• 제목/요약/키워드: Harmonious Union of Divine Beings and Human Beings

검색결과 13건 처리시간 0.022초

神人調化或神人調和 - 以大巡真理會和召會的論述為比較 - (Harmonious Union between Divine Beings and Human Beings or the Blending of God and Man: A Comparison between Daesoon Jinrihoe and the Local Church)

  • 范俊銘;姚蘊慧
    • 대순사상논총
    • /
    • 제35집
    • /
    • pp.509-539
    • /
    • 2020
  • 大巡真理會以《典經》為主體, 闡述神與人的思維於教義之中, 含括神聖性, 宗教性與教義性等探討價值 ; 神與人的傳統意義, 經由《典經》的詮釋, 超越倫理性, 傳統性和社會性, 跨越世俗性的終極關懷。從《典經》的角度分析, 有助於了解大巡真理會的宗旨, 組織的推行方針與未來走向。召會以《聖經》為主體, 將神與人的關連, 作為經歷神聖生命與性情的植入, 而與人的生命與性情調和 ; 神聖的生命是一直不斷地與人的生命調和, 並使之成為神聖的人, 或可稱為屬人的神聖者。此即「神人」的原因, 使人的生命成為神人的生命, 生活是神性調著人性, 作為外顯的行事為人, 性格與生活 ; 因此, 「神人調和」的說法, 作為神與人的關係詮釋, 專注於神與人之間的神聖關連, 從而延伸至召會的範圍。大巡真理會與召會, 代表著歷史, 文化, 語言, 宗教等不同的分野, 卻在神與人的超然解釋上, 各自提出「神人調化」, 「神人調和」等見解 ; 二者可尋覓出論點上的類似點和相異觀, 作為探究的區分與貢獻。

대순사상의 역학적 조명 - 종지(宗旨)를 중심으로 - (Daesoon Thought Explained Through the Philosophy of the Book of Change)

  • 최영진
    • 대순사상논총
    • /
    • 제20권
    • /
    • pp.169-191
    • /
    • 2009
  • The Four Tenets of Daesoon thought are the Creative conjunction of the virtues of Eum and Yang, the Harmonious union of divine beings and human beings, the Resolution of grievances for the mutual beneficence of all life and the Realization of the Dao in the world. This article compares the concepts of the "Creative conjunction of the virtues of Eum and Yang", the "Harmonious union of divine beings and human beings" and the "Resolution of grievances for the mutual beneficence of all life" with "EumYangDaeDaeRon", "ShinMyonKiDeok", the Theory of Mutual Giving Life / Mutual Destruction (SangSaeng/SangGeukRon) of the Book of Changes and analyzes their common and different points. The conclusion is that Daesoon thought and the philosophy of the Book of Changes share common fundamental standpoints. However, the Daesoon thought defines the world of SeonCheon (the state before the Heaven and Earth have been created) as Mutual Giving Life (SangSaeng), and the world of HuCheon (the state after the Heaven and Earth have been created) as Mutual Destruction (SangGeuk). According to Daesoon thought the Mutual Destruction (SangGeuk) is seen as negative, while according to the philosophy of the Book of Changes the Theory of Mutual Giving Live/Mutual Destruction (SangSaeng/SangGeukRon) is viewed as a positive relationship of EumYangDaeDae. This is a point of difference between the Daesoon thought and the philosophy of the Book of Changes. According to EumYangDaeDae relationship theory the contradictory "other" is viewed not as an enemy, but as a necessary element that assures one's existence. When Buddhism and Christianity first came to existence, they did not belong to a main stream. Later, through continuous theorization and systematization they became generally accepted religions. The case of Confucianism was not much different. During Song dynasty in China Buddhism has contributed to the systematization and establishment of Neo-Confucianism; in the middle of 20th century the Confucian scholars of Hong Kong and Taiwan interpreted and defined Confucianism a new in the light of Western philosophy. Thus the "Modern Neo-Confucianism" came to existence. That's why the history of Confucianism is also called "the history of advancing and developing a concept". From this point of view the critical acceptance of some elements of Confucian, Buddhist, Taoist etc. traditions, as well as modern philosophy, by Daesoon, in order to achieve the systematization of Daesoon thought, is a very important process. As a part of this process, this essay explains the Daesoon thought from the point of view of the Book of Changes, which may be said to present the original East-Asian view of the world. Daesoon's emphasis of human dignity, the equality of sexes, the critics the hierarchical society etc. are rather "modern" and should be examined from the point of view of social science. Besides, leaving the boundaries of "modern philosophy", the concepts of "Harmonious union of divine beings and human beings", viewing the universe as one organism etc. should be approached from the point of view of Post-Modernism.

