• 제목/요약/키워드: Failure assessment diagram

검색결과 43건 처리시간 0.019초

취약면적법과 DMEA를 활용한 지상전투차량 유공압 현가장치의 취약성 평가 (The Vulnerability Assessment of Hydro-pneumatic Suspension of Ground Combat Vehicles Using Vulnerable Area Method and DMEA)

  • 남명훈;박강;박우성;유철
    • 한국CDE학회논문집
    • /
    • 제22권2호
    • /
    • pp.141-149
    • /
    • 2017
  • Vulnerability assesses the loss of major performance functions of GCV (Ground Combat Vehicles) when it is hit by enemy's shell. To decide the loss of major functions, it is determined what effects are on the performance of GCV when some components of GCV are failed. M&S (Modeling and Simulation) technology is used to vulnerability assessment. The hydro-pneumatic suspension is used as a sample part. The procedures of vulnerability assessment of the hydro-pneumatic suspension are shown as follows: 1) The components of the suspension are defined, and shot lines are generated evenly around the part. 2) The penetrated components are checked by using the penetration equation. 3) The function model of the suspension is designed by using IDEF0. 4) When the failure of the critical components of the suspension happens, its effect on the function of the suspension can be estimated using DMEA (Damage Mode and Effects Analysis). 5) The diagram of FTA (Fault Tree Analysis) is designed by exploiting DMEA. 6) The damage probability of the suspension is calculated by using FTA and vulnerable area method. In this paper, SLAP (Shot Line Analysis Program) which was developed based on COVART methodology. SLAP calculates the damage probability and visualizes the vulnerable areas of the suspension.

Initiating Events Study of the First Extraction Cycle Process in a Model Reprocessing Plant

  • Wang, Renze;Zhang, Jiangang;Zhuang, Dajie;Feng, Zongyang
    • Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
    • /
    • 제41권2호
    • /
    • pp.117-121
    • /
    • 2016
  • Background: Definition and grouping of initiating events (IEs) are important basics for probabilistic safety assessment (PSA). An IE in a spent fuel reprocessing plant (SFRP) is an event that probably leads to the release of dangerous material to jeopardize workers, public and environment. The main difference between SFRPs and nuclear power plants (NPPs) is that hazard materials spread diffusely in a SFRP and radioactive material is just one kind of hazard material. Materials and Methods: Since the research on IEs for NPPs is in-depth around the world, there are several general methods to identify IEs: reference of lists in existence, review of experience feedback, qualitative analysis method, and deductive analysis method. While failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is an important qualitative analysis method, master logic diagram (MLD) method is the deductive analysis method. IE identification in SFRPs should be consulted with the experience of NPPs, however the differences between SFRPs and NPPs should be considered seriously. Results and Discussion: The plutonium uranium reduction extraction (Purex) process is adopted by the technics in a model reprocessing plant. The first extraction cycle (FEC) is the pivotal process in the Purex process. Whether the FEC can function safely and steadily would directly influence the production process of the whole plant-production quality. Important facilities of the FEC are installed in the equipment cells (ECs). In this work, IEs in the FEC process were identified and categorized by FMEA and MLD two methods, based on the fact that ECs are containments in the plant. Conclusion: The results show that only two ECs in the FEC do not need to be concerned particularly with safety problems, and criticality, fire and red oil explosion are IEs which should be emphatically analyzed. The results are accordant with the references.

Relex를 이용한 항공기 시스템 안전성 평가 절차 사례분석 (A Case Study on Safety Analysis Procedure of Aircraft System using the Relex)

  • 이동우;김입수;나종화
    • 한국항행학회논문지
    • /
    • 제22권3호
    • /
    • pp.179-188
    • /
    • 2018
  • 항공전자 시스템의 개발할 때 항공 사고를 예방하기 위해서 SAE ARP4761 (민간 항공 시스템 및 장비 안전성 평가 프로세스 수행 방법 및 지침) 규격에 명시된 안전성 분석 및 평가를 수행한다. 안전성 분석은 시스템의 정상상태가 아닌 비정상상태에 대한 지식과 다른 규격들 간의 상호 연관성에 대한 지식이 요구된다. 때문에, 안전인증규격의 준수를 입증하는 자료를 자동으로 출력하는 도구가 필요하다. 본 연구는 규격의 안전성 분석 절차를 도식화하고, 안전 분석 CAD 도구들을 개별 절차에 적용하는 방법을 연구하였다. 예시 연구로서, ARP4761 부록의 여객기용 휠 제동 시스템 (WBS; wheel brake system)을 대상으로 ARP4761분석을 수행하였다.