• 한국의료질향상학회지
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.30-39
• /
• 2018

Objectives: In Korea, there are many kinds of evaluations for medical institutions. However, evaluations are increasingly burdensome for medical institutions because evaluation agencies, evaluation timing, and evaluation methods are different. The purpose of this study is to improve the efficiency of evaluation for medical institutions and ultimately to provide quality medical services to patients. Methods: In this study, 2,310 indicators of 19 kinds of evaluation for medical institutions were analyzed. Results: 1,424 indicators were available for on-site surveys and 886 indicators were not available for on-site surveys. There were 4 kinds of evaluation that can be integrated in total, 12 kinds of evaluation that can be integrated partially, and 3 kinds of evaluation that need to maintain the current evaluation system. Conclusion: In order to provide patient-centered quality medical services through reduction of burden due to the evaluation for medical institutions, it is necessary to deeply discuss the efficiency of evaluation integration and result utilization.

• International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.65-89
• /
• 2019

This study has the aim of developing an evaluation index that can help evaluate the reliability of the information resources of institutions retaining humanities assets for the purposes of laying out the foundation for providing one-stop portal service for humanities assets. To this end, the evaluation index was derived through the analysis of previous research, case studies, and interviews with experts, the derived evaluation index was then applied to the humanities assets retaining institutions to verify the utility. The institutional information resources' reliability evaluation index consisted of the two dimensions of the institutions' own reliability evaluation index. The institution provided a service and system evaluation index. The institutions' own reliability evaluation index consisted of 25 points for institutional authority, 25 points for data collection and construction, 30 points for data provision, and 20 points for appropriateness of data, for a total of 100 points, respectively. The institution provided service and system evaluation indexes consisting of 25 points for information quality, 15 points for appropriateness (decency), 15 points for accessibility, 20 points for tangibility, 15 points for form, and 10 points for cooperation, for the total of 100 points, respectively. The derived evaluation index was used to evaluate the utility of 6 institutions representing humanities assets through application. Consequently, the reliability of the information resources retained by the Research Information Service System (RISS) of the Korea Education & Research Information Service (KERIS) turned out to be the highest.

• 한국전자거래학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.89-102
• /
• 2018

최근 4차 산업혁명의 도래로 인해 융합서비스 환경으로 변화함에 따라 융 복합적인 새로운 보안위협이 나타나고 있다. 이에 중소형 의료기관 또한 비즈니스 환경을 고려한 특화된 보안을 필요로 하고 있는 실정이다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 선행연구 분석을 통해 의료기관 보안 특성을 도출하고 중소형 의료기관의 현장조사를 통해 중소형 의료기관 보안 특성과 현황을 조사하였다. 이러한 중소형 의료기관 보안 특성을 기반으로 중소형 의료기관을 위한 보안관리 평가모형을 설계하고 검증하였다. 설계를 위해 현존하는 의료기관 관련 보안관리체계, 평가 인증 체계 비교분석을 수행하였고 본 논문에서 제안한 보안관리 평가 모형과 공유정도 또한 확인하였다. 또한 제안하는 중소형 의료기관을 위한 보안관리 평가모형의 통계적 검증을 위해 적합 타당성 검증을 수행하였고, AHP 분석을 통한 상대적 우선순위 분석을 수행하여 항목별 가중치를 도출하였다. 본 연구의 결과를 통해 중소형 의료기관이 실제 수행 가능한 보안관리 평가모형의 기준으로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

• 의료ㆍ복지 건축 : 한국의료복지건축학회 논문집
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.31-39
• /
• 2022

