• 한국디지털건축인테리어학회논문집
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.83-90
• /
• 2009

Building Information Modeling (BIM) has the great possibility of transforming the AEC industry. BIM will require increased information exchange and mutual collaboration between all stakeholders. BIM implementation and such increased collaboration can affect legal issues and contract provisions. And some legal issues accompanying BIM Implementation will be raised while a large change also comes in responsibility and role between all stakeholders. However, current standard agreement system is based on fragmented agreement between the architect and the owner, and between the owner and the contractor. Another legal obstacles and considerations associated with BIM implementation will be arose from BlM technology and use of BIM. AEC professionals in Korea have long utilized the standard agreement forms as well and look forward complementation of current standard agreement for BlM implementation. Such complement direction for the standard agreement will be examined by investigating the legal issues and overview comparison between AlA E202 and ConsensusDOCS 301.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.247-257
• /
• 2016

개인정보보호법 및 개인정보 보호 관련 법률에서는 개인의 정보를 수집 이용 제공하고자 할 때 이용자의 동의를 얻도록 규정하고 있다. 이에 따라 금융회사에서는 고객으로부터 개인정보 이용 동의서를 징구하여 고객의 개인정보 이용 동의를 얻고 있다. 또한 정부차원에서 고객의 실질적인 동의 의사 확인을 위해 거래별, 상품별 동의서 양식을 다양화하고 필수항목과 선택항목을 구별하는 등의 동의서 양식 개선 노력을 하고 있다. 그러나 아직 금융회사에서는 동의의 본질에 충실하지 못해 동의의 효력을 얻기 어렵거나 동의 의사를 판단하기 어려운 동의서들을 수집 보관하는 사례가 발생한다. 이에 본 연구에서는 개인정보처리자인 사업자의 개인정보 이용 동의 처리 과정에서 개인정보보호 관련 법률을 준수하고 정보주체에게 동의의 본질에 충실한 동의를 유도하기 위한 동의서 검증 절차를 추가한 발전된 개인정보 이용 동의 구현 모델을 제안한다.

• 자원ㆍ환경경제연구
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.95-133
• /
• 2006

기후변화협약은 전세계적으로 환경-경제-에너지가 연계된 가장 중요한 이슈로 부상하였으며, 우리나라는 에너지 이용합리화를 통한 온실가스 감축을 위해 각종 정책들을 수립하여 추진하고 있으며, 이중 자발적 협약(Voluntary Agreement)을 1999년부터 실시하고 있다. 우리나라에서 시행되고 있는 자발적 협약의 온실가스 감축효과 및 국민경제와 타 산업에 미치는 영향을 분석한다. 협약에 참가하는 산업들의 연료대체 및 에너지 효율향상 노력여하에 따라 동 정책이 no-regret 정책이 될 수 있을 것으로 분석되었다. 협약 상의 에너지 절감목표를 달성함에 있어 연료대체와 에너지 효율향상 등을 통하여 협약에 참여하는 산업들의 생산량을 줄이지 않아도 될 경우, 국가 전체적으로 온실가스 감축효과와 경제적 이득을 동시에 도출할 수 있을 것으로 분석되었다. 따라서 향후 자발적 협약을 확대 실시함에 있어 협약에 참가하는 산업들의 청정연료로의 연료대체 및 에너지효율 향상을 위한 정부의 적극적 지원책의 중요성이 부각되었다.

• KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS)
• /
• 제7권11호
• /
• pp.2769-2792
• /
• 2013

In this paper, we propose an authenticated key agreement scheme, TinyIBAK, based on the identity-based cryptography and bilinear paring, for large scale sensor networks. We prove the security of our proposal in the random oracle model. According to the formal security validation using AVISPA, the proposed scheme is strongly secure against the passive and active attacks, such as replay, man-in-the middle and node compromise attacks, etc. We implemented our proposal for TinyOS-2.1, analyzed the memory occupation, and evaluated the time and energy performance on the MICAz motes using the Avrora toolkits. Moreover, we deployed our proposal within the TOSSIM simulation framework, and investigated the effect of node density on the performance of our scheme. Experimental results indicate that our proposal consumes an acceptable amount of resources, and is feasible for infrequent key distribution and rekeying in large scale sensor networks. Compared with other ID-based key agreement approaches, TinyIBAK is much more efficient or comparable in performance but provides rekeying. Compared with the traditional key pre-distribution schemes, TinyIBAK achieves significant improvements in terms of security strength, key connectivity, scalability, communication and storage overhead, and enables efficient secure rekeying.

