• 한국농공학회지
• /
• 제44권6호
• /
• pp.71-82
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study is to develop a 3 dimensional spatial planning model (3DSPLAM) for facilities allocation and visual evaluation in improvement planning of rural village. For the model development, this study developed both planning layers and a modelling process for spatial planning of rural villages. The 3DSPLAM generates road networks and village facilities location automatically from built area plan map and digital elevation model generated by geographic information system. The model also simulates 3-dimensional villagescape for visual presentation of the planned results. The 3DSPLAM could be conveniently used for automatic allocation of roads, easy partition of land lots and reasonable locating of facilities. The planned results could be also presented in the stereoscopic models with varied viewing positions and angles.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2022년도 봄 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.218-219
• /
• 2022

Among the Barrier Free (BF) certification evaluation items for public facilities, at which position the standard for the effective height of the stair railing handle should be calculated is not clearly determined. Because of this, not only the evaluation standards of the certification authority and the evaluation committee are different, but disputes are occurring between the ordering organization, the design company, and the construction company. Therefore, the stair railing installation standard laws for public facilities were analyzed and through a case study of institutions that obtained the BF certification, problems were analyzed. The results of problem analysis reveal the following. 1) The standards of the Ministry of Health and Welfare and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport were different. 2) The effective height calculation standard was ambiguous, and disputes occurred frequently. To solve this problem, we proposed improvement plans for calculating the height of the stair railing that can comply with laws while ensuring safety.

• 지적과 국토정보
• /
• 제53권1호
• /
• pp.5-20
• /
• 2023

정부는 검정형 자격제도의 한계를 극복하고 관련 산업계에 적용가능한 실무능력 인재 양성을 목적으로 과정평가형 자격제도를 운영하고 있으며, 지적분야도 지적산업기사 등급의 과정평가형 자격제도를 운영중에 있다. 그러나 과정평가형자격의 교육훈련과정에 지적분야가 아닌 측량분야의 능력단위를 교육함으로서 과정평가형 자격제도의 취지와 맞지 않는 부분이 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 지적분야의 과정평가형 자격제도를 면밀히 분석하고 그에 따른 개선방안을 제시하였다. 첫째, 지적분야의 NCS는 2014년 개발이후 별다른 보완·개발이 이루어지지 않아 현행 법령과 맞지 않는 부분이 다수 존재하므로 이에 대한 보완개발이 필요하며, 둘째, 현행 지적분야 과정평가형 자격제도에 활용하고 있는 측량분야의 선택능력단위를 지적분야의 NCS 능력단위로 개선할 것을 제안하였다. 또한 현행 지적분야의 NCS의 12개 능력단위를 필수능력단위로 지정하고 교육·훈련을 운영한다면 충분히 지적기사 등급의 역량을 갖춘 실무인재를 양성할 수 있을 것이므로 지적기사 등급의 과정평가형 자격제도 도입을 제안하였다. 그러나 실질적인 제도운영 및 적용을 위해서는 과정평가형 자격제도 교육·훈련에 활용되고 있는 지적분야 NCS의 보완·개발이 반드시 선행되어야 할 것이다.

• 한국도로학회논문집
• /
• 제14권6호
• /
• pp.75-84
• /
• 2012

PURPOSES : This paper aims to improve the evaluation method of the Level of Service(LOS) for urban streets presented by the current Korean Highway Capacity Manual(KHCM) and suggest its utilization plan as a part of the methods to evaluate the sustainability of a transportation policy. METHODS : This paper carried out a research in 3 steps to develop a new evaluation method. First of all, this paper reviewed the previous studies related to the LOS of urban streets and the socially requested items for a sustainable transportation system. Then this paper derived an index and weight through expert questions to select an evaluation index. Lastly, this paper compared the results according to the existing evaluation methods with the new evaluation methods through case studies. This paper used an Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) for importance analysis and weight selection between new evaluation items and indices, and applied a Grey System Theory(GST) for a synthetic and integrated evaluation between the selected evaluation indices. RESULTS : As a result of evaluating the LOS according to the existing evaluation methods and the integrated evaluation methods using a GST through case studies, it was analyzed that new methods' results are less than or equal to the existing evaluation methods; and as a result of applying a weight between evaluation indices according to AHP, it was noticed that the total score seems to rise more when the LOS in the existing evaluation is calculated lower. It was analyzed that the LOS calculated by reflecting the newly established evaluation items and the importance between indices in this study has difference from the LOS of the existing urban streets. CONCLUSIONS : It is expected that this evaluation method can diagnose the current conditions when establishing a future sustainable traffic system and can be used for the measurement of the sustainability effects of the improvement plans and so on.

• 대한전기학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한전기학회 2004년도 하계학술대회 논문집 A
• /
• pp.348-350
• /
• 2004

This paper presents the scheme for reliability improvement by dispersed generation system (US) installation and operation in distribution systems. The objective functions such as power losses cost, operation cost of DGS, power buy cost and interruption cost are minimized for reliability improvement. The original objective functions and constraints are transformed into the equivalent multiple objective functions with fuzzy sets to evaluate their imprecise nature. The several indices for reliability evaluation are improved by dispersed generation system installation.

