• 조명전기설비학회논문지
• /
• 제22권6호
• /
• pp.134-140
• /
• 2008

국내 전력시장에서 현 혼잡처리방법은 혼잡비용(congestion cost)을 부가비용(uplift)형태로 전력 사용량에 비례하여 시장 전체의 모든 소비자가 부담하고 있다. 반면 다수의 해외 전력시장에서 채택하고 있는 지역한계가격 (Locational Margnal Pricing)방식은 혼잡으로 인한 비용을 시장 참여자들에게 차등적으로 배분하고 있다. 현재 국내 전력시장에서는 송전 혼잡처리방법의 변경으로 인한 시장참여자 수익에 미치는 영향에 대한 체계적인 연구가 미흡한 실정이다. 본 논문에서는 혼잡처리방법의 변경이 국내 전력시장의 소비자 비용과 발전기 잉여에 미치는 영향에 대해서 분석한다.

• 전기학회논문지P
• /
• 제64권2호
• /
• pp.74-78
• /
• 2015

With the improvement of living standards and economic development, electricity consumption continues to grow. The electricity is a special energy which is hard to store, so its supply must be consistent with the demand. The objective of electricity demand forecasting is to make best use of electricity energy and provide balance between supply and demand. Hence, it is very important work to forecast electricity demand with higher precision. So, various forecasting methods have been developed. They can be divided into five broad categories such as time series models, regression based model, artificial intelligence techniques and fuzzy logic method without considering special-day effects. Electricity demand patterns on holidays can be often idiosyncratic and cause significant forecasting errors. Such effects are known as special-day effects and are recognized as an important issue in determining electricity demand data. In this research, we developed the power demand forecasting method using ELM(Extreme Learning Machine) for special day, particularly, lunar new year and Chuseok holiday.

• 자원ㆍ환경경제연구
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.909-930
• /
• 2022

국내 전기요금 체계는 연료비 인상 등 원가 변동에 연계될 수 있는 제도적 근거가 마련되어 있음에도 물가상승 등 국민경제적 부담 등을 고려해 적기에 인상되지 못하는 상황이 발생하고 있다. 이처럼 전기요금이 정상적으로 조정되지 않음에 따라 우리나라 전기요금은 전 세계적으로 낮은 수준을 기록하고 있으며, 가격신호 전달 기능을 상실해 비효율적인 전력소비가 발생하는 문제점이 있다. 본 연구는 2017~2020년 연료비와 발전원별 발전량 등 실적 자료를 바탕으로 계약종별 전력의 공급원가(총괄원가) 수준을 추산하였으며, 이를 바탕으로 2030년 전기요금이 조정되어 가격신호 왜곡 문제가 해소될 경우 전력소비가 얼마나 변화하는지를 추정해 보았다. 추정 결과 전기요금이 공급원가(총괄원가)를 모두 회수할 수 있는 수준으로 조정된다면 전력소비는 9,000GWh 가량 절감될 것으로 나타났다. 이는 발전 부문의 온실가스 배출량을 약 3.82백만CO₂ton 감축시키는 효과로 이어졌다.

• 한국철도학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국철도학회 2011년도 춘계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.1202-1207
• /
• 2011

This article introduces the benchmarking methodologies, the results of comparative analysis on the railway electricity maintenance management - preventive maintenance, corrective maintenance, upgrade maintenance. This article also compares the Korean railway electricity maintenance management with the results mentioned above and analyses the situations of each country - France, Germany, Japan. Lastly this article tries to find the comparative position of the Korean railway infrastructure costs and discusses the direction of cost reduction in railway electricity maintenance management.

• 대한전기학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한전기학회 2006년도 제37회 하계학술대회 논문집 A
• /
• pp.408-409
• /
• 2006

In this paper, we surveyed researches on the generation maintenance scheduling in competitive electricity markets. Maintenance scheduling can be one of the strategies submitted by market participants in electricity market. Many researches on the maintenance scheduling were preceded with or without transmission system. They have their own specific algorithm for ISO to operate, and control the maintenance schedules. This paper is focused on the survey on the generator and transmission system maintenance scheduling in competitive electricity markets.

• 전기학회논문지
• /
• 제56권2호
• /
• pp.260-267
• /
• 2007

Systematic studies on the dispatch scheduling algorithm can enhance the efficiency of electricity market operation. In addition, as the dispatching policies in competitive electricity markets directly affect the market participants' profits, the dispatch scheduling procedure should be reasonable, systematic, and transparent. In this paper, we propose an unconstrained/constrained pre-dispatch scheduling algorithm and develop corresponding programs applicable to wholesale electricity markets.

• 한국시스템다이내믹스연구
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.25-40
• /
• 2001

