• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.50-56
• /
• 2017

The IRR (internal rate of return) is often used by investors for the evaluation of engineering projects. Unfortunately, it is widely known that it has serial flaws. Also, External rate of returns (ERRs) such as ARR (Average Rate of Return) or MIRR (MIRR, Modified Internal Rate of Return) do not differentiate between the real investment and the expenditure. The PRR (Productive rate of return) is faithful to the conception of the return on investment. The PRR uses the effective investment instead of the initial investment. In this paper, we examined two cases of the engineering project. the one is a traditional engineering project with financing activity, another is the project with R&D. Although the IRR has only one value, it overestimates or underestimate profitabilities of Engineering Projects. The ARR and the MARR assume that a returned cash reinvest other projects or assets instead of the project currently executing. Thus they are only one value of a project's profitability, unlike the IRR. But the ARR does not classify into the effective investment and non-investment expenditure. It only accepts an initial expenditure as for an investment. The MIRR also fails to classify into the investment and the expenditure. It has an error of making a loss down as the investment. The IRR works as efficiently as a NPW (Net Present Worth). It clearly expresses a rate of return in respect of an investment in an engineering project with a loan. And it shows its ability in an engineering project with a R&D investment.

• International Journal of Contents
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.66-73
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the economic and social impact of the SEP in which the elderly participate by using the blended return on investment (BROI), economic return on investment (EROI), and social return on investment (SROI) research methods. And the sustainable conditions of SEP were confirmed. This study was conducted with one market-type SEP approved by the Korea Elderly Labor Force Development Institute (KLFDI), one preliminary social enterprise approved by Changwon City Hall, and one market-type SEP operated by a social welfare center for the elderly. As a result of the study, it was found that EROI, SROI, and BROI were the highest in the SEP of preliminary social enterprises operated by subsidies in Changwon.However, the difference between EROI and SROI was greatest in the market-type SEP operated by the elderly social welfare center. There was a big difference between economic and social impacts. The social influence of the elderly was evaluated to be higher than the income of the elderly.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.89-99
• /
• 1986

The study attempts to estimate and evaluate the rates of return on graduate degree holders who major in science and engineering. The model of this study adopts the rate of return method considering unemployment as well as mortality rate. The data are collected by questionnaires and interviews. The results show that the social rate of return(SROR) of bachelors is lower than the rate of return on investment in physical capital which is assumed as a decision criterion of public investment in Korea, but the SROR of Ph.D. holders is balanced. The results also show that the private rates of return (PROR) of all the levels in postgraduate science and engineering education are higher than the private discount rate which is a decision criterion of private investment in Korea. It also indicates that the PROR on investment in graduate education is not likely higher than the SROR because an individual bears high share of the educational costs.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제5권6호
• /
• pp.179-190
• /
• 2004

정부는 재정 부담을 완화하면서 인프라를 구축할 수 있는 SOC민간투자사업제도를 도입하여 적극 장려하고 있다. 민간투자사업의 비중은 2003년을 기준으로 전체 SOC투자 중 $11\%$에 이를 만큼 비중이 크게 성장 하였으며 이와 같은 성장세는 당분간 지속될 것으로 판단된다. 하지만 민간투자사업에 참여하고 있는 사업자를 살펴보면 시공수익을 기대하는 시공사들이 전체 투자자의 $80\%$이상을 차지하고 있고, 은행, 보험, 연 $\cdot$ 기금 등의 재무적 투자자는 $3\%$ 수준에 그치고 있는 실정으로 민간투자사업의 효율적인 운영에 장애가 되고 있다. 그러므로 향후 지속적인 민간투자사업의 발전을 위해서는 투자재원을 다변화해야 할 것으로 판단되며, 이를 위해서는 사회적으로 합의된 적정 수준의 투자수익률이 우선적으로 제시 되어야 할 것이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 재무적 투자자의 참여 활성화를 위한 적정 수준의 투자수익률을 제시하기 위하여 민간투자사업의 수익률과 관련한 이론을 살펴보고, 다양한 분석 방법을 통하여 국내 상황에 맞는 SOC민간투자사업의 투자수익률 수준을 제시하였다.

• 정보화연구
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.21-31
• /
• 2012

We focus on the issues of the non-linear return/risk relationship of IT investment and the balance between return and risk of IT portfolio. We develop an IT project selection model by integrating DEA models with Markowitz portfolio selection theory. The project data collected from a Fortune 100 company are used to illustrate the implementation of the model. In addition, computational experiments are conducted to demonstrate the validity of the proposed model.