• Spatial Information Research
• /
• 제19권6호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2011

국가지리정보체계의 구축 및 활용 등에 관한 법률(구법/NGIS Act, 2000)이 폐지되고 국가공간정보에 관한 법률(신법/NSDI Act, 2009)이 제정되면서 국가 공간정보 정책 평가시스템에는 많은 변화가 발생되었다. 구법과 비교할 경우 신법은 국가 공간정보 정책의 추진체계가 일원화되었다는 장점은 있으나 예산 요구권의 약화로 공간정보 정책의 법적 실현가능성은 약화되었다는 논의가 있다. 이러한 문제의식 하에 구법에서 신법으로 법률이 새롭게 제 개정되면서 나타난 평가체계의 변화를 분석하는 것은 매우 중요한 의미를 갖는다고 할 것이다. 따라서 본 연구의 목적은 구법과 신법에서 규정한 국가공간정보 정책 평가체계를 비교 분석하여 평가 제도에서 나타난 변화가 무엇인지를 분석하는데 있다. 주된 연구방법은 구법과 신법의 비교분석 방법을 활용하였다. 비교 분석대상은 평가추진체계, 평가주체, 평가대상 및 범위, 평가결과의 활용, 평가전담기관 등이다. 분석결과를 토대로 할 경우 국가 공간정보 정책 평가시스템의 개선방안으로는 평가목적의 명확화, 평가 전담기관 제도의 활성화, 평가결과와 인센티브 및 예산 연계성의 강화, 공간정보정책의 사전 사후 연계성 강화 방법론 모색, 상향식과 하향식 접근이 결합된 평가지표의 개발 방안 등이 필요하다는 것을 제안하였다.

• 의료ㆍ복지 건축 : 한국의료복지건축학회 논문집
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.67-75
• /
• 2017

Purpose: This study is for the facility eligibility and improvement evaluation analysis for the patient care environment of 7 facilities which has national inpatient isolation units. Methods: For the evaluation, first of all, the patient care environment of national inpatient isolation units are scrutinized by the checklist which is used on from 2014 with the 4 fields of criteria : architectural planning and layout, general requirement and condition for operating the negative pressured isolated patient room, HVAC system, and waste water discharging system. Finally, the evaluation results are compared with that of 2014. Results: The result shows that the average value of facility eligibility is 89.3 percent and which is 8.9 percent higher than the value before the MERS occurred. Implications: It is clear that facility remodeling of 7 institutions is being performed continuously, and the result of facility eligibility evaluation is reflected on design of a new 21 national inpatient isolation units those are going to be constructed from 2016. Therefore, it is expected that this study is used as a practical reference to establish the criteria of patient care environment management and safety management for both infectious disease outbreak and general service condition.

• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제18권6호
• /
• pp.721-727
• /
• 2015

The improvement of the reliability of weapon systems and the reduction of the total life-cycle cost based on the improving of the DT&E system for Company Organized weapon systems research and development are urgently required. The major advanced countries operate test and evaluation centers for military (U.S.), manage a large scale organization of IPT personnel (England) or conduct management of DT&E through a third party organization (France). Based on a survey of experts, an improvement of the DT&E policy in terms of reliability and objectiveness is needed, and management through a third party national defense agency and civilian agency such as the Surion development case is required. In addition, although it appears that efficiency improves when management of DT&E is performed by national defence agencies rather than civilian agencies, it is necessary to proceed by selecting a civilian agency based on competition in the case that it is difficult to select a national defence agency.

• 한국의료질향상학회지
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.30-39
• /
• 2018

Objectives: In Korea, there are many kinds of evaluations for medical institutions. However, evaluations are increasingly burdensome for medical institutions because evaluation agencies, evaluation timing, and evaluation methods are different. The purpose of this study is to improve the efficiency of evaluation for medical institutions and ultimately to provide quality medical services to patients. Methods: In this study, 2,310 indicators of 19 kinds of evaluation for medical institutions were analyzed. Results: 1,424 indicators were available for on-site surveys and 886 indicators were not available for on-site surveys. There were 4 kinds of evaluation that can be integrated in total, 12 kinds of evaluation that can be integrated partially, and 3 kinds of evaluation that need to maintain the current evaluation system. Conclusion: In order to provide patient-centered quality medical services through reduction of burden due to the evaluation for medical institutions, it is necessary to deeply discuss the efficiency of evaluation integration and result utilization.

• 가족자원경영과 정책
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.43-62
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to propose a framework and system for an advanced evaluation scale for the Multicultural Family Support Center and its services. For this study, we used the Meta-Evaluation method, which is also known as an 'evaluation of the evaluation.' The data were collected from 134 surveys of individuals working in the Multicultural Family Support Center. The questionnaire consisted of two parts: a) general opinions regarding the present evaluation scale; and b) concrete opinions about the details of the scale. The results indicated several problems and issues for improvement. In light of these results, we suggest that not only do the detailed scales have to be modified to incorporate workers' opinions, but also that the management of the evaluation system itself has to be improved in order to achieve more effective evaluation procedures.