• 의료법학
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.83-107
• /
• 2019

의료사고에 대한 분쟁의 해결을 위해, 법원은 통상 진료기록에 대하여 의학전문가에게 그의 의학에 관한 전문적 지식이나 그 지식을 이용한 판단을 보고하게 하는 감정(鑑定) 절차를 진행하고 있다. 의료사고에 대한 감정의 결과는 전문가에 대한 참고 의견으로 증거방법의 하나에 불과하다. 그러므로 원칙적으로 법원이 그 결과에 대하여 기속되어야 하는 것은 아니지만, 법원이 의료사고의 구체적 경위를 비롯하여 의료과실과 인과관계가 존재하는지 여부에 관하여 의학적 판단인 감정결과를 온전히 배제할 수는 없다. 따라서 의료사고에 대한 분쟁에서 진료기록감정이 차지하는 비중은 높고 법원 등의 심증 형성에 중요한 영향을 미치고 있다. 본고에서는 의료사고에서 감정의 의의와 기능을 살펴본 뒤, 현행법상 진료기록감정의 양상으로 이루어지고 있는 법원에서의 진료기록감정절차와 한국의료분쟁조정중재원의 의료사고에 대한 감정절차를 각각 유형별로 고찰한다. 또한 우리나라 판례에서 진료기록감정회신에 대하여 어떠한 태도를 취하고 있는지, 외국의 제도로 일본의 경우를 살펴보아 우리나라에의 시사점을 알아보고자 한다. 특히 우리나라의 진료기록감정절차가 지니고 있는 진료기록감정회신의 공정성에 관한 문제, 진료기록감정절차의 지연으로 인한 소송의 지연에 관한 문제 등에 대한 개선점을 제시하고자 한다.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.25-34
• /
• 1997

This study presents a new approach for expert opinion elicitation process to assess an uncertainty inherent in accident management. The need to work with rare event and limited data in accident management leads analysis to use expert opinions extensively. Unlike the conventional approach using point-valued probabilities, the study proposes the concept of fuzzy probability to represent expert opinion. The use of fuzzy probability has an advantage over the conventional approach when an expert's judgment is used under limited dat3 and imprecise knowledge. The study demonstrates a method of combining and propagating fuzzy probabilities. finally, the proposed methodology is applied to the evaluation of the probability of a bottom head failure for the flooded case in the Peach Bottom BWR nuclear power plant.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.311-338
• /
• 2008

This paper aims to introduce an overview of the regime of expert witness in the medical malpractice litigation, and to provide a plan of how to make it improved. In regard with medical expert witness, several problems, such as time-consuming procedure, non-neural and unclear opinion without reasons provided, have been pointed out for several years. Lack of skill of the court and plaintiff/defender to question the expert is one of many cause to lead to the above problems. What is questioned to the expert? Because expert witness is used in determining probability of negligence, questions to the expert should be selected on the grounds of whether or not to obtain opinions or facts sufficient to let the judge infer negligence in view of the theory of proof burden established by the Supreme Court. In addition, to avoid non-neutral and unclear opinion, it is necessary to question the expert clearly, specifically and scientifically.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.115-139
• /
• 2012

Civil proceedings, surveyed results and medical expenses that are evidenced by expert witness are just one of the methods of proof. Since a judge makes decision by synthesizing all evidences on a concerned case, thus the judgement would be different from that of expert witness. It is not rational for medical institutions, of which priorities are medical treatment, to give priority to disability decision. However, despite of its importance, medical institutions less recognize about the necessity of procedural stability and predictability in expert valuation. It is necessary to identify actual problems and investigate rational alternatives to acquire fairness in valuation procedures and accuracy in calculating future medical expenses. Therefore, this research explores the problems and realities of evaluation process in medical treatments, and then discuss the alternatives of written expert opinion and estimation of future medical expenses.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.915-925
• /
• 2021

