로 증례 1은 하악 우측 제 1소구치부터 우각부까지 하악골 절제술과 장골 및 하치조신경 이식술을, 증례 2는 정상 인접골을 포함한 종물의 적출술을 시행하였다. 5. 술후 1년이 경과한 현재까지 정기적인 임상 및 방사선 검사결과 재발증상 없이 양호한 치유 경과를 보여주고 있다.

• Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.121-128
• /
• 2015

Background: The authors studied the hemodynamic effect influent by using the novel high concentration of lidocaine HCl for surgical removal impacted lower third molar. The objective of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic change when using different concentrations of lidocaine in impacted lower third molar surgery. Methods: Split mouth single blind study comprising 31 healthy patients with a mean age of 23 years (range 19-33 years). Subjects had symmetrically impacted lower third molars as observed on panoramic radiograph. Each participant required 2 surgical interventions by the same surgeon with a 3-week washout period washout period. The participants were alternately assigned one of two types of local anesthetic (left or right) for the first surgery, then the other type of anesthetic for the second surgery. One solution was 4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and the other was 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. A standard IANB with 1.8 ml volume was used. Any requirement for additional anesthetic and patient pain intra-operation was recorded. Post-operatively, patient was instructed to fill in the patient report form for any adverse effect and local anesthetic preference in terms of intra-operative pain. This form was collected at the seven day follow up appointment. Results: In the 4% lidocaine group, the heart rate increased during the first minute post-injection (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant change in arterial blood pressure during the operation. In the 2% lidocaine group, there was a significant increase in arterial blood pressure and heart rate in the first minute following injection for every procedure. When the hemodynamic changes in each group were compared, the 4% lidocaine group had significantly lower arterial blood pressure compared to the 2% lidocaine group following injection. Post-operatively, no adverse effects were observed by the operator and patient in either local anesthetic group. Patients reported less pain intra-operation in the 4% lidocaine group compared with the 2% lidocaine group (P < .05). Conclusions: Our results suggest that a 4% concentration of lidocaine HCl with 1:100,000 epinephrine has better clinical efficacy than 2% lidocaine HCl with 1:100,000 epinephrine when used for surgical extraction of lower third molars. Neither drug had any clinical adverse effects.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• 제37권5호
• /
• pp.343-348
• /
• 2011

Introduction: Third molar extraction is one of the most common procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery. The impacted third molar causes many pathological conditions, such as pericoronitis, caries, periodontitis, resorption of adjacent teeth, and cyst or tumors associated with impacted teeth. Extraction is often considered the treatment of choice for impacted lower third molars. On the other hand, imprudent extraction of deeply impacted third molars can cause permanent complications, such as inferior alveolar nerve damage. Therefore, guidelines for the extraction of lower third molars should be set to prevent embarrassing complications. This study examined the indication and current trends of the extracted lower third molars in the dental hospital of a dental college. Materials and Methods: 557 extracted third molars were evaluated at the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery of Yonsei University. The chief complaint, diagnosis, age and degree of impaction were analyzed to determine the tendency for the extraction of asymptomatic lower third molars. Results: The percentage of asymptomatic third molars was 40.8%. In cases of full impacted tooth or full erupted tooth, the percentage of asymptomatic teeth was more than 50% (52.4% and 54.3, respectively). Among those partially impacted teeth, 73.1% of them showed symptoms, such as pain, tenderness and swelling. In terms of age, pericoronitis was evident at a younger age, and dental caries/periodontitis was the main cause of removal in those aged over 50. Twenty nine cases (1.6%) had teeth associated with pathological changes Conclusion: The incidence of pathological changes to the lower third molar was relatively low. Surgical extraction is recommended in cases of partially impacted teeth. In Korea, the incidence of asymptomatic third molar extraction was relatively higher than in European countries. More careful attention would be desirable to consider the risks and benefits of lower third molar extraction.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.123-128
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 안면부 신경병증 통증 모델에서 간극결합을 분리하는 Carbenoxolone(CBX)과 P2X 수용체의 길항제(iso-PPADS)의 진통작용을 확인하고자 수행되었다. 실험동물은 Sprague-Dawley계 수컷 흰쥐(240~280g)를 사용하였으며, 안면부 신경병증 통증을 유발하기 위해 흰쥐의 하악 왼쪽 두 번째 어금니를 발거하고, 아랫 이틀신경의 손상을 유도하기 위해 소형 치과용 임플란트를 식립하였다. CBX를 복강으로 하루 2번 투여 했을 때, 25ug/kg에서 유의한 진통반응이 나타났다(p<0.05). iso-PPADS 역시 복강으로 하루 2번 투여 했을 때, 25ug/kg에서 유의한 진통반응이 나타났다(p<0.05). 두 약물의 각각의 효과가 나타나지 않은 저 농도에서 함께 투여하였을 때, CBX 1ug/kg, iso-PPADS 2.5ug/kg를 투여 시 유의한 진통 효과가 나타났다(p<0.05). 저 농도의 CBX를 이용한 간극결합의 차단과 저 농도의 P2X 수용체의 길항제를 함께 투여 시 구강 안면신경병증통증기전에서 통증을 억제하는 효과를 확인할 수 있었다. 이러한 결과를 통하여 CBX를 이용한 간극결합의 차단과 P2X 수용체의 길항제의 투여가 안면부 통증조절에 중요한 역할을 담당할 것으로 사료된다.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제38권4호
• /
• pp.368-375
• /
• 2011

