• 한국보건간호학회지
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.23-34
• /
• 1991

This study was carried out to analyze the social interests and demands in health-concerned editorials and to help formulate the public opinions in proper ways. The analysis covered the editorials of five leading news papers such as Chosun Ilbo, Han Kook Ilbo. Han Kyu Re, Joongang Ilbo, Donga Ilbo for the past three years from. June 1, 1987 to May 31, 1990. The major findings are as follows. 1. The total number of health-concerned editorials in the five daily newspapers for the period was 414. occupying $4.6\%$, of the total editorials. 2. The main concerned areas of editorial topics was environmental pollution, which was followed by medical affairs, environmental sanitation, health behavior, social-welfare, demography and so on. 3. The $42.5\%$ of the total number of editorials were appeared in dealing with the outbreak of relevant events in social matters. The distribution of motives to dealing the editorials shows no significant difference by news papers and topics. 4. The $66.4\%$ of the total editorials were addressed toward the government policies. They criticized current governmental policies and gave warnings and $52.4\%$ of them ask for the government to increase governmental attention and will in health related matters.

• 가족자원경영과 정책
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.221-239
• /
• 2013

To determine the problems with the apartment management system in Korea and to make recommendations for its development, a review and content analysis of the 2010 and 2011 editorials of two newspapers, The APT News and The Korea Apartment News, was conducted. Apartment management is divided into four areas: maintenance management, operations management, community management, and synthetic management. More than 50 percent of the editorials were concerned with the problems of operations management. There were two management subjects: the apartment manager and the apartment management company. Interest in the apartment management system varied between apartment managers and apartment management companies, so more positive policies and more interest are needed for apartment management.

• BMB Reports
• /
• 제51권4호
• /
• pp.167-173
• /
• 2018

Experimental results obtained from research using only one sex are sometimes extrapolated to both sexes without thorough justification. However, this might cause enormous economic loss and unintended fatalities. Between years 1997 and 2000, the US Food and Drug Administration suspended ten prescription drugs producing severe adverse effects on the market. Eight of the ten drugs caused greater health risks in women. Serious male biases in basic, preclinical, and clinical research were the main reason for the problem. This mini-review will describe why and how funding organizations such as the European Commission, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the US National Institutes of Health have tried to influence researchers to integrate sex/gender not only in clinical research, but also in basic and preclinical research. Editorial policies of prominent journals for sex-specific reporting will also be introduced, and some considerations in integrating sex as a biological variable will be pointed out. To produce precise and reproducible results applicable for both men and women, sex should be considered as an important biological variable from basic and preclinical research.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.145-147
• /
• 2021

The ethical environment in academic research is rapidly changing at a global level. Further, social expectations and public interest toward research ethics are also escalating in Korea. Understanding and applying ethical issues in academic research has become increasingly important. To conform to such changes in the ethical environment, the official journal of the Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management has been consistently establishing and modifying rules and principles regarding research ethics. For instance, we amended the submission guidelines to further address the policies for gendered innovations. For this editorial of the current issue, we would like to organize and share several ethical concerns, which recently gained considerable attention. We hope this review provides scholars with practical guidelines to comprehend and incorporate critical ethical issues into academic research.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제40권6호
• /
• pp.663-665
• /
• 2013

Authors, editors and reviewers, publishers, and subscribers all play their role in scientific journals. These 5 stakeholders are essential to journals. In this paper, firstly, I briefly summarize the role of each journal stakeholder and their respective goals. Secondly, the status of each participant in the Archives of Plastic Surgery is described. Finally, I propose an appropriate role and plan for each of them. Specific roles and responsibilities include the following: subscribers should welcome and submit the critiques of published papers in letters to the editor. Publishers should trust editors and provide them with adequate financial support for ongoing quality improvement of the journal. The editor-in-chief should be given a sufficient period of time-several years-to build up journal quality and train the incoming editor. The editors, including section editors, are also responsible for increasing the author pool. One editor might be designated a 'devil's referee', that is, a kind of devil's advocate with the responsibility of examining the originality of the manuscript, taking a skeptical view of the manuscript, and looking for holes in the methods and results of reported experiments. Authors' responsibilities include submitting manuscripts with scientific integrity and being ready to take responsibility for their articles even long after publication. Finally, reviewers' responsibilities include identifying similar articles not cited. Reviewers are also welcome to write a discussion on the article they review.

• Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.1-6
• /
• 2019

During the Obama administration, America made a shift in its foreign policies to re-focus on Asia. The strategy, known as 'Pivot to Asia', was used to contain a rising China. In this editorial note, I appropriate the geopolitical term to call for a scholarly refocus on Asia (and the broader Asia Pacific region). JCEA started as an area journal. While it has become more technology-focused and less geographically-bounded in its coverage of topics, the journal recognizes the centrality of the region's political economy and technological forces in setting (and upsetting) global norms and rules. The Asia Pacific contains the world's freest economies as well as the most oppressive regimes. It breeds both technology giants and laggards. As new geopolitical tensions loom, it is where the digital iron curtain is drawn, and where the vice and virtue of innovations debated. Social scientists in the English world, who lend extensively on European and American cases, can benefit from studying the Asia Pacific by testing whether and how local experience conforms to or confronts with universal theories. Very likely, western-centric norms and models become morphed and entangled in the grounded local particularity, reflecting many shades of this diverse place. In my arguments below, I highlight the Asia Pacific as a site of contradiction, as well as a site of contention and negotiation. My emphasis is that regional particularity holds the key to answer concurrent debates in the West concerning governance and accountability in the digital age.

• 대한원격탐사학회지
• /
• 제40권3호
• /
• pp.317-317
• /
• 2024

Notice: This article has been retracted as a result of the review (on May 14, 2024) by the Research Ethics Committee of the Korean Society of Remote Sensing, which confirmed research misconduct (plagiarism). The Korean Journal of Remote Sensing (KJRS) Editorial Office received a report alleging plagiarism in a paper published in KJRS authored by Zong and Kohani (2021). Following a thorough investigation by our Research Ethics Committee, we found significant similarities between the original paper (Lee and Mortari, 2017) and the paper (Zong and Kohani, 2021) published in KJRS. The scope of the plagiarism included a number of identical figures, tables, and equations, as well as textual content. As a result, the Research Ethics Committee of the Korean Society of Remote Sensing has decided to retract the paper (Zong and Kohani. 2021) for deliberately using the ideas, research content, and results of others without proper approval or citation. To preserve academic integrity, we take responsibility for enforcing ethical policies and proceeding with the follow-up actions: 1. Disclosure and preservation of the facts and reasons for the retraction of the plagiarized paper, 2. Prohibition of submissions for the next three years for the authors of the plagiarized paper, 3. Notification to the authors’ affiliated institution of the retraction of the plagiarized paper. We deeply regret to report for retraction of the article and apologize to the readers of KJRS and to the authors of the original work for any inconvenience caused.

