• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제27권5호
• /
• pp.15-25
• /
• 2010

본 연구의 목적은 원주 건강도시사업을 평가하여 문제점을 확인하고 건강도시사업의 원칙과 전략에 근거하여 사업을 발전시키고자 하는데 있다. 연구를 위하여 건강도시연맹에서 개발한 과정평가 도구인 SPIRIT Checklist를 사용하였다. 평가팀은 39개의 관련문서를 분석, 평가하고 건강도시사업 담당자, 관련부서 담당자, 자문위원과의 회의를 통해 평가 결과에 대한 의견수렴을 실시하였고 최종적으로는 AFHC의 SPIRIT평가 전문가와의 연석회의를 통하여 분석 결과를 검증하였다. 원주시의 건강도시사업을 평가한 결과 강력한 정치적 지원에 근거하여 지속적인 건강도시사업을 가능하게 하는 자원, 중기사업계획, 인프라, 협력적 조직, 건강도시네트워크 등이 갖추어져 있는 것을 확인하였고, 건강증진 전략을 적용한 사업의 보완 및 개선이 필요한 것으로 나타났다. 건강도시사업의 과정평가를 위해 개발된 SPIRIT 체크리스트는 질적 평가도구로서, 향후 건강도시간의 비교를 위하여 질적 평가방법에 기초한 양적 평가 지표를 추가할 필요가 있다.

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.119-128
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study is to develop Web database for healthy city that contains healthy city indicators for making city health plans, setting project priorities, monitoring projects, and evaluating healthy city projects, effectively. Using Delphi survey method for identifying indicator domains and indicators, we extracted nine domains with thirty-four healthy city indicators. Based on the appraisals of DB users about the contents of DB, a web database for healthy city Wonju was constructed. We developed a web database system for the purposes of sharing high quality health related data for managing and evaluating healthy city projects. The web database currently provides variety data in the web address, http://healthycity.wonju.go.kr/index.html. The web DB comprised with major healthy city indicators that are the most important indicators, healthy city indicator data that have a variety data set for encompassing all domain areas such as city infrastructure, health medicine, economies, and all other related areas and qualitative data that contains policy reports, research results, healthy city information and all other tips. A database of healthy city is very essential and important because it makes healthy city projects alive by managing and sharing healthy city related data effectively. But we need to fill out some blank cells in DB because there are currently unavailable data for some indicators. In conclusion, we expect the web DB contributes information sharing of healthy city project teams and improving healthy city project quality at Wonju city in Korea.

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.123-134
• /
• 2007

Since 1996, the Health Promotion Programme spearheaded by the Korean Central Government has been actively developing and recently, the Healthy City Project led by the local autonomous entities have also been actively promoted. Healthy City is one in which the health and well-being of the citizens are given the utmost importance in the decision-making of the city. While the Health Promotion Programme focuses on changing the "health behavior" of the people, the Healthy City Project, a policy to improve the existing inequality of public health services, deals with more essential health factors and requires political support as well as a new organization. The Healthy City paradigm based on the New Public Health started in England and ever since the Healthy City Model Project spearheaded by the EURO WHO began in 1986, the Alliance for Healthy Cities centered in the West Pacific region supported by the WHO in Oct 2003 was inaugurated. 19 Korean cities are full members of the Alliance for Healthy Cities and 2 laboratories are associate members. The Ministry of Health and Welfare has held the Healthy City Forum consisting of related officials, experts and representatives of civic bodies on 6 occasions since Dec 2005. The need for adequate administrative and financial support from the Central Government to the local autonomous entities governing the Healthy Cities was raised. It is hoped that this Healthy City Project will bring about the improved health conditions of the people as well as promote the equality of the public health services.

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.139-151
• /
• 2008

Objectives: Since 2000 interests in Healthy City Project has been growing fast in Korea. Amid this atmosphere, the need for establishing priorities when planning Healthy City Project and carrying forward the plan has arisen. Therefore, this study tries to conduct practical research on the manner of setting priorities of business valuation standard about Healthy City Project. Methods: The research was carried out with Healthy City experts and government official. And in this research the responses of 28 participants among 37 have been taken into consideration due to their consistent responses. Results: The results of Level 1 showed that the "social & environmental approach" accounted for more than the "individual approach". In the case of Level 2, fields resulted in order of "environment", "infrastructure", "behavior", "evaluation and reflection", "disease prevention and rehabilitation", and "setting approach". Conclusions: The findings derived from this study are first, it is feasible to suggest the ways of establishing priorities as to the evaluation standards for the Healthy City Project and second, the results present the ways to proceed in terms of what tasks should be done for the healthy City Project development.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제5권3호
• /
• pp.501-512
• /
• 1999

