• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.133-167
• /
• 2010

The enforcement of commercial arbitration awards in the People's Republic of China is one the controversial obstacles faced by foreign investors in China. The foreign investor will fail to enforce the arbitration award, if the Chinese court refuses the enforcement in China, even if the arbitration tribunal rules the award in favor of foreign investor who is in dispute with Chinese partners. In Korea, we have not many researches in the enforcement of foreign related awards and awards ruled by other jurisdiction. In recent times, Professor Kyung-Ja Cha(2005) and Professor Sun-Jeong Kim(2008) analyzed the enforcement of arbitration awards in China. Professor Kyung-Ja Cha(2005) reports the details of the enforcement statistics of CIETAC during 1990s. Professor Sun-Jeong Kim(2008) analyzed the obstacles of the enforcement of foreign related awards in China. This paper extends their researches in the field of the enforcement of arbitration awards in China. First, this paper extends Professor Kyung-Ja Cha(2005)'s study by introducing the Chinese enforcement situation during the period of 2000-2007. Second, this paper extends Professor Sunjung Kim(2008) emphasizes the local protectionism and the weakness of judiciary as key factors of obstacles to enforce the foreign related awards in People's Republic of China. This paper, additionally, highlights the role of the Guanxi and the antagonism of court toward arbitration institution to enforce the foreign related awards in People's Republic of China. Third, this study provides the recent developments of Supreme People's Court(SPC)'s rules to narrow down the gap between the practices of international arbitration and those of People's Republic of China. The Implications of this study are as follows. First, it is desirable for foreign investors to appoint the CIETAC or BAC as the arbitration commission in China. Second, the local competent attorney is the best choice to solve the respondent's insolvency in China. Third, foreign investors is required to monitor the provisions on the electronic instruments such as EDI and Email in Chinese law.

• 대한교통학회지
• /
• 제28권6호
• /
• pp.17-24
• /
• 2010

교통사고로 인한 여러 가지 사회적 문제들로 인해 정부에서는 강력하게 교통사고를 줄이기 위한 여러 가지 정책들을 시행하여 왔다. 이러한 결과들로 인해 최근 들어 교통사고 발생건수 및 사망자 수가 감소추세에 있다. 그러나 이러한 교통사고 감소를 위한 여러 가지 정책들을 시행하기 위해서는 비용이 수반되게 마련이며, 이에 대한 비용 대비 효과 평가도 이루어질 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서는 최근 교통단속에 투자되는 비용 가운데 단속효과가 입증된 무인과속단속시스템에 의한 단속과 교통경찰에 의한 인력단속의 경우를 단속이 없는 경우와 비교하였다. 그 결과 평균속도에서 설치전 조건이 평균속도 82.66km/h, 인력단속 조건이 70.57km/h, 기계적 단속조건이 67.85km/h순으로 높게 나타났고 통계적으로도 유의한 차이가 있었다. 또한 제한속도 위반율에서도 설치전 조건이 65%, 인력단속조건이 32%, 기계적 단속조건이 19%의 순으로 나타났다. 차종별로는 승용차, 승합차, 화물차의 순으로 평균속도 및 위반율이 높았으며, 차로별로는 1차로가 2차로에 비해 높게 나타났다. 이와 같은 결과를 토대로 사고율을 추정하여 투입비용 대비 편익을 측정하였는데 무인과속단속시스템 설치전 조건의 경우와 비교하여 연간비용대비편익을 추정하였다. 그 결과 교통경찰에 의한 인력단속조건의 경우 76,130,590원의 마이너스편익이 발생하였고, 무인과속단속시스템에 의한 기계적 단속의 경우 38,577,670원의 편익이 발생하는 것으로 추정되었다

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.1-15
• /
• 2009

The paper analyzes a copyright owning firm's incentive to enforce its copyright in the presence of file-sharing networks. I devise a two-period model where a copyright owner sells two different versions of a creator's information good, and show that the firm's overall profits are enhanced by a strategy of differential inter-temporal enforcement of the copyright protection, compared to strategies of no enforcement or full enforcement in both periods. If the firm enforces no copyright protection in the first period, the low-valuation consumers may make and consume copies that are imperfect substitutes for the original information good. If there is a significant increase in the willingness-to-pay of some low-valuation consumers after they experience the information good, the firm can extract the increased consumer surplus by enforcing a positive level of copyright protection in the second period. Social welfare, however, is maximized in the case of no enforcement.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.107-132
• /
• 2019

