• 디자인학연구
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.105-116
• /
• 2006

In product manufacturing industries, a recent issue is the green concept. The green concept is a complicated area. If the green concept is for products, its serious issues have to be criticized. Although the importance of the green concept has overflowed, its influences have not been disputed vigorously. So this study is to critic the serious issues of the green concept in aesthetics in product design, manufacturing, and products' prices. The green environment has four representative elements: systems, policies, minds, and technologies, but they are not in the field of design. An element of the green concept, green design is also a sub concept for design, so it should be based on aesthetics. It is green aesthetics. But since green design first appeared, it has never approached by aesthetics because it has mostly had social meanings and expectations. So for green aesthetics, to think about what makes a product, and what can be aesthetic issues among them are important. Products consist of form, structure, material, and technology. Form means different shapes in a structure, but there cannot be any specific directions for a green concept. Structure has two kinds: interior and exterior structure. While interior structure has a technological character, exterior structure is deeply related with aesthetics, but it has also no chance for green concept. Material can be divided as two also: aesthetic and technological. Aesthetics materials mean the colors, opacity, and tactile sense of materials, but they are not aesthetic issues. Technological materials are recycled materials or non-recycled materials. Even if recycled materials are used today, they are close to systems or policies rather than aesthetics. With this result, green aesthetics is a very difficult concept. Second, green products are usually 30% more expensive than general products. But every consumer has his or her own economical conditions, and nobody can coerce consumers into buying expensive green products for green environments. And green products without good quality cannot satisfy consumers. This means that green concept is not accomplished by just manufacturing green products. Third, although a lot of proposals have appeared as green design in exhibitions, most of them are close to craft because they are so hard to be manufactured. Manufacturing is the first consideration for products. These three issues are enough to explain why green concept is complicated in manufacturing products. If they are not solved, the green concept is just a fiction. So if this study proposes a turning point against blind green-oriented atmosphere, it will be meaningful enough.

• 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회논문지
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.113-125
• /
• 2021

이 연구는 21세기 이후 새롭게 대두되고 있는 하이브리드의 개념을 연극 공간으로 적용하여 특별히 관객이 적극적으로 극에 개입하고 참여하는 '관객 참여형 연극'에 관한 새로운 접근을 시도해 보는 것에 목적을 두었다. 사실, '하이브리드'는 이미 오랜 시간 인류의 문화 형성과 전승 가운데 주요한 동력을 제공해 왔으며 이를 무대 위로 다루는 연극에서 또한 그 혼종성은 의미 있는 원리로 작용해 왔다. 이전의 극장과 텍스트 중심의 전통적인 연극에서는 '현존과 부재', '현실과 허구' 그리고 '즉자와 대자'의 측면에서 그 혼종성이 오직 무대 위의 한정적 움직임으로 제한된 바 있다. 하지만 20세기 아방가르드 이후 '해체'의 정신을 바탕으로 객석과 무대 사이의 경계가 무너지고 그 사이에서 하이브리드는 이전의 '무대 한정적 하이브리드'에서 '무대를 넘어 객석을 포함하는 연극 공간 전체'의 하이브리드로 확장되기에 이른다. 다시 말해, 객석과 관객은 이제 동등한 연극적 요소로서 다른 요소들과 동등한 수평적 연결 구조를 통해 함께 뒤섞이게 되었으며 이를 바탕으로 이전과는 전혀 다른 새로운 결과물이 형성되는 것이다. 따라서, 관객 참여형 연극은 이전의 전통적인 연극 공간 안에서 가장 이질적인 '객석과 무대', '관객과 배우' 사이의 일종의 하이브리드 현상으로 '혼종화된 관객', '혼종화된 공간' 그리고 '혼종화된 텍스트'라는 독특한 정체성으로 또 다른 접근이 가능할 것이다.