DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Intraosseous anesthesia in symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: Impact of bone thickness on perception and duration of pain

  • Nilius, Manfred (Niliusklinik) ;
  • Mueller, Charlotte (Niliusklinik) ;
  • Nilius, Minou Helene (Niliusklinik) ;
  • Haim, Dominik (Technische Universitat Dresden, University Hospital "Carl Gustav Carus", Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery) ;
  • Leonhardt, Henry (Technische Universitat Dresden, University Hospital "Carl Gustav Carus", Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery) ;
  • Lauer, Guenter (Technische Universitat Dresden, University Hospital "Carl Gustav Carus", Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery)
  • Received : 2020.11.10
  • Accepted : 2020.12.03
  • Published : 2020.12.31

Abstract

Background: Intraosseous anesthesia (IO) allows the anesthetic solution to be injected directly into the cancellous bone. The anesthetic solution immediately reaches the periapical region, and thus the axonal area of the nerve, where it can temporarily disable the sodium pump. The effect is felt almost without any time delay, and only a small amount of anesthetic solution is required. Methods: This study aims to investigate the efficacy of IO using the AnestoⓇ device after infiltration anesthesia (IA) and/or inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia (IANB) failed to work in symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (hot tooth). The 33 patients included in the study were treated additionally with 1.7 ml articaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine hydrochloride (UltracainⓇ D-S, Sanofi-Aventis, Frankfurt, Germany) IO. Results: The electrical pulp test showed that 95.76% of the volunteers reacted positively to the combination of IANB or IA with the IO. In women, the additive IO was effective at 97.22%. In men, the IO led to pain elimination in 94.00% of cases. The duration of the IO was less than a quarter of an hour (13.03 min). The IO worked longer in women than in men (13.61 min vs. 12.33 min). Overall, more than every third tooth that needed trepanation was located in the posterior area of the mandible (36.4%). Treatment of hot teeth in this area was associated with an increased pulse rate and increased residual pain. There was a moderate correlation (Spearman-Rho [IRI] = 0.280) between the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and bone density, and a significant correlation (IRI = 0.612) between subjective residual pain and bone width. The IO resulted in a moderate, transient increase in the pulse rate by approximately 20 bpm. This is similar to the temporary increase in heart rate after conventional anesthesia techniques in non-preloaded patients and can be considered clinically irrelevant. Conclusion: IO with the AnestoⓇ device as an extension and deepening of local pain elimination is recommended for the treatment of hot teeth.

Keywords

References

  1. Probster L. Intraossäre Anästhesie als Alternative zur herkommlichen Infiltrations- und Leitungsanästhesie. Quintessenz, 2012; 63: 71-6.
  2. Jung IY, Kim JH, Kim ES, Lee CY, Lee SJ. An evaluation of buccal infiltrations and inferior alveolar nerve blocks in pulpal anesthesia for mandibular first molars. J Endod 2008; 34: 11-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.09.006
  3. Farhad A, Razavian H, Shafiee M. Effect of intraosseous injection versus inferior alveolar nerve block as primary pulpal anaesthesia of mandibular posterior teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Acta Odontol Scand 2018; 76: 442-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2018.1428826
  4. Collier T. Intraosseous anaesthesia as a primary technique for mandibular posterior teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Acta Odontol Scand 2018; 76: 535-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2018.1489558
  5. Martinez Martinez A, Lujan Pardo MD, Harris Ricardo J. Perception of discomfort during injection and the need for supplemental anesthesia in the intraosseous technique using 4% articaine. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2016; 29: 214-8.
  6. Shapiro MR, McDonald NJ, Gardner RJ, Peters MC, Botero TM. Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in supplemental Infiltration for mandibular first versus second molars with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, tandomized, double-blind Clinical Trial. J Endod 2018; 44: 523-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.10.003
  7. Shahi S, Rahimi S, Yavari HR, Ghasemi N, Ahmadi F. Success rate of 3 injection methods with articaine for mandibular first molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a CONSORT randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Endod 2018; 44: 1462-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.010
  8. Pereira LA, Groppo FC, Bergamaschi Cde C, Meechan JG, Ramacciato JC, Motta RH, et al. Articaine (4%) with epinephrine (1:100,000 or 1:200,000) in intraosseous injections in symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molars: anesthetic efficacy and cardiovascular effects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 116: e85-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2011.10.045
  9. Demi E, Ataoglu H. Clinical evaluatin of efficacy of transcortical anesthesia for the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2020; 20: 9-17. https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.1.9
  10. Razavian H, Kazemi S, Khazaei S, Jahromi MZ. X-tip intraosseous injection system as a primary anesthesia for irreversible pulpitis of posterior mandibular teeth: a randomized clinical trail. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2013; 10: 210-3. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.113346
  11. Vongsavan K, Samdrup T, Kijsamanmith K, Rirattanapong P, Vongasavan N. The effect of intraosseous local anesthesia of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine on pulpal blood flow and pulpal anesthesia of mandibular molars and canines. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23: 673-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2481-3
  12. Hertel M, Sommer K, Kostka E, Imiolczyk S, Ballout H, Preissner S. Outcomes of endodontic therapy comparing conventional sodium hypochlorite irrigation with passive ultrasonic irrigation using sodium hypochlorite and ethylenediaminetetraacetate. a retrospective analysis. Open Dent J 2016; 12: 375-81.
  13. Replogle K, Reader A, Nist R, Beck M, Weaver J, Meyers WJ. Cardiovascular effects of intraosseous injections of 2 percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 3 percent mepivacaine. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130: 649-57. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0274
  14. Guglielmo A, Reader A, Nist R, Beck M, Weaver J. Anesthetic efficacy and heart rate effects of the supplemental intraosseous injection of 2% mepivacaine with 1:20,000 levonordefrin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 87: 284-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70210-6
  15. Ghoddusi J, Zarrabi MH, Daneshvar F, Naghavi N. Efficacy of IANB and Gow-Gates techniques in mandibular molars with symptomatic Irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized double blind clinical study. Iran Endod J 2018; 13: 143-8.