• 경영과학
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.253-272
• /
• 2004

This paper discusses how to develop a comprehensive performance evaluation framework and measure Quantitative and Qualitative benefits of 'Small Business Networking Project' which has been supported by Korean Government since September 2001. Employing BSC framework to identify various benefits realized from the project, we suggest specific procedure and method of deriving ROI (return on investment) for analyzing the benefits against the costs associated with the project, where we restrict our attention to the government investment. From the study, we show that ROI analysis can be served as a useful means to validate government projects as well as uncover specific problem areas to handle in the course of implementing them. Moreover. the ROI analysis we present in this paper can also be applied to pre-evaluate similar government investments.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2011년도 추계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.191-193
• /
• 2011

The government has performed various countermeasures and policies for the efficiency of Construction Industry. However the analysis of the policy performance is not satisfied. In the study we benchmarked the construction performance evaluation system and indicators which was performed by advanced countries like the United States and the United Kingdom. So we suggested indicators for measuring performance of public construction cost saving strategy performed in 2008 by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs. This paper will provide the basis for establishing future construction policies or plans.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.49-72
• /
• 2020

급변하는 환경 하에서 공공도서관은 다양한 변화에 대응하고, 사회적 가치를 입증하고 그리고 투입자원에 대한 정당성을 증명하기 위해 그들의 활동을 포괄적으로 나타낼 수 있는 성과 측정이 필요하다. 그러나 대부분의 성과평가는 특정 영역 혹은 특정 분석방법에 치중하여 진행되어 왔다. 이에 본 연구는 국내 공공도서관 성과관리 도구 개발을 위해, 도서관 선진 국가들의 공공도서관 성과평가도구 개발을 위한 노력을 살펴보았다. 공공도서관 성과평가의 방향성, 평가체계, 주요 성과평가영역 등을 검토·분석하여 시사점을 도출하였다. 주요결과는 공공도서관 성과평가의 관점이 투입-산출위주에서 결과(outcome)혹은 영향(impact)으로 옮겨가고 있었고, 성과평가영역이 공공도서관 발전전략 혹은 도서관의 역할과 연계되어 있었다. 그리고 공공도서관의 성과관리를 위한 평가체계 구축, 도구개발, 수월성 확보 등을 위해 국가와 기관이 함께 노력하고 있었다.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제15권7호
• /
• pp.4148-4156
• /
• 2014

본 연구의 목적은 국가 연구개발(R&D) 성과측정지표의 개선안을 새로운 관점을 통해 제시하는 것이다. 정부는 R&D 패러다임을 기존의 추격형에서 선도형으로 전환하고자 하고 있다. 이에 기존 성과평가의 문제점을 살펴보고 기존 문헌 연구를 통해 국내외 연구기관 정부기관의 성과 평가안을 살펴보았다. 특히 국내외적으로 창조 혁신지표군을 참조하였고 국가혁신 및 R&D 생태계라는 개념에 주목하였다. 이론 체계로 D'Aveni의 혁신경쟁이론(Hypercompetition theory)을 차용하여 새로운 성과평가지표를 제시하였으며 국내 R&D 성과평가 전문가를 대상으로 AHP 분석을 수행하였다. 지표별 우선순위 결과 및 의미는 본문에서 상세히 밝히고 있다. 본 연구는 새로운 관점의 이론적 틀을 바탕으로 창조 혁신지표군을 참조하여 국가 R&D 성과지표군을 제안하였고 실증적 검증을 거쳐 지표별 우선순위를 제시했다는 점에서 이론적 그리고 실무적으로 공헌하고 있다.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.165-198
• /
• 2014