Purpose: The study aimed to extract the space mentioned in the criteria for evaluation and certification of psychiatric institutions in which the most specific standards for medical services of psychiatric institutions are prepared, and to organize and analyze the requirements. Method: The implied space is derived by analyzing the evaluation and certification criteria. The derived space is re-classified by departments of the hospital, and the requirements are organized and analyzed. Results: First, a total of 41 spaces were derived. The derived spaces can be considered as spaces to be treated as important in psychiatric institutions. Second, as a result of reclassifying the derived space by department, 10 spaced for the hospital as a whole, 10 for wards, 12 for central/outpatient departments, 5 for pharmaceutical departments, 2 for catering facilities, and 2 for facilities. Third, if organized by psychiatric institution, there is a total of 40 spaces for psychiatric hospitals according to certification criteria, and according to evaluation criteria, there is 38 spaces for psychiatric hospitals and departments and 19 spaces for the clinics. The difference between the certification and evaluation criteria of psychiatric hospitals is insignificant. In order to promote the qualitative improvement of psychiatric institutions, it is necessary to gradually strengthen from the certification criteria. Fourth, the requirements reflecting the characteristics of a psychiatric institution were very limited to emergency exits and treatment rooms. It is necessary to prepare the space requirements for other rooms in consideration of the behavior of the mentally ill. Implications: The derived spaces and requirements can serve as practical reference materials for practitioners preparing to receive certification and evaluation of psychiatric institutions. In addition, it has meaning as a basic data for estimating the level of space and requirements of psychiatric institutions that are currently required in Korea.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.55-62
• /
• 2023

Public institutions have a responsibility to ensure the safety of their employees and the public. One way to do this is to implement a systematic safety inspection system based on risk assessments and continuous improvements. This study developed a systematic safety inspection system for public institutions that are ordered construction projects. The proposed system in this study consists of a three-step process: (1) developing safety grade evaluation tables, (2) preparing and conducting safety inspections, and (3) evaluating and improving safety management grades. The first step is to develop safety grade evaluation tables by analysis and diagnosis of the construction site's work type, disaster statistics, and related laws. The second step is to conduct safety inspections using the developed evaluation tables. The third step is to determine the safety management grade based on the results of the safety inspection, and to improve risk factors found during the safety evaluation. The proposed system was implemented in highway construction projects carried out by public institutions. The results showed that the proposed system has two major effects: (1) reducing accident-related deaths and injuries, (2) improving safety management levels by continuous evaluation and improvement. The proposed system can be utilized in construction projects ordered by public institutions to improve the level of occupational safety and health.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.313-341
• /
• 2008

본 연구는 대학교 부설 과학영재교육원 평가에 대한 메타평가를 통해 평가실태를 파악하고 개선안을 제안하는 데 목적을 두었다. 이를 위해 2008년 2월 전국 25개 대학교 부설 과학영재교육원 관계자 및 평가위원 9명의 33명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 그 응답결과를 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 현행 평가는 총괄기능을 강조하여 획일적 평가가 이루어지는 문제점이 지적되었다 먼저 평가준거 및 평가요소는 구체적이지 않으며, 평가준거는 평가대상 기관의 설립연도, 지역인프라 등을 고려치 않으며, 과학고/영재학교 진학률이나 경시대회 수상실적으로 성과를 평가하는 점이 지적되었다. 또한 평가대상 기관의 연구역량을 평가하지 않았다. 평가위원의 전문성 부족과 평가기간이 너무 짧은 점, 순위를 결정하는 판단을 위한 평가, 평가결과와는 별개로 제시된 개선방향의 불명확성 등이 문제점이었다. 현행 평가의 개선안으로 컨설팅 평가 기능을 강화하며, 과학적 평가기획과 구체적 평가준거를 제시하고, 현장방문평가를 도입하며, 평가결과 및 평가과정이 공개피고 학생과 학부모 만족도를 평가하는 방안이 제안되었다. 나아가 우수 운영사례를 발굴, 파급하고 과학영재교육원 별 자체적 특성과 성과에 따른 평가지표로 평가받도록 개선되어야 할 것이다.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.125-149
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 교육지원청의 기록관리 기관평가에 대한 문제점을 살펴보고 개선방안을 제시하고자 문헌연구, 설문조사, 심층면담을 수행하였다. 전국 교육지원청 176개 기관의 기록관리 업무담당자를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시(응답율 52.8%)하고 심층면담에 동의한 15개 기관의 기록물관리전문요원과 면담을 진행하였다. 설문 및 면담 분석 결과를 바탕으로 국가기록원 기록관리 기관평가 업무담당자와 면담을 진행한 후, 이를 종합하여 도출된 개선방안을 평가 환경, 평가 주체, 평가 제도적 측면으로 구분하여 제시하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 기관 유형별 특수성을 반영한 기록관리 기관평가를 시행하는데 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국의료질향상학회지
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.86-109
• /
• 1995

