• 헤리티지:역사와 과학
• /
• 제52권4호
• /
• pp.206-225
• /
• 2019

조선시대 문헌에서는 유리거울을 서양경(西洋鏡), 양경(洋鏡), 파리경(玻璃鏡), 파려경(玻瓈鏡), 석경(石鏡) 등 다양한 명칭으로 불렀고, 이를 경험하고 느꼈던 당시의 상황과 교역에 관한 자세한 내용을 살필 수 있다. 이를 통해 17세기 이후 청·러시아와의 교역을 중심으로 유리거울이 수입되었고, 조선 후기에 들어와 수입금지 품목에 포함되는 등 18세기에 들어와 사회적으로 큰 반향을 일으켰던 신문물로 확인되었다. 19세기에는 일상생활에 필요한 상품으로 더 크게 확대되었고, 특히 일본과의 교역이 눈에 띄게 성장하였다. 18~19세기의 유리거울은 개인이 용모를 확인하는 기본적인 용도에서 벗어나 상업적인 용도로까지 폭넓게 활용되었다. 당시 중국이나 일본을 방문했던 조선의 지식인들은 이에 관한 시각적 충격과 경험들을 글로 남겼고, 유리거울에 대한 유용함은 조선의 소비 욕구로 이어져 유리거울의 수입을 자극하였다. 이로 인해 18세기 이후 유리거울은 조선의 청동거울을 빠르게 대체하였고 유리거울을 이용한 새로운 공예품들이 제작 및 사용되기 시작하였다. 특히 실내에서 사용하는 공예품으로 일체식 유리경갑(一體式 琉璃鏡匣)을 개발해 전통적으로 사용해왔던 빗접과 함께 이용해 편리하였다. 당시 경갑의 인기는 국립중앙박물관 소장 <태평성시도(太平城市圖)>를 비롯해 조선시대 풍속화에서도 잘 볼 수 있다. 또한 중국의 기형으로 볼 수 있는 경대(鏡臺)도 조선에서 많이 제작했는데 서랍 개수와 크기, 상자 형태 등 다양한 방식으로 제작한 여러 형태의 경대를 살필 수 있다. 또한 휴대용의 작은 면경도 조선만의 미감으로 표현한 길상 문양, 장식 기법을 통해 품격 있는 공예품들로 제작되었다. 19세기에 들어와 프랑스, 네덜란드, 영국 등 유럽에서도 유리거울을 수입했지만 19세기 말 이후에는 일본식의 공예품들이 성행하였다. 일본 명치~대정시대에 유행했던 유리경대가 수입되었고 대형의 유리거울을 이용한 공예품들이 사용되었다. 이른 시기부터 있었던 경병의 경우 응접실처럼 큰 공간에 진설하거나 연회를 위해 중국·일본으로부터 수입했으며, 서양식으로 거울을 벽에 걸거나 부착해 공간의 밝기를 조절하고 외부의 풍경을 들여와 실내를 장식하는 방법이 도입되었다.

• Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.143-153
• /
• 2011

The sundials produced in King Sejong era had the functions of accurate observation instruments and were fabricated in various forms such as Angbuilgu (hemispherical sundial). In this study, we investigated the literature, structural characteristics and principles of Hyeonjuilgu, Cheonpyeongilgu and Jeongnamilgu that were developed in Joseon to have the unique structures. Additionally, the sundials were reviewed in the perspective of technical history by comparing them with the sundials of China. For the restoration of the sundials, we identified the principle in which the light spots and shade of the sun were used, and drew the variations of the altitude and azimuth by the yearly motion of the sun on the Siban on the hemispheric and flat surfaces. Based on these results, we completed the design drawings of the three sundials and proposed the restoration models.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제23권6호
• /
• pp.21-26
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is to retrospect the establishment process of specification of modern factory-made traditional Korean roof-tile. Its another purpose is to analyze the specification of watong(瓦桶, a wooden molding frame for roof tile making) which is recorded in the literature of Joseon dynasty. The results of this study are as follows. : First, the specification of modern factory-made Korean roof-tile that currently used was established in 1978. And it did not succeed old traditional specification. Second, in case of construction or repair of main building of palace, it was a principle to use Daewa(大瓦, the big size roof-tile). And Sangwa(常瓦, the ordinary size roof-tile) was used when needed. Also, Jungwa(中瓦, the middle size roof-tile) was used regardless of the size of group building. And Sowa(小瓦, the small size roof-tile) was used in house and wall of royal tomb. Third, it is needed to establish a specification of traditional handmade roof-tile based on the specification of watong through research of the litterateur. So, a standard draft for this was proposed. Finally, one can find the significance that this study has tried to find a specification of traditional roof-tile that can be applied to construction or repair of cultural heritage.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.45-60
• /
• 2008

