• International Journal of Contents
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.69-78
• /
• 2010

In recent years, many leading corporations are actively adopting IT as competitive resources to improve productivity and processes efficiency with strategic alignments. In effect, IT investment also continues to increase. As a vast growth of IT investment, questions and criticism on recent IT investment results are also rapidly being raised. Especially, improper decision making and management on IT investment may cause negative impact on the company's reputation and finances, therefore companies need reasonable and wise investment decision making on new IT projects. This study applies the conceptual framework of IT governance to IT investment decision making cases to examine how IT investment governance influences the quality of IT investment decision making and how business-IT strategic alignment affects the quality of IT investment decision making. This paper contributes to identify the main factors for reasonable and effective IT investment decision making and expected to provide proper guidelines for IT investment decision making.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제7권4호
• /
• pp.169-180
• /
• 2009

IT governance implies a system in which all stakeholders with a given organization, including the board, internal customers, and related areas such as finance provide the necessary input into their decision-making process. However, the concepts of IT governance are broad and ambiguous, so IT governance is eventually needed multi-criteria decision making. This paper presents a hierarchical structure to better understand the relationship between control structure and the complexity of collective behavior with respect to IT governance and proposes a corresponding fuzzy model for analyzing IT governance complexity based on an extensive literature review. The results of this study are expected to provide a clearer understanding of how the concerns of IT governance behave and how they interact and form the collective behavior of the entire system.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.93-105
• /
• 2006

More emphasis has recently been put on the strategic application of IT, the linkage and integration between information system, and business process for value increase of a company's business. Thus, it is high time to redefine the concept of IT governance in order to effectively manage various IT services and assets. However, less attention has been paid to the practical study of domestic firms, compared to in the academic and industrial level. In this study, the current situation of IT governance setup and various factors for future development will be examined by a case study to explore activities, types, and determinants of decision making process that companies are currently conducting regarding IT governance. For the purpose of comparative analysis, two large enterprises were chosen with similar size of sales and high investment rate for IT within the same industry, and in-depth analysis was conducted based on the interviews of the concerned parties and in-house materials, from the perspective of structure, process, and relational mechanism. By the case study on IT governance of company 'A' and 'B', decision making mechanism and factors will be analyzed, which will indicate detailed characteristics of each decision-making field and its components for general application. By doing so, it is expected to be used as reference in building IT governance that fits the environment of a firm in the future.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제5권3호
• /
• pp.185-193
• /
• 2018

This paper aims to explore the risk governance framework and socially viable solutions, attempting to provide guidance for the decision making process. The key idea of this study start with overcoming the limitations of IRGC risk governance framework, which mainly focuses on a comprehensive framework for risk governance. This article has employed SWOT analysis as a methodology, which is a strategic planning technique used to help identifying the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats related to business competition or risk management. In this paper, socially viable solutions as an alternative plan place emphasis on the adoption of concern assessment through a concerns table. It is also proposed that scoping has to get introduced, with SWOT analysis in the process. The results of this paper support that multiple stakeholders have to participate in the process of identifying and framing risk and communicating with each other, considering the context. It should be noted that communities can become involved and take important parts in decision making process in various ways. It is recommended that engaging stakeholders to both risk assessment and risk management is material to dealing with risk in a socially viable way. It also implies that the community-based disaster management should be better prepared for the decision making process in socially viable solutions.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.129-156
• /
• 2008

This study empirically tested a research model and hypothesis extracted and based on IT governance and knowledge sharing theories. In this study we targeted CIO and IS managers to find the effects of the degree of knowledge sharing between CEO and CIO regarding five areas of IT governance decision-making: IT principles, IT architecture, IT infrastructure, business application needs, and IT investment and prioritization, on IT and business alignment. Additionally we studied the effects of business alignment on the effectiveness of information systems. Results showed that the degree of knowledge sharing in CEO and CIO on IT principles, IT infrastructure, IT investment and prioritization had a positive influence on IT and business alignment, ultimately showing a positive influence on the effectiveness of information systems. This research has shown that fording the preferable relationship between IT and business affected by performing high quality decision making based on knowledge sharing and consequently it also is a basis to provide a positive influence to the effectiveness of the information system.

• 한국콘텐츠학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국콘텐츠학회 2007년도 추계 종합학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.183-187
• /
• 2007

고도의 지식 기반사회인 현대사회에서 과학적 지식과 기술 혁신은 개인과 사회, 그리고 국가의 경제 발전과 경쟁력을 위한 필수적 요소로서 자리매김해 왔다. 그러나 이와 동시에 줄기세포연구, 유전자조작기술 등 기술혁신에 따른 잠재적 위험성은 사회적 불안 및 갈등요소로도 작용하고 있다. 기술에 대한 불확실성이 증가하고 사회가 다원화하면서 과학기술정책의 의사결정과정도 기존의 톱다운 방식인 '거버먼트(Government)'에서 점차적으로 '거버넌스(Governance)로 옮겨가고 있다. 다양한 사회 구성원의 참여로 의사결정이 이루어지는 거버넌스는 복잡한 사회 현상들에 대한 다원적 접근을 가능하게 한다. 본고에서는 거버넌스, 특히 기술혁신과 관련된 리스크 거버넌스를 중심으로 과학기술지식을 기반으로 한 의사결정모델을 살펴보고, 글로벌 시대에 과학기술과 사회의 지속가능한 발전을 위한 거버넌스 체계를 모색해보고자 한다.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.289-309
• /
• 2013