The aim of this study was to utilize the 20 steps in the three phases from the book, 'Twenty steps for developing a Healthy Cities Project $2^{nd}$ Ed., 1995, WHO/EURO' to survey Healthy Cities to identify the similarities and differences by implementation rates and perceived significances among Healthy Cities worldwide. For this study, a self-administered questionnaire was developed based on the book. The questionnaires were delivered by air-mail and e-mail to 213 Healthy City coordinators or directors in 43 nations from Jan 13 to Feb 10, 1999. The responses were gathered up until March 31 from 40 Healthy Cities in 17 nations, mostly in the USA and in the European regions. The main results are as follows; Overall the perceived significances were higher for healthy cities with higher implementation rates and there were significant differences for 'set-up office', 'plans strategy', 'increase health awareness', 'mobilize intersectoral action', and 'secure healthy public policy'. 1. According to national health system, the implementation rate, perceived significance and implementation ability of the 20 steps were higher in the healthy cities with a comprehensive-type health system as compared to those with an entreprenetrial & permissive health system. Overall there were significant differences in the steps 'mobilize intersectoral action', and 'secure healthy public policy'. steps which were predominant in the healthy cities with a comprehensive-type health system. There was no concordance in the ranks of implementation rate and perceived significant score. 2. According to the length of implementation time, the perceived significance and implementation ability were higher in healthy cities with more than 6 years compared to those with less than 6 years, although implementation rate was the same. Overall there was a significant difference in 'secure healthy public policy' the step which was predominant in the healthy cities with more than 6 years of implementation. 3. According to population covered by the Healthy City Project, the implementation rate and implementation ability were higher in healthy cities with more than a population of 100 thousand. There was no significant difference in perceived significance, but there were differences in the following, 'find finances', 'set-up office'. 'mobilize intersectoral action' in the implementation rate and implementation ability. These three steps were predominant in the healthy cities with a population of more than 100 thousand. 4. The population covered by the Healthy City Project was the only effective factor influencing the total implementation ability of each healthy city, and it was higher for those cities with a population of more than 100 thousand. In Conclusion, the implementation rate, the perceived significance and the implementation ability were higher in cities with a comprehensive -type health system, with more than 6 years of healthy city experience and with a population of more than 100 thousand. To increase the reliability and the validity of the questionnaire and the results of this study arising from lack of sufficient data, repeated study needs to be considered with a more refined questionnaire delivered to more healthy cities worldwide.

• 농촌의학ㆍ지역보건
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.155-167
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 국내 건강도시사업을 추진하는 지역사회 담당자를 대상으로 세계보건기구의 건강도시 특성을 중심으로 건강도시 추진 현황을 살펴봄으로 국내 건강도시의 나아가야 할 방향을 위한 기초자료를 제공하고자 실시되었다. 2007년 2월부터 2007년 12월까지 우편설문조사를 하였는데, 설문문항은 건강도시 현황, 건강도시 담당자의 일반적 특성, 건강도시 기본 특성, 건강도시에 대한 자체평가, 건강도시 발전방향 등으로 구성하였다. 전체 23개 지역사회 중 도시가 11개(47.8%), 농촌이 12(52.5%)였으며, 건강도시 담당부서는 보건소가 73.9%로 대부분이었다. 건강도시 담당자는 여자가 60.9%, 연령은 40대가 65.2%, 건강도시 경력은 6~12개월인 경우가 34.8%로 가장 많았다. 건강도시 기본 특성을 살펴보면, 건강도시 자체 예산 확보(91.3%), 도시건강 프로파일 작성(91.3%), 협력대학 기술지원(82.6%), 건강도시 조례 제정(78.3%), 주민참여(78.3%), 운영위원회 구성(73.9%), 생활터 접근 사업(69.9%), 건강도시 네트워크에 적극적 참여(69.6%) 등이 높았으며, 부서간 협력 활성화(34.8%), 건강도시 장기 계획 수립(39.1%), 공약 및 시정방향에 건강도시 포함(43.5%), 취약 계층 대상 사업(47.8%), 전담조직 구성(47.8%), 건강도시 자체 세미나 실시(47.8%)가 낮았다. 도시농촌간 건강도시 전담조직의 경우 도시가 72.7%가 구성되어 있는 반면 농촌은 25.0%만 구성되어 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다(p<0.05). 건강도시 전담조직 유무에 따른 건강도 기본특성을 살펴보면, 전담조직이 있는 경우 부서간 협력, 주민참여, 생활터 접근, 건강도시 네트워크가 잘 된다고 응답하였다(p<0.05). 건강도시 수행시 사업개발과 예산확보가 어려웠으며, 건강도시 사업시 우선 고려 사항으로는 부서간 협력이 34.8%로 가장 높았다. 건강도시성공을 위한 핵심인물로는 82.6%에서 단체장이라고 응답하였고, 국내 건강도시 활성화를 위해 향후 역할을 할 기관으로는 중앙정부인 보건복지가족부(52.2%)가 가장 높았다. 국내에서는 AFHC 회원도시 수가 급속히 증가하여 왔으나 건강도시를 위한 정치적 지원과 전담조직의 설립 등이 미진하며, 건강형평성을 고려한 사업 및 부문간 협력에 의한 포괄적인 건강도시 경험이 축적되어 오지 못하였다. 이를 해결하기 위해서는 건강도시의 정의와 선진 건강도시들이 제시하고 있는 원칙 및 특징에 충실하도록 노력하여야 할 것이다.