This study lists the vocabulary of the inscriptions on SeoGwol-YeongGeon-DoGam-UiGwe(西闕營建都監儀軌 1831). This study also deciphers and explains the meanings of them. In advance, this study compares them with the vocabulary of the national language in the middle ages and in modem times. There are two important missions in deciphering a transcription marking of the architectural vocabulary of UiGwe(儀軌). One is to gain an understanding of the reading method of transcription marking and the other is an explanation of what that means. As a result, we can correctly understand the UiGwe(儀軌) written in transcription marks. If we could decipher the transcription markings of the documents as it is, we cannot only recover plenty of vocabulary related with characteristic architecture in the age of the later Joseon Dynasty, but also correct wrongly used vocabulary in the present. As a result, we can standardize and adjust the vocabulary use of Korean traditional architecture. In advance, we can correct errors of spelling and mistaken explanations in the Korean Encyclopedia.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제28권6호
• /
• pp.31-42
• /
• 2019

The harsh economic conditions of Buddhist temples in late Joseon dynasty, and the prevalence of the Buddhānusmrti(念佛) practice, which is a practice of reciting Amita Buddha(阿彌陀佛), led Buddhist temples to organize the Buddhānusmrti association(念佛契) in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. For the practices and the activities of organization, an architectural facility was required; thereby, many temples had a Yeombul-dang(念佛堂). However, only a few of the Yeombul-dang have survived and are known today. This research investigates the ways temples tried to acquire Yeombul-dang buildings during the period and their architecture characteristics by reviewing historical records and documentary works of literature. In this research, Yeombul-dang is found to have various types of building names and building forms. Different hall names such as Amitābha Hall(佛殿), Yosa(寮舍) and Daebang(大房) were used as Yeonbul-dang. The commonalities and differences in terms of building forms, spatial elements composition and layouts were found depending on how they were acquired. The Yeombul-dang were most commonly built as multi-complex buildings consisting of worshiping rooms and residential areas. Most of Yeombul-dang were located in the central areas of the temple site. On this basis, this research suggests the possibility that many Yeombul-dang is still being used under different names and for different purposes.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.113-127
• /
• 2008

Bogildo is Byel-Seo architecture from the Joseon dynasty period. There were ruins in Nakseojae, Goksudang, Seyeonjeong and Docheonseoksil. Docheonseoksil had been protected as Scenic Site No.34. A pond, a stone embankment, a stone stairway was discovered during repair and restoration of the site. Also, a site with ondol was discovered in 2007. The literatures to know Docheonseoksil is Gosanyugo, Buyongdongpalgyeong, Bogildoji. These are important sources of data to know the original of Docheonseoksil at the moment. Accordingly we will search the original of Docheonseoksil to systematicly study the excavation report and literature now. Then the restoration of Huihwangkyo and the building site with ondol will be studied through th literatures and excavation report for an architectural point of view. Also, the location of the stone gate remaining in Docheonseoksil and the approach way to it will be studied. The translation of the literatures are referred translated books, found with help from professor. This thesis is a step to knowing the original. If Docheonseoksil is studied, we can know more of its origin.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제20권5호
• /
• pp.47-61
• /
• 2011

This study examined the background and change of building Yeongam eupseong and characteristics and construction method of its spatial structure. The results of this study can be summarized as follows. First, Yeongam eupseong was built for the same purpose of national border defense against the invasion of Japanese army as other Eupseongs were built and it was found first in the literature in the era of King Munjong of Joseon Dynasty with the scale of three gates and 4,369 cheok of castle wall. Such a scale was continued and in particular, according to flat structure, road network and gate position shown in the map, the form and road system of Yeongam eupseong before the 19th century were mostly identical with the current ones. Second, castle wall was built over foundation by using talcum after leveling the foundation soil and castle wall can be divided into outer wall, filling part and inner wall from the section. Outer wall was constructed by inserting and layering pebbles with big irregular stone, filling part was made with talcum and riprap and inner wall with soil in several layers by keeping gradient. This building method showed common features in inserting and layering pebbles for outer wall, use of protruded base and section form compared to Jeollado Eupseong.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.29-46
• /
• 2008

This study is to present Chinese character notation for common use through investigation of examples and graphonomy related literature with beam and purlin of wooden members and its conclusions are as follows. It suggests two commonly used Chinese characters of beam and purlin. The first method of indicating them is Riyang(樑) for beam and Hang(桁) for purlin and the second method is Bo(保) for beam and Hang(桁) for purlin. Riyang(樑) as the first method was already used in the Joseon period and was profitable to convey limited meaning as wooden term compared to Riyang(樑) with wider meaning and Bo(保) as the second method contained logical association and hieroglyphic connection of Bo(保) as the Korean character. Hang(桁) for purl in was presented by both the first and second methods and it was already used in the Koryeo age, also commonly used as the term of purlin in China and Japan and it was also presented as letter containing logical and hieroglyphic connection with Hyeng(行).

