• 헤리티지:역사와 과학
• /
• 제46권1호
• /
• pp.102-123
• /
• 2013

표암 강세황(1713~1791)은 그림이나 글씨 시 제발 인장뿐만 아니라 탁월한 서화감식과 비평으로 조선 후기 회화의 큰 흐름을 주도했던 대표적인 문인서화가이다. 그는 79세의 장수를 누리며 다양한 화목(畵目)의 작품을 제작했는데 특히 말년에 천착했던 문인화류의 사군자화는 조선 말기 묵란화 유행의 바탕을 마련했다는 점에서 주목할 필요가 있다. 또한 그는 조선시대 화가 중 처음으로 사군자화를 갖추어 그렸는데, 작품량이 많고 회화사적 연구 가치가 있는 '묵란화(墨蘭畵)'에 대해서는 적극적인 연구가 진행되고 있지 않다. 따라서 이 논문은 강세황의 묵란화에 대한 기록과 작품 연구를 통해 그의 묵란화 인식과 지향을 살피고자 시도되었다. 먼저 강세황의 묵란화 기록에는 사생(寫生)과 고화(古畵)의 연습, 화보(畵譜)의 임방을 고루 중시했던 그의 작화태도가 나타나 주목된다. 18세기 예림의 종장 강세황은 고인(古人)의 뜻과 정신이 집약된 고화의 임방(臨倣)을 중시했으며 그림을 '우의(寓意)'와 '재도(載道)' 등의 수단으로 인식했다. 즉 그의 지속적인 화보임방의 작화방식에서 수기적(修己的) 가치관과 회화관을 읽을 수 있다. 다음으로 그의 이런 회화관이 녹아 있는 묵란화는 양식적 분석을 통해 30~40대의 전반기와 절필기를 끝내고 군자화에 몰두했던 60대~79세인 후반기로 나누어 볼 수 있다. 그는 전반기에 "개자원화전"을 주로 학습하였고, 후반기에는 "십죽재서화보"나 "매죽난국사보" 등의 화보를 학화(學畵)하였다. 때문에 전체적으로 그의 묵란화는 전시기(全時期) 화보 의탁이 농후하다고 할 수 있다. 그럼에도 묵란화를 다작했던 70대는 화보의 의고와 임방을 주지하면서도, 그것을 능숙하게 소화해 고아하고 단아한 '표암난'을 완성하여 조선 후기 묵란화 발전에 일조하였다. 마지막으로 강세황의 묵란화풍과 관련 있는 당시(當時) 화가들에 대해 살펴보았다. 서화합벽첩을 만들며 서화로 교유했던 심사정이나 최북의 묵란화풍에서 강세황의 영향이 감지되어 앞서 언급한 문인들의 상찬과 아울러 18세기 조선 화단에서의 강세황 묵란화에 대한 위상을 짐작할 수 있다.

• Journal of Advanced Marine Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.56-63
• /
• 2014

해양플랜트는 태풍, 해일 등과 같은 환경적인 요소와 충돌, 화재 등의 인공적인 요소에 의해 위험에 노출되어 있기 때문에 일반적인 선박에 비해 유지보수 비용이 높으며 사고 발생 시, 빠른 대응이 어려워 관리적 측면에서 어려움이 많다. 이 논문에서는 이러한 문제를 개선하고 해양플랜트를 관제하기위해 AtoN AIS, 다단 데이터베이스를 활용한 영상복합형 해양플랜트 원격 관제 시스템을 개발한다. 개발한 시스템은 카메라 및 AIS를 이용하여 실시간으로 해양플랜트 주변의 영상 및 환경 정보를 수집하여 VHF 무선 통신 모뎀을 통해 전송하고, 육상에서 이를 수신하여 전자해도 기반의 원격 관제 어플리케이션을 통해 해양플랜트 주변의 상황을 정확하게 판단할 수 있게 해주며, 다단 데이터베이스를 이용하여 여러 정보를 효율적으로 관리할 수 있도록 해준다.