본 연구는 소아에서의 성공적인 하치조신경 전달 마취를 위한 정보를 얻기 위해 파노라마 방사선 사진에서 한국인 소아의 하악공 위치를 분석하였다. 총 240명의 7-15세의 파노라마 방사선 사진을 수집하여, 연령에 따라 7-8세, 9-10세, 11-12세, 13-15세의 하위 그룹으로 나누었으며 각 그룹은 남녀 각 30명씩을 포함하였다. 좌우측의 하악공으로부터 하악절흔, 악각전절흔, 하악지 전연, 하악지 후연까지의 최단거리와 교합평면까지의 수직거리를 측정하였으며, 하악공으로부터 하악절흔과 악각전절흔의 거리의 비와 하악공으로부터 하악지 전연과 하악지 후연의 비를 계산하였다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 1) 하악공의 하악지 내 상대적 위치는 남녀 모두에서 연령 증가에 따라 전방으로 이동하는 경향이 관찰되나, 수직적인 위치는 연령과 유의한 상관관계를 보이지 않았다. 2) 하악공의 교합평면과의 상대적인 위치는 연령 증가에 따라 교합평면 하방에서 상방으로 이동하였으며, 연령과 높은 상관관계를 나타내었다(p<0.05). 3) 여자보다 남자에서 하악공이 교합평면을 기준으로 더 상방에, 하악지 내 전후방 및 수직적으로는 하악지의 후상방에 위치하여 성별에 따른 차이를 보였다(p<0.05).

• Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
• /
• 제22권5호
• /
• pp.339-348
• /
• 2022

Background: To compare the anesthetic efficacy of supplemental buccal infiltration (BI) (1.7 ml) versus intraligamentary (IL) injection containing 0.4 ml of 4% articaine with 1:100.000 epinephrine after an inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) with 1.7 ml 2% lidocaine in the first and second mandibular molars diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis (IP). Methods: One hundred subjects diagnosed with IP of either the mandibular first (n = 50) or second molars (n = 50) and failed profound anesthesia following an IANB were selected. They randomly received either the IL or BI techniques of anesthesia. Pain scores on a 170 mm Heft-Parker visual analog scale were recorded initially, before, and during supplemental injections. Furthermore, pulse rate was measured before and after each supplemental injection. During the access cavity preparation and initial filing, no or mild pain was assumed to indicate anesthetic success. The chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, and independent samples t-test were used for the analyses. Results: The overall success rates were 80% in the IL group and 74% in the BI group, with no significant difference (P = 0.63). In the first molars, there was no significant difference between the two techniques (P = 0.088). In the second molars, IL injection resulted in a significantly higher success rate (P = 0.017) than BI. IL injection was statistically more successful (P = 0.034) in the second molars (92%) than in the first molars (68%). However, BI was significantly more successful (P = 0.047) in the first molars (88%) than in the second molars (64%). The mean pulse rate increase was significantly higher in the IL group than in the BI group (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Both the IL and BI techniques were advantageous when used as supplemental injections. However, more favorable outcomes were observed when the second molars received IL injection and the first molars received BI.

• Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.283-309
• /
• 2021

Achieving profound anesthesia in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis is a tedious task. This review aimed at evaluating the success of buccal/lingual infiltrations administered with a primary inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) injection or as a supplemental injection after the failure of the primary injection in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with irreversible pulpitis in human mandibular molars. The review question was "What will be the success of primary and supplemental infiltration injection in the endodontic treatment of patients with irreversible pulpitis in human mandibular molars?" We searched electronic databases, including Pubmed, Scopus, and Ebsco host and we did a comprehensive manual search. The review protocol was framed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. We included clinical studies that evaluated and compared the anesthetic outcomes of primary IANB with primary and/or supplementary infiltration injections. Standard evaluation of the included studies was performed and suitable data and inferences were assessed. Twenty-six studies were included, of which 13 were selected for the meta-analysis. In the forest plot representation of the studies evaluating infiltrations, the combined risk ratio (RR) was 1.88 (95% CI: 1.49, 2.37), in favor of the secondary infiltrations with a statistical heterogeneity of 77%. The forest plot analysis for studies comparing primary IANB + infiltration versus primary IANB alone showed a low heterogeneity (0%). The included studies had similar RRs and the combined RR was 1.84 (95% CI: 1.44, 2.34). These findings suggest that supplemental infiltrations given along with a primary IANB provide a better success rate. L'Abbe plots were generated to measure the statistical heterogeneity among the studies. Trial sequential analysis suggested that the number of patients included in the analysis was adequate. Based on the qualitative and quantitative analyses, we concluded that the infiltration technique, either as a primary injection or as a supplementary injection, given after the failure of primary IANB, increases the overall anesthetic efficacy.

• Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.229-236
• /
• 2023

Background: Local anesthesia has been reliably used to control pain during dental procedures and is important in pediatric dentistry. However, children occasionally complain of prolonged numbness after dental treatment, leading to several problems. Studies conducted to reverse the effect of local anesthesia using phentolamine mesylate and photobiomodulation therapy (PBM) are encouraging but limited. PBM is a type of light therapy that utilizes visible and near-infrared non-ionizing electromagnetic spectral light sources. Hence, this study used this modality to compare the reversal of local anesthesia at two different wavelengths. This study compared the effect of PBM at 660 and 810 nm wavelengths on the reversal of soft tissue local anesthesia using a diode LASER in pediatric dentistry. Method: Informed consent and assent were obtained, and the participants were then divided randomly into three groups of 20 children each: control group-without LASER irradiation, LASER irradiation at 660 nm, and LASER irradiation at 810 nm. Sixty children aged 4-8 years with deciduous mandibular molars indicated for pulp therapy were administered an inferior alveolar nerve block. After 45 min of injection, a duration that was similar to the approximate duration of treatment, they were exposed to 660- and 810-nm LASER irradiation according to their groups until reversal of local anesthesia was achieved. The control group did not undergo LASER irradiation. The reversal of the soft tissue local anesthetic effect was evaluated using palpation and pin prick tests every 15 min, and the LASER irradiation cycle continued until reversal of the soft tissue local anesthesia was achieved. Results: A significant reduction of 55.5 min (27.6%) in the mean soft tissue local anesthesia reversal time was observed after the application of 810 nm wavelength PBM and 69 min (34.7%) after 660 nm wavelength LASER irradiation. Conclusion: PBM with a 660 nm wavelength was more effective in reducing the mean soft tissue local anesthesia reversal duration, and thus can be used as a reversal agent for soft tissue local anesthesia in pediatric dentistry.