  • PDF

대순사상에서 '인사(人事)'의 의미 고찰 - '천도(天道)'와의 관계를 중심으로 - (A Study on the Meaning of 'Human Affairs' in Daesoon Thought: Focusing on Its Relation to 'the Way of Heaven')

  • 김의성
    • 대순사상논총
    • /
    • 제48집
    • /
    • pp.445-479
    • /
    • 2024
  • '천도(天道)'로부터 '인사'의 의미를 찾는 '천인합일(天人合一)'의 사상적 맥락은 '인도(人道)'의 근거를 '천도'에 두면서 성립된다. 대순사상에서 '인사'의 의미 또한 기본적으로 '인도'의 근거인 '천도'라는 구조 속에서 도출된다. 하지만, '천도'와 '인사'의 관계는 특별하게 드러나고 있다. 대순사상에서는 '천도'의 개념이 이법적이며 본체적인 측면과 더불어 능동적인 의미로 확장되면서 고유한 '인사'의 의미를 부여하고 있다. '천도'가 지닌 이러한 특징은 상제의 천지공사(天地公事)로부터 기인하는 것이다. 구체적으로 '모사재인(謀事在人) 성사재천(成事在天)'의 원리가 '모사재천(謀事在天) 성사재인(成事在人)'으로 변화된다는 것은 인간과 하늘의 관계가 새롭게 규정되면서 드러나는 '인사'의 원리다. 또한 새롭게 변화된 인간과 하늘의 관계는 '신인의도(神人依導)'라는 신인관계의 원리로 제시되면서 대순사상이 지닌 '인사'의 원리를 극명하게 보여준다. 그에 따라 드러나고 있는 대순사상의 '인사'가 완성되는 두 가지 방향은 영통(靈通)과 신인조화(神人調化)라는 '인사' 완성의 두 가지 경지로 표현된다. '인사'가 '천도'를 지향하는 두 가지 경로는 초월성과 내재성을 포괄하는 차원에서 나아가 심화한 논점들을 보여주게 된다. 그중의 하나인 '천도'와 상제(上帝)의 관계에 관한 내용은 대순사상의 '인사'의미가 지닌 차이를 조망할 수 있는 지점이다. 대순사상의 '천도'는 상제의 천지공사에 의해 규정되어야 한다는 점에서 상제의 초월성으로부터 연유되었다. 그러면서도 외적인 차원에서 '천도'와 합일을 이루는 '인사'완성이 긍정된다는 점에서 '인사'와 대비되는 '천도'의 초월성 또한 인정될 수밖에 없다. 이러한 다른 층위의 두 가지 초월성을 인정하는 관점은 절대적 유일신관과 대조되는 대순사상의 신관을 염두에 둔 것이다.

두 가지 해원사상 비교 - 대순사상과 도교문헌을 중심으로 비교고찰 - (A Comparative Study on the Two Haewon Theories)

  • 주잔옌
    • 대순사상논총
    • /
    • 제24_2집
    • /
    • pp.1-55
    • /
    • 2015
  • Haewonsangsaeng(解冤相生; the resolution of grievances and mutual beneficence) along with sininjohwa(神人調化; harmonious union of divine beings and human beings) belongs to the mid-stage of the Four Tenets. Thus, it is a core factor to achieve creative conjunction of the virtues of yin and yang and realization of the Dao in the world. It is very significant that Daesoonjinrihoe includes haewonsangsaeng in its dogma. Daoism has focused on the resolution of grievances with haewonseokgyeol(解怨釋結) from the beginning of its foundation. Haewon(解冤; the resolution of grievances) is the important matter which Chinese Daoism has paid attention to. This study compares the similarities and differences between Haewon thoughts of Daesoonjinrihoe and Daoism in order to help promote communication of Korean and Chinese culture.