Clinical trials of drugs on humans is the final and most important stage in evaluating the safety and efficacy of the drugs. Good Clinical Practice(GCP) standards were announced in 1987 to protect testees' rights as well as to ensure validity of the clinical trial results, but its implementation has been delayed until now. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the preparedness of the designated institutions to abide by GCP standards during clinical trials, and thereby to determine GCP implementability at the institutions. Survey on the status of clinical trials was conducted for the designated 83 clinical trial hospitals. Response rate was 95.2%. Donabedian's quality assessment model was applied as the basic framework for the study. And the relative - weights for the evaluation items were determined by expert's evaluation. Among the designated 83 hospitals, 39 conducted clinical trials to obtain drug manufacturing approval from 1990 to 1994. Only 19 institutions are found to be able to meet the requirements of KGCP. Structure variables - manpower, organization, and facility -, which are the basic elements for GCP, are evaluated as unsatisfied in many hospitals. Institutions which established IRB accounted for 41 or 51.9%, but those who have a protocol evaluation guideline, or Adverse Drug Reaction(ADR) reporting system were only 12 and 21 institutions, respectively. Also, the institutions providing educational programs on conducting clinical trials are few - 20. The study results indicates that the level of conducting KGCP is unsatisfactory. However, more institutions are expected to be able to meet the standards soon because GCP standards does not require so much regulation on facilities, but stress importance on research methodology and human right. At present as the institutions for clinical trials are primarily training hospitals with residency programs, such efforts as education will accelerate the implementability of GCP in Korea. Institutions must build the appropriate infrastructure and government must prepare to strongly enforce KGCP before it can successfully take place.

• 한국기록관리학회지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.251-274
• /
• 2019

공공기관에 기록관리 평가제도가 도입된 지 10년이 지났다. 지난 10년간 공공기관의 기록관리 평가제도는 기록물관리전문요원 배치와 기록관인프라 확충에도 기여하였으나, 현 시점에서는 서열화, 환류조치의 미흡 등 여러 가지 문제점들로 인하여 새로운 평가체제를 도입할 필요성이 제기되고 있다. 이에 기록관리 평가제도에 대한 변화과정 검토를 통해 현황분석을 진행하였고, 전문가 간담회, 현장 방문 등 다양한 방식의 의견수렴을 통해 문제점을 확인하고 개선방향을 제안하고자 하였다. 여러 문제점 분석에 기반하여 제안한 새로운 기록관리 평가의 방향은 단계별 도입, 기관의 특성에 따른 맞춤형 지표선정, 거버넌스 체계의 도입, 기관의 자율적 지표선정에 의한 자체평가, 그리고 국가기록원의 컨설팅기능 강화 등이다.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.31-39
• /
• 2019

The 129 public institutions in Korea are subject to Information Security Management Condition Evaluation (ISMCE) as a part of the government management evaluation system by the Ministry of Economy and Finance. ISMCE is started in 2006 with the central government institutions, and applied to the all public institutions in 2009. This evaluation is annually conducted by the National Intelligence Service through the site visits, and the number of the evaluated institutions is increasing year by year. However, the process of ISMCE - identifying existing vulnerabilities in the information system - is conducted manually. To improve this inconvenience, this paper introduces the various evaluation system in the major countries, especially in the United States, and analyzes the Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP) by NIST. SCAP is automation protocol for the system vulnerability management (in technical fields) and security policy compliance evaluation. Based on SCAP, this paper suggests an improvement plan for the ISMCE of Korea.