• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제57권
• /
• pp.61-78
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study is to clarify the standard of fair and equitable treatment. Although most international investment treaties prescribe fair and equitable treatment that is the obligation to provide fair and equitable treatment to foreign investor, there is no clear definition and specific elements of fair and equitable treatment. Through the arbitral award cases we can find that tribunals have interpreted to include six principles; Due process & Protection from denial of justice, Good faith, Reasonableness & Nondiscrimination, Compliance with contractual obligation, Full protection and security, Transparency & Protection of the investor's legitimate expectations. This study suggest that host countries and investors focus on international trends concerning investment disputes in order to avoid future disputes. So future disputes can be prevented and prepared in advance.

• 한국응급구조학회지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.13-28
• /
• 2010

Purpose: In this study, we investigated the better application of the law which is about the AED installation and more effective ways of emergency medical care system, to understand the law and to research the current condition of public facilities which belong to local governments, and to seize the aspect of safety guards who currently work in order to provide the installation of AED in the public facilities and to provide more efficient emergency medical service with the effectuation of the immunity law of the good intention of first-aid treatment. Methods: In Gwang-ju, 234 public facilities have been identified by 31 December, 2008. With the exception of the duplication, we researched 158 facilities and received the answers from 95 of them. Results: In the research, 53% of them have had internal emergency first-aid education, and 55% of them didn't have this education and a CPR education manual, and 30% of the facilities even didn't know how to connect with the manager of the company for the first-aid department. On the other hand, most of them were highly interested in CPR and AED education on the ratio of 91% and 93%. 88% of them have been trained about first-aid, 51% of them haven't been retrained, 17% have never been trained. so, the reality of emergency system at public facilities is serious. 78% of them knew they are working at public facilities, though 49% of them didn't know about AED installation. 57% of them didn't know the fact there is the immunity law related with good intentions for first-aid treatment. 63% of the facilities have security guards, and 30% of them didn't answer the questions. Also, many of them agreed to the opinion that all employees should have first-aid training. At representative survey report of participator of public-facility, emergency treatment is 61%, 16% of patients calling. Accordingly they importantly think better doing an on-site first-aid than evacuating the patient. And the rates show that 57% of them answerers tend to call Fire-Office(119) for evacuating the patients, and 28% of them EMIC(1339) for the first-aid. Conclusions: In this study, we are suggest to improve the details of the efficient operations and management after the grasp of the uninstallation, indifference, and unreliable conditions of AED. 1) Need a publicity of AED install cognition which is an emergency medical instrument at public facilities. 2) Arrangement of safety agents at facilities and concerns about them for good management from the parties concerned. 3) Need a designation of legal details according to the decision of the AED installation and the standard of the AED installation. 4) Training about first-aid of safety guards and the persons concerned in the facilities should be practiced participation with the positive and through this, first-aid treatment could be done by anyone who knows the immunity law related to medical emergency. 5) The brochures for the potential users and the results form practicing the instructions need to be improved in many ways through recording the emergency cases that have happened.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제34권4호
• /
• pp.781-799
• /
• 2024

최근 미국과 유럽연합은 ICT 제품 및 서비스에 대한 보안취약점 대응 강화를 위하여 화이트해커와의 협력에 기반한 보안취약점 대응체계인 Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure(CVD)를 제도적으로 도입 및 확산해 나가고 있다. 이러한 사이버보안 변화에 맞춰 본 논문은 CVD를 정보통신망법에 기반하여 도입하는 방안을 3단계 절차로 제안한다. 첫 번째 단계에서는 CVD 법제화 필요성 및 요구사항을 파악하기 위하여 우리나라 현황과 미국, 유럽연합, OECD의 CVD 관련 동향을 조사한다. 두 번째 단계에서는 CVD 법제화 필요성을 분석하고 CVD를 법제화하기 위해 요구되는 사항을 도출한다. 본 논문에서는 CVD 법제화 필요성을 CVD 도입 필요성, 법률에 기반한 제도화 필요성, 법제화 법률로 정보통신망법의 적합성 등 3가지 측면에서 분석하였으며, CVD 법제화 요구사항으로는 보안취약점 처리방침(VDP, Vulnerability Disclosure Policy) 수립 및 공개, 화이트해커 법적 보호, CVD 운영을 위한 조정기관(coordinator) 지정 및 역할 부여를 도출하였다. 세 번째 단계에서는 CVD 법제화 요구사항을 우리나라 민간 분야 침해사고 예방 및 대응에 관한 법률인 정보통신망법에 적용하는 방안을 소개한다.