This paper describes the forecast of power plant construction in a competitive korean electricity market. In Korea, KEPCO (Korea Electric Power Corporation, fully controlled by government) was responsible for from the production of the electricity to the sale of electricity to customer. However, the generation part is separated from KEPCO and six generation companies were established for whole sale competition from April 1st, 2001. The generation companies consist of five fossil power companies and one nuclear power company in Korea at present time. Fossil power companies are scheduled to be sold to private companies including foreign investors. Nuclear power company is owned and controlled by government. The competition in generation market will start from 2003. ISO (Independence System Operator will purchase the electricity from the power exchange market. The market price is determined by the SMP(System Marginal Price) which is decided by the balance between demand and supply of electricity in power exchange market. Under this uncertain circumstance, the energy policy planners such as government are interested to the construction of the power plant in the future. These interests are accelerated due to the recent shortage of electricity supply in California. In the competitive market, investors are no longer interested in the investment for the capital intensive, long lead time generating technologies such as nuclear and coal plants. Large unclear and coal plants were no longer the top choices. Instead, investors in the competitive market are interested in smaller, more efficient, cheaper, cleaner technologies such as CCGT(Combined Cycle Gas Turbine). Electricity is treated as commodity in the competitive market. The investors behavior in the commodity market shows that the new investment decision is made when the market price exceeds the sum of capital cost and variable cost of the new facility and the existing facility utilization depends on the marginal cost of the facility. This investors behavior can be applied to the new investments for the power plant. Under these postulations, there is the potential for power plant construction to appear in waves causing alternating periods of over and under supply of electricity like commodity production or real estate production. A computer model was developed to sturdy the possibility that construction will appear in waves of boom and bust in Korean electricity market. This model was constructed using System Dynamics method pioneered by Forrester(MIT, 1961) and explained in recent text by Sternman (Business Dynamics, MIT, 2000) and the recent work by Andrew Ford(Energy Policy, 1999). This model was designed based on the Energy Policy results(Ford, 1999) with parameters for loads and resources in Korea. This Korea Market Model was developed and tested in a small scale project to demonstrate the usefulness of the System Dynamics approach. Korea electricity market is isolated and not allowed to import electricity from outsides. In this model, the base load such as unclear and large coal power plant are assumed to be user specified investment and only CCGT is selected for new investment by investors in the market. This model may be used to learn if government investment in new unclear plants could compensate for the unstable actions of private developers. This model can be used to test the policy focused on the role of unclear investments over time. This model also can be used to test whether the future power plant construction can meet the government targets for the mix of generating resources and to test whether to maintain stable price in the spot market.

• 에너지공학
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.9-16
• /
• 2015

전력은 인간의 생존과 산업생산에 있어서 필수적인 투입요소이다. 전력의 소비로부터 경제적 편익이 발생하며, 특히 전력소비의 경제적 편익은 전력과 관련된 정책의 다양한 분야에서 중요한 정보로 활용된다. 이에 본 연구에서는 전력소비로 인해 발생하는 경제적 편익을 평가하고자 한다. 전력소비의 경제적 편익은 소비자 지출과 소비자 잉여의 합으로 구성되는 전력 수요함수 아랫면적이다. 이때 소비자 지출은 쉽게 관측되는 반면에 소비자 잉여를 계산하기 위해서는 수요의 가격탄력성에 대한 정보가 필수적으로 요구된다. 본 연구에서는 주택용, 산업용, 일반용 전력을 대상으로 하며, 문헌 조사를 통해 전력의 용도별 가격탄력성에 대한 정보를 유추한다. 용도별 전력 수요의 가격탄력성은 각각 -0.332, -0.351, -0.263으로 추정되었다. 2013년을 기준으로 추정된 전력 1kWh 소비의 소비자 잉여는 각각 191.54원, 143.44원, 231.91원이며, 2013년 기준 전력의 용도별 평균가격은 각각 127.02원, 100.70원, 121.98원이므로, 전력소비자의 경제적 편익은 각각 318.56원, 244.14원, 353.89원이다. 소비자 물가지수를 이용하여 이 값을 2014년 기준으로 환산하면 주택용, 산업용, 일반용 순으로 각각 321.96원, 246.75원, 357.67원이다. 이 값은 전력공급사업의 경제성 분석에서 중요한 정보로 활용될 수 있다.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제11권5호
• /
• pp.91-96
• /
• 2011

This study is to analysis the characteristics of electric power consumption of apartments complex in Korea. This study shows the pattern of electric power consumption and correlation of each apartment complex's completion year monthly and timely. With this result, we are able to predict the demand pattern of electricity in a house and make the schedule by demand pattern. It is expected this data is used as reference of electric consumption of Daejeon area to operate the simulation tools to predict the building energy. The yearly data of 10 apartment complexes of 2010 are analyzed. The results of this study are followed. The averaged amount of electricity consumption in winter is higher as summer because of the high capacity of heating equipment. All of the house has electric base load from 0.26kWh to 0.5kWh. The average of the electricity consumption of month is shown as 310.2kWh. A week is seperated, as 4 part such as week, weekend, Saturday and Sunday. During week, the average of timely electricity consumption is shown as 0.426kWh. The Saturday consumption is 0.437kWh. The Sunday is 0.445kWh. The peak electricity consumption in summer and winter is measured. The peak consumption on summer season is 1.389kW on 22th August 64% higher than winter season 0.887kW on 3rd January.

• 자원ㆍ환경경제연구
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.573-593
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 1980~2009년 동안 한국의 경제성장과 총 전력소비 및 산업별 전력소비 사이의 인과관계를 분석하였다. 이를 위해 단위근 검정을 실시하였으며 그 결과, 실질 GDP, 제1차 산업, 제조업 그리고 총 전력소비는 1차 차분형태의 안정적인 변수로 나타났다. 그러나 서비스업 전력소비는 2차 차분을 실시했을 때에 안정적인 변수로 나타났다. 공적분 검정을 실시한 결과, 실질 GDP와 총 전력소비 및 산업별 전력소비 사이에는 장기균형 관계가 존재하지 않는 것으로 분석되었다. 따라서 표준 Granger 인과관계 검정에 의하면, 경제성장이 총 전력소비, 제1차 산업 및 제조업의 전력소비에 영향을 주는 일방향 인과관계가 존재하는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 서비스업 전력소비는 경제성장과 아무런 인과관계를 발견할 수 없었다. 이러한 인과성은 전력부문의 가격 및 비가격정책 등이 경제성장에 부정적인 영향을 최소화하면서 실행될 수 있음을 의미한다.