• 한국진공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국진공학회 2016년도 제50회 동계 정기학술대회 초록집
• /
• pp.307.2-307.2
• /
• 2016

In this study, we synthesized Au nanoparticles (AuNPs) in polyacrylonitrile (PAN) thin films using a simple annealing process in the solid phase. The synthetic conditions were systematically controlled and optimized by varying the concentration of the Au salt solution and the annealing temperature. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) confirmed their chemical state, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) verified the successful synthesis, size, and density of AuNPs. Au nanoparticles were generated from the thermal decomposition of the Au salt and stabilized during the cyclization of the PAN matrix. For actual device applications, previous synthetic techniques have required the synthesis of AuNPs in a liquid phase and an additional process to form the thin film layer, such as spin-coating, dip-coating, Langmuir-Blodgett, or high vacuum deposition. In contrast, our one-step synthesis could produce gold nanoparticles from the Au salt contained in a solid matrix with an easy heat treatment. The PAN:AuNPs composite was used as the charge trap layer of an organic nano-floating gate memory (ONFGM). The memory devices exhibited a high on/off ratio (over $10^6$), large hysteresis windows (76.7 V), and a stable endurance performance (>3000 cycles), indicating that our stabilized PAN:AuNPs composite film is a potential charge trap medium for next generation organic nano-floating gate memory transistors.

• Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.317-325
• /
• 2001

For heuristic purposes, the relative ratio of urease contents inside and outside cells was surveyed using nine ureB+ strains of Helicobacter pylori. the ratio of the enzyme specific activity appeared to vary greatly between the various H. pylori strains, ranging from 0.5 to 2.5. Besides the above compartment, urease was also richly found in the membrane fraction, especially in either peripheral or integral form. The urease distribution across the H. pylori membrane was significantly influenced by the ambient pH; the specific activity of external urease was highest at pH 5.5 with a narrow plateau, whereas the internal specific activity was highest within a pH range of 4.5 to 6.5 with a broad plateau. These finding strongly suggest that H. pylori urease is secretory and responded to the external pH. However, at pH 4.0 or below, no urease activity was detected in either the internal or external compartment, although an increase in the color development with 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonate (TNBS) was observed. Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) demonstrated that these phenomena may be related to a specific proteolysis in certain proteins, including urease or ${\gamma}$-glutamyl transpeptidase. Interestingly, the effect of ammonium ions n alleviating the enzyme inactivation inside the H. pylori cells was remarkably similar to that of D-glucose. In addition, it would appear that the cation acted as a surrogate of not only $Na^+$ but also $K^+$ thereby increasing the H. pylori P-type ATPase activity. This is of great interest, as it implies that the urease action in H. pylori is indispensible at any locus.

• 혜화의학회지
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.595-646
• /
• 2000