The study investigates some psychological and environmental factors affecting the intention to purchase organic foods of consumers in the inner-city of Hanoi. Impact factors applied for the study include three psychological factors (health concern, environmental concern, consumer awareness of organic foods) and seven environment factors (family's opinion, friends and colleagues' opinion, influence of celebrities, expert's opinion, social status, mass media, state's encouragement). We analyzed research data from 396 consumers to measure the impacting level of these factors. The convenient sampling method was used to collect the research sample. The measurement applied a 5-point Likert scale classifying from 1-completely disagree to 5-completely agree. Based on previous studies, the research model was recommended. We had estimated the reliability of the scales through Cronbach's Alpha and composite reliability. The research data is analyzed by using Structural Equation Model method (SEM). The findings of the study suggest that psychological factors (health concern, environmental concern, consumer awareness of organic foods) had a significantly positive influence on consumer's purchase attention toward organic food. The results also revealed that environmental factors (family's opinion, friends and colleagues' opinion, influence of celebrities, expert's opinion, mass media) were positively linked to consumer's purchase attention toward organic food.

• 조명전기설비학회논문지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.148-153
• /
• 2009

FMECA는 전력설비의 기능, 고장 모드, 고장 원인 및 고장의 파급 효과 등을 분석하고 각 고장 모드가 시스템의 기능 유지에 영향을 미치는 정도인 심각도(Severity)와 고장 발생의 빈도의 정도인 치명도(Criticality)를 평가하여 치명도 매트릭스(Criticality Matrix)를 구성함으로써 높은 위험성을 갖는 고장 모드를 판별하고 효과적인 시스템 구성을 위한 참고 자료를 제공한다[4-5]. 대부분의 경우, 고장 모드의 두 지수는 미리 정해진 기준에 따라 전문가들의 정성적인 평가에 의해 결정된다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 두 지수들에 대한 다양한 전문가의 의견을 종합하여 결론을 도출하기 위한 방법론으로 기존의 Linear Opinion Pool에 퍼지이론을 결합하는 방식을 제안하였다. 또한 기존의 치명도 매트릭스 방식으로 위험도를 판별하던 방식의 한계를 인식하고 운영자의 관심에 따라 두 지수를 종합적으로 평가하기 위해 퍼지 FMECA 전문가 시스템을 구성하였다.[7-8]. 사례연구에서는 대표적인 전력 설비에 대한 적용 예를 나타내었다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제17권32호
• /
• pp.297-308
• /
• 1994

In the information system, there are many fields that used by decision making support system. Nowadays, the reasons that the need of the decision making system in audit is increased, are as follows. \circled1 The increased of competitiveness in audit environment \circled2 The rapid replenishment of computer hardware and computer system in corporations. The purposes of this study are as follows. \circled1 The connection of Internal management assess results and practical examination. \circled2 In the making of audit opinion, the establish of non-measure and evaluate logic. \circled3 The suggestion of knowledge base structure about the audit task. \circled4 The development of prototype system for the accounting audit expert system. The expected usefulness of accounting audit expert system development are as follows. \circled1 Audit time may be saved \circled2 The consistence of opinion will be increased \circled3 The elevation of audit technique \circled4 The decreased of audit risk \circled5 In the decision making rationlization of accounting information users, it will be proved as usefulness.

• 대한한의진단학회지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.107-126
• /
• 2008

Background : There was seldom study about method that diagnose 8 Constitution beside method of pulse diagnosis in 8 Constitution Medicine. Objectives : This study is to make out 8 Constitution Medicine Diagnosis Expert System Development used CBR(Case based Reasoning). Methods : First, at case base construction process we constructed case base for CBR embodiment because gathering 925 cases all to patient who constitution is verified, and second, at study model establishment process superior expert system development by purpose CBR of reasoning process dividing fundamental type CBR that spend basis data value and expert type CBR that reflect weight in basis data value accordin I II III to advice expert opinion, and third, system embodiment process explained about way to give process and weight that diagnose constitution through Nearest Neighbor Method sampling process of CBR techniques, and fourth, at system estimation process we selected superior CBR model because comparing and estimate the diagnosis rate of expert system with fundamental type system (GECBR) model and expert type I II III CBR system (AVCBR, AACBR, AGCBR) model that reflect expert opinion in fundamental type system. GECBR and AGCBR chose on superior study model. Through such 4 study process, we developed 8 constitution diagnosis expert system lastly. Results : 1. When we select GECBR that is fundamental type by reasoning system, diagnosis rate 78.91% of 8 constitution diagnosis expert system is expected, and the constitution diagnosis rate Hepatonia 90.4%, Cholecystonia 63.0%, Pancreotonia 91.1%, Gastrotonia 0%, Pulmotonia 71.2%, Colonotonia 74.4%, Renotonia 37.5%, Vesicotonia 67.1% expect. 2. When we select AGCBR that is expert type III by reasoning system, diagnosis rate 77.51% of 8 constitution diagnosis expert system is expected, and the constitution diagnosis rate Hepatonia 93.4%, Cholecystonia 58.5%, Pancreotonia 91.1%, Gastrotonia 0%, Pulmotonia 73.1%, Colonotonia 64.4%, Renotonia 41.7%, Vesicotonia 72.2% expect. Conclusion : Based on this study, 8 constitution diagnosis expert system may give help to diagnose 8 constitution, and it is going to utilize as objective estimation tool of 8 constitution diagnosis, and further study for 8 Constitution Medicine Diagnosis Expert System Development used CBR(Case based Reasoning) is needed to supplement this study.

