• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.61-85
• /
• 2004

It is tried that evaluation areas and items of information system in public sector are derived ration-ally and its weight value call be applied differently to type of information system to enhance validity and objectiveness of measurement in evaluating IS in this research. To obtain the goal of this research, firstly, five sectors - system sector, user sector, organization and management sector, the degree of strategic contribution to IS, and the degree of optimizing re-source in IS - are categorized based on broadly reviewing previous theoretical and practical research. Secondly, IS type in public sector is divided into internal operation one and customer oriented one that is object of the IS, and divided into application oriented and IT infrastructure oriented which are influence by IS. Thirdly, evaluation areas and its items are measured by 5 point scales (Likert summated scales) in addition to analysis of validity and reliability to improve objectiveness of establishing evaluation areas and its items. Fourthly, the weight values in the evaluation areas and its items are derived by using analytic hierarchy process. According to the results of analysis of weight value through AHP, it were found to be 30.4% to organization and management sector. 25.5% to degree of strategic contribution, 21.0% to user sector, 13.5% to degree of optimization of resource management, and 9.6% to system sector. and. different weight values each of the four IS type are proposed which establishing in this research. The main implications of this study is that the criteria by which IS in public sector can be categorized 4 ones is suggested and The weighted evaluation for four types of IS based on the AHP analysis enables proposing an objective evaluation method of IS in public sector for considering individual IS characterics.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.155-170
• /
• 2015

This study examines whether CSR (corporate social responsibility) activities of the public sector affect on its corporate evaluation in their perspective of consumers. Both public and private sectors are being encouraged to conduct the CSR activities in the four dimensions of economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibility. While many previous studies have examined the relationship between CSR and corporate's business performance, these studies focus on the private companies, not the public sector. In this paper, we offer a consumer-side study about the effect of CSR on the corporate evaluation on the public sector. The purpose of this study is to understand the effect of fit of CSR activity, perceived engagement, and perceived authenticity on the consumer's corporate evaluation of the public sector. We conducted two quasi-experiments involving 223 respondents using the actual CSR cases of two Korean public sectors. As a result, consumer's perception of engagement and authenticity about the CSR of public sector affects the corporate evaluation in a positive way. The 3-way interaction effect among fit of CSR activity, perceived engagement, and perceived authenticity was significant in corporate evaluation. To achieve successful CSR of the public sector, the public organizations need to increase the communication with their consumers and to implement the strategic CSR activities which can improve the consumer's perception of authenticity about CSR.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.155-189
• /
• 2003

In this research, the comprehensive evaluation model of IS(information systems) for public sectors is theoretically constructed through reviewing and integrating previous IS evaluation-related research. This model is hypothesized to consist of five sectors(System Sector, User Sector, Organization and Management Sector, Resource Management Sector and Strategic Contribution Sector), ten evaluation items belonging to these five evaluation sectors, and sixty two evaluation indices for these ten evaluation items. The results of empirical analyses to test the validity of the research model show that the evaluation sectors turn out to be the same ones as proposed in the hypothetical model. The evaluation items(System Quality, Information Quality, Service Quality) in System Sector proves to be consistent with the hypothetical model. However, in case of User Sector, two evaluation items(Perceived Usefulness and User Satisfaction) which are included in the hypothetical model are found to be merged into one item(User Satisfaction). And, it is shown that four evaluation items such as the Efficiency of Internal Process, Customer Satisfaction, Organizational Innovation, and the Degree of Informatization competence improvement are included in Organization and Management Sector, differently from the research model in which the items, Organizational innovation and the Degree of Informatization competence improvement, are not divided. As a final result, sixty two evaluation indices that comprise all the evaluation items belonging to five sectors are found to be reduced to fifty seven ones through factor analyses, criterion-related validity tests and reliability analyses.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.13-23
• /
• 2008