I. Introduction Bi(痺) means blocking. BiJeung is one kind of symptoms making muscles, bones and jonts feel pain, numbness or edema. For example it can be gout or SLE etc. says that Bi is combination of PungHanSeup. And many doctors said that BiJeung is caused by food, fatigue, sex, stress and change of weather. Therefore we must treat BiJeung by character of patients and characteristic of the disease. Many famous doctors studied medical science by their fathers or teachers. So the history of medical science is long. So I studied ${\ll}Bijeungjujip{\gg}$. II. Final Decision 1. JoGeumTak(趙金鐸) devided BiJeung into Pung, Han, Seup and EumHeo, HeulHeo, YangHeo, GanSinHeo by charcter or reaction of pain. And he use DaeJinGyoTang, GyegiGakYakJiMoTang, SamyoSan, etc. 2. JangPaeGyeu(張沛圭) focused on division of HanYeol(寒熱; coldness and heat) in spite of complexity of BiJeung. He also used insects for treatment. They are very useful for treatment of BiJeung because they can remove EoHyeol(瘀血). 3. SeolMaeng(薛盟) said that the actual cause of BiJeung is Seup. So he thought that BiJeung can be divided into PungSeup, SeupYeol, HanSeup. And he established 6 rules to treat BiJeung and he studied herbs. 4. JangGi(張琪) introduced 10 prescriptions and 10 rules to cure BiJeung. The 1st prescription is for OyeSa, 2nd for internal Yeol, 3rd for old BiJeung, 4th for Soothing muscles, 5th for HanSeup, 6th for regular BiJeung, 7th for functional disorder, 8th for YeolBi, 9th for joint pain and 10th for pain of lower limb. 5. GangSeYoung(江世英) used PungYeongTang(風靈湯) for the treatment of PungBi, OGyeHeukHoTang(烏桂黑虎湯) for HanBi, BangGiMokGwaTang(防己木瓜湯) for SeupBi, YeolBiTang(熱痺湯) for YeolBi, WoDaeRyeokTang(牛大力湯) for GiHei, HyeolPungGeunTang(血楓根湯) for HyeolHeo, ToJiRyongTang(土地龍湯) for the acute stage of SeupBi, OJoRyongTang(五爪龍湯) for the chronic stage of SeupBi, and so on. 6. ShiGeumMook(施今墨) devided BiJeung into four types. They are PungSeupYeol, PungHanSeup, GiHyeolSil(氣血實) and GiHyeolHeo(氣血虛). And he introduced the eight rules of the treatment(SanPun(散風), ChukHan(逐寒), GeoSeuP(, CheongYeol(淸熱), TongRak(通絡), HwalHyeol(活血), HaengGi(行氣), BoHeo(補虛)). 7. WangYiYou(王李儒) explained the acute athritis and said that it can be applicable to HaneBi(行痺). And he used GyeJiJakYakJiMoTang(桂枝芍蘂知母湯) for HanBi and YeolBiJinTongTang(熱痺鎭痛湯) for YeolBi. 8. JangJinYeo(章眞如) said that YeolBi is more common than HanBi. The sympthoms of YeolBi are severe pain, fever, dried tongue, insomnia, etc. And he devided YeolBi into SilYeol and HeoYeol. In case of SilYeol, he used GyeoJiTangHapBaekHoTang(桂枝湯合白虎湯) and in case of HeoYeol he used JaEumYangAekTang(滋陰養液湯). 9. SaHaeJu(謝海洲) introduced three important rules of treatment and four appropriate rules of treatment of BiJeung. 10. YouDoJu(劉渡舟) said that YeolBi is more common than HanBi. He used GaGamMokBanGiTang(加減木防已湯) for YeolBi, GyeJiJakYakJiMoTang or GyeJiBuJaTang(桂枝附子湯) for HanBi and WooHwangHwan(牛黃丸) for the joint pain. 11. GangYiSon(江爾遜) focused on the internal cause. The most important internal cause is JeongGiHeo(正氣虛). So he tried to treat BiJeung by means of balance of Gi and Hyeol. So he ususlly used ODuTang(烏頭湯) and SamHwangTang(三黃湯) for YeolBi, OJeokSan(五積散) for HanBi, SamBiTang(三痺湯) for the chronic BiJeung. 12. HoGeonHwa(胡建華) said that to distinguish YeolBi from Hanbi is very difficult. So he used GyeJiJakYakJiMoTang in case of mixture of HanBi and YeoBi. 13. PiBokGo(畢福高) said that the most common BiJeung is HanBi. He usually used acupuncture with medicine. He followed the theory of EumYongHwa(嚴用和)-he focused on SeonBoHuSa(先補後瀉). 14. ChoiMunBin(崔文彬) used GeoPungHwalHyeolTang(祛風活血湯) for HanBi, SanHanTongRakTang(散寒通絡湯) for TongBi(痛痺), LiSeupHwaRakTang(利濕和絡湯) for ChakBi(着痺), CheongYeolTongGyeolChukBiTang(淸熱通經逐痺湯) for YeolBi(熱痺) and GeoPungHwalHyeolTang(祛風活血湯) for PiBi(皮痺). 15. YouleokSeon(劉赤選) introduced the common principle for the treatment of BiJeung. He used HaePuneDeungTang(海風藤湯) for HaengBi(行痺), SinChakTang(腎着湯), DokHwalGiSaengTang(獨活寄生湯) for TongBi(痛痺), TongPungBang(痛風方) for ChakBi(着痺) and SangGiYiMiTangGaYeongYangGakTang(桑枝苡米湯加羚羊角骨) for YeolBi(熱痺). 16. LimHakHwa(林鶴和) said about TanTan(movement disorders or numbness) and devided TanTan into the acute stage and the chronic stage. He used acupuncture at the meridian spot like YeolGyeol(列缺), HapGok(合谷), etc. And he also used MaHwangBuJaSeSinTang(麻黃附子細辛湯) in case of the acute stage. In the chronic stage he used BangPungTang(防風湯). 17. JinBaekGeun(陳伯勤) liked to use three rules(HwaHyeol(活血), ChiDam(治痰), BoSin(補腎)) to treat BiJeung. He used JinTongSan(鎭痛散) for the purpose of HwalHyeol(活血), SoHwalRakDan(小活絡丹) for ChiDam(治痰) and DokHwalGiSaengTang(獨活寄生湯) for BoSin(補腎). 18. YimGyeHak(任繼學) focused on YangHyeolJoGi(養血調氣) if the stage of BiJeung is chronic. And in the chronic stage he insisted on not using GalHwal(羌活), DokHwal(獨活) and BangPung(防風).