• 환경정책연구
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.119-136
• /
• 2015

유엔기후변화협약 협상에서 재정 분야는 개도국 지원의 장단기 목표를 수립하고, GCF를 설립하였으며, 상설위원회를 구성하는 등 큰 성과를 나타냈다. 이로서 협약 재정메커니즘의 실질적인 작동을 위한 체제는 갖춰진 것으로 볼 수 있다. 신기후체제 협상에서는 선진국의 역사적 책임을 강조하는 개도국과 변화된 상황에 부합하는 개도국의 행동을 주장하는 선진국의 상반된 입장이 어떻게 절충될 것인지가 핵심 쟁점이다. 특히 합의 도출에 있어 이행수단으로써 기후재원의 역할에 대한 기대가 고조되고 있다. 본고에서는 협약 채택 이후 지난 리마 당사국총회(COP20)까지 재정지원 관련 논의동향을 정리하고 신기후체제 합의를 앞두고 기후재원 분야의 주요 쟁점과 과제를 제시한다.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.1053-1062
• /
• 2015

This research assesses the implementation of the bilateral fisheries order of the China-Japan fisheries agreement. After establishment of UNCLOS, the China-Japanese fisheries agreement has played as a basis for the fisheries order in the East China Sea. The China-Japanese fisheries agreement intends that the fisheries industries in China and Japan can utilize the renewable natural resources in the East China Sea. As the EEZ of China overlaps with that of Japanese in the East China Sea, the two countries established the China-Japan Provisional Measure Zone and Middle Zone in the Sea. Even though the three coastal States (e.g. Korea, China, and Japan) in the East China Sea are involved in managing these zones, there has been little effort to coordinate each county's management. Additionally, the Taiwan-Japan fisheries agreement, which is for the area of N $27^{\circ}$, has made costal States to establish and implement united measures to conduct effective fisheries management. Regarding access to the joint fishing zone in EEZ, Chinese fisheries regulations have been enforced in the zone because the fishing capacity of China exceeds all of other countries, reducing the number of fishing licenses and catch quotas. It turned out that a nation that has authority over fisheries resources tends to establish specific conditions of fishing operations to maximize its national interest. In the China-Japan Provisional Measure Zone, Chinese and Japanese authorities have introduced united measures to manage fisheries resources. However, in the Middle Zone between China and Japan, there is no regulation on fishing; both countries' fishing vessels can have free access to the zone. Thus, it is recommended that one should introduce an international fisheries management regime for the Middle Zone. In this regard, Korea should play a leading role in establishing the international management regime because Korea has middle position in terms of geographical standpoint, the degree of dependence on commercial fishing, and its fishing capacity.

• 한국전자거래학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국전자거래학회 2001년도 International Conference CALS/EC KOREA
• /
• pp.177-189
• /
• 2001

ㆍ RosettaNet is one of the most rapidly expanding XML- based B2B standards aiming at lingua-franca for e-Business. ㆍ RosettaNet delivers PIP/sup TM/-based B2B process standards, dictionaries, and implementation frameworks guaranteeing interoperability among integration solutions. ㆍ RosettaNet is an evolutionary standard featuring need-based expansion, implementation-promoting development methodology, and release model based on collective agreement among members. ㆍ RosettaNet plans to continue to focus the majority of its efforts on vertical supply chain and business model specific e-commerce process standards, with an emphasis on rapid adoption and production implementation in the high technology industry.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.191-210
• /
• 2017