Changed the business environment, private sector focuses on the performance management, so to manage the performance he uses BSC that overcomes the limitation of financial indicators. Also, it is getting emphasized to evaluate the performance about services that the public sector provides and obliged for the public sector to be responsible for managing and improving its performance as the private sector has been doing. But lacks of knowledge and experience on performance management and evaluation are blocking the public sector from introducing and implementing new performance management systems. To solve those problems, this study has derived general guidelines and KPIs that public sector should keep in mind when BSC is introduced new management system. This study focused on the public hospital which is the performance management and evaluation system of Government administration.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.231-246
• /
• 2017

As an interest in the efficiency of public sector expenditures has spread across the world, Korea has operated a self-evaluation system for government projects as a part of the performance-based budget system. However, an evaluation system for public information technology project has been criticized for its lack of validity, which stems from the uniformity of performance management. This study draws insight from knowledge management literature in an attempt to address the problems with the extant performance evaluation system in public agencies. To realize benefits from IT investment, an agency needs to develop its own performance management model for information systems projects, with a focus on the interaction of IT and organizational system. The knowledge management-based framework for IT projects was verified through a case study, with which we discussed the applicability of knowledge management to the evaluation of public information systems projects.

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제22권6호
• /
• pp.297-309
• /
• 2022

Taking into account the globalization of the economy and the intensification of European integration processes, it has been proved that an important part of evaluating the effectiveness of activity of public sector enterprises should be a comparative analysis of the overall operation environment, namely public procurement, economic environment and tax policy, with the relevant systems of other countries of the world. The indicators and components of international ratings "Doing Business", "Paying Taxes", "Benchmarking Public Procurement" have been studied. Different groups of indicators forming "Doing Business" and "Paying Taxes" in the context of the impact on public sector enterprises have been identified: those which fully comply with the need to evaluate the operating environment of public sector enterprises and those which should be used with restrictions, regarding the peculiarities of creating and functioning of public sector enterprises. A comparative analysis of the place of Ukraine, Lithuania and Slovenia among other countries of the world in accordance with the international rankings of "Doing Business", "Paying Taxes", "Benchmarking Public Procurement" have been made. It has been substantiated that the results of such comparative analysis will allow identifying risk areas, and relevant information can be used in developing of recommendations for improving the effectiveness of activity of public sector enterprises.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제37권4호
• /
• pp.100-110
• /
• 2009

The customer-driven efficiency evaluation has been in the mainstream of public administration research, since the 1980s. However, there have been relatively fewer efficiency evaluation research in public administration compared to those of public institutions. This paper is to analyze the service efficiency of public sector using Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA). We suggested two stage DEA model to accomplish efficiency evaluation that an operation and performance characteristic of the public institution were reflected and then the number of the government employee and tax expenditure per residents were used as the input elements at the 1st stage and four integrated service dimensions were used as the output elements. At 2nd stage, four integrated service dimensions and citizen's satisfaction were used as the input and output elements respectively. In addition, we suggested PSEI(Public Service Efficiency Index) which showed the efficiency of the public sector using the two stages efficiency result. According to the results for '07, there were no efficient institutions among 15 DMUs and the most efficient public institution was K(0.9150). In case for '08 analysis, there was only one efficient DMU.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.71-92
• /
• 2023

Globally, under the leadership of advanced ICT countries, the private sector is promoting various policies to promote the digital transformation of public services. Looking at the research trend, design of public service indicators, development of evaluation system, and empirical research are being carried out steadily, but there are insufficient research cases on models in which the private sector participates in the planning, development, and operation of public services. In this study, Private-centric digital public service suitability evaluation indicators were discovered through interviews with experts in various fields, and weights for each indicator were analyzed through AHP evaluation. In addition, by applying the analysis results to 18 digital public services on a trial basis, the importance and priority of evaluation indicators for each service were derived, and at the same time, the evaluation framework was designed and applied to diagnose implications. As a result of the study, 'social utility', 'corporate acceptability', and 'public acceptability' were selected as the top three indicators of suitability evaluation. At this time, it was analyzed that the weight of the 'company acceptability' index, which includes sub-indices such as 'service profitability', 'service scalability', and 'private initiative possibility', was the highest among the three top indicators. As a result of the demonstration for public services, "IoT facility unmanned remote monitoring service", "blockchain real estate transaction service", and "digital twin disaster prediction service" were evaluated as the most suitable public services for the transition to the private sector.