The arbitration procedure, which is a private trial, does not have a separate enforcement agency. Therefore, unless a party consents to the arbitration award and voluntarily fulfills the award, its execution is accomplished through the implementation of the national court. In particular, the decision in the foreign arbitration procedure will be refused or rejected for the arbitration award in case the proceedings of the law and procedure on which the judgment is based are caused by inconsistency with the domestic law or procedural defect. However, all foreign arbitration awards generally do not have to go through the approval process, and it will come into force with the arbitration award. In the case of Germany in the revision of the German Civil Procedure Act of 1996, the main provisions of the New York Convention concerning the ratification and enforcement of arbitration proceedings are reflected. Germany provides for the arbitration procedures in the arbitration proceedings of Book 10 of the Civil Procedure Act. Particularly, with Article 1061 in Book 10 Section 8 below, the approval and enforcement of foreign arbitrators shall be governed. Article 1061 has been referred to as "The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Jurisdictions," Article 5 (1). The main reasons for approval and enforcement rejection are: (1) Reason for the acceptance or refusal of enforcement by request of the parties: Reason for failure of subjective arbitration ability, invalidation of arbitration agreement, collapse of attack or defense method, dispute not included in arbitration agreement, (2) Reasons for the approval and enforcement of arbitration considered by the competent authority of the arbitrator: violation of objective arbitration ability, violation of public order, but not based on the default of German statute.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제46권
• /
• pp.381-406
• /
• 2010

The enforcement of international arbitration raises a variety of procedural and related issues in national and international arbitral laws. In addition to the problems it is not easy to understand the rights and enforcement of interim measures by arbitral tribunal. Many countries and international rules allow the arbitral tribunal to submit the interim measures applied by a dispute party. However, interim measures are not recognised and enforced by itself in international commercial arbitration. It has not been completed in the rules of arbitration nationally and internationally. This is the reason why the confirmation of international and national laws is important to effect interim measures practically. In the case of Korean arbitral laws do not include articles of enforcement of interim measures even permit rights of decision of interim measures by arbitral tribunal in the national arbitral laws improperly and unreliably. This paper discuses the deficits of enforcement of interim measures which is submitted the type of award by the arbitral tribunal. The paper also points out and refers the revised model law of arbitration by UNCITRAL in 2006 which was changed to allow the interim award and should be imposed its enforcement of any types of interim measures by the arbitral tribunal in international commercial arbitration.

• 한국도로학회논문집
• /
• 제19권6호
• /
• pp.175-182
• /
• 2017

PURPOSES : Road sectors contribute approximately 16 % of total GHG emission rates in South Korea. Engineers and experts expend significant efforts to identify countermeasures for the reduction of carbon emission. This study aims to determine how total carbon emission rates change depending on whether or not there is speed limit enforcement. METHODS : In this study, Lamm's travel speed profile theory is first adopted to select the hazard road, which sections are designated as speed limit enforcement. Second, Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) was used to simulate the carbon emission on the road. RESULTS : The total carbon emission rate under speed limit enforcement was 10,773 g higher than the condition without speed limit enforcement in the designated road. This might affect acceleration, which can lead to increased emissions. CONCLUSIONS : There would be no researches about proving the relationship how speed limit enforcement has an effect on carbon emission. The result of our study can provide valuable guidelines regarding road safety and eco-friendly roads.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.115-136
• /
• 2011

In the past, Chinese arbitral system and Chinese arbitral associations were avoided by international society due to the cases which Chinese court rejected the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards based on rural protection. Especially Chinese court adjudicated to reject the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards by interpreting public policy broadly. The abuse of public policy by court threats the existence of commercial arbitration system. Under this awareness, the author figured out Chinese court shows what kind of attitude about public policy of Chinese court in the present through analyzing the cases about rejection of enforcement in Chinese arbitral awards in order to analyze whether Chinese court still maintain the negative attitude like past or there exist changes with public policy which is one of the rejection reasons of recognition and enforcement in foreign arbitral awards as the central figure. Chinese court behaved in an uncooperative attitude about arbitral awards like that it reached a verdict to reject the enforcement of arbitral awards by reason of violation in public policy about several foreign arbitral awards at the beginning stage of establishing arbitration law. However, the situation of abuse in public policy was improved a lot by Chinese prime court which enforces pre-inspection system about judgment of rejection of enforcement in arbitral awards. So, there is no case about rejecting the approval and enforcement of arbitral awards by reason of violation in public policy by Chinese court except Yongning Co. case. Moreover, Chinese court got the trust and support from other countries through reinforcement of applied standard. However, Chinese court had been expressed concern from international society because they highly applied public policy and rejected to enforce arbitral awards in the recent case of Yongning Co.. Therefore, this study examined whether it is appropriate to apply public policy of Chinese court in the case of Yongning Co., and then I concluded that. Although Yongning Co. case is the first case which Chinese prime court agrees with public policy by reason of rejection of approval and enforcement in foreign arbitral awards, in my opinion, it doesn't mean that Chinese court has fundamental change in basic attitude and position about the approval and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. Chinese court keeps the cautious uses of public policy in legal judgment of foreign arbitral awards and it looks like implementing the obligation in regulation of New York Convention sincerely.