• 한국조리학회지
• /
• 제22권6호
• /
• pp.52-60
• /
• 2016

This study attempts to measure the financial performance of the food distribution company. In order to achieve the goal, this study have measured the ratios of ROE, ROA applying the DuPont analysis, which have been demonstrated with tables to show the change periodically. DuPont analysis is based on analysis of Return on Equity (ROE) & Return on Investment (ROI). The return on equity disaggregate performance into three components: Net Profit Margin, Total Asset Turnover, and the Equity Multiplier. The return on investment consists of Assets Turnover (Operating Income${\times}$Total Assets) and Profit Margin (EBIT${\times}$Operating Income). From the study it if found that Hyundae Green Food's Financial performance is high followed by Foodmerce and then Dongwon home food and Lotte Food. The four companies are significant at their level. In conclusion, ROE & ROI is the most comprehensive measure of profitability of a firm. It considers the operating and investing decisions can be made as well as the financing and their leverage-related decisions.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.137-142
• /
• 2019

There are two methods for evaluating two or more mutually exclusive projects. One is a total investment approach and the other is an incremental investment approach. The former can rank projects by the criterion of the net present value, but the latter can't do it. An incremental investment approach is only possible when all pairwise alternatives are compared. Thus an incremental investment approach is superior in ranking them over an incremental investment approach. To do so, a principle of comparison must be established. Comparisons of profitability are reasonable when operating the same amount of investment over the same period of time. One principle is that all projects are invested in the largest of the projects. Another principle is that all projects are invested during the longest project life of the projects. In this paper, even if the principle is followed, it will be shown that the external rate of return fails to rank them. However, the productive rate of return criterion would prove to be able to rank them like the net present value standard, provided that the principle of comparison is kept. In addition, rate of returns can be assessed so that all mutually exclusive projects can be compared at once, such as on the criterion of the net present value. That is, it can be also compared with many other returns, such as the profit rates on financial investments or real investments.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제16권5호
• /
• pp.51-60
• /
• 2011

이 연구에서는 기업 전자교육프로그램(e-learning program)의 효과성 평가를 위한 일종의 투자수익률 분석방법을 제안한다. 일반적으로 전자교육프로그램의 투자수익률 분석을 위한 정확한 비용과 수익 산출은 복잡한 과정이기 때문에 이를 분석하는 것은 용이한 일이 아니다. 이 때문에 지금까지 기업 전자교육프로그램의 투자수익률 분석에 대한 연구는 쉽게 찾아볼 수가 없다. 그러나 투자 대비 수익을 중시하는 기업 환경에서 교육투자수익률 분석은 교육훈련프로그램의 효과성을 검증하고 투자여부를 결정하는데 있어 매우 중요한 근거가 된다. 따라서 이 연구는 특정 회사의 전자교육프로그램의 투자수익률 분석을 시도함으로써 기업 전자교육프로그램의 투자대비 수익률을 규명하고자 하는 데에 구체적인 방안을 제공하고 다양한 기업 교육훈련프로그램의 투자수익률 분석을 위해 시사점을 제시하는 데 목적이 있다.

• Industrial Engineering and Management Systems
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.121-130
• /
• 2010

In today's uncertain economic environment, economic risk is inherent in making large investments on manufacturing facilities. It is, therefore, practically meaningful to divide investment over multiple periods, reducing the risk of investment. Then, the cash-flow over the entire planning horizon would comprise positive inflow and negative outflow. In this case, in general, evaluation by internal rate of return (IRR) is not feasible, because multiple IRRs are involved. This paper deals with a problem of evaluating profitability, as well as risk, of investment alternatives made in multiple times of investment over the entire horizon. Typically, an additional investment is required after the initial one, for expanding manufacturing capacity or other reasons. The paper pays attention to a unit cash-flow over two periods, decomposing the total cash-flow into a series of unit cash-flow patterns. It is easy to evaluate profitability of a unit cash-flow by using IRR. The total cash-flow can be decomposed into the series of two types of unit cash-flows: an investment type one (negative-positive) and the borrowing type one (positive-negative). This paper, therefore, proposes a method in which only the borrowing type unit cash-flow is eliminated in the series by converting total cash-flow using capital interest rate. Then, a unique IRR can be obtained and the profitability is evaluated. Thus, the paper extends the method of IRR so that it may help decision making in complicated cash-flow pattern observed in practice.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제38권3호
• /
• pp.95-99
• /
• 2015

The IRR(internal rate of return) is often used by investors for the evaluation of engineering projects. Unfortunately, it has serial flaws: (1) multiple real-valued IRRs may arise; (2) complex-valued IRRs may arise; (3) the IRR is, in special cases, incompatible with the net present value (NPV) in accept/reject decisions. The efforts of management scientists and economists in providing a reliable project rate of return have generated over the decades an immense amount of contributions aiming to solve these shortcomings. Especially, multiple internal rate of returns (IRRs) have a fatal flaw when we decide to accep it or not. To solve it, some researchers came up with external rate of returns (ERRs) such as ARR (Average Rate of Return) or MIRR (MIRR, Modified Internal Rate of Return). ARR or MIRR. will also always yield the same decision for a engineering project consistent with the NPV criterion. The ERRs are to modify the procedure for computing the rate of return by making explicit and consistent assumptions about the interest rate at which intermediate receipts from projects may be invested. This reinvestment could be either in other projects or in the outside market. However, when we use traditional ERRs, a volume of capital investment is still unclear. Alternatively, the productive rate of return (PRR) can settle these problems. Generally, a rate of return is a profit on an investment over a period of time, expressed as a proportion of the original investment. The time period is typically the life of a project. The PRR is based on the full life of the engineering project. but has been annualised to project one year. And the PRR uses the effective investment instead of the original investment. This method requires that the cash flow of an engineering project must be separated into 'investment' and 'loss' to calculate the PRR value. In this paper, we proposed a tabulated form for easy calculation of the PRR by modifing the profit and loss statement, and the cash flow statement.