• 한국언론정보학보
• /
• 제45권
• /
• pp.296-340
• /
• 2009

민주화 이후 한국 언론이 권력화하고 있다는 것은 이미 새로운 사실도 아니다. 연구는 노태우, 김영삼, 김대중, 노무현 4개 정부에 걸쳐서 한국 언론이 어떻게 권력화되고 있는지를 프레임 분석 등을 바탕으로 4마리 개 모델(watch/lap/guard/attack dog)을 통해 우회적으로 알아봤다. 분석 대상 언론은 조선, 중앙, 경향, 한겨레 등 4개 일간지이며 분석 내용은 해당 기간 동안의 정부의 재벌 규제정책에 관한 해당 신문의 전체 사설이다. 분석 결과 보수 성격의 조선일보는 1987년 민주화 초기에는 정부 재벌 규제정책에 찬성하는 논조를 보이다가 김대중 정부의 중립적인 논조에서 노무현 정부 시기에는 강력한 비판 프레임이 주류를 이루고 있다. 중앙일보는 노태우 정부부터 노무현 정부에 이르기까지 일관되게 정부의 재벌 규제정책에 반대하는 모습이 뚜렷하게 나타났다. 특히 노무현 정부시기에는 반정부 프레임이 절대적이었으며 정부에 대해 공격견의 모습을 띠고 있다. 경향신문은 시기별로 친정부, 반기업 또는 친재벌, 반정부 등의 복합적인 면모를 보인다. 한때 소유주였던 한화그룹이 물러나고 우리 사주제가 정착됨에 따라 시기별로 다른 모습을 보인 것으로 추론할 수 있겠다. 한겨레신문은 재벌 규제정책에 관한 한 4개 정부 통틀어 일관되게 친정부적인 입장을 취해왔다. 특히 노무현 정부시기보다 김대중 정부시기 동안 더 절대적으로 정부의 재벌 규제정책을 옹호하는 모습을 보여 눈길을 끌었다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제11권8호
• /
• pp.488-498
• /
• 2011

본 연구는 중앙지와 지역 신문들이 국책사업 입지 선정을 놓고 뉴스의 프레임을 어떻게 달리 구성하는지 분석하였다. 분석 대상은 2011년 4월 28일부터 5월 28일까지 한 달간의 중앙 일간지와 시도별 21개 지역 신문 기사 중 국제과학비즈니스벨트 거점지구 입지 선정 관련 사설과 '해설 성 기사' 93건이다. 분석 결과 중앙지들은 전체적인 맥락에서 일관성 없는 정책에 대한 '무능한 정부 프레임'과 '재발 방지 프레임'을 가장 많이 구성하였다. 그러나 지역 신문들은 거점지구로 선정된 지역과 탈락된 지역 간에 뉴스 프레임이 심한 대조를 보였다. 선정된 지역의 신문에서는 '발전'과 '성과 프레임'의 비중이, 탈락된 지역 신문들에서는 '무능한 정부 프레임'과 '대항 프레임'의 비중이 높게 나왔다. 한편, 국제과학비즈니스벨트 후보 지역이 아니었던 여타 지역 신문들에서는 과학비즈니스벨트 관련 기사를 거의 기사로 다루지 않았다. 본 연구의 결과가 말해주는 것은 핌피(PIMFY) 시설 유치를 위한 과열 경쟁이 가져온 지방정부 간의 갈등 현상이 님비(NIMBY)시설 입지 선정에 못지않은 심각한 양상을 보이고 있다는 것이다.

• 대한영상의학회지
• /
• 제83권4호
• /
• pp.752-758
• /
• 2022

저자됨은 연구 진실성과 출판 윤리적 측면에서 중요하다. 저자됨은 학문적 성취를 증명하는 신용(credit)의 주된 수단으로 저자의 출판 업적은 연구비 수혜와 학술 경력에 중요한 영향을 미친다. 복잡한 이해관계와 경쟁적인 환경 등 다양한 이유에 의해 부적절한 저자됨이 보고되었다. 대표적인 저자됨 오남용에는 명예저자됨과 유령저자됨이 있다. 친족 공저자 또한 부적절한 저자됨이며, 최근 사회적 문제로 대두된 부모 자녀간 부적절한 저자됨이 이에 포함된다. 의학잡지편집인 국제위원회(International Committee of Medical Journal Editors; ICMJE)는 저자됨의 기준을 제시했다. 저자됨의 오남용을 막고 저자의 신용과 책임 평가를 체계적으로 하기 위해 많은 저널들이 기여자 역할 분류(Contributor Roles Taxonomy; CRediT)와 Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) 체계를 사용하고 있다. 이 종설에서는 올바른 저자됨과 부적절한 저자됨에 대해 알아보고 저자됨 오남용을 피하기 위한 방법을 소개하고자 한다.