• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제27권
• /
• pp.183-213
• /
• 2005

This study is achieving overseas investment to be kept and manages important position in business scope because Korean Company achieves business in major market in world and goes forward. under proposition that development(foreign direct investment) previous engagement can not but differ with advanced nation enterprise's model in over sea direct investment achievement. Grasp ramification(pattern change substance) of overseas direct investment since the 1990 to korean manufacture Firm(enterprise). Seek political consultation by analyzing change of factor and investment decision factor by year in dimension by industry investment winter season by year affecting in oversea direct investment and was attained in purpose to verify existent theory's explanation power connected with investment previous engagement. This is that can develop and procure competitive advantage of enterprise peculiarity by making overseas direct investment adversely with existent theory that can make foreign country direct investment though there is high position of enterprise characteristic's competitive advantage and move of knowledge and information is important in korean firm's overseas direct investment in globalization roadbed in at least own field through change and renovation establish experiment model under proposition that should grope more active previous engagement than advanced nation enterprise and arranged subject of study if it is korean's firm that wish to become universal guidance enterprise. and examine trend of direct investment and actual conditions invested first in the foreign countries as examples by investment department, by investment industry inside of investment scale etc..., establish korean firm's invest area selection and decision and investment very important person and effect analysis Circumstance-model that is based in strategic adaptedness by year. Circumstance-variable have influenced how in overseas direct investment and decision and what variable will be considered first in over sea direct investment did Empirical analysis in here after

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제18권9호
• /
• pp.13-18
• /
• 2020

Purpose: Research and development of human capital in countries bring sustainable development to the nations. Especially for developing countries, the attraction of foreign direct investment not only brings economic growth to the country but also contributes to improving human capital. This study aims to assess the impact of foreign direct investment on human capital in ASEAN countries. Research design, data and methodology: With data collected from ASEAN countries from 1990 to 2019, panel data analysis is performed with revised model types (the Pooled OLS, Fixed effect model, Random effect model and regression with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors). Result: The results of the regression analysis show that FDI has a positive impact on human capital. At the same time, the study also found that public investment in education also positively affects human capital; the life expectancy factor does not affect human capital. Conclusions: With this research result, the authors also proposed a number of solutions to improve human capital by attracting FDI and improving the efficiency of investment for the education of ASEAN countries. Besides, public expenditure on education also plays an important role in raising human capital. Therefore, investment in education should be promoted further in the future.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제41권4호
• /
• pp.245-267
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 GVC(글로벌가치사슬) 관점에서 한국의 해외직접투자(FDI)의 현황을 실증적 연구방법을 통해 분석하고 정책방향을 제시하였다. 전 세계 50개국의 자료를 활용한 회귀분석과 독일, 스위스, 싱가포르 등 주요국과의 국제비교 분석을 수행하였다. 분석결과 2000년대 이후 동시에 늘어나는 전 세계 FDI와 수출입을 동시에 설명하는 GVC 관점에서 볼 때, 한국의 국제화 수준은 지나치게 무역위주로만 형성되어 있는 것으로 나타났다. 특히, 한국의 1인당 GDP를 높이기 위해서는 분석에 포함된 주요국에 비해 20~30여년 뒤쳐져 있는 해외직접투자(OFDI) 수준을 높이는 것이 필요해 보인다. 즉, 무역의 이익과 투자의 이익을 동시에 추구하여 1인당 GDP 수준을 높여나가는 것이 중요한 것으로 분석되었다.

• 재무관리연구
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.119-131
• /
• 1985

Although Korea is short of capital technology, and natural resources, she has achieved an outstanding progress by the export-drive policies by Korean government and the creative endeavor of Korean firms. As a result of that, Korean economy and enterprises are in the same file of newly industrialized countries and Korea is ready for an economic take-off as a developed country. But in the early 1980s, each country strengthens protective trade theory and resources nationalism, and this has a great influence on the field of international trade environment. In spite of that, to continue the same high development as that of the past. Korea must try to secure and find export markets, solve trade barriers, make sure of the long-term security of resources, develop technology, and strengthen economic cooperations. To satisfy these desires by 2000s, we must try to make Korean enterprises have the global competitive power and them grow strongly among world wide firm through capital and technology accumulated during the passed years, and to do so, there must be a foreign production and marketing management, too, this can be achieved only through foreign overseas direct investment. This investment has various forms, to say, verifical integrated, horizontal integrated. conglomerate integrated forms, and the amount of investment in each country from 18 century to today reaches 500 billion dollars. This investment is done by strategic, behavioral economic, and financial motives. So I am going to approach the fields of like these; in spite of the differences among political, economical, caltural, and social systems, and many risk compared with domestic enterprises, why do Korean firms witsh to transfer the productive facilities to overseas countries and run them there? What is the comparative advantage of foreign direct investment compared with domestic investment ?. why is the factor of comparative advantage transferred through foreign direct investment?, what is the motive of foreign overseas direct investment?, and last the ownership-specific factors and the theory of internalization, and the location specific factors were analysed chiefly. But in consideration of the given condition in Korea, Korean overseas direct investment must be propelled rationally on the basis of the above mentioned theory.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.111-126
• /
• 2009

This study analysed determinants of Foreign Direct Investment to ASEAN+ 3 member nations using panel data for which cross-sectional data are combined with time series data. The data for the analysis included the amount of FDI, GDP, and indexes of economic independence. This study collected data from six nations(Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam) whose data were easily available, China and Japan from 2003 to 2007 and analysed them. The results are summarized as follows: Using the pooled OLS method, we found Model 2 had the highest explanatory power whose adjusted R-squared was 89.4%, which accounted for about 89% of foreign investment. Using the fixed effect model, Model 2 had the highest explanatory power whose adjusted R-squared was 96.8%, which accounted for about 97% of foreign investment. Using the probability effect model, Model 5 had the highest explanatory power, but in respect to its statistical significance, only GDP was 1% significant and the rest variables had no significance.