Korea has been ranked at the top consecutively in UN e-Government Survey. This fact reflects consistent efforts by public institutes in Korea. However, there were some duplicate efforts and inefficiency in the investment into IS(information systems). In other words, management and decision making on e-government have yet to improved. Accordingly, governmental institutes have long been promoting policies for EA in order to carry out and manage effectively IT projects including the e-Government projects. EA is being regarded as a means to facilitate IT Governance for systematic management of IT projects, A major objective is to firmly establish the decision making process for IS investment through EA, since the each institute is a large organization with so complicated and specialized demand for IS. As a result, systematic decision making is becoming quite difficult. Thus, this study attempts to identify different types of IT investment decision making and to figure out the relationship between the decision types and the organizational performance of public institutes where EA was implemented.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제39권1호
• /
• pp.65-74
• /
• 2011

최근 새로운 도시관리 시스템으로 대두되고 있는 거버넌스의 정착을 위해서는 지역적 상황과 특색에 적합한 Good-Local거버넌스의 바람직한 모델 및 모형의 마련이 시급한 상황이다. 이에 본 연구는 거버넌스의 핵심요소인 의사결정 영향력에 대해 이상적 형태와 실제상황을 비교하는 새로운 방법론을 통해 청주시 원흥이 생태공원 조성과정에서 나타난 거버넌스 참여주체 영향력 변화를 분석했다. 분석결과, 원흥이 생태공원 조성에 따른 지역문제 해결을 통해 거버넌스 참여주체의 의사결정 영향력 수준이 점차적으로 향상되었으며, 운영 관리기에 이르러서는 새로운 지역문제에 대해서 협의형성적인 의사결정을 할 수 있는 Good-Local 거버넌스로 발전했음을 알 수 있었다. 향후 본 연구에서 제시된 분석기법을 다양한 거버넌스 사례에 적용 및 분석을 통해 거버넌스 구성의 핵심요소라 할 수 있는 영향력의 수준을 평가하는 일반화된 모형을 구축하여야 할 것이다.

• 농촌계획
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.49-59
• /
• 2022

Recently, Korea aimed to increase water use efficiency by implementing integrated management according to the water management unification policy. Considering the enormous use of water resources in the agricultural sector, it is necessary to efficiently conserve water in terms of demand management by intensifying the stakeholders' involvement and awareness campaigns. The existing agricultural water management system in Korea is based on a top-down approach by which the government agencies directly plan budgets and policies to be enforced on and implemented by farmers, with little to no involvement of farmers in the decision-making process. However, this process has hindered the desired water resources management and the water conservation goal at the field level. Moreover, the limited research on water governance operations focusing on agricultural water creates a knowledge gap, particularly in Korea. Thus, it is necessary to investigate water governance cases with successful implementations in agricultural and rural areas to identify the factors applicable to domestic governance in Korea. In addition, a more systematic governance model should be established by identifying the subjectivity of the stakeholders' involvement in agricultural water governance. Therefore, this study proposed a new bottom-up model for agricultural water governance, which aims to raise the problem of autonomous water governance while promoting stakeholders' voluntary participation in agricultural water management and reflecting farmers' involvement in the decision-making process. Moreover, if agricultural water governance is expanded nationwide by reflecting agricultural and water resource policies in the future, it is believed that positive effects can be achieved in increasing utilization efficiency and securing sustantiality through agricultural water saving.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.159-191
• /
• 2016

과학기술 전문가가 근거를 제시하고 정책관료가 결정을 내리던 기존의 정책결정체계와는 달리, 불확실성과 이해관계 대립으로 특징지어지는 기술위험 영역에서 참여적 의사결정방법이 바람직한 모델로 상정되어왔다. 이어 여러 가지 정책실험이 이루어졌다. 그러나 의사결정과정에 있어서 '누가 어떤 역할을 할 것인가'에 대해서는 여전히 다양한 견해가 존재한다. 본 연구는 기술위험 거버넌스에 대한 사회적 배경이 다른 두 나라인 영국과 한국에서 각각 수행된 방사성폐기물 관리방안 모색을 위한 공론화 프로그램을 역할분담의 관점에서 분석한다. 본고는 영국과 한국의 공론화 프로그램이 전개되는 과정에서 다양한 참여자 그룹이 어떻게 정의되고, 어떠한 근거로 역할이 상정되며, 적용된 의사결정방법은 무엇인지에 관해 논의한다. 공론화과정의 사례연구를 통해 많은 기술선진 민주주의 사회에서 지지 받고 있는 '참여를 통한 의사결정'이라는 기술위험 거버넌스의 규범이자 방법론이 실제 각기 다른 정치사회 환경에서 어떻게 구현되는 지를 살펴본다. 방사성폐기물 관리와 공론화에 대한 오랜 경험을 가진 영국과의 비교분석은 한국의 방사성폐기물 관리정책과 나아가 기술위험 거버넌스를 위한 정책도구를 정교화 하는 데 기여할 것이다.