탈추격형 혁신체제가 강조됨에 따라 국가연구개발사업은 기술역량 향상에 초점을 맞춰온 기존의 방식과 달리 문제해결 실용화 사회적 영향을 모두 아우른 통합적 접근을 필요로 한다. 이러한 상황에서는 R&D예산의 효과적 효율적 집행과 성과관리가 중요한 과제이나, 기존의 성과평가제도는 획일적 평가, 양적지표 위주 등으로 인해 한계를 가지고 있다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 문제점에 대응하기 위해 우리나라의 국가연구개발사업 성과평가의 진화과정을 조사 분석 평가 체제와 1,2차 성과평가기본계획 체제 세 시기로 나누어 제반 법 제도, 평가체제 및 내용, 평가의 활용 등의 요소를 비교분석하였다. 성과평가제도는 조사 분석 평가에서 1차 기본계획, 2차 기본계획으로 이행되면서 R&D자원 투입에 따른 양적 성과관리 위주에서 연구사업의 다각적 측면을 평가하기 위한 수단으로 진화하였다. 그 과정에서 평가인프라, 표준성과지표 등 평가체계의 고도화 실효성을 제고하기 위한 제도적 장치가 다수 마련되었다. 1차 기본계획에서는 과학기술행정체계의 잦은 개편이 성과평가 진화의 일관성에 영향을 미쳤으나, 2차 기본계획 이후 체계가 안정화되면서 성과평가제도는 우리나라 혁신시스템 전환을 뒷받침할 수 있는 방향으로 개선되고 있다.

• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제12권6호
• /
• pp.682-700
• /
• 2012

Over the last several years, Korea has increasingly adopted design-build for public construction projects. There is a much greater awareness of the need to change to a system based on 'Value for Money', which is high on the government's agenda. A whole life performance bid evaluation model is proposed to aid decision makers in the selection of a design-builder. This is based on the integration of a framework using an analytic hierarchy process, as the bid awarding system is being changed from one based on the lowest price to one based on best value over the life-cycle. Key criteria such as whole life cost, service life planning and design quality are important through the key stages of the evaluation process. The model uses a systematic and holistic approach, which enables the public sector client to make better decisions in design-builder selection, which will deliver whole life benefits based on long-term cost-effectiveness.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제26권6호
• /
• pp.62-70
• /
• 2023

The purpose of this study is to derive implications for improving related policies and evaluation criteria in the future by analyzing trends of evaluation criteria for industry-university cooperation in Korea. For this purpose, five surveys on industry-university cooperation by government departments, major general university evaluations, and evaluation indicators of specialized industry-university evaluations by the Ministry of Education were analyzed. As a result, most of the evaluation criteria for domestic industry-university cooperation have been composed of quantitative indicators and have a limited character as quantitative performance management for government projects. Although the Ministry of Education's evaluation criteria for industry-university cooperation projects has gradually changed to a segmented index considering universities, industries, and regions, it needs to be supplemented for sustainability of industry-university cooperation. In order to promote sustainable industry-university cooperation in the future, it was suggested that first, it is necessary to supplementation of qualitative Indicators considering each university's characteristics, second, the composition of indicators related to reflect on demand in the process of the cooperation, and third, to build a virtuous cycle system for future operation of evaluation criteria.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.13-23
• /
• 2008

Changed the business environment, private sector focuses on the performance management, so to manage the performance he uses BSC that overcomes the limitation of financial indicators. Also, it is getting emphasized to evaluate the performance about services that the public sector provides and obliged for the public sector to be responsible for managing and improving its performance as the private sector has been doing. But lacks of knowledge and experience on performance management and evaluation are blocking the public sector from introducing and implementing new performance management systems. To solve those problems, this study has derived general guidelines and KPIs that public sector should keep in mind when BSC is introduced new management system. This study focused on the public hospital which is the performance management and evaluation system of Government administration.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.177-203
• /
• 1997

This study concerns performance evaluation of the research-funding agencies focused on Korea Science and Engineering Foundation(KOSEF). On the basis of the constituents approach and the systems approach of organizational effectiveness theory, the evaluation items are derived reflecting generic characteristics of the research-funding agencies, and their priorities are determined using analytic hierarchy process(AHP). Three groups of constituents with differing interest and expections are identified, and their perceptions on the importance of the evaluation items are measured through questionnaire survey. Analyses show that the evaluation items perceived important by each constituency are significant different from one another. The implications of the result to the Government and KOSEF are discussed.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.177-177
• /
• 1989

This study concerns performance evaluation of the research-funding agencies focused on Korea Science and Engineering Foundation(KOSEF). On the basis of the constituents approach and the systems approach of organizational effectiveness theory, the evaluation items are derived reflecting generic characteristics of the research-funding agencies, and their priorities are determined using analytic hierarchy process(AHP). Three groups of constituents with differing interest and expections are identified, and their perceptions on the importance of the evaluation items are measured through questionnaire survey. Analyses show that the evaluation items perceived important by each constituency are significant different from one another. The implications of the result to the Government and KOSEF are discussed.