• 대한한의진단학회지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.142-184
• /
• 2008

Background: There was seldom study about method that diagnose 8 Constitution beside method of pulse diagnosis in 8 Constitution Medicine. Objectives: This study is to make out 8 Constitution Medicine Diagnosis Expert System Development used CBR(Case based Reasoning). Methods: First, at case base construction process we constructed case base for CBR embodiment because gathering 925 cases all to patient who constitution is verified, and second, at study model establishment process superior expert system development by purpose CBR of reasoning process dividing fundamental type CBR that spend basis data value and expert type I II III CBR that reflect weight in basis data value according to advice expert opinion, and third, system embodiment process explained about way to give process and weight that diagnose constitution through Nearest Neighbor Method sampling process of CBR techniques, and fourth, at system estimation process we selected superior CBR model because comparing and estimate the diagnosis rate of expert system with fundamental type system (GECBR) model and expert type I II III CBR system (AVCBR, AACBR, AGCBR) model that reflect expert opinion in fundamental type system. GECBR and AGCBR chose on superior study model. Through such 4 study process, we developed 8 constitution diagnosis expert system lastly. Results: 1. When we select GECBR that is fundamental type by reasoning system, diagnosis rate 78.91% of 8 constitution diagnosis expert system is expected, and the constitution diagnosis rate Hepatonia 90.4%, Cholecystonia 63.0%, Pancreotonia 91.1%, Gastrotonia 0%, Pulmotonia 71.2%, Colonotonia 74.4%, Renotonia 37.5%, Vesicotonia 67.1% expect. 2. When we select AGCBR that is expert type III by reasoning system, diagnosis rate 77.51% of 8 constitution diagnosis expert system is expected, and the constitution diagnosis rate Hepatonia 93.4%, Cholecystonia 58.5%, Pancreotonia 91.1%, Gastrotonia 0%, Pulmotonia 73.1%, Colonotonia 64.4%, Renotonia 41.7%, Vesicotonia 72.2% expect. Conclusion: Based on this study, 8 constitution diagnosis expert system may give help to diagnose 8 constitution, and it is going to utilize as objective estimation tool of 8 constitution diagnosis, and further study for 8 Constitution Medicine Diagnosis Expert System Development used CBR(Case based Reasoning) is needed to supplement this study.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.37-45
• /
• 2016

Purpose: According to the characteristic of hanok public building, Planning criterion of structure, technology, efficiency, design is needed which can includes various type of new-hanok type public buildings. In this paper, we collect expert opinions to be used as a basis for developing models of New-hanok type Public Buildings. Method: This study was conducted in Research Study and expert surveys. The Part of reviewing Study looked at conception of new-hanok type public buildings model development and overview planning criterion set briefly. Expert surveys were targeted to professors and architects who are related in new-hanok type public buildings model development research. Result: In this study, we suggest improvement direction about planning criterion of new-hanok type public buildings model development based on opinions collected by expert surveys. In conclusion, first, In concept and legal status, it is necessary to adjust clearly than the term and legal status of new-hanok type. Second, various applicability is needed by using new materials and new construction method at the part of planning elements. Third, 'composed structure-convergence type' and 'composed structure-juxtaposed type' should be clearly classified or combined at the part of Setting of type. Forth, improvement on heat insulation, soundproof, waterproof efficiency is demanded to roof, wall, window systems. Fifth, arranging revitalization plan is important.