• 고전문학과교육
• /
• 제37호
• /
• pp.253-281
• /
• 2018

이 논문은 19세기 말 가린-미하일로프스키에 의해 채록된 "조선설화" 속 수달 전설의 특징과 그 의미를 밝히는 것을 목표로 한다. "조선설화"에 수록된 64편의 설화들은 1898년 두만강과 압록강 유역에서 채록된 것으로 이른 시기 한반도 북부 지역에서 전승되던 설화의 일면을 보여주지만 1980년대 후반에 이르러서야 우리에게 소개되었다. 이후 선행 연구를 통해 "조선설화"의 대체적인 성격과 연행 과정에 대한 정리가 이루어졌다. 그러나 개별 작품에 대한 본격적인 논의는 아직 미흡하다. 이에 본고에서 조선과 만주의 기원을 다루는 설화 <수달에 관한 전설>을 중심으로 그 이야기의 형식적 특징을 살폈고, 나아가 이야기 속에 형상화된 누루하치 가문과 이성계 가문의 대결 양상에 개입하고 있는 서술시각의 의미에 대해 논의해 보았다. 그 결과는 다음과 같다. <수달에 관한 전설>의 형식적인 특징은 '야래자 유형'과 <물 속 미륵 귀에 건 아버지 유골>, 눈 빛 강한 이인, 정충신 일화처럼 개별적으로 존재하는 설화 유형이나 화소를 재구성하여 새로운 혼합형 설화로 만들어냈음을 밝혔다. 각각의 서사 논리를 지닌 기존의 설화들을 재배치하면서 <수달에 관한 전설>에는 여러 변형들이 생겨났다. 그러나 다양한 종류의 변형을 가로지르는 일관된 논리는 누루하치 가문과 이성계 가문 간의 비교와 대결을 뚜렷하게 만들기 위해 개별 설화를 활용하려 했다는 점이다. 그 결과 청나라의 기원이 되는 누루하치 가문의 신성성은 확대되고 구성원들의 인품도 높여졌다. 반면 조선의 기원이 되는 이성계 가문은 누루하치 가문에 비교해서 비범성이 떨어지고 능력도 떨어졌다. 그런데 이것은 청나라에 대한 선망에서 비롯한 것은 아니었다. 오히려 청나라와 조선의 혈통은 관련이 있다는 생각에 기반하고 있었다. 19세기 말 한반도 북부에서 채록된 설화에 담긴 인식은 청나라에 대한 재조명인 바, 청은 조선의 또 다른 혈통이기 때문에 청나라가 천하를 통일했던 경험을 조선 또한 공유해야 한다는 것임을 확인했다. 그것은 후일 금나라의 역사를 민족사의 관점에서 포섭하고 만주와 조선을 단군대황조의 후예이며 한 겨레로 보는 대동(大東)사관과 닮아 있는 것이기도 했다.

• 고전문학과교육
• /
• 제15호
• /
• pp.355-387
• /
• 2008

The purpose of the study was to decide Korean translation and the copying period of "Korean Translation of " and to look all around their characteristics in different versions carefully until now. The "Korean Translation" is a collection of Korean-translated romance and love stories excavated by a professor Kim,Il Geun, and there is not a little meaning in the context of novel history in the point of view of 'Korean translation of a court possession'. Arranging conclusion of the study generally, it is as follows. (1) Considering phonological phenomena, grammar and vocabulary in the study of Korean language, it is presumed that they would be translated into Korean and copied between the regime period of the King Sukjong and the regime period of the King Yungjo in the Joseon Dynasty. For, they were composed of a middle declaration of copied 'Myeoknambon "Korean Translation of Taepyeonggwanggi(태평광기)"' and 'NakseonJaebon(낙선재본)' between the middle of the 17th century and the middle of the 18th century and the regime period of the King Jeongjo in the Joseon Dynasty appointed as the background period of the novels should be excepted. Consequently, through the Korean Translation, we can confirm that the novel scope between the 17th century and the 18th century in Korean novel history was widened until 'The Royal Court' and 'Women'. (2) In the side of vocabulary, the "Korean Translation" also has not a little meaning in the side of a collection translated in the Royal Court. It doesn't have new vocabularies, but partial vocabularies as '(Traces:痕)' '(Clean eyes:明眸)', ' (Sail:帆)', '(Get up:起)', '글이플(Weak grass:弱草)', '쇼록(Owl:? 梟 or 鴉?)', '이 사라심(This life:此生)', and '노혀오매(Look for:訪)' are good data in the study of Korean language. (3) The "Korean Translation" is a valuable data about translation and copying of a court novel and we can discover intentionally changed parts and partially omitted sentences rather in the than in the . There are differences between a translation book and a copying book and we can catch sight of intention of translation and unsettledness of copying in the second work. Therefore, we can know that the "Korean Translation" has a double context which one work is translated and a work in different version is derived, compared to a simple copy. (4) The "Korean Translation" has a close relation with "Hangoldong(閒汨董)", but it doesn't regard the same copy as a foundation. The basic copy of translation of the "Korean Translation" is a different version of the same line as "Hangoldong" and "Jeochobon(저초본:정명기 소장본)" and is more similar line to "Hangoldong", but it is also not the same basic copy. (5) Considering that the "Korean Translation" doesn't has a distinct relation with the "Hangoldong", there is no correlation between the "Korean Translation" and and the "Hangoldong" and . In addition, we could not discover a writer's identity between the two.