강증산의 '개벽'과 새로운 문명 ('Gaebyeok' and the New Civilization of Kang Jeungsan)

  • 허남진
    • 대순사상논총
    • /
    • 제32집
    • /
    • pp.109-136
    • /
    • 2019
  • 본 연구는 강증산의 개벽사상을 문명론적 관점으로 살펴보는 것을 목적으로 한다. 한말 개화기 동아시아 문명권의 위축과 물질문명을 앞세운 서구 열강의 동점은 문명적 충격 속에서 새로운 문명전환을 촉발하는 동인으로 작용했다. 척사파와 개화파와 다르게 근대한국 개벽종교 역시 서구 근대에 대한 구체적인 대응과 새로운 문명론을 제시하는 등 개벽파의 일정한 흐름으로 이어졌다. 특히 강증산은 차별과 억압에 저항하여 조화문명과 상생문명을 제시했으며, 이성 중심의 서구적 근대를 비판하면서 신인공공(神人公共) 문명을 제시했다. 증산은 서구 근대문명이 확산하는 과정에서 당시의 상하 귀천, 남녀차별, 정치부패, 지배층의 착취와 외세의 침략 등 사회 내외의 사회모순 속에서 신음하던 민중들에게 새 문명의 건설을 선언했다. 증산은 물질 중심주의와 인간소외 등을 비판하고 그러한 병폐들로부터 민중들을 구제하는 제생의세 실천으로 이어졌고 개벽을 주장했다. 이것은 묵은 하늘에 대한 청산을 통한 새 하늘 선언이며, 조화와 통합, 살림을 지향하는 새 문명을 건설하려는 노력의 표출이었다. 증산이 지향한 새로운 문명은 상생의 도에 의해 운행되는 사회이고, 인간이 신과 같은 존귀한 존재로 대접받는 인존의 시대로 집약된다. 증산이 구상한 새로운 문명은 동서양의 사상과 문명을 통합하는 조화문명((調和文明)이며, 신인공공(神人公共)의 문명이었다. 또한, 증산의 삶은 민중들의 삶을 구제해 주기 위한 제생의세(濟生醫世)의 삶이었다. 이후 무극도·태극도의 상생 운동 역시 증산이 지향한 문명 건설을 위한 노력이었다.

大巡伦理思想探析 (A Research on the Ethics in Daesoon Jinrihoe)

  • 曾勇;秦铭昂
    • 대순사상논총
    • /
    • 제37집
    • /
    • pp.357-384
    • /
    • 2021
  • 大巡伦理思想以"一道""二山""三界"为信仰要素, 建构一套生命宗教的新型伦理形态。其中, "一道"即姜甑山"大巡"天下所传"真理", 亦即大巡伦理思想之基本道德原则, 内容为"阴阳合德, 神人调化, 解冤相生, 道通真境" ; "二山"为大巡真理会之信仰对象, 即"教主"姜甑山和"道主"赵鼎山 ; "三界"为大巡道德关怀的涵括天地人在内的生命视域。围绕其宗教道德原则, 大巡真理会以"诚, 敬, 信"为"三要谛", 以"安心, 安身, 敬天, 修道"为"四纲领", 将其"一道"的伦理要旨, 转化为终极信仰的道德要求与人伦日用的行为规范, 进而对道人之身心修行工夫与神明交互感应做出宗教礼仪规制, 再从个人修道之"道通真境", 人神皆尊协同, 以及道信众生共建"地上仙境"道出其伦理价值理想。大巡伦理思想与佛, 耶, 道诸教相较, 具有三大精神特质 : "三界相生"的整体性, "人神皆尊"的协同性, 以及"地上天国"的入世性。

Jin-gyeong and Sin-ingan: The Prophecy of the Later World in The Canonical Scripture of Daesoon Jinrihoe