지난날 경쟁력과 부가가치 창출의 원천이 토지 노동 자본에서 창출되었다면 오늘날 21세기 지식기반경제에서 새로운 성장의 동력으로 기술이 주목 받고 있다. 이러한 세계경제 패러다임의 변화는 국제적 기술이전의 확산을 가져왔고 국제거래에 있어서 물품과 같은 유형재뿐만 아니라 특허나 노하우 등 대표되는 무형재의 거래도 점차 증가하고 있다. 국제라이선스계약은 기술이전의 대표적 형태로 기술제공자가 기술의 소유권은 그대로 보유한 채로 기술이용자에게 일정기간 기술의 실시만을 허락하고 그 대가로 로열티를 취하는 계약이다. 이러한 기술거래를 통한 경제적 이익은 계약의 원만한 이행과 종료로 실현할 수 있다. 한편 국제라이선스계약은 기술이라는 무형재를 대상으로 하면서 일정기간 대여를 목적으로 한다는 점에서 당사자간 의무가 국제상거래의 대표적 형태인 매매계약과 상이한 부분이 많다. 이에 본고에서는 국제라이선스계약상 당사자의 주요 의무와 각 의무에서 분쟁이 될 수 있는 쟁점을 살펴봄으로써 분쟁의 사전적 예방에 도움이 될 수 있는 시사점을 도출하고자 함을 목적으로 한다.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제47권1호
• /
• pp.31-45
• /
• 2016

This study aims to evaluate the status of implementation of bilateral-fishery order since the Korea-Japan Fisheries Agreement came into effect in 1999 in order to improve fisheries relationships between two countries. The agreement regulates bilateral-fishery order by the principle of the EEZ regime and mutual benefits among countries. (e.g. the mutual agreed fishing in EEZ and cooperation for resource management). However, the Korea-Japan Fisheries Agreement has some limitations such as reducing quotas of the mutual agreed fishing in EEZ, strengthening Japanese fisheries regulation, insufficient cooperation for fisheries management and joint countermeasures. In order to improve fisheries relationships between the two countries, it is imperative to rebalance quotas for the mutual agreed fishing in EEZ, to establish effective resource management systems in the Intermediate zone, to invigorate fisheries cooperation in the private sector, and to introduce new management systems by species over the all waters around East Asia. To accomplish such measures, it is necessary for Korean and Japanese governments to improve fisheries relationships based on trust and cooperation, achieving a win-win situation. Additionally, it is required to incorporate fisheries management among Korea, China, and Japan.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.67-91
• /
• 2000

Fisheries Agreements among Korea, China, and Japan, for the effective management of fisheries resources and protection of fisheries disputes, have been processed in a manner to conclude interim arrangements those are effective prior to the final demarcation of the maritime delimitation which often requires much time to settle among the relevant states, Based on this understanding, Korea, China, and Japan, had proceeded their mutual fisheries agreement ; and, two fisheries agreements, between Korea-Japan and China-Japan, have already entered into force on 22 January 1999 and on 1 June 2000, respectively. Lastly fisheries negotiation between Korea and China has been concluded in order to make it effective on 30 June 2001. As Korean fisheries have already experienced the impacts after the entry into force of Korea-Japan Fisheries Agreement, it is inevitable that the likewise will also be true for the Korea-china Fisheries Agreement. The results of fisheries negotiation should minimize the loss by ensuring Korean flagged vessels' fishing rights to the maximum level in the counterpart's waters, and to maximize our counterpart's loss by restricting its vessels' fishing rights to the minimum level in our waters. However, such goals are almost unreachable in an intergovernmental negotiation. On this ground, regardless of the results, the negotiation is highly criticized from all the interested realms of the society. First, this study reviews the negotiation process ana subject matters of the fisheries agreement, and then evaluates the disputed items issued by academic, political, and industry areas in an international law and fisheries perspective. After the entry into farce of fisheries agreement, various activities should be accommodated as future tasks, such as the adjustments of the domestic fisheries structure, the reorganization of the resource management based fisheries structure, the construction of EEz large surveillance system, and the construction of the multilateral fisheries cooperation system Through an earlier implementation of those tasks, the Korean fisheries will be better prepared in minimizing the predicted impacts once the Korea-China Fisheries Agreement becomes effective.