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.31-42
• /
• 2011

Objectives: Busan had the highest mortality and the shortest life expectancy at birth among 16 provinces in Korea in 2008 and there were considerable health inequalities within the region. This study was performed to build up a priority setting framework in Healthy City Busan project. Methods: Analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the relative priority weight for different strategic and program dimensions along with the consistency of response. An on-site workshop-based meeting (calculating importance) and online survey (calculating risk) were conducted to obtain data from 8 experts. Results: The results showed that in strategic criteria "active health promotion & diseases prevention" and "building infrastructure for the Health City project" were two most important factors. In program criteria, considering both importance and risk scores, "making a healthy community" and "building community health centers" in disadvantaged areas were a top priority group. In addition, "enacting an ordinance for the Healthy City", "building the infrastructure for health impact assessment" and "making health care safety net for vulnerable population" were also higher priorities group. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the Healthy City project in Busan should be focused on strengthening health equity and building infrastructure for sustainability of the project.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.513-521
• /
• 2020

Aging populations and the increasing mental health issues among them have set a new challenge for the international community, governments, and people. Given this, society's role is very important, and involving the local community in resolving the problems can play a pivotal role. The current study presented the systematic review of the financing mechanism and cost-effectiveness of the "social prescribing" (SP) project in the United Kingdom and how SP can be adapted for other settings. The data showed comparatively low running costs and the overall effectiveness of SP projects. The running cost of SP projects varied between £54,525 and £1.1 million. The cost-effectiveness of the projects reported as 12% and the return of investment was about 50% depending on the type of analysis and the activities implemented. This type of intervention can be one of the options that support solving the issues of aging populations and their accompanying mental disorders.

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제31권5호
• /
• pp.159-166
• /
• 2014

Purpose: In spite of many Healthy Cities projects in Korea, there are few research about healthy urban planning. So we tried to use available recent models to a Healthy Cities project in a medium sized city in Gyeongnam province. Methods: Using mainly European Healthy Urban Planning Model and opinion leader survey, SWOT analysis, forum and discussion have been done to a city. Secondary city health indicator obtained from Ministry of Statistics. Results: There are strong need to develop health industry, green traffic and healthy living from survey using Healthy Cities policy direction of Korean Health Promotion Fund. Among the Healthy Urban Planning objectives, improvements of physical environments, prevention of accidents and crime, improvements of healthy esthetics rated highly. Although environmental pollution was problem local government push forward to the pilot healthy urban project as active healthy water-front development. Considering secondary healthy city indicators, change of external forces and internal capacity final task for healthy urban planning for Yangsan city were development of riverside physical education park and active living and anti-ageing environments etc. Conclusions: Comprehensive assessment and plan was possible through MAPP Model using European Healthy Urban Planning objectives to draw the direction of future urban planning for Healthy Cities Projects. Further research and formal introduction would be needed.

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.93-103
• /
• 2013

Objectives: This study was to compare two healthy cities, Liverpool in England and Wonju in Korea, which evaluated healthy city projects and to reorient evaluation strategy which fits into Korean Healthy cities. Methods: Comparatives analysis was used by reviewing documents, healthy city plan and evaluation report, of two cities. Results: Healthy city projects in two cities, fifteen programs were identical items among twenty-seven but there were differences in seven items for Liverpool and five items for Wonju. In Liverpool evaluation was done by a stakeholder group called Liverpool Local Involvement Network(LINK), while in Wonju by Yonsei Healthy City Research Center. The evaluation tool was two types; quantitative and qualitative analysis. Liverpool mostly used qualitative and added quantitative, vice versa in Wonju. Conclusions: Evaluation plan for Healthy city projects need to be made in the first phase of the projects, instead of in the end. Moreover, it is important to include stakeholder in conducting qualitative analysis for unquantifiable evidence of effectiveness, as well as quantitative analysis.