• 산업진흥연구
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.69-81
• /
• 2021

파키스탄은 남아시아의 상서로운 개발도상국이다. 국제투명성기구(Transparency International)의 2020년 부패인식지수 보고서에 따르면 파키스탄은 0(최저)에서 100(최고)까지의 정치적 안정성 측면에서 전 세계적으로 총 31점으로 124위, -2.25점으로 188위를 기록했다. 더 결정적으로, 파키스탄에 대한 외국인 직접 투자의 유입은 2008년과 2019년 사이에 감소했다. 정치적 불안정과 정부 부패는 외국인 직접 투자와 양의 선형 관계와 음의 선형 관계를 모두 가지고 있지만, 본 연구에서는 시간이 지남에 따라 정치적 불안정과 외국인 직접 투자 사이의 정부 부패의 완화된 영향을 테스트했다. 또한 같은 국가의 여러 정치 체제에서 정치적 불안정과 외국인 직접 투자 사이의 관계를 테스트했다. 따라서, 본 연구의 결과는 권위주의 정권이 민주적 정부 기간보다 더 많은 외국인 직접 투자를 유치했음을 시사하였다. 더욱이, 우리는 그 나라에서 정부의 부패가 심할 때 외국인 직접 투자가 적다는 것을 발견했다. 그러나 정부의 부패는 정치적 불안정과 외국인 직접 투자(FDI) 사이의 긍정적인 관계를 약화시켰다.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제6권3호
• /
• pp.123-130
• /
• 2019

The paper aims to investigate whether foreign direct investment (FDI) has positive effect on the labour productivity in Vietnam. Labour productivity is the elemental determinant of a country's development level in long-term. In recent years, although increasing consistently, labour productivity of Vietnam remains low in comparison to other South East Asian countries. To identify the direction of effect and the level of effect of FDI and human capital on the labour productivity of Vietnam, Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model was used to examine the effect of FDI and human capital on labour productivity in Vietnam from 1986 to 2014. The results of bounds test confirm the existence of cointegration among the variables. Further, the Toda and Yamamoto Granger causality test affirms that there is unidirectional causality running from foreign direct investment and human capital index to labour productivity. The empirical results provide strong statistical evidence that foreign direct investment and human capital has a positive impact on labour productivity in Vietnam in long-term. These findings imply that workers are expected to further improve their knowledge, skills and that policy-maker should establish concrete plans to increase human capital. Results from this study provide suggestion necessary for Vietnam to achieve sustainable development.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제8권9호
• /
• pp.11-22
• /
• 2021

This study investigates the long-run relationship between the de jure economic, political, and social globalization and foreign direct investments in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) to establish whether policies that foster trade and investment relations among geographical entities can help revive the GCC countries from the prevailing economic debacles of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study is driven by the GCC's quest to fully overcome the economic challenges occasioned by the outbreak of the global pandemic and position itself as the most potent regional economic bloc in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. The study employs the panel data of the six GCC countries of Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, and Saudi Arabia from 1971 to 2017. The findings of the panel fully modified ordinary least square regression estimation show that the de jure economic and social globalization have a significant positive impact on the region's foreign direct investment inflows. The impact of the de jure political globalization on foreign direct investment is statistically significant but negatively signed. Based on the preceding findings, we offer some holistic policy recommendations to the GCC region as recipes for timely recovery from the economic impact of COVID-19 and beyond.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제44권3호
• /
• pp.123-136
• /
• 2019

This study investigates the facilitating factors of FDI (foreign direct investment) inflows in 15 developing countries of three continents (Asia, Latin America, and Africa) using fixed-effect panel regression analysis with 30-year macro socio-economic data. The facilitating factors of FDI inflows in each continent differed. In Asia, labor compensation, GDP, consumer expenditure, human capital, and export facilitated FDI inflows in decreasing order, as did export, total factor productivity, GDP, and human capital in Latin America, and investment expenditure, human capital, government expenditure, and export in Africa. Most importantly, the character of cost saving efficiency-seeking investment was very strong in Asia. Also, third-party export-oriented investment and economic growth-oriented investment were shown in Latin America and Africa, respectively.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제15권6호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 한국이 투자대상국인 OECD국가를 대상으로 외국인직접투자에 영향을 주는 요인을 파악하기 위하여 현지국과 투자국의 문화 거리와 부패인식지수의 차이를 활용하여 외국인직접투자에 영향을 주는 요인을 규명하였다. 연구결과 문화적 차원과 부패인식지수에 따라 외국인직접투자에 차이가 나타나는 것을 살펴볼 수 있었다. 문화적 성향에 따라 외국인직접투자가 증대될 수도 감소될 수도 있으며, 부패인식지수가 높을수록 투자가 활발하게 이루어졌다. 외국인직접투자에 영향을 주는 요인에 있어서 현지국과 투자국사이의 권력거리가 작을수록, 개인주의 대 집단주의 거리가 클수록 투자건수와 규모가 증대되는 것으로 나타났으며, 투자국의 부패인식지수가 높을 때 외국인직접투자가 증대되는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구결과를 통하여 문화와 부패인식정도가 무역거래에 영향을 줄 수 있음을 확인함으로써 무역거래시 교역당사자간의 문화적 성향과 문화적 거리를 고려하여야 하며, 공공부패 등을 비롯한 사회적 변수를 적절하게 관리함으로써 무역 및 경제성장에 영향을 줄 수 있다는 시사점을 제시하였다.