  • KIM, David W.
    • 대순사상과 동아시아종교
    • /
    • 제1권1호
    • /
    • pp.127-151
    • /
    • 2021
  • The core tenets of Daesoon Jinrihoe in Jeungsanism are encapsulated in the teachings of Eumyang-hapdeok (陰陽合德, Virtuous Concordance of Yin and Yang), Shinin-johwa (神人調化, Harmonious Union between Divine Beings and Human Beings), Haewon-sangsaeng (解寃相生, Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence) and Dotongjingyeong (道通眞境, Perfected Unification with Dao). Among them, the first three teachings eventually turn towards the prophetic thought of Dotong-jingyeong, which is the process of man becoming a divine figure. While these principles are considered crucial advice for overcoming an unstable life, there are many curious questions that help for better comprehension. What is the reality of Jin-gyeong (眞境) for their followers? How can one reach the ultimate stage under this belief system? Is this ideological concept different from similar perspectives of other major religions? How is this concept related to the idea of Jisang-cheonguk (地上天國, earthly paradise)? This paper analyses these issues of Jin-gyeong from the historical and social narratives of Haengnok (行錄, Acts), Gongsa (公事, Reordering Works), Gyoun (敎運, Progress of the Order), Gyobeop (敎法, Dharma), Gwonji (權智, Authority and Foreknowledge) and Yesi (豫示, Prophetic Elucidations) in The canonical scripture of Jeon-gyeong and also from the ontological approaches of East Asian faiths in order to identify alternative notions of Daesoon cosmology. The paper, based on the sayings of Kang Jeungsan, particularly his philosophy of the Later World, argues the insight that the Jin-gyeong world can be interpreted as created through the Cheonji-gongsa (天地公事, Reordering Works of Heaven and Earth) project in terms of Gaebyeok (開闢, Great Opening) and the earthly paradise as open only for those who achieve the condition of Sin-ingan (新人間, literally means 'new humans' but symbolizing 'being a human-god') by the personal cultivation of Dotong (道通, the unity with Dao).

九天上帝與明明上帝: 當代新興宗教「上帝」信仰之研究 (The Upper Thearch of the Nine Heavens (Jiutian shangdi 九天上帝) and The Upper Thearch of Manifest Luminosity (Mingming shangdi 明明上帝) : Research on "Upper Thearch" Beliefs in Contemporary Emergent Religions)

  • 林榮澤
    • 대순사상논총
    • /
    • 제34집
    • /
    • pp.107-139
    • /
    • 2020
  • 本論文的探討, 主要集中在韓國大巡真理會的最高神「九天上帝」與臺灣一貫道的萬靈真宰「明明上帝」, 二者皆為當代很具代表性的新興「上帝」信仰, 試著就其信仰的淵源, 特色及關聯性作比較研究。根據的文獻有中國古籍及道教典籍, 大巡真理會的《典經》及一貫道的《一貫道藏》等文獻, 借此以了解大巡及一貫道宇宙觀思想的特色。例如, 九天上帝因不忍看到世間愈來愈混亂, 為了讓世間變好, 走向神人調化的世界, 所以下凡來大巡世間教化世人。最終來到了韓國, 降生在甄山客望里, 展開教化世人, 解冤相生, 陰陽合德, 神人調化, 達於道通真境的理想實現。一貫道則說人的來源是在「理天」, 人是由明明上帝所創造的「原胎佛子」, 來世間為了治理世間, 接受鍛煉, 最終是要回到理天的故家鄉。但由於迷戀紅塵, 忘了回鄉之路, 所以上帝派了彌勒佛, 濟公活佛及月慧菩薩, 降生在世間教化世人, 使能認母歸根, 達本返原, 回到理天老母的家鄉。大巡會與一貫道都將萬靈真宰的最高神簡稱為「上帝」。這又與西方聖經中的上帝, 具有某些聯結性, 但又有其差異性。探究其淵源, 九天上帝與明明上帝, 似乎又與形成於殷商時期, 中國古代的上帝信仰有關。這些都是很有趣的問題, 值得作更深入的比較探究。

주자학과 대순사상의 수양론 비교 연구 (The Comparative Research on the Theory of Self-cultivation in Neo-Confucianism and Daesoon Thought)