• 대한교통학회지
• /
• 제26권3호
• /
• pp.85-95
• /
• 2008

고속도로 교통사고 발생의 주요 원인인 과속을 줄이기 위하여 경찰청에서는 많은 예산을 들여 과속단속카메라를 설치 운영하고 있다. 지점식 과속단속카메라의 경우 GPS 탑재장치에 의해 위치가 노출되어 과속단속 실적이 떨어지며, 과속단속카메라가 설치되지 않은 차로나 구간에서 캥거루 주행 등 회피거동에 의해 과속억제 효과 또한 감소하고 있다. 운전자의 회피거동으로 인하여 긴 내리막 구간, 터널, 교량 등에서 과속예방효과나 교통사고 감소효과는 제한적일 수밖에 없다. 따라서 중요 시설이나 위험구간에서 차량들의 속도를 일정하게 유지시켜 교통사고 예방효과를 높이기 위한 대안으로 구간과속단속의 필요성이 높아지고 있다. 따라서, 본 연구에서는 우리나라 고속도로에 최초로 도입된 구간과속단속시스템의 효과평가를 위하여 시스템 적용 전 후 교통류특성과 관련된 자료를 수집하여 비교.분석하였고, 그 결과, 시스템 설치 후 속도저감 효과 및 해당 구간의 교통류 안정적 흐름을 보이는 것으로 나타나 구간과속단속 운영구간에 있어서 교통안전성 제고와 교통사고 감소효과가 있는 것으로 파악되었다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.3-24
• /
• 2010

In the approaching 21th century, the outstanding development in international trade and commerce has established arbitration as the preferred form of dispute resolution on international business transaction. Because the form of commercial dispute becomes more complicated and varied with the quantitative increase of them, the reasonable and rapid settlement of them must be the important problem simultaneously. In this article, the author discusses various issues on the recognition and enforcement of an foreign arbitral awards under Korean Arbitration Act, which is modeled after the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration of the UNCITRAL of 1985. The Dec. 31, 1999 amendment to the Korean Arbitration Act admits the basis for enforcement of foreign arbitral awards rendered under United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958(commonly known as the New York Convention). Korea has acceded to the New York Convention since 1973. When acceding to the convention, Korea declared that it will apply the Convention to the recognition and enforcement of awards made only in the territory of anther Contracting State on the basis of reciprocity. Also, Korea declared that it will apply the Convention only to differences arising out of legal relationships, whether contractual or not, which are considered as commercial under the national law of Korea. The provision relating to the enforcement of arbitral awards falling under the New York Convention consists of Article III, IV, V. In particular, Article V of the New York Convention enumerates the grounds for refusal of recognition foreign arbitral awards. The grounds are separated into two categories : One that abides by procedures and the others are based on national legal sovereignty. In Korea, a holder of a foreign arbitral award is obliged to request from the court a judgment ordering enforcement of awards. Because Korea requires enforcement to be based on a judgement, the result is that arbitral of award holders are forced to institute domestic litigation.

• 한국ITS학회 논문지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.126-142
• /
• 2023

본 연구는 이륜차 법규위반 및 교통사고 예방을 위한 무인교통단속장비 및 표준규격 개발을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 현재 운영중인 무인교통단속장비의 이륜차 단속의 문제점 및 신기술 검토를 진행하였고, 설문조사를 통해 이륜차 무인교통단속장비 도입타당성 및 기술현황을 조사하였다. 또한 개발장비 현장실험을 통해 이륜차 단속기능을 구현하였고, 성능개선을 통해 단속대상 추가 및 번호인식률이 향상되었다. 현장실험 및 성능평가 결과를 바탕으로 이륜차 무인교통단속장비의 성능기준을 마련하였고 통신프로토콜에서는 차종분류코드 및 위반항목에 이륜차에 관한 사항을 신규로 구성하여 규격을 개발하였다.