• 벤처혁신연구
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.51-65
• /
• 2021

공공부문의 인사 관련 정책은 폐쇄적이며 필기시험 위주로 운영이 되어왔으나, 2006년 고위공무원단 도입을 통하여 공무원의 승진과 선발제도에서 역량을 기반으로 하는 평가와 승진, 교육체계가 새로이 도입되었다. 특히 승진과 관련된 역량평가(Assessment Center)를 운영하여 연공서열 중심의 승진제도가 역량을 기준으로 평가받는 계기가 되었다. 역량평가는 현재까지 사용하는 평가방법들 중에서 신뢰성과 타당성이 가장 높은 평가방법으로 알려져 있으며 성과에 대한 예측 타당성도 높은 것으로 알려져 있다. 2001년 정부 표준역량 19개 역량모델을 설계하였으며, 2006년 고위공무원단제도의 시행과 함께 역량평가를 실행하였고, 2015년 중앙부처 과장급으로 확대 시행과 2012년 서울시를 시작으로 하여 광역지방자치단체도 간부급 공무원에 대한 역량평가를 도입, 시행하고 있다. 공공부문에서 역량평가의 활용 목적은 주로 3급은 선발, 4급은 배치(보직), 5급은 승진에 초점을 맞춰 운영하고 있다. 하지만 공공부문의 역량평가는 민간부문과 비교하면, 역량평가의 목적, 평가과정, 역량평가 프로그램의 측면에서 차이를 보이고 있다. 역량평가의 목적에서 공공부문은 후보자 선발 승진을 위한 것이며, 민간부문은 경력개발과 육성에 초점을 두고 있다. 따라서 민간부문보다 지속적인 역량개발을 하지 못하고 있으며, 직무를 수행하는 데 있어서 성과를 높이기 위한 목적으로 활용 되지 못하고 있다. 평가항목과 관련해서, 공공부문은 일반적으로 6개 역량에 대하여 5점 만점에 2.5점 이상이면 역량평가를 통과하는 방식으로 제도를 운영하며, 역량의 수준이 어느 정도이며, 부족한 부문은 무엇인지에 대한 피드백이 미흡한데 반하여, 민간부문은 탈락자를 선별보다는 우수자와 적임자를 선별하기 위하여 개인별 평균점수 뿐 아니라 각 개인의 역량별 점수를 중요시 하고 이를 활용하여 보직과 경력개발에 활용한다. 평가자 선발 및 운영과 관련해서는 공공부문은 평가에 있어 공정성에 중점을 두고, 민간부문은 활용성에 중점을 두어 공공부문은 역량평가를 통하여 역량을 개발하고 적재적소에 인적자원을 활용한다는 측면에는 부합하지 못하고 있다. 따라서 공공부문도 역량평가를 통하여 우수자를 파악하고 이들이 동기부여가 될 수 있도록 하는 방안으로 개선하고 정확한 보고서와 개인별 피드백을 통해서 더 우수한 관리자로 성장할 수 있도록 역량평가제도 운영에 변화를 기하여야 한다.

• 농촌계획
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.41-53
• /
• 2022

This study aims to identify perceptions on ESG management evaluation priorities based on public value in the agricultural and rural sector with the focus on the Korea Rural Community Corporation. We conduct Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to analyze how ESG management evaluation priorities are perceived by distinctive groups across industrial fields. To this end, experts working in the agricultural and rural sector and the general public in non-agricultural sector were questioned to derive and compare the weights for each class of ESG management. Results show the followings: First, the weight for the environment (E) was derived as 0.51774 in the first layer, which was found to be the most important evaluation item among the environment (E), society (S), and governance (G). Second, "ecosystem restoration," "urban-rural exchange expansion and regional development," and "increasing transparency" were the most important items in the second layer. Third, priorities between the agricultural and non-agricultural respondents groups were different in environmental (E) and social (S) categories, which explained that perceptions on ESG management by workers and policy makers in the agricultural and rural sector are different from those by general public in the non-agricultural sector.