  • 이광주
    • 대순사상논총
    • /
    • 제24_2집
    • /
    • pp.231-270
    • /
    • 2015
  • This thesis examined Chu Hsi's self-cultivation theory as the representative theory of cultivation in Confucianism, while juxtaposing it to self-cultivation theory in Daesoon thought, concentrating on its similarity and difference. Neo-Confucianism is a scholarship which has wielded a tremendous influence upon East Asia, while functioning as an official scholarship for long period up to Yuan, Ming, and Ching period, after achieving its synthesis by Chu Hsi. After 13th century, Neo-Confucianism has been a representative academic system in Confucianism, and self-cultivation theory was in its center. It suggested various virtues that classical scholars have to equip to fulfill the sainthood and the politics of royal road. The self-cultivation theory of Chu Hsi was developed upon the basis of the theory 'Li-Qi' and the theory of mind. Here, the practice of Geokyung(morally awakened state with a reverent spirit in every moment) and Gyeokmul-tsiji(reaching into the utmost knowledge through investigation of things) formed a nucleus of Chu Hsi's self-cultivation theory. While Geokyung was to reveal one's true nature through cultivation of mind, Gyeokmul-tsiji was to demonstrate the complete use of mind's essence and function. Chu Hsi's self-cultivation theory attempted to realize the unity of heaven and man, and through cultivating self and governing people, it also tried to achieve its ideal of the society of Great Union(Daedong). Daesoon Thought is originated from Sangjenim who has descended to this world as a human being called Jeungsan. He went on his circuit to rectify the disorder of heaven and earth for 9 years to rectify the Three worlds of heaven, earth and human being which were faced with total annihilation due to its rule of mutual conflict, while creating an earthly paradise. Respecting the will of Sangjenim, Dojunim established the foundation of Do through launching 'Meukeukdo' and setting tenet, creed and object so that the cultivators (Doins) could believe and respect the truth of Sangje's great itineration (Daesoon). Among those, the two components of creed, which are four fundamental principles and the three fundamental attitudes are of great account as precept and cardinal point. Through this means, the cultivators of Daesoonjinrihoe aspire to guard against self-deception through transforming the human spirit, to realize earthly immortality through renewing human beings, and to create an earthly paradise through transforming the world. This thesis attempted to compare and analyze the theory of self-cultivation in Neo-Confucianism and Daesoon Thought in the aspect of ground, method, and object of cultivation. First, as for the ground of cultivation, the doctrines of Chu-tzu and Daesoon thought place the essence of cultivation on 'heaven'. Yet, whereas the former postulates Taekeuk (the Great Ultimate) as a principle as well as the heaven of a natural order, Daesoon thought postulates Sangenim as the heaven of superintendence as well as the heaven of a natural order, signified as its equation of Daesoon with circle, along with the unity of Meukeuk (Endlessness) and Taegeuk (the Great Ultimate). Further, the doctrine of Chu-zhu and Daesoon thought is identical in the point that both thoughts see mind as the subject of cultivation, while trying to restore a pure essence. Nevertheless, whereas Neo-Confucianism intends to give scope to ability of the complete use of mind's essence and function, Daesoon Thought sees mind as the essence which is used by spiritual beings and as an organ that heaven, earth and human being rely upon as the center of the universe. In the aspect of method of cultivation, the doctrine of Chuzhu lays emphasis on the rational factor in that it brightens its 'myung-deoki'(bright inner virtue),' while trying to correspond to the law of heaven on the basis of 'Geokyung' and 'Gyeokmul-tsiji.' On the contrary, Daesoon thought lays much emphasis on faith factor in that it aspires for human perfection based on the restoration of conscience by cultivating Daesoonjinri with sincerity, reverence and faith along with 'quieting the heart-mind', 'quieting the body', 'respecting the God of the Ninth Heaven', and 'observing ritual practice on the basis of the faith in Sangjenim. Yet, both thoughts have similarities in that cultivation of body forms the basis and that they attempt to realize their ideals through cultivation in daily life while taking 'Guarding against self-deception' as the key method of self-cultivation.' However, the principle of Chu-zhu can be said to be a voluntary and autonomous practice based on scripture of the saint as well as self-reflection. On the other hand, Daesoon thought reveals certain difference in that it combines faith factor with one's self-effort by concentrating on cultivation under the presence of Sangjenim as the object of belief and the spirits of heaven and earth. In the aspect of object of cultivation, both thoughts share similarities in that the saint and the perfected gentleman with a moral virtue as an ideal image of men in both thoughts attempt to realize each of their 'myung-deok' in human nature as a heavenly mandate while respecting morality. Further, they also share similarity in the point that the desirable characters in both thoughts want to participate in harmonious creation and nurturance. Yet, the perfected gentleman with a moral virtue is also characterized by its aim for a new heaven and earth where there is no mutual conflict but mutual beneficence, by promoting the moral influence and virtue of Sangjenim over one's own virtue, while practising the mutual beneficence of all life through harmonious union of divine beings and human beings.

해원시대를 전제하는 인존시대에 대한 이해 (Understanding Human Nobility Epoch, the Prerequisite of the Era of Resolution of Grievances)

  • 박용철
    • 대순사상논총
    • /
    • 제27집
    • /
    • pp.135-169
    • /
    • 2016
  • 증산의 천지공사에 내포된 종교사상을 살펴보면 어느 종교에서도 찾아볼 수 없는 독특한 사상이 다양하게 나타난다. 그중에서도 대표적인 사상이 바로 '인존(人尊)'사상이고, 타종교와 차별되는 대순진리회의 고유사상이기도 하다. 그래서 '인존은 언제부터 구체적으로 구현되었는가? 인존은 신명계와 인간계 사이에서 어떠한 유기적 관계를 가지고 있는가? 인존시대를 맞이하여 신명계와 인간계 사이에서 모사재천(謀事在天)하고 성사재인(成事在人)하는 구체적인 모습과 그 형태의 흐름이 어떻게 되는가?'에 연구 초점을 맞추었다. 그래서 논지를 전개하기 전에 기존의 선행된 담론 및 논문 등 43편을 검색하고, 43편의 연구에서 상관관계를 보기 위하여 자료를 시간 순으로 나열 정리하고, 인존에 관한 시작시기와 인존에 대한 논지를 요약 정리하였다. 논지에서 '인존'만이 가지고 있는 고유성, 독특성, 차별성을 어떻게 설명하는지를 살펴봄으로써 선행 연구에서 발견되는 몇 가지 문제점은 다음과 같다. ①인존에 함의되어 있는 개념을 잘 이끌어 낸 것은 발견되지 않았다. ②인존을 음양합덕·신인조화·해원상생과 관련시켜 검토한 논문도 발견되지 않는다. ③대다수 논문은 인존의 구현 시기를 후천오만년이 시작되는 시점으로 볼 뿐 만아니라 논자들 사이에서도 선천과 후천을 구분하는 시점이 다르다는 것도 발견되었다. ④인존이 구현되는 대상에 대한 심도 있는 논문도 찾기가 쉽지 않았다. ⑤인존에 대한 연구 간의 연계성도 잘 발견되지 않았고, 연구 간에 발전이 있었다고 판단하기도 쉽지가 않았다. 그러므로 이 논문을 통하여 선행 연구에서 발견되는 문제에 대한 답을 제시하고, 논지를 다음과 같이 전개하였다. ①『전경』을 중심으로 선천과 후천에 대한 시대적 구분을 구체적이고 정밀하게 조사하여 인존을 이해하는 데 도움이 되는 '선천(1901)→해원시대→후천(미래의 그 날)'이라는 시대분류 안을 제시하고, ②인존시대는 신축(1901)년부터 인간계의 해원시대를 열어가는 전제 조건이 되며 인존은 해원시대를 열어나가는 우주의 구조적인 운행법칙을 함의하는 시스템적 법칙으로 규정하였고, ③인존시대가 구현되어 가는 변화의 양상을 종합적으로 고찰해 볼 때, 그 고찰 기간은 신축(1901)년부터 후천이 시작되는 시기까지이고, 대상은 인존의 첫 주자인 증산으로부터 시작하여 후천에 살아가는 도통군자와 창생군자들로 귀일되는 흐름으로 규정하였다. 그리고 인존시대에서 인존의 구현 변화과정을 연구하는 것은 해원상생을 연구하는 것과 마찬가지로 대순사상을 깊이 이해하는 데 필요한 공부 방법이지만 이 논문에서는 깊이 논하지 않고 개론적으로만 논의하였다.